SUV Reviews

Given the way so many four-wheel drives have morphed into performance SUVs over the years, it’s no surprise Range Rover had its own take on a high-spec, high-stepping wagon. The difference being, of course, that with a Range Rover badge, the end result needed to be sporty(-ish) and capable of plugging through the worst forest tracks and trails imaginable.The product of that thinking became the Range Rover Sport.Although the badging and high-end interior materials said Range Rover, the platform with its semi-monocoque construction said Land Rover. Land Rover Discovery 3, to be precise. But when you started to explore the Sport’s on- and off-road abilities and its tremendous looking body, any misgivings might have been scratched.The range kicked off in Australia in 2005 as the L320 series and included a huge range of mechanical packages. They started with the 2.7TDV6 which used a 2.7 litre turbo-diesel V6 with a six-speed automatic. With 140kW performance was okay, but importantly, the L320 used a proper two-speed transfer-case with permanent four-wheel drive.There was also a 4.4-litre petrol V8 option with 220kW and a storming 4.2-litre supercharged petrol V8 with no less than 287kW at its disposal. Both of those also had six-speed automatic transmissions and all V8 models had a locking rear differential for more off-road prowess.A year after the model’s launch, Range Rover added a 3.6-litre twin-turbo diesel V8 model with 200kW.The Range Rover badge decreed that luxury could not be forgotten, so every version of the Sport featured 18-inch alloy wheels, dual-zone climate control, cruise control, LED lighting and leather upholstery. The 4.4-litre V8 version added a CD stacker, bi-xenon headlights, and rear parking sensors, while the diesel V8 carried the same specification but with 19-inch alloys. The supercharged Sport added 20-inch wheels, Brembo brakes, front parking sensors, memory seats and mirrors as well as hydraulically controlled anti-roll suspension.Air suspension was a much hyped part of the Sport deal with the (on-paper) ability to make the independent suspension work as if the vehicle had solid axles in tougher off-road settings.Range Rover gave the L320 a facelift (to Series 2 spec) in 2009 with new engines and improved suspension as well as interior improvements to make the driver’s job easier.The new engines started with a 3.0-litre turbo-diesel V6, while the V8s were replaced by a 5.0-litre petrol V8. Available in either naturally aspirated or supercharged form, the new V8s were good for 276kW and a massive 375kW.The model was eventually replaced in 2013 by the L494 model Range Rover Sport. The short answer is yes, and no.The Range Rover Sport is a pretty amazing thing dynamically, able to combine high-speed stability with good comfort and even exceptional off-road abilities. That’s the ‘yes’ part.The ‘no’ comes in the form of a litany of serious mechanical and electrical problems that have surfaced over the years, tainting the Sport’s reputation.This car is a classic case of buyer beware, but if you do get lucky and find one that is reliable, the driving experience is hard to match. The problem is picking a good one, because the odds aren’t great that it will be clear sailing. In a nutshell, not great. In fact, not even close. Too many owners have had expensive, often catastrophic failures to make any other judgment. The problems are wide and varied, too, so there’s no short-cut to finding one that won’t necessarily break the bank.The rusted-on fans out there will beg to differ, but the facts are the facts, and this vehicle’s a gamble at best. This is no short list and the Range Rover Sport’s reputation for fragility and dud engineering is based on many years of turning motorists into mechanics.Let’s start with the real elephant in the room, the 2.7 and 3.0 litre V6 turbo-diesels. These have a pretty shocking record for destroying themselves due to problems with the bottom end bearings. Speculation is that the bearings themselves were either fitted incorrectly at the factory, or that they could wear and 'spin' in service. Either way, once you hear the warning noises from under the bonnet, you had a handful of seconds to pull off the road, shut the engine off and call a tow-truck. Any longer and you were likely to destroy the engine completely as the crankshaft failed due to the bearing problem.Symptoms that you have those precious seconds remaining include a knocking noise that gets louder as you load the engine, and a low oil pressure warning on the dashboard. Ignore it and you’ll soon have the con-rods on the ground under the car. Not nice.Scandalously, despite this being a known problem affecting the very earliest L320 cars, it took Land Rover until 2012 to sort a fix with a revised bearing design.Early examples of this engine also had a major design flaw in the oil pump assembly which was too weak to support the tensioner for the rubber timing belt that was mounted on the pump casing. This often showed up straight after a new timing belt was fitted and the added tension of the new belt exceeded the integrity of the pump casing.At that point, all hell boke loose as the timing belt jumped ship, allowing the pistons to collide with the valves and reducing the engine to scrap in milli-seconds. A revised pump casing design fixed things, but not before plenty of owners were replacing entire engines.The single turbocharger unit fitted to the 2.7-litre V6 was also prone to internal wear. Lots of white smoke from the exhaust was a sign that this was the case. Replacing the turbocharger unit was the usual fix. EGR valve failures on this engine are not unknown, either.The 5.0-litre supercharged V8 was not without problems and it often developed a rattle or ticking noise. This was usually traced to the timing chain tensioner, requiring the tensioner and the timing chain to be replaced. An improved design of the chain and tensioner helped, but didn’t arrive until the 2012 model.The Sport’s air suspension has also caused its share of grief with many owners returning to their vehicle to find it lying almost flat on the ground. The cause