Nissan V30 Reviews

For 25 years and four generations, the Nissan X-Trail has been an okay mid-sized SUV choice. But the e-Power extended-range electric vehicle hybrid has been a standout since arriving in 2023. Fast, refined, sophisticated and fun, it redefined class standards, though buyers were slow to realise. Now, a minor facelift brings improvements, but are they enough for the Nissan to finally break through?

A number of popular car brands in Australia are at risk of paying fines in excess of $10 million for not meeting tightening emission standards if they don’t correct course quickly.

Nissan’s Pathfinder large SUV will return to its 4x4 roots after years as a more plush family-oriented model, as part of a new-generation overhaul before the end of the decade.Industry publication Automotive News has reported sources familiar with the program have claimed the Pathfinder nameplate will be split in two, with an updated version of the current car co-existing with a new version, which will return to a more hardcore ladder-frame chassis.The Pathfinder nameplate has a history of dipping in and out of ladder-frame construction, with the first-generation version in 1985 being body-on-frame, the second-generation in 1995 being monocoque, then returning to a ladder frame shared with the Navara in 2004 for the third-generation.Since then, the fourth and current fifth-generation vehicles have been on a monocoque chassis, positioned as the brand’s three-row rival to the likes of the Toyota Kluger, Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Sorento.According to the Automotive News report, the upcoming ladder-frame Pathfinder will share its underpinnings with the revived US-market Xterra off-roader and next-generation Frontier ute, both of which are expected to feature a petrol V6 engine to go with their 4x4 hardware.The updated monocoque Pathfinder and its ladder-frame alternative are expected to launch around 2029 as a two-prong large SUV offering from the brand.As this plan seems specifically targeted at reviving Nissan’s ailing fortunes in the US, it raises questions of the future of the Pathfinder nameplate for Australia.Two competing factors may affect it. Firstly, current US policy to stimulate vehicle exports has forced Nissan to consider exporting currently left-hand-drive only vehicles from America to Japan, which would necessitate right-hand-drive conversion, and therefore make them theoretically available to Australia, too.On the other hand, Australia’s recently-implemented New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) which closes the vice on high-emitting engines (like a petrol V6) under threat of fines, would seem to rule out or limit the appeal of importing US models with V6 engines, such as the Pathfinder or US-market Frontier.The second factor is Nissan’s increasing Chinese presence. Its joint-ventures are producing models that could be essential additions to its line-up locally, both from an emissions and sales potential stand-point. The company’s Australian division has expressed interest in the Chinese-built Frontier Pro plug-in hybrid ute as part of a similar two-prong ute strategy, with the Chinese model serving as a BYD Shark 6 or GWM Cannon Alpha rival, and the Mitsubishi Triton-based version serving as a traditional diesel workhorse.The US-built Pathfinder has struggled for sales in Australia against stiff competition.While it was up 40 per cent year-on-year by the end of 2025, it amassed just 732 units which pales in comparison to rivals like the Toyota Kluger (8098 units), Mazda CX-80 (3851 units), Kia Sorento (8745 units) and Hyundai Santa Fe (6264 units).Nissan’s Australian sales dropped 21.6 per cent over the course of 2025 as buyers turn to more keenly priced and largely hybrid-powered competitors as well as more affordable new arrivals from China.The Australian situation is not unique and Nissan has promised a wide-ranging turn-around strategy dubbed Re:Nissan, which involves leaning more heavily into its Chinese and US manufacturing, renegotiatiating its alliance with Renault, reorienting its entire model line-up and closing underperforming factories.

A new engine from this Geely joint-venture promises 40 per cent lower consumption compared to rivals.

Battery recycling will take on an increasingly important role in electric vehicle production and sustainability as more EVs hit the roads. 

The federal government has released the results of the first New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), with several major manufacturers impacted. 

