Articles by Graham Smith

Nissan was relatively late into the compact SUV market, arriving here in the wake of the trail blazing Toyota RAV4 and the popular Honda CR- V, but when it did hit the market it did so with a thoroughly competent vehicle in the X-Trail.The T31 was an all-new model launched late in 2007, initially in all-petrol form, but with a turbo-diesel option from 2008. With its rugged looks, practical cabin, gutsy petrol engine and its clever all-mode 4WD system it won its share of followers, but the diesel was really the icing on the cake.There were two versions of the turbo-diesel engine, one that came with the auto transmission that was less powerful, and one you got with the manual gearbox that boasted more performance. While most buyers would probably prefer the automatic transmission variant for its smooth driveability around town it's important to understand that it has a lower towing capacity than the variant with the manual gearbox. When hooked up to the manual the towing capacity is a hefty 2000 kg, but with the auto it drops to just 1350 kg.Nissan's smart all-mode drive system gave the driver the option at the flick of a switch of 2-wheel drive, 4-wheel drive, or a combination of both in which the system chose which drive was needed for the conditions of the moment.The cabin was roomy and flexible, but if there was a criticism it was the central location of the instruments, which meant the driver had to take his/her eyes off the road for an instant to check speed and other vitals.That aside the interior was spacious for the class and there were lots of practical storage options. All models boasted a full-sized spare wheel mounted under the rear for better security.The T31 is still relatively new in the market and few have done high mileage, so there is little service history to report. But there are lots of the earlier T30 models that have done the big kays to have confidence that this one will go the distance without too much trouble. Both the petrol and diesel engines use chains to drive the camshafts, so the cost of servicing is reasonable. The introduction of the diesel brought with it a Diesel Particulate Filter, which periodically needs to go through a regeneration cycle. If a driver fails to complete the cycle as required it can mean a trip to the dealer to have it done and that will cost.Anyone considering converting the petrol X-Trail should think again, the LPG industry generally recommends against it. A number of X-Trails that have been converted have suffered high engine wear, which has been attributed to the engine drawing in particles of the internal structure of the catalytic converter, causing excessive wear on the cylinder bores. While it's been mostly associated with X-Trails on LPG, and blamed on the gas, there have also been reports of cars showing high oil consumption at higher odometer readings. That suggests the issue, while perhaps exacerbated by LPG, is not restricted to engines running on gas.The X-Trail uses regular unleaded fuel and Nissan approves the use of E10 ethanol blend as well.Competent, well-equipped all-rounder with intelligent 4WD system and choice of diesel engine makes it a worthy contender in the compact SUV class.

Skoda was once cheap, bland little cars built behind the Iron Curtain.They failed to get any traction here and vanished from the market almost as fast as they arrived, and no one cared. Today's Skodas are a far cry from those old models. Skoda is one of the many brands now part of the broad portfolio of VW and the cars reflect the quality and sophistication of the go-ahead German carmaker.VW launched the Skoda brand here in 2007 with the release of the Roomster and the Octavia. The Octavia was based on the VW Jetta and was built with the same quality as its VW cousin. Skoda was positioned as a more affordable brand relative to the VW range, and it came in two practical body styles, a sedan and a wagon that offers families a real alternative to an SUV. There were three levels in the range, the Ambiente, the Elegance and the RS, with a range of petrol and diesel engines, and manual and auto transmissions, all from the VW parts bin.TECHNOLOGYThere were three petrol engines, a 2.0-litre four, a 1.8-litre turbocharged four and a 2.0-litre turbo four. The non-turbo engine put out 110 kW and 200 Nm and delivered a smooth driving experience. For a little more zip there was the 1.8-litre turbo unit that punched out 118 kW and 250 Nm, while the 2.0-litre upped the ante to 147kW and 280Nm in the sporty RS. If fuel economy was your want the