Car News

Geely has confirmed it will add the Emgrand sedan to its roster of cars in Australia, following the EX2 electric SUV Q3 arrival.The Emgrand will go into battle with the segment dominant Toyota Camry, as well as existing favourites like the Kia K4 and newcomers like the BYD Seal 6 PHEV.Measuring 4806mm long 1886mm wide and 1490mm tall, the fifth-generation Emgrand is in the mid-size sedan category, although sits in the space between the larger Camry and smaller Kia K4.Like the Seal 6, the Emgrand will launch into Australia as a plug-in hybrid initially. A plugless hybrid version is also on the cards, according to Geely’s Australian CEO Alex Gu.CarsGuide understands the Emgrand will launch in 2027, with its EM-i plug-in hybrid system consisting of a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine and dual electric motors inside a hybrid transmission.The engine produces 82kW/136Nm, while the electric motor provides 120kW/210Nm. This is backed by the choice of two battery capacities, either a 8.5kWh unit or a 17kWh unit for either 60km or 125km of driving range.These ranges are to the CLTC standard, so expect slightly less once it arrives here. It is likely only the larger battery capacity version will be offered. All versions of the car sold in China are able to provide 3kW of external power via the vehicle-to-load system.Geely says the Emgrand will consume 2.9L/100km even when the battery is depleted to the reserve level, and it manages to maintain a 52-litre fuel tank despite making room for its battery underneath the cabin.Maximum fast charging speed is 35kW, allowing a 30 - 80 per cent charge in 20 minutes, according to the brand.The Emgrand rides on the same GEA platform as the EX5 and Starray, which is a spin-off of Volvo’s CMA architecture for the purposes of Geely’s more mass-market hybrid and electric models.On the inside, it gets a similar steering wheel to the EX5 or Starray, and a console with a multimedia dial and shortcut buttons, the shifter is on the steering column. It also has a 14.6-inch multimedia touchscreen running Geely’s Flyme Auto software and a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster.A 50W wireless charger exists in the centre console, while boot space measures 609 litres.Pricing in China is up to the equivalent of $24,600, suggesting a starting price in Australia of $30,000 or less. The newcomer from Geely will have to establish itself against the just-announced Kia K4 hybrid (from $32,090), BYD Seal 6 (from $34,990), and the segment-dominating Toyota Camry (from $39,990).Expect to learn more about the Emgrand ahead of its launch in 2027. It will form part of a slowly-but-surely product roll-out from Geely, which is likely to include both the Monjaro mid-size SUV and M9 three-row plug-in hybrid.Geely has had a reasonable start in Australia, with its EX5 and Starray EM-i amassing 1437 and 1384 units respectively, capturing close to five per cent of the mainstream mid-size SUV category.

Leapmotor has performed a welcome about-face on its controversial keyless entry system, with the brand to introduce physial keys on all future models.

Mazda has enjoyed unprecedented success in North America with the CX-50 since its 2022 release, filling a unique space in the Japanese brand’s line-up while attracting a new type of buyer with its chunky, urban-adventure crossover styling.But, despite repeated requests since the beginning of this decade for a version to be sold in Australia, the company headquarters in Hiroshima has refused permission for the mid-size SUV to be re-engineered for us.But why?According to Mazda Australia Managing Director Vinesh Bhindi, the reasons why the CX-50 has not made it here yet has to do with a lack of support from Japan and the United Kingdom.“There isn't a factory that makes it in right-hand drive (RHD),” Bhindi told CarsGuide at the unveiling of the CX-6e SUV electric vehicle in Melbourne.“We still want it, but at this stage, the answer from head office is it's not available.”However, there’s more to it than that.Mazda Motor Corporation General Manager of Global Sales and Marketing Manabu Osuga went deeper, revealing the surprising reason for the lack of desire from other big RHD markets.“RHD is the challenge,” Osuga said. “There's two other key markets, Japan and the UK, and they're not warming to it as hard as Australia. So, that's really the challenge.“The CX-50 is quite big car for both the Japanese market and the European market, especially in terms of the width, which is much wider (than other comparable small-to-medium-sized SUVs).“It's even wider than the CX-5, and is even equivalent to the CX-60 through to the CX-90 (big SUV) sizes. So, because of that, Japan is not raising its hand and the UK is not raising its hand. Only Australia is raising its hand.“So, this generation is quite a tough equation that we need to solve, it's been so successful in the USA.”That said, Osuga is optimistically taking the ‘never-say-never’ approach that one day a future version of the CX-50 will land.“But, this stage, it doesn't stop us asking,” Osuga revealed. “(Developing for RHD requires) a high-level number, but if we can prepare, like, at least 50,000 units to 100,000 units (to be sold globally in RHD), then we can… discuss about it (being imported to Australia).”Bhindi stated that he will continue to support Osuga’s efforts, adding that he will not give up on the CX-50 fight for Australia.