Ford Ranger vs Foton T5

What's the difference?

The Ford Ranger is a strong starting point for a plug-in hybrid upgrade. And there are valid pros accompanying the addition of a high-voltage battery. But those benefits aren’t primarily seen on the road.

In fact, given its higher price, the Ranger PHEV loses out when compared to its BYD and GWM rivals, which offer more features and a far higher EV range at lower prices.

The Ranger doesn’t compromise its ‘ute-ness’ as its rivals do in different ways. But its target audience is likely relatively small. One that's willing to fork out for a capable, comfortable ute that can power a campsite or run tools on the job.

If you want an EV that just looks like a ute, this isn’t it. But if you're after a dual cab that can do proper ute things, with a bonus when it comes to efficiency and convenience, you’ll need deep pockets.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The T5 EV would be best suited to short-haul city and suburban tasks, with daily back-to-base operations ensuring the convenient and dependable charging infrastructure required (compared to the lottery of public charging). Given Foton’s claim of upfront and operational cost reductions, the T5 EV could be what some commercial fleet managers are looking for. 

The Ford Ranger is still one of the best-looking utes available, with a strong brand identity and a lack of design features that lean into trends - perhaps aside from the ‘C-shaped’ DRL signature.

There are only a few hints that any given Ranger you might be looking at is a plug-in hybrid, with the vehicle’s panels and general design features looking primarily the same.

The most obvious change is fender badging that outs the Ranger as a ‘PHEV’, though its lettering isn’t too ‘shouty’.

But to those more familiar with the Ranger, or anyone able to have a proper look around a PHEV, there are a couple of other giveaways.

For example, the Ranger plug-in has a new set of wheel designs that range from the 17-inch alloys on the XLT to the Stormtrak-specific 18s featuring 'Chill Grey' inserts as trim accents.

The Stormtrak can also be had in Chill Grey, the colour being exclusive to that variant along with the aforementioned unique trim design.

There are also plug outlets in the ute’s tub for access to the Ranger’s battery power. Harder to spot if you’re looking at one of the higher-spec variants that feature a roller cover.

Inside, it’s a similar story with the PHEV’s interior being standard Ranger fare aside from the button that controls its EV modes.

The T5 EV has a 3360mm wheelbase and steel ladder-frame chassis, with a leaf-spring solid front axle, leaf-spring rear axle and rear-wheel drive. Braking is by front discs and rear drums.

Its 81.14kWh of energy capacity is provided by two 60Ah lithium-ion batteries, one on each side, mounted in long parallel cradles. Drivetrain maintenance items, including motor and battery cooling systems, are accessed by unlocking and tilting the hinged cab forward.

The cab offers sufficient head, shoulder and legroom for up to three occupants, including tall people in the often-compromised centre seat. However, the centre seat is only equipped with a lap-belt.

The Ford Ranger’s interior is impressive for a dual-cab ute when it comes to layout and functionality.

A large 12-inch touchscreen dominates the central space on the dash, but there are still physical controls for the climate settings and the screen has shortcuts to main functions thanks to Ford’s 'Sync' software.

A big 12.4-inch driver display is similarly handy, being clear in its layout and able to be customised to the extent you’d expect from a modern bit of kit.

As mentioned, in the XLT you miss out on a few goodies, but the phone charger found in other variants is placed out of the way, under the screen and behind the gear shift.

Cupholders are similarly out of the way of any buttons or controls, and the gear-shifter itself is mercifully a traditional one rather than a dial or buttons.

With everything in an ergonomically sensible place, it’s similarly comforting that the seats and the steering wheel can be adjusted to find a suitable position.

It’s still a dual-cab ute, so don’t anticipate ‘melt-into-the-seat’ levels of comfort, but the space on offer in the front and rear seats is enough for an adult to feel at ease on even a long trip.

Behind the cabin, there’s space for two euro pallets according to Ford, with a payload as high as 973kg for the XLT. The Stormtrak’s 808kg payload is the lowest of the bunch, with Sport (934kg) and Wildtrak (885kg) slotting in between.