Specifications for the updated 2026 Nissan X-Trail have just been released.Pricing was detailed in November last year, but the updated X-Trail will start from $38,140 before on-road costs before hitting $58,215 for the top-spec grade.It will be available in petrol or e-Power hybrid guise in front or all-wheel drive variants.The X-Trail’s hybrid and all-wheel drive grades see it shape up as a rival to the strong-selling Toyota RAV4 hybrid.The RAV4’s all-wheel drive grades start from $49,340, before on-roads, which is marginally more expensive than the cheapest X-Trail hybrid, with a starting price of $48,915.Hyundai’s Tucson hybrid is roughly $6000 cheaper than the X-Trail, but that model does not have an all-wheel-drive system.Nissan’s e-Power system operates differently to conventional hybrids, as the petrol engine never directly drives the wheels, only generating energy for the battery.The petrol variant of the X-Trail is slightly more expensive than the Mazda CX-5.The X-Trail comes in five-seater and seven-seater configurations.It is powered by either a 2.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine or a 1.5-litre three-cylinder turbo-petrol hybrid set-up.The petrol-only unit produces 135kW and 244Nm, while the hybrid version has a total system output of 157kW of power.Inside, the X-Trail gets a 12.3-inch central touchscreen display as standard as well as a digital driver display, with wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay functionality.New colours are also available, including ‘Deep Ocean Blue’ and ‘Everest White’, while there is a new ‘Chestnut’ interior on the Ti-L grade. 2026 Nissan X-Trail pricing Australia 2026 Nissan X-Trail engine and efficiency  2026 Nissan X-Trail standard features17-inch alloy wheels12.3-inch central touchscreenWireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay7.0-inch digital driver displayPowered and heated door mirrorsPaddle shiftersRain-sensing wipersLED headlightsST-L grade adds18-inch alloy wheelsLeather-accented seatsLeather-accented steering wheelPower adjustable seatsRemote engine start12.3-inch digital driver displayDual-zone climate controlHeated front seatsWireless phone chargerAuto-dimming rear-view mirrorTi grade adds19-inch alloy wheels10.8-inch head-up displayTri-zone climate controlMotion sensing power tailgateRear door sunshadesTi-L grade adds20-inch alloy wheels (hybrid model only)Bose premium 10-speaker audio systemHeated steering wheelHeated second-row outside seatsAmbient interior lightingMemory driver seat 2026 Nissan X-Trail safetyThe Nissan X-Trail has a five-star ANCAP safety rating, awarded in 2022. Standard safety featuresSeven airbags360 degree cameraLane keep assistAuto emergency brakingBlind spot warningAdaptive cruise controlRear parking sensorsST-L grade addsFront parking sensors3D surround view monitorTyre pressure monitoring system 2026 Nissan X-Trail dimensions  2026 Nissan X-Trail warranty and servicingThe Nissan X-Trail comes with a 10-year/300,000-kilometre warranty and roadside assistance when serviced at authorised Nissan dealers. The car has flat price servicing at $399 per year for the first five years. Intervals for servicing have changed from every 10,000km/12 months to a better 15,000km/12 months. 