“(It’s been a massive hit) not just in the US, but also in Canada and Mexico,” Bhindi said.“And (the CX-50) has been tailored specifically for those markets, but which may not translate to other markets around the world.“We will continue to lobby with Japan and European colleagues to say, ‘let’s have a bigger (RHD SUV)!”Essentially a stretched and rebodied version of the smaller, Mazda 3-based CX-30, the CX-50 has garnered popularity with buyers who might have otherwise considered a Subaru Outback, before the latter grew into a significantly larger SUV than it has traditionally been.This vacating of a proven market segment may open opportunities for the CX-50 to become a more-global proposition in the future.As reported, the CX-50 is made at the joint-venture Mazda and Toyota Manufacturing USA factory in Alabama, USA, next to the Toyota Corolla Cross. The two vehicles are unrelated otherwise, except for sharing Toyota’s series-parallel hybrid system, since Mazda does not as yet produce one.This might change when the expected second-gen CX-50 arrives later this decade, probably in time for Mazda’s highly-anticipated SkyActiv-Z hybrid system that promises to break new ground for efficiency and performance, in keeping with the brand’s reputation for making driver-centric vehicles.Previously, Mazda has also cited limited manufacturing capacity at the JV plant as another reason why it has not bothered with CX-50 RHD.Whether this leads to another production site outside of the USA is unknown at this stage.If this happens, Japan and Thailand (another RHD market) have been mooted in past speculative reports as contenders, along with Mexico and perhaps China.Watch this space.

Fuel prices are coming back down slightly at time of writing, but this whole Middle East conflict has been a massive wake-up call for all of us.Australia is as vulnerable as any country to changes in fuel supply and/or prices.But you can reduce your 4WD's fuel consumption – and thus cut your fuel costs – by better managing your driving style and your 4WD.Fuel consumption depends on many factors – including individual driving style, the conditions, the load – but there are myriad ways you can at least reduce your vehicle’s fuel consumption so that you’re ultimately forking out less at the service station.Improving fuel consumption boils down to reducing the stress on your vehicle’s engine: the less stress and strain on your engine, the better it will perform and therefore the less fuel it will use.Here are some tips to slash your fuel bills – and most of it is common sense, really.Read on.The lighter a vehicle is, generally speaking, the less fuel it should use.A whole lot of extra weight onboard your 4WD – whether that be people, gear, pets or a load of job-site tools and materials you’re actually not using on any given day – places far greater demands on the vehicle than if it was unladen, and that excess weight will result in increased fuel usage.If you use your 4WD as a daily driver or if you rarely go out bush in it any more, do away with the bullbar, winch, roof-top tent, tray canopy (if it’s easy enough to get on and off), heavy-duty spare-wheel carrier, MaxTrax (be honest: you’ve never used them), long-handled shovel etc. Delete anything and everything that adds extra bulk to your vehicle, for now at least.All of that gear adds extra weight to your vehicle and thus increases fuel consumption. Again, this is all common sense stuff.On bitumen, recommended tyre pressures on a 4WD will generally be from around 30 psi (pounds per square inch) and up but always check the tyre placard on your vehicle to make sure.Always check tyre pressure when your tyres are cold (i.e. the vehicle hasn't been driven for about three hours) and only use a tyre-pressure gauge from a reputable company, such as ARB or Ironman 4x4, to get an accurate reading to make sure you're running at recommended pressure.If your tyres are under-inflated, rolling resistance increases and so too does your 4WD’s fuel use, simple as that.For reference, Michelin’s in-house tyre experts have described rolling resistance as “the resistance experienced by your car tyre as it rolls over a surface. The main causes of this resistance are tyre deformation, wing drag, and friction with the ground. The higher the rolling resistance is, the more energy to overcome it is needed.“A 30 per cent increase in rolling resistance generates between 3 and 5% of fuel overconsumption.”Rolling resistance is decreased when a tyre’s pressure is increased.No specific PSI tyre pressure figure can be applied every time to every vehicle on every different type of terrain or in every different driving scenario. Your optimum tyre pressure will change according to the vehicle, the load onboard, the terrain your vehicle is traversing, the time of day, the amount of time you've been driving on those tyres on that day, the size and type of tyres you're using and myriad other variables.However, there are various approximate tyre-pressure ranges that work best on different terrain and if you operate within those parameters, you will be able to drive off-road sensibly and safely.Note: If you want to know how to deflate and inflate your tyres, read this yarn.Another thing to think about is unsprung weight (tyres) and rolling resistance. If you’re driving around on big heavy Mud Terrain tyres, then of course your fuel use is going to suffer, so it’s time to throw on a set of road-friendly SUV tyres or mild all-terrain tyres.Worth noting is the fact that larger wheel sizes generally decrease fuel economy due to increased the weight and rolling resistance. Steel wheels are heavier than alloys so swap those out for the time being if you want to further decrease your fuel consumption.Drive with supreme patience and consideration.This is easy to accomplish: simply delete your heavy right foot.No more hard acceleration, no stomping on the brakes – drive smoothly and safely.Unless you’re urgently delivering a heart in an esky to an awaiting transplant patient at a hospital, there’s no need to drive like your pants are on fire.As I tell my kids about driving: just imagine your job is to make sure that everyone on the road at the same time as you arrives at their destination safely – no matter how determined they appear to not want to arrive at all.As mentioned earlier, improving fuel consumption boils down to reducing the stress on your vehicle’s engine, and one of the ways to achieve this is to ensure that your vehicle is well maintained, in terms of all components, fluids, filters etc.The better your 4WD is running, the less fuel it should use.When you head out, bunch the things you have to do for the day together, so you’re doing one trip, instead a series of shorter trips, with the extra driving, stop-starting, parking etc involved in those. Common sense? Of course it is.A hybrid vehicle – one with a traditional fuel source (petrol or diesel) and electric power – is a cheaper alternative to an EV and it yields better fuel economy and less environmental impact than a standard petrol or diesel engine vehicle.Hybrids, right now, offer the best of all possible worlds; currently there are still simply so many variables involved with using an EV as your vehicle of choice in Australia – range anxiety, long distances, lack of charging stations, the actual time it takes to charge – that, outside of the city, it doesn’t make as much sense as a daily driver as a hybrid does.Hybrid powertrains are claimed to improve fuel efficiency, boost torque, improve responsiveness and overall output.Is it time you consider something like a BYD Shark 6? Yep, join the queue.

They say going to the movies has declined since the rise of larger home televisions. It seems if Mercedes-Benz has its way, we will soon be watching movies in the car instead.At least if the all-new C-Class EV interior is any guide to the brand’s future. While it’s still an optional choice, the new 39.1-inch MBUX Hyperscreen is one of the largest screens I’ve ever seen in a car. And it might be one of the worst design decisions I’ve ever seen Mercedes-Benz make.It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Mercedes has gone down this path. The German giant’s design leader, Gordon Wagener, is on the record with both his love of a large screen and his dislike of rival brands.In a rare on-the-record assessment of his rivals, Wagener told the UK’s Top Gear magazine at the 2025 Munich motor show that the new Audi Concept C interior had “too little tech” and looked like “it was designed in 1995” – which is a pretty generous critique of 1995-era technology and design.In the same interview he explained his decision to introduce larger and larger screens into new Mercedes models, because he believes that owners might want to “watch a movie and stuff like that.”The problem I have with this is two-fold. Firstly, it's not good design. I know that design is subjective, but objectively speaking, the new C-Class EV loses so much about what made Mercedes look and feel luxurious. The difference between Mercedes and mainstream brands was the quality and presentation inside the cabin. I haven’t sat in the just-revealed C-Class EV yet, but looking at the images it feels like it could be something produced by any of the new Chinese premium brands.Yes, there are still some nice premium trims and I’m sure it looks impressive, but for me it doesn’t immediately project a sense of class and sophistication that Mercedes is known for. Mercedes’ arch-rivals at BMW have taken a slightly different approach, its ‘neue klasse’ 3 Series and iX3 feature a combination of large multimedia touchscreen, in a conventional sense, with a narrower screen wrapping around almost the entire base of the windscreen. It’s a different kind of big, but it’s still big. Not to sound like an old person, but… back when I was younger and obsessed with cars, whenever I sat in a Mercedes, BMW or Audi, you could tangibly see and feel the difference between them and their competition. But that differentiation is getting harder to feel these days, as new brands without the heritage of Mercedes and company can simply go inch-for-inch in terms of screens.If you look at luxury houses, they do not fill every room with a huge television or make every room feel like a movie theatre. Good design is about moderation and restraint as much as anything. Secondly, and more importantly, we shouldn’t be ‘watching movies and stuff’ in the car. If you want to watch a movie, stay at home – or heck, go and watch it on an actual ‘big screen’ at the local cinema.Cars are for driving and safety should always remain