There’s a spare tyre underneath the tub and the ability to tow a 3500kg braked trailer - all combining to make it the most functional workhorse on offer in the plug-in hybrid ute segment. The GWM Cannon Alpha PHEV can tow 3.5-tonne and the BYD Shark 6’s payload is okay, but neither can do it all.

That said, the Ranger falls short in the plug-in game, which we’ll get to shortly.

With a maximum claimed kerb weight of 2500kg, the T5 EV has a 2000kg payload rating for car licence operation and up to 3500kg for drivers with a Light Rigid truck licence (these payloads include the weight of service bodies).

Its 8000kg GCM (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) means car licence drivers can tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer while carrying its maximum payload. For Light Rigid drivers, the maximum trailer weight drops to 2000kg, given the larger payload allowance.

The Pantech body fitted to our test vehicle has twin rear doors, with 270-degree opening and sturdy hooks on the body sides to hold them in place.

Cabin storage includes narrow bins but no bottle-holders in the doors, an overhead storage shelf on the driver’s side, a small compartment with spring-loaded lid in the dash and a single glovebox.

The centre console only offers a single bottle-holder. However, the centre seat backrest folds forward and flat to reveal a small desk on the back of it, complete with a hidden storage compartment and two cup/bottle-holders.

The T5 EV cab-chassis comes equipped with a single electric motor and 81.14kWh battery capacity for MSRP of $139,450 plus GST. 

Standard equipment includes 16-inch alloy wheels (dual rears) with 205/75R16 LT tyres and a full-size spare, seating for three, remote central-locking and height/reach adjustable steering wheel.

There’s also a reversing radar and camera, cabin roof air-deflector, lower rear and side guards, 24-volt dash socket and basic multimedia including radio, Bluetooth and MP3/MP5 connectivity.

The Ranger PHEV remains an off-road-capable 4x4 ute, with all four wheels receiving power. But the drivetrain is not your standard Ranger gear.

Ford’s 2.3-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder 'EcoBoost' engine does the heavy lifting, aided by an electric motor mounted between it and the transmission.

The engine isn’t unproven in the ute game. In fact, it’s found in some variants of the current-gen Ranger’s cousin, the Volkswagen Amarok.

In the Ranger PHEV, it makes 138kW and 411Nm which, paired with the 75kW electric motor, contributes to a total 207kW and 697Nm output, transferred to all four wheels via Ford’s 10-speed automatic transmission.

Of course, the ute’s 4WD system is able to be set to '2H', '4A', '4H' or '4L' and has a rear diff-lock to assist in traversing tricky terrain.

The T5 EV’s single electric motor has a peak power output of 115kW and maximum torque of 300Nm. It also offers two drive modes: ‘Eco’ which minimises energy use with a top speed of 73km/h and ‘Power’ which uses more battery charge but increases top speed to 94km/h (both speeds achieved during our test).

Ford claims the Ranger PHEV sips 2.9L/100km according to NEDC testing, but like many plug-in hybrids that would be difficult to achieve without constantly stopping to charge.

It’s also only able to charge the 11.8kWh lithium-ion battery at a 3.5kW rate under AC power and it takes around four hours to do so. There’s no DC fast charging.

It’s got a 70-litre fuel tank, and requires minimum 91 RON petrol.

During the launch drive, the highest figure reasonable driving produced in terms of a fuel consumption on the trip computer was 9.6L/100km during battery charging.

So, while theoretical range is around 2400km, that closer to real-world number reduces the distance between fills to a still useful 730km.

Ford didn’t offer an expected general consumption figure for ‘low-power’ driving - i.e. while the battery isn’t being actively charged but also isn’t carrying enough juice to fully propel the ute.

Foton does not publish an official kWh/100km consumption figure, but claims a fully loaded driving range of 180km from its 81.14kWh battery capacity.

According to the dash readouts at the end of our test, which we did on a single charge, we drove 142km with 38km of estimated range remaining. Our displayed average consumption was 51.3kWh/100km, so based on that figure you could expect a driving range of around 160km, which is less than the dash estimate.

Our testing was conducted without a load (see Driving) but it did include considerable freeway travel required to collect and return the vehicle, so regenerative braking was minimal. And we had to use Power mode to maintain freeway speeds.