is usually the air suspension’s compressor system which can either fail to maintain the required ride height or simply allow all the air to escape the suspension units. One theory holds that the compressor itself was too small and was overworked, leading to failures.We’ve also heard of a few instances where the suspension units themselves have failed requiring costly replacement. But even the plastic plumbing for the air suspension seems underdone in the sense of a car designed for off-road work.Those are by no means the only faults associated with this make and model, but they’re the ones that keep surfacing over time. None of them are minor. Again, this is a long list because the Range Rover Sport has been far from immune from safety recalls to fix things that should never have gone wrong.Let’s start with the transmission which could sometimes refuse to select Park. This affected very early build L320s.Then there was the ABS sensor which could chafe its wiring on the wheel under extreme cornering and suspension travel situations. Again, this affected early (2005 and 2006) models.Perhaps the recall with the greatest potential for mayhem was one for V6 turbo-diesel vehicles built between mid-2004 and mid-2009. In those, there was a chance the vacuum system and the entire braking system could fail, leading to a total loss of brake performance. And again, that’s an awful lot of cars to be affected by such a serious defect.The L320 was also recalled at various points in time to correct faulty crank angle sensors that would stop the engine in its tracks, door latches that wouldn’t (latch) and fuel pumps that could fail prematurely.You can find out more by visiting https://www.vehiclerecalls.gov.au/ Later built cars were definitely better than earlier-build examples, purely because Range Rover had time to sort things out (not that it always did). But the one vehicle we’d avoid would be the turbo-diesel in any of its forms as these were the ones with the dicky bottom end. This is a vehicle where the fewer kilometres covered, the better. That said, you do see the odd one with better than 400,000km on board still getting around, but it would be very interesting to find out how much of a grandfather’s axe it is. Those high-milers are also almost always turbo-diesel cars, too, but that’s as much a function of the fact that this vehicle arrived in Australia when diesel was the new black, and people were flocking to it. It’s very difficult to recommend this make and model unless you’re an expert in diagnosing and fixing them and don’t mind a bit of down time. The non-supercharged petrol V8 stands a better chance of going the distance, but even it lives in the shadow of air suspension failures and other maladies. A high-mileage turbo-diesel can be had for comfortably less than $10,000 these days. In fact, you see them advertised for as little as $5000 which still makes them a punt, but a much lower-stakes punt.There’s a wide spread of prices after that with something like a supercharged V8 version with 100,000km showing for between $45,000 and $50,000. The one thing in the Sport’s favour as a long-term proposition is the magnificent repair and parts industry that has sprung up around the brand. You could argue that’s a function of necessity to keep a flawed product on the road, but it also reflects the fanaticism the Range Rover brand has created for itself.There’s a legion of specialist workshops that know these vehicles backwards and can supply pretty much every part needed. Independent specialists are also usually a lot cheaper than Range Rover dealership repairs and servicing.The better news is that every time a Range Rover Sport is pensioned off or scrapped its parts help keep other Rangies on the road. There’s no way of knowing how many L320 Range Rover Sports were sold during the model’s eight years on sale. But we can tell you that the bigger online sales sites have between 50 and 140 L320s available for sale.The vast majority of those are turbo-diesel V6 variants.

Two months into my three-month media loan of the 2026 Kia EV3 GT-Line Long Range and the little electric SUV has become part of the family.It fits perfectly in my cramped carport, and looks good there to boot. And, importantly, my partner is a fan.But is it a match made in heaven? There’s definitely a lot to like about the EV3, but in this instalment I deep dive into practicality, design and more. If you’re keen to learn more about pricing, spec and what the EV3 is missing, check out my first instalment.Kia’s current design language made its debut with the large and in-charge EV9 a few years back. That filtered down to all the other EVs and even to internal combustion models like the K4 and facelifted models like the Sportage.But I think the EV3 is the most successful example of that design philosophy to date. I mean, it looks like a Transformer! What more could you want?It’s a blocky SUV but with some curves, specifically on the EV3’s nose. But that duality works and never contradicts itself.Beyond the beautifully boxy silhouette, other winning design elements include the sharply shaped, blacked-out wheel arches and other chunky black elements like the roof rails, mirror caps, lower front and rear bumpers, pillars and the extended C-pillar. The black 19-inch GT-Line alloy wheels add to the vibe.The Volvo-esque tail-lights help frame the tailgate beautifully and the side view of the rear third of the EV3 is my favourite angle. That’s where the Transformer vibe is at its most pronounced.The headlights are in keeping with many current Kia models and look great. If you look closely you should count 12 tiny square LED elements on each side. And those lights are exceptional at night. But more on that in next month’s instalment.The EV3’s dimensions are 4310mm long, 1850mm wide and 1570mm tall (GT-Line is 10mm longer and taller than other grades) with a 2680mm wheelbase.It looks short in terms of length and tall in terms of height, but a quick look at rivals shows it’s exactly as long as a BYD Atto 2, but 20mm wider and 105mm shorter.That wheelbase isn’t as long as a Zeekr X (2750mm), but it’s got