both the car makers and the driver’s top priority. In case any of these designers have forgotten, cars are approximately two-tonnes of metal and glass that typically travel up to 100km/h. This isn’t an entertainment device, it’s transport. If you can’t go one car ride without watching a movie or having a screen in front of you, maybe you should see a doctor, not your local car dealer.Also, just a reminder in case anyone has forgotten, it is very much illegal to touch your smartphone with its 6-plus-inch screen, so why do the lawmakers not have any problem with these absurdly large screens that are becoming increasingly common – and increasingly distracting?To be fair to Mercedes, the German brand is alone in introducing ridiculously large screens. Instead, I blame Tesla.The American EV brand really kicked off this trend when it realised it could save costs – sorry, I mean create a minimalist interior design – by getting rid of as many buttons as possible and replacing them with a touchscreen.Rival brands saw the acceptance of this technology by consumers and didn’t need any more excuses to save money on buttons and dials. And, of course, like anything in the car industry, it soon became a… measuring competition… between the brands. And thus we find ourselves now in the era of the hyperscreen.The saviour, somewhat ironically, may actually be the Chinese government, which is mandating that car makers do include physical controls for key functionality, which is forcing a rethink from not just Chinese car makers but anyone who wants to sell cars in the world’s biggest market.While this won’t mean the end of the large screen, hopefully it will restrain future designs and reprioritise design, usability and safety.

Rumours have been rife over the past few weeks that Mazda may be investigating the fully electric Deepal E07 Multitruck for Australia.And why not?With its unique design that combines the passenger compartment of a five-seat, large SUV with the versatility of a utility, the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) seems to evolve the coupe-utility formula that was so famously pioneered in Melbourne by Ford in the early 1930s.This is especially relevant at these times with spiking fuel prices and interest in electrification of all sorts booming at all-time highs in this country.In March 2026 alone, EV sales alone went from under nine per cent of total vehicle volume to nearly 15 per cent.Fanning the reports is Mazda’s decades-old relationship with Chinese partner Changan Automobile Technologies that owns Deepal, which is only now bearing fruit in this market, with the 6e EV liftback and its CX-6e EV SUV coming later in the year derived from and made by the latter brand.As such, for many speculators, a quick repurpose of the E07 Multitruck for the enormous ute segment in Australia seems like a no-brainer to new conquest buyers, especially as the Japanese company’s volumes have slipped some 12 per cent in the first three months of 2026.However, despite all the compelling arguments for an electrified ute to slip alongside the robust BT-50 diesel ute that is built and supplied by compatriot rival Isuzu, it seems almost certain that Mazda is neither developing nor intending to introduce a version of the Deepal SUV-cum-ute.“It’s not happening,” according to a Mazda Australia spokesperson speaking to CarsGuide earlier this week. “The E07 is an interesting concept, but there are no plans at all for it.“The reports are wrong.”It is difficult to argue with the facts. Firstly, just 66 examples of the E07 Multitruck were registered in the first three months on sale in Australia, suggesting most ute consumers are yet to be convinced of the concept.Secondly, with the Deepal kicking off from $65,000 before on-road costs for the RWD model and from $74,000 for the high-performance AWD version, a Mazda version would likely sit above the BT-50, competing directly with the company’s menagerie of large, premium SUVs from the CX-60 through to the three-row CX-90 flagship.And, as we have reported previously, the E07 Multitruck is a ute-ified SUV EV with a large and heavy 80kWh battery that eats into potential payload, rather than a purpose-built pick-up. It just doesn’t have the capacities and capabilities of a traditional utility – or even some SUVs.And another big, expensive SUV is not what Mazda needs right now.The flurry of stories, which went global, emanated from a roundtable in Melbourne back in March, when senior Mazda and Changan Mazda officials were asked about the possibility of launching a version of the E07 Multitruck.“We can’t talk about future product,” was the reply from Changan Mazda General Manager of Tech Development Centre and Program Manager for product development in China of CX-50, 6e and CX-6e Hiroshi Ozawa.“But I think it is a very interesting vehicle and I like that type of vehicle that opens up. And I think in Australia people may like it, but Mazda does not produce trucks on its own.“But, if there is a global need we may have to consider it as well. But not at the moment, and we are not studying such a model currently.”A nice-to-have rather than a must-have response, then, from a Japanese company that is a comparative minnow in the automotive world, with limited resources, falling sales in Australia and much more pressing new-model priorities that lay ahead.