diesels were the way to go. The 1.9-litre engine produced 77kW and 250Nm while the 2.0-litre boasted 103kW and 320Nm. The transmission choices included 5 and 6-speed manuals, a conventional six-speed auto, and a six-speed DSG.Most models were front-wheel drive, but the Elegance and Ambiente could also be had as an AWD wagon. Ambiente models came standard with air, MP3 compatible sound, leather steering wheel, trip computer, cruise and a full-sized spare. Tick the Elegance box and you picked up larger alloys, premium sound, auto headlamps, rain-sensing wipers and climate control air. At the head of the pack the RS had even bigger alloys, firmer suspension, heated front seats and an alarm.IN THE SHOPPrecious little feedback has been received from Octavia owners, which suggests they're a happy lot. It's also a reflection of the fact the company is owned by VW and the cars are built in VW-owned and run factories with the same production standards. Ask for evidence confirming regular maintenance , and take a close look for possible crash repairs.IN A CRASHAll models were well equipped with active safety features, including ABS brakes with electronic brakeforce distribution, traction control and electronic stability control. They also had a comprehensive array of passive features, including front, side and head airbags. ANCAP rated the Ambiente at four stars when it was tested.AT THE PUMPThe turbo diesel engines delivered the best economy in the range with the 1.9-litre engine averaging 6.1L/100km and the 2.0-litre unit averaging 6.4L/100km. Averaging 8.5L/100km the 2.0-litre normally aspirated engine was the thirstiest of the bunch. Meanwhile the turbocharged petrol engines averaged 7.7 L/100 km (1.8- litre) and 7.3 L/100 km (2.0-litre) respectively.Price new: $30,990 to $39,490AT A GLANCEEngines: 2.0-litre 4-cylinder petrol, 110 kW/200 Nm, 1.8-litre turbo 4-cylinder petrol, 118 kW/250 Nm, 2.0-litre turbo 4-cylinder petrol, 147 kW/280 Nm, 1.9-litre 4-cylinder turbo diesel, 77 kW/250 Nm, 2.0-litre 4-cylinder turbo diesel, 103 kW/320 NmTransmissions: 5-speed manual, 6-speed manual, six-speed auto, six- speed DSG. FWD, AWDBodies: 4-door sedan, wagonVariants: Ambiente, Elegance, RSSafety: 4-star ANCAP.VERDICTSolid, practical family transport in a value-for-money package.RATING4 stars.

Who wants to be able to drive at the posted speed limit and know they won't be booked for speeding?But the reality is that speedos are inaccurate, that's something we have to accept, and they are allowed to be within a specified tolerance by the relevant Australian Design Rule, ADR 18.Before July 2006 the design rule specified an accuracy of plus or minus 10 percent of the vehicle's true speed when traveling above 40 km/h.That is, at a true speed of 100 km/h, the speedo could legally indicate anywhere between 90 km/h and 110 km/h. On top of that there was also a requirement for the odometer to read within plus or minus four percent of the real distance travelled.Owners of cars built before July 2006 should note the variation in speed they could see on their speedo, which could indicate a speed that is lower than the real speed at which they are driving. On those cars it is well worth checking your speedo reading against a known speed measurement, such as an overhead speed indicator that have been erected on our highways.While they too have their tolerances and can't be relied on 100 percent they can be taken as a guide to the accuracy of our speedos. After July 2006 the rule was changed and the speedo on vehicles built after that date must not read lower than the true speed of the vehicle, but is allowed to show a higher speed than the true speed by 10 percent, plus 4 km/h.Under this revision to the rule a vehicle's speedo must read between 100 km/h and 114 km/h when the true speed of the vehicle is 100 km/h, it cannot read lower than 100 km/h. Alternatively, at an indicated speed of 100 km/h the vehicle can be traveling at between 86 km/h and 100 km/h.The odometer accuracy was also changed and now has to read within plus two percent of the real distance travelled; it cannot read lower than the real distance travelled.While automotive instrument specialists can measure the accuracy of the speedo in your car there is little they can do to make it more accurate. For buyers of used cars it's worthwhile checking for modifications that might have an effect on the speedo accuracy.Things like the incorrect wheel or tyre size can have a marked effect on the reading, so to can a different differential ratio or a gearbox with different ratios.