more space between the wheel arches than the Atto 2.While the exterior is something to behold, interior design is well executed without moving the game forward.Kia’s twin integrated screens dominate the dash which includes a mix of textured hard plastic, fabric, brushed aluminium panels and an ambient light bar.Two-tone interior and seat trim (light grey and mid-dark grey) brightens up the cabin and the two-tone steering wheel looks super cool.But how does it all function?Living with the EV3 every day for more than two months now, it’s clear this little car has some big ticks in the practicality column, but there are also some quirks and, frankly, some poor choices.Let’s start up front. Getting into the EV3 is the first quirk. The proximity key is temperamental. It constantly locks and unlocks the car if you hover near the vehicle. Just when you think it’s open, nope! Locked. It seems only French carmakers Renault and Peugeot know how to successfully operate this tech.Also, it has pop-out exterior front door handles, presumably for better aerodynamics. They’re the sort of handles where the rear arm pops out. Regardless of whether you’re left or right-handed, it feels awkward grabbing the handle, but more so if you have something in your dominant hand and you need to use the other one. A regular flush door handle you can put your hand under would suffice.Once in the driver’s seat it’s not hard to find your perfect driving position. The 10-way power-adjustable front seats help here. The seats are another quirk because they are not uncomfortable by any means, quite the opposite. But the back rest has a rounded shape, rather than traditional side bolsters and it makes for an odd sensation. But the base is comfy and supportive. I prefer nice cloth or synthetic suede to real or fake leather seats, but the Kia has the latter and it does the job.The height of the EV3 ensures ample headroom up front and there’s decent space across, although you might bump elbows with your passenger because of the central armrest.There’s more than enough legroom up front, but my knee regularly bumps the steering wheel-mounted gear selector stalk when I get in the car and occasionally when driving. If it were a little higher up it wouldn’t be an issue. I appreciate carmakers moving gear shifters from the console to make room for other things so I’m not mad at the stalk location.The only buttons are auto parking and auto hold on the centre armrest/table. There’s also a volume wheel on the centre stack, thankfully.While the air con is controlled via an always-on screen between the multimedia and driver display, you can change the mode, temperature and fan speed via toggles underneath. They feel nice to touch.Under the 12.3-inch multimedia screen you’ll find haptic buttons for nav, home and search. You can also do this via the touchscreen but it’s nice to have the option of a button.Kia’s head-up display is bright and clear and while the main driver display has a lot of information, it’s also clear and doesn’t overwhelm.Kia’s multimedia set-up is pretty solid. It consists of large tiles and sub menus and you can touch and swipe to your heart’s content. The EV3 includes connected services via 'Kia Connect' (in-car and app), so you can check the weather, your calendar, voice memos and EV data all through the screen. It’s a clever, high-tech car but, again, the tech never overwhelms.There’s a pair of USB-C ports under the dash and a wireless charging pad that is excellent for two reasons. It has a rubberised mat so your phone stays in place even when cornering, and the charger actually charges your phone. So many in-car chargers just heat up your phone and barely add charge, but this one does what it says on the tin. Thank God!Storage is a mixed bag in the EV3. The door bins will fit smaller, narrower bottles only. The base is actually huge but the door armrests impede it. The EV3 has a medium-sized glove box.I’d like to tell you about the EV3’s central storage bin between the drive and passenger, but there isn’t one. Well, not in the GT-Line anyway. Air and Earth grades get a conventional storage bin under the front central arm rest, but Kia’s product planners opted for a small pull-out table instead.It’s a pointless inclusion. I have only once used this function when I was running late for my mother’s birthday and had to write in a card on the run. Aside from that, it’s pretty useless. I’d much rather a covered storage compartment because currently the only secure storage space is the glove box. Under the armrest/console/table is a large open space with plenty of room for small bags. That space includes two cupholders that open up if you require even more space. But the cupholders are quite low and far from the driver and passenger’s reach. These would've been better placed higher on the central console.One thing I can’t fault is the overall feeling of quality to the cabin materials. It feels like a well built, robust cabin.Moving to the rear seats, you’ll find ample headroom, but toe room under the front seats is limited. Knee room behind my 184cm driving position is just okay. The front seat backs are made from quite hard plastic so you wouldn’t want the seat to be too far back.Amenities back there include map pockets, a USB-C port on the back of both front seats, knee-level air vents, a small nook on the back of the console and a fold-down arm rest with shallow cupholders.There’s no chunky transmission tunnel because it’s an EV.Rear seats are flat but reasonably comfortable and the chunky head rests are adjustable.Earth and GT-Line grades get a standard power tailgate, which is always welcome and the boot comes with a light and side nooks.Kia says the EV3 can swallow 460 litres of cargo with all seats in place and it’s a sizeable space, especially given the compact dimensions of the car.I love the two-level boot floor. You can place the removable floor at the same level as the tailgate lip, making for ample secure under-floor storage, or place it lower for larger items. Very clever.A front trunk can stow 25 litres which is enough for a charge cable. The bonnet has gas struts, too, which I always appreciate.Sadly the EV3 only comes with a tyre repair kit and not even a temporary spare wheel. Not uncommon for EVs, but Australians deserve better.I clocked up just under 1000km of driving in the past month and the trip computer says it was a more efficient few weeks than my first instalment. It showed 16kWh/100km, which is a tick under Kia’s claim of 16.2kWh. Not a bad result.Factoring in usable battery capacity and my efficiency figures, the real-world range this month was about 488km.That’s it for my second instalment of the 2026 Kia EV3 GT-Line long-term review. Keep an eye out for my final instalment in a few weeks and an accompanying video wrapping up my time with the car and outlining everything I like and don’t like about this appealing little EV. Acquired: February 2026Distance travelled this month: 968kmOdometer: 6931kmAverage energy consumption this month: 16kWh/100km