Enough is enough – serious questions have to be raised about Australia’s independent crash testing authority.The Australasian New Car Assessment Program, better known as ANCAP, has been a beacon of safety for the past three decades.And while it has no doubt been a driving force in ensuring Australians and New Zealanders drive safer cars, in recent years I have noticed some troubling, confusing decisions that have raised concerns in my journalistic head.And the latest example is perhaps the most troubling of all – ANCAP’s decision to not independently crash test Australia’s most popular passenger car, despite the car maker acknowledging it is missing key safety technology required to get ANCAP’s maximum five-star safety rating.I’m talking about the new Toyota RAV4, which the Japanese giant admits is missing key safety elements required for a five-star rating under the new-for-2026 testing protocols.This is because the RAV4 was meant to launch in late 2025 and Toyota designed it only to meet the previous testing protocols.While you can certainly question Toyota’s ‘just in time’ approach, and the fact that if Toyota had met those requirements it would have received a five-star rating that it could use for the the majority of the new RAV4’s showroom life, even as other new SUVs launched from now onwards would require a higher standard of safety (but that is an ongoing problem for ANCAP and not unique to this situation).Importantly, Toyota has said updates are coming to ensure the RAV4 meets the new five-star standard, but hasn’t made it clear precisely when that will happen or what those changes are.What is most troubling is that ANCAP has not publicly stated when, or even if, the RAV4 will be crash-tested by ANCAP or its sister organisation, Euro NCAP.A statement provided by ANCAP and attributed to Chief Executive Officer Carla Hoorweg on said: “As with any new model entering the Australian or New Zealand market, the Toyota RAV4 is a potential candidate for ANCAP assessment.“Details of models scheduled for testing and rating are not publicly released until assessments are complete.“We are aware of Toyota’s planned update to the RAV4 later this year. Until independent safety testing has been conducted, the updated model will remain unrated.“Given the RAV4’s popularity, ANCAP encourages fleets and consumers to consider the availability of an independent safety rating when making purchasing decisions.”That’s sound advice, people should definitely consider the safety of an unrated car.But it doesn’t answer the question of why ANCAP won’t simply crash test the RAV4 now.It was the biggest selling passenger vehicle in Australia in 2025, so it is an obvious choice for families.ANCAP is funded by governments, motoring clubs and other industry bodies, but it does not have infinite resources to crash test every new model that comes into the market – especially as each test requires between six and seven cars to be written-off as part of the process.Therefore, the majority of the testing is carried out on cars supplied by the car brands.It’s a mutually beneficial relationship – the car brand (hopefully) gets a five-star rating to advertise, while ANCAP gets another crash test to promote and consumers get an independent assessment of the safety of what cars they are buying. It’s a win-win-win situation.Except in this case, because Toyota is, understandably, not about to submit a car it knows won’t pass all the tests with flying colours. And ANCAP is seemingly happy to wait until that time.As time in crash labs is in-demand and usually booked months or even years in advance, CarsGuide understands Toyota has already arranged for the updated RAV4 to be crashed by Euro NCAP later in 2026.But why wait? Why is ANCAP happy to give Toyota this time to sell an unrated version of the RAV4? This is fundamentally a bad thing for you – the Australian consumer (and taxpayer).Without knowing specifically when the updated RAV4 will arrive in Australia, let's use an example of six months. In 2025 Toyota sold 24,034 examples of its mid-size SUV in that span.That means, if it takes six months for Toyota to update the car and get it into showrooms, potentially more than 20,000 Australians will be buying an unrated car.I completely understand ANCAP’s budgetary limitations, it simply cannot afford to go out and buy six or seven examples of every unrated vehicle.But surely, if it is going to spend its own money on crash testing specific models, surely you start at the top of the sales charts and work your way down?Some of the cars that ANCAP has self-funded crash tests for in the past include the Hyundai Palisade, Hyundai i30 Sedan and Suzuki Swift.Combined, those three models sold 12,303 examples in 2025, compared to 51,947 RAV4.Far be it for me to tell ANCAP how to run its business, but it would seem like, from a return-on-investment perspective, it should be looking to help the greatest number of people for its direct funding, and crash testing the best-selling models would seem like the best way to do that.To be clear, I’m not accusing ANCAP and Toyota of collusion or favouritism, but this is simply a very strange situation and a very hard ‘square to circle’, so to speak.As the organisation states on its own website: “ANCAP plays a vital role not only informing consumers of the differences in safety performance of new vehicles entering the Australian and New Zealand vehicle fleets.”Also stating: “ANCAP is Australia and New Zealand's independent voice on vehicle safety.