While it began with small cars it was always Hyundai's aim to expand into more segments as it grew in this market and the Grandeur was its entry into the family car segment. Sales have been slow to be brutally honest. When it was first introduced the Hyundai brand was still finding its way with local buyers and cars like the Commodore and Falcon were the dominant players in the segment the Grandeur was in. Today, Hyundai is well and truly established with a strong reputation, which makes revisiting the Grandeur a worthwhile exercise.In 2009, Hyundai revised the specifications of the Grandeur and reduced the price in the hope of getting sales moving. There were some minor cosmetic changes in the form of a new grille, new flashers on the sides, and new alloy wheels. The features list was revised, with the sunroof, xenon low-beam headlights and pop-up rear headrests all deleted, while rain-sensitive wipers, heated front seats, and new trim was added. But perhaps the biggest news was under the bonnet where Hyundai offered a turbo-diesel engine option alongside the existing V6.The 3.8-litre V6 was unchanged with 194kW and 348Nm and delivered decent punch on the road. The 2.2-litre turbo-diesel, the same engine that powered the Santa Fe SUV, developed 114kW and 343Nm.Both engines were linked to a five-speed auto transmission that offered a manual shift option.On the road the Grandeur offered good ride quality, light steering, while the cabin was impressively roomy.IN THE SHOPFrom small beginnings the Hyundai brand has blossomed into a well- respected one with a suite of well-built, well-specced and overall reliable models.Where once CarsGuide would regularly receive complaints from Hyundai owners they are few and far between these days, which is a sure sign of improved design and production quality.Check for a service record to confirm vital maintenance has been carried out in accordance with Hyundai's service schedule, and also inspect bodywork looking for dodgy panel repairs.IN A CRASHANCAP doesn't give a rating for the Grandeur, but with ABS braking, emergency brake assistance, electronic brakeforce distribution, and electronic stability control, overlaid by front, head and side airbags it's fair to say that the Grandeur was well equipped with safety features.UNDER THE PUMPThe new turbo-diesel engine was the fuel economy star in the Grandeur range, with the company claiming 7.9L/100km as an average.The V6 petrol, which required at least 91-octane regular unleaded but would happily run on E10 blend, would average 10.8L/100km according to Hyundai.HYUNDAI GRANDEUR - 2008-2010Price new: $39,990 to $41,990Engines: 3.8-litre V6 petrol; 2.2-litre 4-cylinder turbo-dieselTransmission: 5-speed autoEconomy: 10.8 L/100 km (V6), 7.9 L/100 km (diesel)Body: 4-door sedanVariants: V6 and CRDiVERDICT Smooth driving, good-looking, comfortable prestige sedan but lacks in chassis refinement

With the focus firmly on electric cars as the preferred future form of transport, natural gas has dropped off our radar. But natural gas is here now and could be a cheap and clean alternative fuel for the medium term, if not the long term. Australia is blessed with vast reserves of natural gas and it's already being piped into our homes for use in heating and cooking, so it's a small step to using it to fuel our cars. The issue with natural gas is, like electric cars, the range you can achieve. In the case of a natural gas the volume of the tank you can realistically fit into a car determines the range. Typically, the tank you would need to do 400 km between refills is too large to be practically fitted to a passenger car. That rules natural gas (CNG) out in a single-fuel use, but it doesn't rule out its use in a dual-fuel application, much as a dual-fuel vehicle uses LPG and petrol. Systems are in place that combine CNG and petrol systems that give vehicles an attractive running cost equation along with the flexibility of use of a regular petrol-fuelled car. The natural gas is stored under pressure in a tank in the car, and fed to the engine through lines under pressure before entering the engine in much the same was as with an LPG system. The same electronics that drive the car's petrol system are used to control the CNG system, the two systems work in tandem in the same way the current fuel injection and LPG systems work together. There is little difference in the way the cars drive on CNG and petrol and there is little difference in performance once the timing is adjusted for the lower energy value of natural gas. Cars running on CNG now have a range of around 150-160 km between refills, which makes it ideal for day-to-day commuting. The issue right now is refilling the car with natural gas. There are few commercial outlets where it can be done, but that problem is likely to be solved when home refilling stations become available. They are in use in other countries and are on trial here. When they become available commuters would be able to refill their cars overnight simply by plugging into the refilling station, which would be installed in their garage at home. Refilling is a rather slow process with CNG, it could take as much as six hours to fill the tank being used in cars today, but it could easily be accomplished overnight while we're tucked up in bed and be ready to go the next morning. The advantage of CNG in a dual-fuel application, unlike an electric car, is that the same car can be used as cheap commuter during the week and a regular long distance cruiser whenever needed.