The small SUV market is getting busy. Plenty of aggressively affordable models are here, arriving, or soon to land thanks to the boom in China’s international new car market.Cars like the Kia Seltos can’t win on price alone anymore, as may have been the case in the past.It’s a good thing, then, that Kia has a new Seltos with some fresh tricks like a hybrid system for Australia and an interior that wouldn't look out of place in much more expensive Kias.This car isn’t due in Australia for some time - around October should be the launch - but an international preview in South Korea gave us a pretty solid look at what we can expect from Kia’s new small SUV.We don’t know quite how much the Seltos will cost just yet, but we have some clues.Given the last-gen Seltos pricing and the market positioning of the very closely related Hyundai Kona, we expect the Seltos to start in the high $30,000 region, before on-road costs.Chances are its line-up will look a lot like the previous Seltos range, with a few options ranging from a relatively basic ‘S’ to the fully-specified GT-Line.Specifications and features are also yet to be determined. The cars available to us during the test were likely representative of GT-Line cars that will arrive in Australia, with panoramic sunroofs, heated and vented seats, adjustable interior ambient lighting, synthetic leather upholstery and a large screen display.The three-part screen unit consists of 12.3-inch screens - one touchscreen for multimedia and one for the driver display - either side of a 5.0-inch touchscreen for climate controls. As is often the case with this section of the screen arrangement in Kias, it’s out of sight behind the steering wheel when you’re in a driving position.If you’ve been in a recently designed Kia like the EV3 or EV5, the interior design and layout will look familiar. There are still physical buttons and controls for important functions, as well as shortcuts to key sections in the multimedia menus, but the overall layout is relatively tidy.The driving position works well, visibility is good thanks to decently-sized windscreen and windows, and the seats are comfortable enough for a full day of driving.The second row is spacious enough for an adult on a decent drive, Kia says there’s another 20mm of legroom because the Seltos is now slightly bigger than the previous generation - 45mm longer with a 60mm longer wheelbase.There’s also 536 litres of boot space, and in Australia under that will be a spare wheel. This means we won’t have vehicle-to-load (V2L) capability, but it seems the sensible trade-off for Australia if only one of the two is up for grabs.In Australia, the drivetrain will be a hybrid-assisted 1.6-litre four-cylinder petrol engine mated to a six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission.We’re expecting a front-wheel drive version with outputs to be approximately 113kw/265Nm, plus an all-wheel drive with 131kW, though its rear wheels will be powered by an electric motor and not mechanically connected to the front wheels.The hybrid version will be it for Australia, with the brand forgoing petrol-only variants. This means more efficiency to be expected from the new Seltos, and while Kia hasn’t provided indicative fuel economy expectations for this variant, the Korean test drive provided some insight.While not a perfect indication of the efficiency we can expect in Australia (given South Korea’s roads are flatter, straighter and slower for the most part), our test averaged between 4.8L/100km and 6.1L/100km. Tyre pressures were a few kilopascals higher than you’d expect them to be on an average Australian commute, by the way.We’re going to wait until later this year for a more definitive judgement on the Seltos, but first signs are impressive.Of course, a local Australian tune is already in the works thanks to Kia Australia’s Chief Engineer for Ride and Handling, Graeme Gambold, but the starting point built to suit the Korean market is a good basis.It’s soft and can get wafty on uneven surfaces, but generally easy to control in dynamic cornering without sacrificing comfort on long stretches of old roads.We can expect a firmer tune for better input response here in Australia, with the aim of reduced body roll and more accurate steering.The drivetrain, aside from its efficiency, is also a big plus for the Seltos, though its regenerative braking caused a couple of unexpected minor lurches during braking.While not entirely lacking urgency, keen drivers might be disappointed by the outputs, especially in front-drive.The nature of Korea’s highways and roads meant we were only able to get a matter of minutes rather than hours of twisty-road dynamic driving in, but given Kia Australia’s history of decent suspension work, there’s reason to expect the new Seltos will handle well once it lands in Australia.

Ford's Everest off-road SUV has been a good performer for Ford, but sometimes not so good for its owners. Now, Ford has moved to address the biggest potential reliability issue by switching to a lower-tech, lower-output four-cylinder turbo-diesel for entry-level Everest variants. But is the new engine up to the job? And does the Everest keep pace with the competition with such a mild facelift?

