Mercedes-Benz G63 vs Range Rover Velar

What's the difference?

The Mercedes-AMG G 63 isn't for shrinking violets. It's bold, fast, and loud, and in second-generation form massively improved dynamically and technically. It's a lot of money, but there's a lot to love, and here's hoping it stays around for decades to come.

The Range Rover Velar P400e looks damn sexy and is large enough to house your family comfortably while still being easy to manoeuvre around town.

But I’m not a fan of these luxury brands forcing you to pay extra for what should be standard features when you’re at this grade level and price point. This is a model I’d pay close attention to in terms of the optional trims required to maintain a high-end feel.

But the powertrain works quite well here and it has pleasant on-road manners.

The original (W460) G-Glass, then known as the G-Wagen (or Geländewagen for cross-country vehicle), was launched in 1979 as an ultra-capable off-roader, soon favoured by armies the world over. Arriving here in 1982, its distinctive, slab-sided form remained unchanged over the best part of four decades.

At close to 4.8m nose-to-tail, more than 1.8m across, and a bit over 1.9m tall, the G 63 is now longer (+110mm), wider (+106mm), and fractionally lower overall (-13mm), but still pulls off a convincing impersonation of a bread box.

Merc-AMG confidently quotes a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.55 for the G 63, which isn't as bad as a brick (around 2.0… I Googled it) although it is in the same league as a heavy truck.

But it's the car's unique, upright stance, complete with pumped wheelarches and old-school flat glass, that sets it apart and draws people in. Looking more like a take-no-prisoners, functional device than a luxury cruiser, I can assure you it attracts as many admiring looks and comments as a low-flying supercar wedge.

The new-gen G 63 features AMG's vertically slatted 'Panamericana' grille, and our test example was fitted with the optional 'Night Package' ($5900) adding a range of dark exterior details including tinted indicator lenses, dark tinted glass, black exterior mirror shells and spare wheel ring, other black trim pieces and painted areas, as well as 22-inch AMG forged alloy rims.

Also worth noting, Merc has retained the G-Class's solid metal door handles, complete with the mechanism's unmistakable 'click-clack' opening and closing sound. Nice touch.

Inside, the biggest change is the upgrade from a conventional dual-gauge instrument cluster and central media stack to a pair of 12.3-inch digital screens, forming a sleek widescreen display, and bringing the G 63 in line with other recent Merc offerings.

Similarly, the gearshift moves from a traditional console-mounted set-up to Merc's 'Direct Select' lever on the steering column (exactly where the indicator stalk is located in 90 per cent of right-hand drive cars).  And the standard flat-bottom, leather-trimmed 'AMG Performance' steering wheel is a racy addition.

Like the exterior door handles, another tip of the hat to the car's heritage is retention of the horizontal grab handle ahead of the front passenger on the dash above the glove box. Nice to have something to hold on to if the going gets rough.

Land Rover hasn’t updated the exterior looks of the Velar and for good reason. It is almost flawless in how sleek and sexy it looks. It hovers between its larger Ranger Rover siblings and the more nimble-looking Discovery Sport.

There is still a distinctly ‘Range Rover’ vibe but it looks more agile and fun than its bigger siblings. But while its external looks are beautiful, the cabin loses me.

It’s even more pared back now than the pre-facelifted model and while the minimalistic style will appeal to some it doesn’t tick the luxury factor box for me.

There are too many plain and empty spaces in the dashboard and doors. The multimedia system has been updated to the cool 11.4-inch floating-effect screen but all the buttons and dials are gone. So, there’s even less going on and it makes you 100 per cent reliant on the screen.

And funnily enough, the grey knit fabric and synthetic material that’s used in the upholstery and trims is an optional extra and replaces Windsor leather. The knit-fabric adds some warmth but the black synthetic stuff is awful to touch or clean and reminds me too much of neoprene-style wetsuit material.

The large panoramic sunroof keeps the cabin feeling bright and cheery when it's open, though.

The G-Class has never been a particularly squeezy proposition for passengers or cargo, but an extra 40mm in the wheelbase adds even more breathing space.

Getting in is the first step, and it's a big one. At 183cm tall, in an athletic mood, I could grab the A-pillar and swing up into the driver's seat in one vaguely respectable movement.

But, those side steps aren't just for show, and at the end of a long day provide a handy staging camp between terra firma and the lofty pilot's chair.

Once on-board there's plenty of room up front, with adequate storage including a bin between the seats (now with a double door opening rather than a single hinged lid), a modest glove box, oddments space and two cupholders in the centre console, and bins with space for bottles in the doors.

There's a 12-volt power outlet in the front, second row and cargo area, while there are two USB ports in the centre console bin and a charging USB port in the second row.

In the back I could have donned a dusty Akubra and still had headroom to spare, with generous foot room, and a substantial gap between my knees and the driver's seat (set to my position).