Mazda was once one of the innovators in the car industry, but somewhere in the '90s it became a follower. In short it lost its way. Fast-forward to the noughties and it had rediscovered its mojo with trendsetting models like the '6', '3' and baby '2'. By 2007 when it launched the revamped '2' the Mazda brand was

Quirky is the first word that comes to mind when thinking of Citroen. The company has always produced cars that don't fit in the box, they have sometimes been groundbreaking and innovative, but they have always been challenging.Rusted-on Citroen buyers revel in the quirkiness of their cars, they celebrate the things that separate them from the mundane pack. For others not so committed to the brand and being different, buying a Citroen is a leap of faith. It's particularly so when it comes to peoplemovers, which are dominated by the big Japanese brands.The C4 Picasso is a seven-seater peoplemover based on the mid-sized, front-wheel drive C4 hatch. Unusually for a Citroen its looks aren't challenging.DESIGNThe Picasso is a sleek, attractive vehicle, particularly in its class, which pretty much determines what it will look like.It's inside that the Picasso comes alive with a mix and match cabin layout that can be adjusted to carry pretty much anything you want, from seven people, to oodles of sports gear, camping equipment, even a spot of cargo if the need demands.There is also a large array of features to get used to, from a second rear view mirror to keep track of the kids out back, an in-dash chiller bin, a plug-in torch in the boot, picnic tables, power points, heaps of storage options, and even drop-down sunshades to cut the glare from the sweeping windscreen.You also need to get used to the steering wheel that twirls around a stationary centre boss, a tiny gearshift in the steering column, and the automatic park brake.If quirky is the first word that comes to mind when thinking of Citroen then comfort must surely be the next. Citroens have always been supremely comfortable, in seating and in ride, and the C4 Picasso is similarly so. The ride is supple, the seats plush.TECHNOLOGYThe engine choices were a 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol that boasted 103kW and 200Nm that delivered reasonable if not scintillating performance, and a 2.0-litre turbo diesel with 100 kW and 270 Nm that gave great fuel economy.DRIVINGOut on the road the C4 Picasso rides comfortably and shows good performance, but isn't the greatest handling car around. For those concerned about visibility and being able to see out of a car the Picasso is great with very good all-round visibility.IN THE SHOPCitroens are not exactly thick on the ground in this country so there isn't a lot of accumulated data about them. Generally they are well built and that seems to stand them in good stead, but buying one is a leap of faith. The other issue is that dealers aren't located on every street corner, so it's worth working out where you will have it serviced and repaired should you buy one.IN A CRASHFive stars from ANCAP is suggestion enough to tell you the C4 Picasso is a safety leader. Not surprising given that it came equipped with a comprehensive array of safety goodies, from front, side and curtain airbags, ABS brakes and electronic stability control.UNDER THE PUMPUnder test by CarsGuide the C4 Picasso diesel averaged 8.4L/100km, well above the claimed average of 7.4L/100km, but still impressive given the size and shape of the beast. The petrol version was claimed to average 8.9L/100km on the recommended 95-octane Premium unleaded. To save a few bucks Citroen says you can use E10 ethanol blend fuel.AT A GLANCEPrice new: $39,990 to $48,990Engines: 2.0-litre petrol, 103 kW/200 Nm; 2.0-litre turbo diesel, 100 kW/270 Nm.Transmission: 4-speed auto (petrol), 6-speed auto (diesel); front- wheel drive.Economy: 8.9 L/100 km (petrol), 7.4 L/100 km (diesel)Body: seven-seat peoplemoverVariants: Base and ExclusiveSafety: 5-star ANCAPExpect to pay: $20,000 to $25,500 for the base petrol model; $22,500 to $28,500 for the diesel; add $2000 to $2500 for the Exclusive.VERDICTNot as good as the Tarago, but has a great cabin with lots of useful features for the family. Definitely worth a look.