The Volkswagen Tayron eHybrid might just be the hidden gem in VW’s SUV line-up, and it’s all because you get less of something, not more.Sounds weird, I know, but stay with me. It was once pretty easy to identify the difference between the Tiguan and the Tiguan Allspace. One had five seats, and the other mostly had seven. Simple.But this Tayron eHybrid changes that equation. It’s the plug-in hybrid replacement for the Allspace, joining the petrol-powered versions that have already launched in Australia.And like the just-launched Tiguan eHybrid, it’s exclusively a five-seat affair. But it’s also bigger, cheaper and I reckon better to drive than the Tiguan, if it doesn’t have the immediate nameplate recognition of its smaller sibling.Same five seats, same petrol-electric powertrain, just with more space for less money, even if its equipment list isn’t quite as generous as the one in the Tiguan.The Tayron eHybrid is the latest arrival in Volkswagen’s plug-in hybrid push, sharing its powertrain specifics with the Tiguan eHybrid. That means a 1.5-litre turbocharged petrol engine with a front-mounted electric motor and a 19.7kWh (net) battery, and an all-electric driving range of around 115km on the WLTP cycle.Both grades are set up for 40kW DC charging, or 11kW charging at home — the latter meaning you can essentially use a regular power point, or a much faster wallbox charger.There are two trim levels, the Elegance and the sportier-feeling R-Line, with the latter also adding progressive steering to the driving aid list (both also get adaptive damping and an e-diff lock). There are also different power outputs for each — in Elegance guise, that means 150kW and 350Nm, while the R-Line improves the grunt on offer to 200kW and 400Nm.Each trim has its petrol engine and electric motor up front, meaning front-wheel drive, with the battery at the rear, and feed their power through a six-speed dual-clutch gearbox.And all of that is largely identical to the Tiguan. But from there, things change.The Tayron PHEV might not sport the seven seats of internal combustion versions, but it’s still got the body size to fit them. It’s both longer and wider than its five-seat sibling, and it serves up wagon-like space in its boot, with a sizable 705 litres with the second row in place, and a massive 1915 litres with the row folded flat. That makes this a proper family transporter. There is oodles of room in the back seat, too, though there is a comically large tunnel running through the centre of the backseat that will definitely impact leg room for adults riding in the middle seat.The window seats offer an adult-friendly amount of room, though. I’m 175cm, and had no issue getting comfortable. There’s also a pull-down divider, twin USB ports and tri-zone automatic climate with twin rear vents.Both the Elegance and R-Line interior treatments are clean and modern, with solid material choices and a genuine feel of quality in the elements you interact with.In more good news, I think the cheapest version is the stronger buy. The extra power on offer in the $75,990 R-Line version actually feels unnecessary in the context of the Tayron. The performance in the $62,390 Elegance feels ample, especially with the added zip from the electric motor when taking off at city speeds. Right now both models are significantly cheaper, too, with a limited drive-away offer on both grades that will see you on the road for less than the RRP.Anyway, the Elegance is officially about one second slower to 100km/h than the R-Line, sure, but a) it doesn’t feel it, and b) who cares? This is spacious family transport, not a Nurburgring rocket.It can get a bit revvy when when you really plant your foot from a rolling speed, and it can feel too firm on properly jittery road surfaces. But it’s otherwise a competent and pretty comfortable drive, with a confident weight to the steering and a feeling of connection between drive and car, especially on winding roads, that’s sometimes missing from its competition.There are subtle differences in the way the Tayron and Tiguan drive. Both feel competent and buttoned down, but the Tayron feels a little more stable and better balanced, likely owing to the 110mm longer wheelbase.Like in the Tiguan, the EV power delivered when you take off really eases forward progression so much so that you really don't want for more power.In Elegance trim, your spend buys you 19-inch alloy wheels, an auto-opening boot, and LED lighting. Inside, there’s leather trim with seats that offer heating, cooling and ventilation, a digital driver display, a 12.9-inch central screen and wireless charging.Springing for the R-Line nabs you a sportier look, as well as 20-inch alloy wheels and VW’s clever Matrix LED headlights. There’s a bigger screen and some other niceties, too, but how much all of that matters is up to you.Unfortunately, Volkswagen won’t budge on its now-too-short-feeling five-year and unlimited-kilometre warranty, which grates in a world of seven-, eight- and 10-year warranties. Volkswagen insists its customers don’t want or need more, but I’d like to speak to some of these customers. The battery is covered for eight years or 160,000kms. Servicing is required annually, and a three-year prepaid package will set you back $1605, while a five-year package is $3391For mine, the Tayran is the VW sleeper, and the Elegance eHybrid is the pick of the plug-in bunch.