The President of the United States Donald Trump and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin have combined to eliminate the ‘off-cycle credit’ the EPA said was used to implement the start-stop feature in American vehicles. An EPA off-cycle credit awards carmakers greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction credits for technologies that improve real-world fuel efficiency but are not fully captured by laboratory-based emissions tests. For example, stop-start systems and active aerodynamics.The statement said the feature is “almost universally hated”, with the EPA’s final rule eliminating all subsequent federal GHG emission standards for all vehicles and engines with model years 2012 to 2027 and beyond, “including for what many Americans refer to as the single worst feature in cars - auto start-stop buttons”.Announcing the change, Administrator Zeldin said, “As I travelled across all 50 states this past year, I heard from countless Americans who not only dislike the start-stop feature but passionately advocated for this mechanism to be a thing of the past. “Not only do many people find start-stop annoying, but it kills the battery of your car without any significant benefit to the environment.“The Trump EPA is proudly fixing this stupid feature at Trump Speed.“Automakers should not be forced to adopt or rewarded for technologies that are merely a climate participation trophy with no measurable pollution reductions. Consumer choice is a top priority for the Trump EPA and we are proud to continue delivering commonsense rules for the American people,” he said.The official EPA announcement stated “about 60 per cent” of new cars have the stop-start feature, and “with the elimination of the off-cycle credits, manufacturers will be incentivized to listen to what Americans actually want in their cars”.Multiple automotive brands manufacturing cars in the US issued statements in response to the regulation change.Stellantis said, “We remain supportive of a rational, achievable approach on fuel economy standards that preserves our customers’ freedom of choice.”A Ford statement said: “We appreciate the work of President Trump and Administrator Zeldin to address the imbalance between current emissions standards and customer choice.”Hyundai made the point that the EPA's rule changes remove incentives rather than mandating change and said, “Hyundai continues to comply with all applicable emissions regulations and regularly evaluates vehicle technologies based on customer feedback, regulatory requirements, and overall efficiency.”General Motors, Honda, Nissan, Toyota and others referenced comments from automotive industry group, Alliance for Automotive Innovation.Alliance President John Bozzella said, “I’ve said it before, automotive emissions regulations finalized in the previous administration are extremely challenging for automakers to achieve given the current marketplace demand for EVs.“The auto industry in America remains focused on preserving vehicle choice for consumers, keeping the industry competitive, and staying on a long-term path of emissions reductions and cleaner vehicles,” he said.

The incoming new-generation Nissan Navara is mechanically identical to the Mitsubishi Triton, but carries a sizeable price jump in comparison.It adds another rival to a compact ute market, so how does the more expensive Navara shape up to its cheaper Triton sibling? Nissan said money and time has been invested into its ute’s suspension, receiving assistance from Australian specialists Premcar.The brand said this local tuning offers improvement to driving and handling with and without load. The Navara has three different suspension set-ups across the range, with lower grades tuned for carrying loads, while SUV-like suspension is fitted to higher grades. Nissan’s ute also has a locking rear differential as standard on all grades, unlike on the Triton. Here is a breakdown of the difference between the Navara and the Triton.Pricing Australia (before on-road costs) Noting the Triton’s current drive-away offering, it comes in substantially cheaper than the Navara across the range. DimensionsBoth have the same braked towing capacity of 3500kg. Things start to change when we look at payload, with the Triton offers superior carrying capacity across the range. When it comes to cargo bed size, the pair share the same-sized space.  Engine and efficiencyThe Navara and Triton are nearly mechanically identical and use the same engine and transmission, so there is no difference between the two. Standard featuresNext grade adds or replaces: Next grade adds or replaces: Next grade adds The Navara does have more standard equipment than the Triton in a comparison between the pair.As standard, the Navara gets a digital driver display, unlike on the Triton, while it also gets a bigger central touchscreen. There is digital DAB+ radio, LED lighing front and back, tailgate assist and a rear diff lock as standard on the Navara, while that is only available on higher grade Tritons. There are areas where the Triton matches the Navara, including all-terrain tires and basic cloth trimmed manually adjustable seats.On the top-spec grades, the Triton has bigger alloy wheels, but they both have leather seats. The Navara’s top grade has a towbar fitted, but the Triton does not.Safety The Nissan Navara adopts the same five-star ANCAP safety rating awarded to the Mitsubishi Triton in 2024. Both get all the safety gear you would expect, such as eight airbags, lane keep assist and auto-emergency. As standard, both cars get a reversing camera and front and rear parking sensors. VerdictThe Mitsubishi Triton appears to be the value buy here as it gets most of the gear as on the Navara, but for a cheaper price. The Triton's special drive-away price makes it more compelling for now, but the price gap will close once that offer is removed.The Triton may be the budget pick, but the Navara’s benefits are not obvious from the spec sheet. Its Aussie-tuned suspension and rear-differential lock could give it the edge on the off-roading scene, while also aiding the on-road driving experience. 