There can be no doubt that Ford had an enormous impact on the SUV scene when it launched the Territory, so much so that other carmakers, such as Toyota, simply had to respond. One of the features of the Territory that drove sales was the option of two-wheel drive. Once dismissed as a silly idea the success of the two-paw Ford made others sit up and take notice.As a result the new Toyota Kluger unveiled in 2007 came with the choice of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive. The reality of the market was that the SUV was being used as a replacement for the old station wagon, and all-wheel drive simply came as part of the package rather than a priority.The arrival of the front-wheel drive Kluger was hailed as the birth of a whole new car, at least by Toyota, who seemed to be claiming the idea as their own rather than a rip-off of Ford's.MODEL WATCHThe new Kluger was larger than the previous model, with a larger cabin, which matched or bettered the Territory in some dimensions. It also boasted more luggage space than the old model as well as a bigger third-row seat package.A larger, 3.5-litre V6 provided the power to the tune of 201kW and 337Nm, up 29 kW and 9 Nm. It was hooked up to a five-speed automatic transmission; with final drive through either the front wheels or all four in the case of all-wheel drive models.The range kicked off with the KX-R and moved up through the KX-S to the Grande. At the lower end of the range the KX-R came standard with air-conditioning, alloy wheels, a reversing camera, electronic stability control, ABS brakes and seven airbags.IN THE SHOPThe Kluger boasts the same quality of engineering and production as all Toyotas do, and despite some recent glitches, it stands up well in all ways. Make the usual checks to confirm routine servicing, which is the key to a long trouble free life on the road. Also check for offroad use, not that many Klugers go beyond the blacktop, but it's worth the check anyway.IN A CRASHANCAP awarded the Kluger five stars in recognition of its comprehensive array of safety gear, which included electronic stability control and ABS brakes, and front, head and side airbags.UNDER THE PUMPToyota claimed the front-wheel drive model would average 11.0L/100km, while the all-wheel drive model would return 11.6L/100km. When tested by CarsGuide the all-wheel drive Grande consumed 12.4L/100km.AT A GLANCEPrice new: $39,990 to $59,990Engine: 3.5-litre V6 petrol, 201 kW/337 NmTransmission: 5-speed automatic, front or all-wheel driveEconomy: 11.0 L/100 km (FWD), 11.6 L/100 km (AWD)Body: 5-door wagonVariants: KX-R base model, KX-S, Grande Safety: 5-star ANCAPVERDICTHigh ride and handsome, the Kluger is rightly a firm family favourite.

There's no doubt that today's buyers, particularly younger ones, don't feel the same need for size as their forebears who were sold on the concept that bigger was better. Today's buyers are more size-savvy and are happy to buy the car that fits their needs.In that context small cars, like Ford's Fiesta, have become important players in today's market. While they've resolved their size issues they still want their car to be sexy, and the Fiesta can claim to be that. With its slinky lines, pumped up guard flares and slimline headlamps it was as cute as a button.Inside, there was plenty of room for front seat passengers, but those in the rear found themselves a little snug thanks to the sweeping roofline that compromised their headroom. The interior was flashy and the design sometimes overrode function, although it was certainly appealing at first glance.MODEL WATCHFord's Fiesta range was made up of three and five-door hatch body styles, with entry level CL, mid-range LX and range-topping sportster Zetec, and 1.4-litre and 1.6-litre engines.The CL and Zetec were available in both body styles, but the mid-range XL was only available as a 5-door.The 1.4-litre Duratec unit developed 71kW at 5750rpm and 128Nm at 4200rpm, while the 1.6-litre engine boasted 88kW at 6000rpm and 152Nm at 4050rpm.Buyers also had the choice of transmissions with Ford offering a five-speed manual and a four-speed auto. Underneath the Fiesta had MacPherson Strut front suspension and torsion beam rear suspension.IN THE SHOPWhile we have had few complaints from Fiesta owners, those we have had have been rather damning.Engine pinging is a common complaint and is something to be mindful of when test driving a potential purchase. Running the car on the more expensive higher-octane fuel doesn't necessarily fix the problem, and it rather defeats one of the purposes of buying small in the first place.We have also had reports of cars that simply cutout for no apparent reason, and the fault hasn't been diagnosed.Build quality can also be variable, so cast a critical eye over any cars under consideration for purchase and don't accept anything that's not quite right.Check for a service record to make sure the required maintenance has been done.IN A CRASHThe CL and LX only came with dual airbags; to get more you had to buy a Zetec, which came with head and side airbags as well. Dynamically all models had ABS brakes and electronic brakeforce distribution, but again you had to buy a Zetec to get important