One of Volkswagen’s most important vehicles has welcomed what will almost certainly be its most important powertrain, with a plug-in hybrid variant here to capture all those people tired of having to black-market an organ every time they need to fill up.And it turns out that there are a lot of those people. Plug-in hybrid sales are up 119 per cent so far this year — and more than 500 per cent in April alone — and it’s into this PHEV feeding frenzy that Volkswagen launches its plug-in Tiguan, which is available in Elegance guise, or as a sportier and more powerful R-Line.In Elegance guise, the sticker price is $64,590 before on-road costs, while the R-Line ups the cost to $74,550. Both have sharp drive-away price deals at the moment that will see you on the road for less than the RRP.There's a solid inclusion list too, mirroring the non-hybrid range, as well as some driving kit, like adaptive damping, and a clever e-diff that smooths out understeer and dials up grip.Well, VW calls it an eHybrid, which is company parlance, but the end result is the same, with its powertrain combining a 1.5-litre turbocharged petrol engine with a front-mounted electric motor and a 19.7kWh battery.Electric driving range is around 115km (WLTP), and both grades are set up for 40kW DC charging, or 11kW charging at home — the latter meaning you can essentially use a regular power point, or a much faster wallbox-style charger.Opt for the Elegance, and the total system power is 150kW and 350Nm, while the R-Line is tuned to deliver 200kW and 400Nm. Both feed their power through a six-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox, and are front-drive only, with the electric motor positioned on the front axle.Power is only ever a small part of a new-car story. Producing grunt is often the easy part. Delivering it in a car that feels properly ready to receive it is seemingly much harder.Happily, the Tiguan is a definite bright spot on the soft and spongy horizon of new-car sales in Australia. It feels properly engineered from behind the wheel, with a ride that delivers true connection with the road surface below, even if it does definitely stray into too-hard (and even a bit jittery) territory over corrugated road surfaces. There's not a huge amount of body roll when cornering, and it feels sorted from behind the wheel.The way the electric power is delivered in this car is also a bonus. It is very noticeable that it is using exclusively electric power from low speeds. The torque is instantaneous and it propels you forward before the engine kicks in at about 20 kilometers an hour or so. The result is an SUV that feels more like a nippy little EV at city speeds, before turning into plug-in family transport elsewhere.There are only two quirks that irk me a little. One is the consistency of the brake pedal feel, which sometimes feels like there is plenty of pedal travel, and other times feels like there isn't much at all, which makes how much pressure to apply a little unpredictable at times. The other is the weight of the steering, which can go from very light as you brake into a corner, before quickly weighting up as you accelerate out. Neither are major problems, but can take a little getting used to.Inside, the interior lighting is customisable and has a nice, sporty touch in the R-Line, while the twin screen setup – including the gigantic centre screen – is premium in look and feel, too.Be warned though, the driver-distraction monitor doesn't just sound an alarm, but locks you out of the screen until it decides that you're paying attention again, so if you're doing something on the screen, it then freezes.But kudos to Volkswagen for concocting an iPhone wireless charging solution that actually holds your phone in place, with a little lift flap in the centre console that keeps things secure while charging, whether that's via the twin USB-C ports or via the twin wireless charging pads.Elsewhere, and apart from the plastic-feeling centre console edging, everything in the cabin is nicely wrapped, and it does give the sense of a car that just feels well sorted, both on the road and from the driver's seat.Space in the backseat is ample for my 175cm frame, and boot space is pretty family friendly – despite a slight space penalty to pay compared to non-hybrid models –with 490 litres with the rear seats in place, and 1486 litres with the second row stowed.

Geely is the Chinese powerhouse behind Polestar, Volvo and Zeekr, but its own brand is on track to be bigger than them all.The Chinese brand launched in Australia at the start of 2025, but it hasn’t gone on a model explosion like BYD or Chery, instead it is slowly building out its line-up Down Under.First came the all-electric EX5 mid-size SUV and next the related Starray EM-i plug-in hybrid SUV we are testing here. Both are selling well.The Starray range is simple, with just two variants.First is the Starray Complete starting at $37,490 (before on-road costs) and next is the fully loaded Starray Inspire priced from $39,990. We are living with the latter for three months.That is a sharp price that undercuts the rival 2026 BYD Sealion 6, which starts at $42,990 and rises to $52,990, and is more on par with the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.The Starray is powered by a 1.5-litre four-cylinder non-turbo petrol engine paired to an electric motor, which combine for 193kW.A hybrid transmission sends power to the front wheels, there is no all-wheel drive option.This is matched to a circa-18kWh Lithium-Ferro-Phosphate (LFP) battery that delivers a driving range of up to 83km.That driving range misses the mark against some of its rivals, but luckily Geely is rolling out an update to the Inspire grade this year that will feature a bigger battery capable of delivering a range of up to 136km.Geely claims its current setup uses just 2.4-litres of fuel per 100km, which is excellent but it also requires pricier premium unleaded petrol.You won't get near this figure unless you are very militant about charging the car so it always has a decent amount of energy to allow for electric-only driving for most trips. I've relied mostly on hybrid driving during my stint and I'm averaging double the claimed figure.The Starray can be driven in three modes: Pure (electric-only), Hybrid (petrol-electric) and Power (petrol-only).If driving in Power mode expect fuel use to be much more than the claimed figure. The battery can accept a max DC charge rate of 30kW and can suck up to 6.6kW of juice via an AC connection.It also has a vehicle-to-load function, which means it can power appliances and other items, but you’ll need to buy an adapter to plug into the car’s charging port.One of the Starray’s big selling points is it is packed full of equipment.Outside the Starray Inspire has LED head and tail-lights, auto-folding side mirrors, rain-sensing wipers, roof rails and 19-inch alloy wheels.Inside some of the highlights are a big 15.4-inch central display paired with a 10.2-inch digital driver’s screen. A 13.8-inch head-up display projects vital information such as travelling speed and prevailing speed limit onto the windscreen in front of the driver.It has wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, in-built sat nav, digital radio, wireless device charging and USB-A and -C charging ports throughout.The Inspire grade ditches the basic six-speaker stereo for a 16-speaker