“We crash test cars and conduct on-track and on-road performance assessments on safety features and technologies then publish a simple star rating or grading to indicate relative safety performance.“Over the last three decades we have published independent safety ratings for thousands of new vehicle makes, models and variants. These independent safety ratings and gradings are used to compare the relative safety between vehicles of similar size and have become a critical factor in vehicle selection for private consumers and fleet buyers.”Except in this case, where one of the best-selling vehicles in the country has been given extra time to prepare and leaves thousands of customers set to miss out on safety features that ANCAP itself has deemed important (hence the updated 2026 protocols).What is most troubling to me is, what message does this send to the industry and to consumers?Can a car maker launch a less-well-equipped model with an attention-grabbing initial price, sell it for a few months (or longer) and then add safety and submit it for ANCAP testing? That would be a dangerous precedent to set, in my opinion, but in the future car brands will be able to point to this situation and claim that it is simply following past form.Again, to be crystal clear, I’m not accusing Toyota of deliberately deploying this as a tactic, it seems like a genuine production-related issue.But ANCAP, as the independent safety body that it is, should step in and crash test the RAV4 that is on sale today to give consumers a clearer choice.

The ute market has peaked in Australia, and some new and established workhorses could struggle.Kia Australia Chief Executive Officer Damien Meredith said the ute market appears to have peaked, with a flat result in quarter one this year showing growth will be tough to find.That spells bad news for the Kia Tasman, which was launched last year with a sales target of 20,000 per year. It is on track to sell less than 5000 in 2026, which is a a far cry from the segment-leading Ford Ranger and strong-selling Toyota HiLux and BYD Shark 6.Meredith said “of course” they were concerned about the Tasman’s performance.When quizzed if the Tasman would be here in three years if sales didn’t improve, he simply said: “I believe so”.The Tasman ute has been critically acclaimed for how it performs its duties, but Meredith said there were several issues holding back the new ute.“I think once you’re inside it, it's fantastic,” said Meredith. “I think you know the exterior of the car is very polarising. Some people love it, some people don’t. And that’s had an effect.“I think you’ve got to be upfront and honest that the competition that’s out there is quite dramatic. “When we were planning this six years ago, the competition wasn’t as great as what it is right now.“So did we plan correctly? We planned as well as we possibly could, but the competition is hot, and there’s a polarising look to the vehicle,” he said.Kia is currently the third best-selling car brand in the nation this year, but it acknowledges it needs to do more to get the Tasman in more hands.“We’ve fallen short. We know the facts,” said Meredith.“What’s happening in the world over the last 35-40 days hasn’t helped. But we can’t use that, we can’t use anything as an excuse.“The fact of the matter is we’ve got to make Tasman a better success in Australia than it is at its current level,” said.A facelift to give the Tasman more conventional styling is still at more than a year or two away, according to CarsGuide’s previous reports, but there are other levers the brand can use.Kia is a volume seller, so some sharp discounts might be on offer for the dual-cab ute in the coming months to help stimulate demand and attract fleet buyers.Kia’s headquarters has been canvassing Australian owners on how to improve the product.The Korean brand also revealed plans for a plug-in hybrid dual-cab ute for the US market, which could be a possible replacement for the slow-selling Tasman.Meredith said they have their hand up for all types of powertrains in the brand’s global armoury."We're open to everything, but first and foremost we've got to make what we've got a success."