features like emergency brake assistance, BAS, or dynamic stability control.To get those same features on the CL or LX you had to fork out an extra $1000 for the optional 'Safety Pack'. For anyone in the market for a used Fiesta should take note of that when out car shopping.UNDER THE PUMPFord claimed the Fiesta would average 6.1L/100km to 6.9L/100km, and would run on 91-octane unleaded.OWNERS SAYJeff Pegg has owned his WS 1.6-litre manual 3-door Fiesta CL a mere three months and already regrets it. Already $10,000 worth of parts has had to be replaced because of rust, which he believes should have been found if it was properly inspected prior to delivery.The engine also pinged terribly, even though the car was only run on 98 RON fuel, and while after three reflashes it is improved it still pings. The air-conditioning, in his view, is pitiful, and there is an annoying rattle in the dash that can't be traced. In both instances he has been told to "get used to" it.On the plus side Jeff says his Fiesta handles well, looks great, and is good to drive in the cooler months.Jeff reserves his harshest criticism for Ford's after-sales care, which he claims is "non-existent."AT A GLANCEPrice new: $16,450 to $22,990Engines: 1.4-litre 4-cylinder petrol, 71 kW/125 Nm; 1.6-litre 4-  cylinder petrol, 88 kW/152 NmTransmissions: 5-speed manual, 4-speed auto, front-wheel driveEconomy: 6.9 L/100 km (1.4-litre auto), 6.1 L/100 km (1.6-litre man)Body: 3-door hatch, 5-door hatchVariants: CL, LX and ZetecSafety: 4-star ANCAP.VERDICTGood looking, great driving little car that makes you want to drive small.RATING3 stars

Once the X5, BMW's SUV breakthrough model had blazed a trail across our 4WD landscape it was to be expected that the company would follow it up with a more compact model. That was the X3 and it arrived in 2004.The X3 slotted in below the X5 in much the same way the 3-Series fitted into the passenger car range underneath the 5-Series.It looked much the same as its larger cousin, but was smaller, and cost heaps less. While it had the BMW corporate look the tough chunky look that made the X5 attractive was lost, the X3 looked wimpy by comparison.Buyers could choose between two six-cylinder petrol engines and a turbo-diesel. The base petrol engine was a 2.5-litre unit boasting 141kW and 245Nm, the larger one 3.0 litres putting out 170kW and 300Nm. The diesel option was a 3.0-litre turbocharged six that put out 160kW and 480Nm.There was a 6-speed manual gearbox available, but only on the 2.5-litre model; all others had an automatic transmission with the option of manual shifting.Final drive was full-time four-wheel drive with BMW's xDrive system to maintain grip in slippery going.Underneath the suspension was independent all round, the brakes were discs with ABS, the alloy wheels were wrapped in all-round rubber, and the spare was only a space-saver.Inside the X3 had all you could desire with the list of standard features including automatic air-conditioning, cruise, remote central locking, leather trim, multi-function steering wheel, power mirrors and windows and CD sound.IN THE SHOPThe jury is out on BMW durability. The build quality is high, and they certainly look the goods sitting in the showroom, but history suggests that cars with the blue-and-white spinner badge can become expensive as the kays climb. If you choose to get into one it's best to do it when the kays are low and get out again before the bills start to roll in.Look for an independent specialist to have the servicing done, as dealers tend to be very expensive. Same goes for parts. Bought from a dealer parts are expensive, but relief can be found with the independents who are able to source much cheaper parts that still do the job.Servicing is critical so make sure any prospective purchase has had the required maintenance. Look for oil leaks around the engine, and coolant leaks from the radiator.IN A CRASHWith a comprehensive array of active and passive safety features the X3 was given 4 stars out of a possible five by ANCAP.Active features include ABS braking, traction control, electronic stability control and hill descent control, while passive safety is well covered by a combination of dual front airbags, head and side airbags.UNDER THE PUMPNothing special on the petrol front with the 2.5-litre averaging in the mid- to high-11s by BMW's own claim, and the 3.0-litre returning low-12s.On Carsguide's test the 2.5i auto returned an average of 11.8L/100km, bang on the BMW claim.The turbo diesel was the way to go for economy with an average claimed of 8.6L/100km. BMW recommended 98-octane premium unleaded for the petrol models, but have approved E10 ethanol blend for the X3.AT A GLANCEPrice new: $67,900 to $74,600Engine: 2.5-litre six-cylinder petrol, 3.0-litre six-cylinder petrol, 3.0-litre six-cylinder turbo dieselPower/torque: 141 kW/245 Nm (2.5), 170 kW/300 Nm (3.0), 160 kW/480 Nm (TD)Transmissions: 5-speed auto, 6-speed auto, 6-speed man, 4WDEconomy: 11.2/11.9 L/100 km (2.5 man/auto), 12.1 L/100 km (3.0), 8.6 L/100 km (TD)Body: 5-door wagonVariants: 2.5i, 3.0i, 3.0d (from 2005)Safety: 4-star ANCAPVERDICT Smaller, cheaper version of popular X5 set a new benchmark for compact SUVs.