stereo from Chinese tech company Meizu, which is owned by Geely.The Starray also runs Meizu’s Flyme operating system for its multimedia.Customers can expect power-adjustable front seats wrapped in synthetic leather and with heating and ventilation functions. The driver’s seat also has a memory function.A giant panoramic sunroof is exclusive to the Inspire grade as is the power tailgate.Boot space is decent at 428 litres and can be expanded to 528L by removing the floor.There is no spare tyre, with owners forced to make do with a fiddly tyre repair kit.Geely ticks all the safety boxes with a wide range of active driver aids and seven airbags covering both rows.The Starray was given a five-star safety score last year with good scores for adult and child occupant protection during crash tests.Paint colour is the only optional extra, with anything but white costing $600. Our test car is finished in a handsome metallic jungle green.Geely covers its cars with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty, and the battery is covered for eight years/unlimited km.The Starray is covered by a five-year capped-price servicing program that requires workshop visits every 12 months or 15,000km. It’ll cost almost $2000 over that time, with buyers to be aware of the $691 fourth service price. Next instalment we’ll cover how practical the Starray is in the real world and report back on fuel use figures, EV-only driving range and how it works for a family of four.2026 Geely Starray EM-i InspireAcquired: March, 2026Distance travelled this month: 436kmOdometer: 2776kmAverage fuel this month: 4.8-litres per 100km

It’s time to say goodbye to my Leapmotor C10 REEV, which has been my family transport for the past three months or so.And if you’re thinking about putting one of these on your shortlist, then read on, because I’m going to tell you what I liked, and what I didn’t about life with the Leapmotor.And this is one you don’t want to miss. Because the things I like about this car, I really like. But the things I don't? Well, those I really, really hate.So, let’s take a closer look, shall we?So, the things I like. Let’s kick off with the design. I'm surprised not everyone agrees with me on this, but I like the way this C10 looks. And that’s because I see it as a bit like a haircut.This is, basically the automotive equivalent of a bloke asking for a short back and sides. You’re not going to walk out of the hairdresser turning heads. But equally, you’re not going to look back at photos of yourself 10 years from now and think ‘a top bun with an urban mullet – what the hell I was thinking?’.This is simple, straightforward car design that is clean and likely to age well.And that’s true in the cabin, too, where the C10 offers a simple, screen-forward design language that doesn’t inspire but doesn’t offend.Some cars you just know are going to look like real fashion choices within a few years, but I don’t think that’s the case here. What do I like number two? The space. There’s a lot of it. The C10 maximises its dimensions in the back seat and in the boot, which has been incredibly valuable given we now have a 18-month old for whom we always have to pack heavy, whether we're going to the shops or for a weekend away.The back seat is the real superpower of the C10 REEV, which uses its 4.7m in length and 1.9m in width to maximise space for the rear riders.I’m 175cm, and I had heaps of knee and headroom, but the real test for us is always our baby’s massive child seat. In some cars, the room is too tight so the front of the child seat pushes into the back of the passenger seat. But that’s not the case in this, with the front seat rider able to get comfy with room to spare.The boot is decent, too, with 546 litres on offer with the rear seats in place and 1375L with them folded flat. I wish there was a better dedicated charger storage area, though. There is some space under the boot floor, but the charger doesn't sit flush, so it pushes the floor up. What do I like number three? The powertrain is clever, even if it doesn’t deliver the fuel savings I was hoping for.This is a REEV, or Range Extender Electric Vehicle. And this one pairs a rear-mounted electric motor with a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine that acts as a mobile power generator for the C10’s 28.4kWh lithium iron phosphate battery.In simple terms, it drives like an EV, but when charge is low the engine kicks in to provide power to the battery, with a bunch of drive modes that control when and how the battery is recharged.Okay, so onto the bad stuff. And by far the single biggest annoyance is the fact it all feels needlessly complicated and frustratingly slow.That begins with the credit-card-style key, which may well be the worst system I've ever encountered. To unlock and start the car, you need to hold it against the driver's wing mirror. And you need to do the same everytime you get out to turn the car off and lock it.Now, I want you to imagine getting out of the car, grabbing a baby from the back seat, groceries from the boot, and then having to carry both back to the driver's door mirror where you then fumble for the key card to turn off the car. It’s ferociously annoying. And, because there’s no push-button start, you need to rest the keycard on the wireless phone charger to select a gear, too.Yes, there’s a phone app and a passcode system that means you can circumvent the card. But I found the app’s proximity lock and unlock to be woefully hit-and-miss and the passcode entry system is slow and clunky. And because it can take ages for the screen to wake up, you can find yourself sitting there for ages waiting to be able to enter the code to start the car.That system is emblematic of my Leapmotor C10 REEV experience. Everything is complicated. Everything lives within the screen menus and everything is slower than it should be.Number two on my don’t like list. It’s not as efficient as expected. I’ve tried charging lots, driving gently, and I cover lots of long-distances and I can’t get the fuel use to be as good as a regular hybrid SUV. There are four driving modes available – 'EV+', 'EV-normal', 'Fuel mode', 'Power+' – all of which control when the petrol engine should kick in.Over my final 670km with the car, I averaged around 6.9L/100km. That's not horrific for a car this size – especially given it sips the cheapest E10 fuel – but it's also not as good as you might find in something like a RAV4 Hybrid, which you would also never need to plug in.If you plug it in every night and use that EV mode as much as possible, that number will plummet. But that felt like a lot of work, especially given the 28.4kWh battery will only give you around 100km or so of pure-EV driving.The final item on my don’t-like list? It just doesn’t feel polished enough to compete in Australia. I know that sounds harsh, but I like the smaller Leapmotor B10, so I know the brand can do it. The C10 REEV, for me, just isn’t it.The truth is the C10 found a way to annoy me in some way on just about every trip, whether it was how long it took for the reversing camera screen to wake up, or the proximity unlocking deciding when to work and when not to, or the phantom honking of the horn when it incorrectly thought there was still a baby in our baby seat.In a time filled with affordable newcomer brands in Australia, there are just a few too many quirks aboard the C10 REEV for me.