A fold-down armrest incorporates a pair of cupholders (as well as a through-port to the cargo space for long items) and there are map pockets on the front seat backs as well as space for bottles in the doors. Two adjustable air vents in the rear of the front centre console, and another pair in the B-pillars also provide climate-controlled air to those in the rear.

With the rear seats upright boot volume is quoted at 454 litres (VDA); enough to easily swallow our three-piece hard suitcase set (35, 68 and 105 litres) or the CarsGuide pram, or a largest-suitcase-and-pram combo.

There are tie-down shackles in each corner of the floor, usefully bright lighting, a netted storage area on the passenger side (containing five fluorescent emergency vests), and folding the 60/40 split rear seat liberates even more space.

Unfortunately, gaining access to that load space is fraught with compromise. First, the single-piece rear door hinges vertically and opens from right to left. No problem when you've nosed into a shopping centre space, but not so great when you're parking nose-to-tail on the left-hand side of the road.

That means you typically have a small space between you and the car behind to get the door open, and when it is at 90 degrees, you're blocked from unloading things onto the footpath until you've shut the door.

As well as that, the door has a full-size spare (alloy) wheel and tyre attached to it. Good because a full-size spare is welcome, and bad because it makes the already bulky door even heavier.

Those keen on towing things will be pleased to hear the G 63 is rated to haul up to 3.5 tonnes of braked trailer and 750kg unbraked.

Practicality on a whole is pretty good in the Velar and that comes down mostly to the space provided for each occupant and the high-end tech.

Up front, there is a lot of head- and legroom for my 168cm height and even when you have a co-pilot you’re not jockeying for elbow room.

The seats are very comfortable as they’re well-cushioned and feature excellent lumbar support. I miss a seat heat function on colder days but you can easily do a long trip in the Velar and not feel too fatigued.

The 214mm ground clearance has made it an easy SUV to get in and out of, for me and my seven-year old. Annoyingly, though, some of the doors don't close properly unless you slam them.

The individual storage is a bit less than you might expect as there's not a lot of centre console storage for little items but you still get a small glove box and middle console, two cupholders, two drink bottle holders and a phone cubby up front.

The back seat offers enough space for me to be comfortable but I did have a comment from my dad, who is 183cm, that it was a smidge squishy for him.

The seats are comfortable and amenities are good with two USB-C ports, a 12-volt socket, directional air vents, map pockets and a fold-down armrest with two cupholders. There are storage bins but they're very shallow.

Because of the sleek rear shaping, the boot space is smaller than most of its rivals at 625L when all seats are in use. It’s large enough for my gear and you should still be able to stack luggage easily for a road trip.

The technology on offer is pretty darn good. The multimedia system takes a while to get used to but once you do, it's an easy enough system to get around but not having any buttons/dials means you tend to look at it more than I like while on the go.

Unlike the Disco Sport I was just in, which features the same system, there have been no issues with connectivity with my iPhone with the Bluetooth or wireless Apple CarPlay. There’s also Android Auto and the built-in satellite navigation is top-notch.

I've already mentioned the rear charging options but up front you're spoiled for choice with a USB-A port, three USB-C ports and a wireless charging pad.

The Velar is offered in three variants with a choice of four powertrains spread between them. The model I'm testing is the plug-in hybrid mid-level HSE Dynamic in P400e form, which sits right behind the flagship Autobiography.

The P400e is priced from $143,508, before on-road costs, and sits close to the middle of the pack compared to its rivals.

The Volvo XC90 Recharge Ultimate PHEV comes in as the most affordable at $128,990 MSRP, then the BMW X5 xDrive50e M Sport PHEV at $149,900 MSRP.

Even with our model's optioned extras, the Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid PHEV sits a country-mile above them all at $178,300 MSRP (thus it's a 'stretch').

Our test model has a few optioned extras, including a 'Dynamic Handling Pack' for $1750, a black contrast roof ($1420), ash veneer trim ($930), rear privacy glass ($890), 21-inch diamond turned alloys ($780), non-leather premium steering wheel ($750), black synthetic leather upholstery ($700), cabin lighting ($540), rear seat remote levers ($300) and 'Terrain Response' ($430).

That all equates to an extra $8490 and brings the total before on-roads costs price tag to $151,565.

Standard technology features that are included are an 11.4-inch touchscreen multimedia system, 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, built-in satellite navigation, wireless connectivity for Apple CarPlay, wired Android Auto, Amazon Alexa app, dual-zone climate control, a wireless charging pad, five USB-C ports, one USB-A port, two 12-volt sockets and a Meridian sound system with digital radio.

Other features include pixel LED headlights, panoramic sunroof, keyless-entry, push-button start, rear fog lights, powered front seats, run-flat tyres, a powered boot lid and a tyre pressure monitoring system.