Foton claims that DC fast-charging allows for a full recharge in 1.5 hours, while the 11kW onboard AC charger takes 7.2 hours which is suitable to overnight turnarounds.

During a presentation and Q&A to media before the launch drive program, the Ford Australia team was keen to spruik how handy the PHEV’s battery would be for things like powering worksite equipment or for use during camping trips.

Alternately, focus on how the battery might come into play while on the road was modest. And behind the wheel it became clear why.

On-paper, the 49km electric driving range seems handy, but the NEDC testing which produced that figure is known for being optimistic.

On top of that, the launch program's highway driving wasn’t prime EV territory. In fact, we were encouraged to keep the cars in ‘charge’ mode to leave enough electric power in reserve to experience the Ranger PHEV’s off-road capabilities.

As mentioned, fuel consumption doesn’t exactly skyrocket even while the engine is charging the battery, but to make the most of the Ranger’s EV range you’d want to have a relatively short commute.

In terms of its on-road manners, the Ranger’s status as a benchmark for the category means even with the extra weight of the battery, the PHEV performs well.

Its 75kW EV output means driving under the electric motor’s power alone is reserved for low speed, but it does well to boost the torque provided by the engine. While it’s no sports car, it doesn’t feel sluggish.

The Ranger’s suspension does well to balance relative softness when it comes to bumps and rough surfaces without feeling like it doesn’t have the ute's weight under control.

If you want the best on-road driving experience from a Ranger, a V6-powered variant will provide the balance of comfort and power you seek.

Off-road, the PHEV’s capability is likely more than enough for most weekend warriors.

The electrified ute’s ability to use battery and engine to carefully cover terrain that would likely intimidate any off-road beginner is impressive. But we'll wait until we can get the Ranger PHEV onto home turf for a proper off-highway test before making a definitive judgement.

There are large handles on the windscreen pillars to assist climbing aboard and the driving position offers adequate comfort, with its steering wheel adjustments and left footrest. However, some rake adjustment in the flat base cushion would be welcome, as it can feel like you're sliding forward at times.

The drive selector dial on the console has three settings (Reverse, Neutral, Drive) marked by the letters R-D-N, so it’s simple to use. Because of its near-silent operation at low speeds, the T5 EV is equipped with an audible pedestrian warning system. This activates at speeds below 30km/h and makes a unique sound that defies description.

We drove in Eco mode when not on the freeway and found that its quiet and smooth surge of acceleration was more than adequate for a vehicle weighing more than 2.5 tonnes. We did briefly try the Power mode but did not detect a significant boost in performance.

It has good steering feel (with electric power assistance) and its noticeable lightness at low speeds is appreciated when manoeuvring in tight spots. The brake pedal provides vigorous response and a strong regenerative effect (as displayed on the energy gauge) that optimises battery range.

The instrument display shows drive mode, estimated driving range, battery charge and temperature, energy use, average energy consumption and other useful data relating to drivetrain operation. Useful enhancements would be speed-sign recognition and a clearer image for the reversing camera.

Although almost silent under 60km/h, increased noise at freeway speeds includes some faint drivetrain hum and wind-buffeting around the large door mirrors, which compensate by offering excellent rear vision.

We didn’t get to do our usual GVM test, due to a software glitch in the public charging facilities we arranged to use on the day. Back-to-base operations with in-house charging would avoid these issues.

Includes driver and passenger airbags plus AEB, lane departure warning, hill-start assist, traction control and other active safety features. There’s also the low-speed pedestrian warning system, reversing camera/radar/buzzer, fire extinguisher, unlocked cab warning and more. The lap-belt for the centre passenger seat, though, needs upgrading to a full lap-sash type.

Ford’s five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Ranger PHEV, but like all electrified Fords there’s an eight-year or 160,000km warranty on the high-voltage battery.

Ford also has set pricing for the first five years of servicing at a reasonable $399 per service, with the recommended interval set at 12 months or 15,000km.

Five years/200,000km warranty plus an eight years/300,000km traction battery warranty. Also 24/7 roadside assist. Scheduled servicing every 12 months/20,000km whichever occurs first. Total scheduled servicing cost for five years/200,000km is $7850 or a pricey average of $1570 per year. No capped-price servicing is offered.