A month ago we said goodbye to our Chery Tiggo 8 Super Hybrid long-term test car and hello to our current one, the Volkswagen ID.5 SUV.Alongside its ID.4 sibling, the ID.5 is Volkswagen’s first electric SUV and it's the first time I’ve driven one, so I entered this long-term test the same way you walk into a supermarket while on holiday - a bit lost, even if everything looks the same.The ID.5 is a mid-sized electric SUV and the Volkswagen rival to the Toyota bZ4x, Tesla Model Y, Geely EX5 and the mechanically related Skoda Enyaq.The ID.5 is the not-so identical twin to the ID.4, the difference being the ID.5 has a swoopier, coupe-like profile while the ID.4 has a boxier shape.Both the ID.5 and ID.4 are offered in two grades, the Pro and the sporty, top-of-the-range GTX.The ID. 5 Pro is the car we are testing and it lists for $62,990 before on-road costs.The standard features list includes heated and massaging front seats, three-zone climate control, a panoramic sunroof, a head-up display, proximity unlocking and LED headlights.The ID.5 has a 77kWh battery and a range of up to 543km. There’s one motor and it makes 210kW and 543Nm.What’s interesting is that Volkswagen created completely new models for its first electric SUVs rather than just making an electric variant of its combustion powered Tiguan mid-sized SUV.Frankly, I think an electric Tiguan would have been a better idea and I’ll tell you why later.My first impression is that the ID.5 isn’t really an SUV but just a large-ish, round-ish car. Some people told me they loved the way it looked, but I have trouble seeing its beauty. Although I admit it is uniquely designed compared to many SUVs.I immediately appreciate the quality feel of every touch point, from the door handles through to the seats and steering wheel. The ID.5 doesn’t look like any Volkswagen that went before it, but the materials and craftsmanship are very much on-brand even if the styling is new.I was concerned the ID.5 might not be big enough for my family. It doesn't seem particularly spacious or practical for a family of five.Getting our child into the car and buckled up has been hard on my back, largely because of the coupe-like roofline. Higher-riding SUVs with taller door openings make this job easy, but the ID.5’s shape doesn’t help. Halfway through putting my daughter into her car seat in the pouring rain at night, I wished Volkswagen had just made a Tiguan EV. At least the ID.4 has a boxier shape.However, the space back there for head and legroom is actually very good. Our forward-facing child seat fits well with room for our daughter’s legs without the front passenger having to squash themselves against the dashboard.Storage is good with big door pockets but the adaptable cup holder area is a waste of space (literally) and the wireless phone charger lives in a pokey little cave down there, too.The boot is big at 549 litres but, again, the sloping roofline means tall objects won't fit under that hatch. Again, I miss the practicality of the Tiguan with its draws and utility. At this point I feel like VW has forgotten its ethos of maintaining practicality.Finally, while the volume and climate control functions are physical they're haptic buttons which sometimes work and sometimes don’t. It’s already making me go a bit bananas.The best thing about the ID.5 so far is energy efficiency. Also, the way the ID.5 drives, too. It’s smooth, comfortable, planted and quick. And we’ve spent more than a thousand kilometres behind the wheel - 1142km to be exact.But really if there's one thing that impresses me the most, it’s the SUV's efficiency. Some EVs I've lived with have given me such range anxiety. They've stayed home in the driveway while we’ve taken our own combustion car instead if we are traveling far and the availability of chargers is scarce.But the ID.5 uses its charge quite frugally. Officially, the combined energy use is 16.3kWh/100km but we’ve done even better at 15.8kWh. In the coming months I’ll attempt to calculate exactly how far we can get on a full charge because I might be able to beat the 543km range.I know I’m going to regret saying that…The headlights perform an unsettling movement when the car detects the key within range. It’s a sort of shifty side-eye action that is a bit too life-like for me.The other thing is the ID.5's accelerator pedal has a 'play button’ icon embossed on it and there’s a pause button on the brake pedal. I don’t like this nor do I like the person who thought it was cute, whoever they are. Acquired: March 2026Distance travelled this month: 1142kmOdometer: 1848kmAverage energy consumption this month: 15.8kWh/100km  

The Land Rover Defender Octa Black is supposed to be the 'ultimate Defender', but I'll be the judge of that after living with this monstrously capable high-performance luxury SUV for a week.