Annoyingly, a lot of luxury features have to be added at additional cost and given the price tag it's odd there are no heat or ventilation functions for the seats, no heat function for the steering wheel, no climate control for the rear or even a head-up display.

So, it feels a bit bare on features once you start to compare the Velar to some of its rivals, like the well-specified and more affordable Volvo.

The G 63's 4.0-litre (M177) all-alloy V8 is closed deck design using direct-injection and a pair of twin-scroll turbos to produce 430kW at 6000rpm and no less than 850Nm from 2500-3500rpm. That's 10kW/90Nm more than the 5.5-litre twin-turbo V8 it replaces!

To improve throttle response and optimise efficiency, the turbos are located inside the engine's 'V', improving air flow and shortening the distance from the exhaust side to the turbos, and in turn, from the turbos to the inlet side.

And the housings on the twin-scroll turbos are divided into two parallel flow channels connecting with separate ducts in the exhaust manifold, allowing fine management of the exhaust gas coming in and pressure going out. Result is more torque and even better response times.

Drive goes to all four wheels via a new 'AMG Speedshift' nine-speed, dual-clutch auto (replacing the previous seven-speed auto transmission) with paddle shifters and a multiple downshift function which will go to the lowest ratio possible as you keep squeezing the shift paddle.

The 'AMG Performance 4Matic' all wheel drive system is front/rear biased 40/60 (50/50 in the previous model), although if you want to head off-highway the G 63 still features three 100 per cent diff locks and low-range off-road gear reduction.

The Range Rover Velar P400e's plug-in hybrid powertrain combines a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo-petrol engine with an electric motor to deliver 297kW of power and 640Nm of torque.

The Velar features an eight-speed auto transmission and is an AWD. With that optioned Terrain Response feature, it can do some mild off-road adventuring or tackle a trip to the ski-fields with relative ease.

Claimed fuel economy for the combined (ADR 81/02 - urban, extra-urban) cycle is 13.1L/100km, with the 4.0-litre, twin-turbo V8 emitting 299g/km of CO2 in the process.

Despite the fact cylinder management tech means the engine will run on four cylinders under light load, and start-stop (with 'glide mode') is standard, we managed 16.7L/100km (measured at the bowser) over a mix of city, suburban and freeway running. To be expected for such a big bus, especially one that constantly tempts you into squeezing the throttle just to hear the exhaust bellow.

Minimum fuel requirement is 98 RON premium unleaded, and you'll need 100 litres of it to fill the tank.

The official combined fuel-cycle consumption figure is 2.2L/100km and my real-world usage came out at 6.0L/100km after doing mostly open-road trips with some urban stuff thrown in.

I have charged it to full twice with a few (small) charging moments scattered in between as that’s been realistic for life this week. 

Claimed pure electric driving range is 69km but expect closer to 50km in the real-world. 

Based on my real-world consumption and the 69L fuel tank, expect a theoretical driving range of 1150km.

The only draw back with a PHEV is the charging element as you get the best economy if you charge it to full every time you drive, and that's not always realistic!

The P400e has a Type 2 CCS charging port, so you can hook it up to a fast charger. On a 50kW system you can go from 0-80 per cent in 30 minutes and on a 7.0kW system, you can go from 0-100 per cent in two-hours and 12-minutes.

On a standard domestic socket, expect to leave on overnight for a 0-100 per cent fill.

Land Rover recommends a minimum 95 RON premium unleaded petrol for the Velar.

Let's cut to the chase. The G 63's pure grunt overpowers its challenging aero profile to thrust this boom box on wheels from 0-100km/h in a claimed 4.5 seconds. And believe it or not, despite its greater length and width, it has enough power to punch a 240km/h hole in the air (maximum velocity is limited to 220km/h if you choose not to opt for the 'AMG Driver's Package').

The new electronic architecture brings with it the latest version of Merc's 'Dynamic Select' system with five driving modes adjusting the engine, transmission, suspension, steering and assistance systems right up to maximum attack Sport+ mode.

All 850Nm of peak torque is available between 2500-3500rpm and pinning the throttle anywhere in that band feels like lining up a runway and preparing to rotate for take-off.

The two-stage exhaust flap arrangement allows you to turn the noise up from growl to roar even at modest around town speeds, and the nine-speed transmission is sharp and positive, with the multiple downshift function (in manual mode) hilariously good fun.

The racy AMG sports seats are as grippy as they are comfortable, and the fat 295/40 Goodyear Eagle F1 rubber, wrapped around the optional 22-inch forged alloys, does a good job of keeping all that mass and momentum in control as the high riding G 63 careens around corners.

And speaking of mass, the job of hauling it from warp speed to rest sits with big ventilated discs all around (cross-drilled 400mm front/370mm rear), clamped by monster six piston calipers at the front and single piston at the back. They're progressive and reassuringly powerful.

