Suzuki e Vitara News

The Nissan Qashqai is among several models to learn their safety fate as part of the latest batch of Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) ratings.The updated Qashqai family SUV has received a four-star rating, down from the five-star rating awarded in 2017.The Qashqai maintained a high child protection rating of 91 per cent, but it saw substantial drops in the Adult Protection, Vulnerable User Protection as well as Safety Assist categories.The 78 per cent Adult Protection rating was in significant part due the front structure of the car presenting a moderate risk to occupants of oncoming vehicles in the frontal offset test.Its Vulnerable Road User Protection rating was at 68 per cent, while its Safety Assist rating was 62 per cent.The incoming Suzuki e-Vitara was also hit with a four-star rating.The e-Vitara was the first Suzuki to be tested by ANCAP since the Fronx compact SUV. The Fronx was subject to a major recall following its one-star rating, with ANCAP urging people to not travel in the rear seats of the car.With a 77 per cent Adult Protection rating, the e-Vitara had marginal protection for the driver’s chest and adequate protection for the passenger’s chest, with good protection elsewhere.The car was also marked down due to the lack of a centre airbag, according to ANCAP.The safety regulator’s Chief Executive Officer Carla Hoorweg acknowledged the safety improvement from Suzuki.“It’s encouraging to see improvements in safety performance across the market, this latest rating achieved by the e-Vitara is evidence Suzuki can produce a model that offers sound levels of safety performance,” Hoorweg said.There were new five-star ratings for the revamped Audi A3 hatchback and the Q3 compact SUV. The A3 was awarded 86 per cent for Adult Protection and 80 per cent for Child Occupant Protection, while the Q3 got 87 per cent and 86 per cent, respectively.The other car to earn a five-star rating was the updated Cupra Leon hatchback. It received 88 per cent for Adult Protection and 86 per cent for Child Protection, with 82 per cent each for Vulnerable Road User Protection and Safety Assist.

The Suzuki Vitara will go down in history as one of the true pioneers of the modern automotive history.The 1988 original sparked the SUV era with its urban off-road chic, prompting Toyota to refine and greatly capitalise on the concept for the seminal, first RAV4 of 1994, that instantly became the template for others to follow.Strangely, Vitara wouldn’t go full SUV until the fourth-generation arrived in mid-2015, after years of holding on to Suzuki’s proper 4x4 roots in the same way that the ultra-successful Jimny still does today.That Vitara, known as the LY series, remains current to this day, helped by great design and superb proportions that have helped keep the Japanese SUV from The Grim Reaper all this time.It’s also a sporty and even fun drive, with direct steering, predictable handling and an actual, torque-converter automatic transmission, instead of the continuous variable transmission (CVT) alternative favoured by many, far-more mundane rivals.But there-in lays the problem with the latest, Series III facelift, released earlier this year and now dubbed the Vitara Hybrid. Its age plus a lack of real change are really starting to show.Take, for instance, the Hybrid badge emblazoned on the (completely unchanged since 2019 Series II facelift) tailgate.Today’s small SUV buyers expecting an advanced, series-parallel hybrid petrol-electric powertrain as (again) trailblazed by Toyota nearly 30 years ago will, instead, be met with a mild-hybrid system with a 48-volt integrated starter motor generator acting as an electric motor, and small 48V 8Ah lithium-ion battery. Admittedly, that’s more than what Mazda’s so-called “M Hybrid” system provides, but that’s not saying a lot.Though Suzuki’s hybrid does add an additional 12kW/50Nm of power and torque respectively, adding 15Nm more torque overall than before, the ageing 1.4-litre four-cylinder turbo ‘Boosterjet’ engine it is paired to is 21 per cent less powerful than the proceeding non-electrified version.That would be OK if there was a corresponding 21 per cent drop in fuel consumption, but the ADR 81/02 consumption figures have only edged down incrementally, by 0.1 and 0.3 litres per 100km depending on grade compared to before. The best average figure is 5.8L/100m, which is only in the region of a 1.7 to four per cent slide.If you’re seeking a Vitara Hybrid with Toyota-hybrid levels of fuel economy, you may be disappointed, as the larger Corolla Cross hybrid returns 4.2L/100km while the smaller Yaris Cross hybrid is at just 3.8L/100km.Especially as the Suzuki also prefers to sip from the more-expensive premium unleaded petrol bowser.And speaking of prices, there’s the $39,990 drive-away pricing for the base Vitara Hybrid 2WD, extending to $45,990 for the (albeit better-equipped) AWD version.That’s a lot more than what the preceding non-Hybrid 1.6-litre model started at (from $31,990 before on-road costs), though – in fairness to the company – reflects the huge increase in the cost of shipping from the Hungary plant that provides Australia with its Vitaras.But that’s somewhat more than the Yaris Cross GX hybrid’s $31,790 and just a bit under the larger Corolla Cross GX hybrid’s $37,440 (both before on-road costs), and exactly the same as the Honda HR-V e:HEV starts at (returning 4.3L/100km), which, like the Toyotas, is newer, more-modern and technically-advanced than the Suzuki.Surely 11 years of production have amortised the development costs of the fourth-gen Vitara. Shouldn’t it be cheaper as a result?The last point about modernity is also obvious inside, as the Vitara continues with much the same dashboard design, layout and hardware as the 2015 original. Again, back then, Suzuki’s stylists were clearly ahead of the game, as the basics remain sound and the whole thing is well built, but there is very little for current owners to trade-up to the 2026 model when, trim changes, digital speedo, updated multimedia set-up and removal of the analogue clock in the centre air vent aside, the cabin feels nearly identical. And, in contrast, every rival seems at least one-generation newer inside.What we’re saying is that the Vitara remains a good car, but one that cannot compete on value for money, fuel economy or performance compared to its many, fierce strong-hybrid competitors from Japan, South Korea, China and Europe. Expectations must be tempered.Throw in a now-void five-star ANCAP crash-test rating (it expired years ago due to age), as well as a very average five-year warranty against some others’ seven and even conditional 10-year schemes, and we reckon we deserve a newer, better Suzuki small SUV.Luckily, the e-Vitara all-electric small SUV looks very, very promising, so don’t dismiss Suzuki yet. Let’s just hope the pricing is as sharp as the styling and packaging are.Watch this space.