I drive a lot of electric cars, but I’ve had somewhat of an epiphany in my time with the Nissan Ariya Evolve e-4orce these past few months.Dual-motor EVs are mostly unnecessary.This issue has been gnawing at me for awhile, and it isn’t just the Ariya that is affected, but all EVs.There are a few reasons.One, is it adds extra weight to an already heavy car, which then affects how the suspension performs. Most dual-motor EVs have a bouncy rode and struggle to keep their hefty weight in checkTwo, is that extra weight, combined with the extra energy consumed by the second motor, means driving range is reduced considerably.The Ariya’s claimed driving range is is only 17km less than the single motor version at 487km. It has been verified via the Worldwide Harmonised Light-Duty Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP), which is the benchmark measurement for EV ranges.During our time behind the wheel we have seen the Ariya Evolve e-4orce deliver less than 400km per charge. CarsGuide’s previous experience with the Ariya single motor variant has seen it deliver more than 500km per charge.Another reason to not go the dual motor route for your EV is your wallet. Ditching the second motor will save you big time, or about $8000 if you are shopping for an Ariya. This does include a few specification differences, but nothing life changing.The extra motor also requires more space, and as nearly every automotive engineer has told me over the past few decades, saving weight and space are the two biggest challenges they face.In the Ariya's case the extra motor eats into the boot space, dropping it from 466 litres in single-motor guise to 406 litres in the dual-motor version. There is no spare tyre either, with owners making do with a fiddly tyre repair kit that doesn't pass the pub test.This packaging issue affects all dual motor EVs, and all-wheel drive petrol and diesel cars, so it is not an isolated issue.Having all-wheel drive does add some benefits.The Ariya Evolve e-4orce is exceptionally composed and poised in the wet, with it handling Sydney summer storm downpours with ease, where front- or rear-wheel drive vehicles can slip and struggle to put the power down in greasy wet conditions.Lets not forget the second motor brings plenty of extra grunt, too.The Ariya Evolve e-4orce pumps up the outputs to a beefy 320kW and 600Nm, which is good enough to drop the zero to 100km sprint time to 5.6 seconds.You might not want your family electric SUV to go that fast, but there are plenty out there who do.I think the sweet spot for most electric car ranges, including the Ariya, is the single-motor version that delivers a real-world driving range of more than 500km.That 500km range appears to be the marker that removes most of the range anxiety.Moving along from the all-wheel drive/dual-motor conundrum I’ve been dealing with the past six weeks, the Ariya has shown off some of its quality.Without a doubt the Ariya’s cabin is its standout feature. It is a warm, comfortable and inviting space for my family of four.Child seats — front and rear facing — fit in the back pew with ease, and the supple Nappa leather-trimmed seat upholstery is easy to wipe down if needed.The Ariya’s egg-shape gives it a lofty feeling inside, with the high roof — along with the full length panoramic sunroof — giving it an airy feel that few can match.A head-up display — which projects vital information such as your travelling speed, prevailing speed limit and safety warnings onto the windscreen in front of the driver — should be standard on every car.It reduces distraction and means you are unlikely to ever creep over the speed limit. Speed bracket creep is a real thing in EVs, where there are often no audible cues to you accelerating as there is with petrol or diesel vehicles.The cabin materials are excellent, with plush and high-end elements throughout.Many passengers were impressed by the haptic button integrated in the faux wood dash trim and centre console. You can control some climate functions and switch the drive modes and engage the single pedal driving functions with these buttons.There are still some functions, such as more advanced climate and comfort controls, buried in the touchscreen.Nissan’s multimedia software falls behind tech-leading alternatives from newer brands.The centre console is bulky but lacks any proper storage options.As mentioned earlier, the boot is on the small side. It isn’t horrendously small, but squeezing everything in for a family of four is a struggle I often lose. A slow leak in the tyre meant a running repair needed to be done by the dealer, but the lack of a space saver or full size spare meant negotiating with the tyre repair kit. And I don’t negotiate with terrorists. It was easier and quicker to drive to the nearest petrol station to top up then it was to charge the inflator via the car’s 12-volt plug and then hook it up to the tyre.Next instalment we’ll give our final verdict on the Ariya Evolve e-4orce.2026 Nissan Ariya Evolve AWD Acquired: December 2025Distance travelled this month: 528kmOdometer: 6742kmAverage energy consumption this month: 20.7kWh/100km