So, the performance is as dramatic as ever, but when I think of previous Merc-AMG G-Class offerings, two main shortcomings come to mind... steering and ride.

The steering was like a laggy mouse, with a few beats separating input at the wheel from response at the front treads. And the damping came up short, with a bouncy ride par for the course.

Still sitting on a ladder-type frame, the new G's suspension was developed by Mercedes-Benz and Mercedes-AMG. And finally, it has a decent double-wishbone independent front-end, with a rigid axle at the rear and coil springs all around. Plus, a strut tower brace, Merc-AMG calls it a 'suspension bridge', now connects the front strut towers, increasing torsional rigidity.

Ride comfort, especially in the most compliant 'Ride Control' suspension setting and riding on the big 22s, is massively better. It's no limo. You'll still feel jittering over higher frequency imperfections. But it's way, way ahead of the first-gen version.

The steering system changes from a recirculating ball to rack and pinion, and is now variable ratio with electro-mechanical rather than purely hydraulic assistance. And it's also much improved. We're not talking about a Lotus Elise-style connection with the road, but the steering is clearly more predictable and responsive.

One thing that hasn't changed is an ocean liner-worthy, 13.6m turning circle. You'll need to plan ahead for U-turns and reverse parks, but enough parking cameras (including surround view) to please Cecil B DeMille are on hand to help.

It's like a whole new world with a familiar cover wrapped around a markedly improved package. But (there must be a but) visibility is still compromised by thick window and door pillars, and despite the new dash layout ergonomic efficiency is patchy, with some switches and knobs located in relatively awkward positions.

As mentioned earlier the G 63 features three 100 per cent diff locks and low-range off-road gear reduction. But forget breakover angles and wading depths. This 4x4 seeing off-road action is as likely as an Abbott 2.0 prime ministership.

Suffice it to say, this car wears the 'Schöckl' badge at the base of its B-pillar. And in case you were wondering, Schöckl is a 1445m mountain in Graz, the Austrian city where the G-Class is built (and big Arnie Schwarzenegger was born!).

In the second-gen G-Class's development, prototypes covered roughly 2000km over a five kay trail including gradients of up to 60 per cent and lateral inclines up to 40 per cent. So, despite its irrelevance, the off-highway box is ticked.

The P400e has a deep well of power to dip into and fantastic pick up when you need to overtake or get up to speed.

Like other plug-in hybrids I’ve sampled from Land Rover there's a little lag sometimes when you accelerate from a full stop but it’s not as pronounced in this model as others. 

The back brakes seem to hold a couple seconds longer than they should and if you accelerate as you would in any other car, there is a ker-clunk sound and you shift forward in your seat until they release.

This was most noticeable in stop-start city traffic and to be fair might just be a quirk on our test car and not on the model as a whole.

The switch between the electric and petrol components is mostly smooth and the cabin is refined because it’s so quiet. Pretty much no external noise makes its way inside.

I did a trip with my father-in-law this week and he said riding in the back seat was smooth, comfortable and very quiet. In fact, he fell asleep not long after we left! A high compliment, indeed.

The wide windows and higher ride have ensure excellent visibility but you only get a reversing camera. Yes, it’s great quality and clear but a 360-degree view system should come standard on a large SUV like this, especially considering its price tag. That being said, the P400e is still pretty easy to park.

The plug-in hybrid variant is not rated with ANCAP yet but features a good number of safety features, like blind-spot monitoring, driver attention alert, tyre pressure monitoring, rear collision warning, forward collision warning, AEB, DRLs, rear cross-traffic alert, lane keeping aid, traffic sign recognition, intelligent seatbelt warning, adaptive cruise control, reversing camera, as well as front and rear parking sensors.

It does miss out on lane departure warning and only has six airbags, which is low for a large SUV but all of the other safety tech seems well-tuned and not intrusive on everyday driving.

For any families, the Velar has ISOFIX mounts on the rear outboard seats plus three top tethers. You might get three seats installed if they’re not too big but two will fit best.

Mercedes-Benz (and by extension Mercedes-AMG) offers a three-year/unlimited km warranty with 24 hour 'Road Care' emergency roadside assistance provide for three years.

Servicing is recommended every 12 months/20,000km and a capped price servicing plan is available at Silver and Platinum levels for up to five years/100,000km.

The Range Rover Velar comes with a five-year/unlimited km warranty and the battery is covered by an eight-year/ 160,000km warranty, which is a usual term for the class now.

There is a five-year capped-price servicing program which costs a flat $2100, or $420 per service, and is more affordable than a pay-as-you-go option.

Servicing intervals are very reasonable at every 12 months or 20,400km, whichever occurs first.

You also get five years roadside assistance through Assist Australia as a part of your servicing plan.