Chery's boss has confirmed the new Freelander brand has been locked in for a launch in Australia and New Zealand, with its arrival to be spearheaded by the new Freelander 8, which was unveiled at the Beijing motor show."The Freelander will be introduced to Australia and New Zealand," Yin Tongyue, Chery Auto chairman told Australian media at a round table event.Created as part of a joint venture between Chery and Land Rover, until now the Freelander's first model, the rugged Freelander 8, had only been announced that it would be produced in right-hand drive.Addressing rumours the Freelander 8 would be sold through Land Rover dealers, the Chery boss was quick to dismiss that idea."It will be an independent . It will have an independent network."Speaking to an insider later on, CarsGuide was told that behind the scenes Chery will work as hard as possible to separate its brands, with the Freelander brand joining both newly announced Lepas and Jetour to be sold, serviced and maintained via its own dealers, even in small markets like New Zealand.On sale in China in the second half of 2026, Chery's boss did not provide any time frame for the rollout of Freelander Down Under, but it's hotly tipped that right-hand drive production is scheduled to commence as soon as early 2027, suggesting the brand and the Freelander 8 could arrive as soon as next year.Created to be a capable off-roader, the Freelander brand will not be offered with pure-combustion engines; instead, it will only be available with pure-electric power or Chery's latest range-extender hybrid.The first of six SUVs to be launched in the next five years, in Beijing the fledgling brand revealed its first car – a mid-to-large six-seat SUV alternative to the hybrid Toyota Kluger that would come with powerful 800-volt electrics for ultra-fast DC charging.In Australia, it's likely range-extender hybrid (EREV), as well as the plug-in hybrids, are expected to be the most popular powertrains, with the former among the earliest adopters of CATL's latest Freevoy battery.Capable of 6C charging, the EREV version can handle a peak charge of up to 360kW, ensuring charging times a fraction of most plug-in hybrids currently on sale in Australia.With Land Rover responsible for the design in and out and reportedly tasked with ensuring it is as capable as any other Land Rover on or off-road, the Freelander 8 features an electronic limited-slip differential, which combines a virtual central locking differential, for maximum traction in all conditions.A height-adjustable dual-chamber air suspension, meanwhile, should provide plenty of ground clearance for serious off-roading.Within, advanced new tech that has been sourced from its Chinese partner, includes a BMW iX3-style curved screen that stretches from pillar-to-pillar.Backed up by a large central floating infotainment, the Freelander is likely to appeal to Aussies fed up with having to operate everything through a touchscreen as both physical switches and a large rotary dial are present.Appealing to families, a 2+2+2 seating configuration is standard, with the second-row bagging a pair of Chery's 'zero-gravity' seats for enhanced comfort.Fresh tech includes extra-bright 8000-pixel projection headlamps, and Huawei's latest-gen 896-LiDAR that helps the Freelander SUV support the tech giant's new Qiankun ADS 4.1 driver assistance system, which provides Level 2+ driverless tech.The advanced autonomous driving aids benefit the Freelander 8 even when it's off-road, with the tech helping deliver up to nine driving modes, evolving Land Rover's famed traction-boosting terrain response tech.Designed and engineered to achieve the full five stars in EuroNCAP crash tests, the Freelander 8 is expected to be awarded top marks by ANCAP.Announcing the Freelander 8 will be built at Chery-Land Rover's current factory in Changshu, close to Shanghai, the Freelander production model does without both Chery or Land Rover badging – an early hint that the Freelander 8 would not leverage either parent when sales begin.No pricing has yet been released, but it's thought the Freelander 8 will be positioned as an even more rugged and capable alternative to the Denza B5 ($74,990-$79,990) that's currently on sale Down Under.

Kia has announced its new Seltos small SUV will ditch a pure petrol power in favour of a hybrid-only lineup for the new generation. It marks a significant change for one of the brand’s best-selling models in Australia, with it previously being a petrol-only model. The switch puts the Seltos into direct competition with hybrid variants of the Hyundai Kona as well as the hybrid-exclusive Toyota Corolla Cross. It will also take on budget offerings such as the Chery Tiggo 4 and the GWM Haval Jolion, which have hybrid choices, as well as petrol. The Seltos has been one of Kia's best-selling models and accumulated more than 9000 sales in 2025.There is no official news on price but it is likely to be a step up on the outgoing petrol variant’s starting price of $31,250 (before on-road costs).Based on South Korean pricing, it could even sit around the $40,000-plus bracket, especially for high-specification models.The brand has not yet revealed the set-up that will power the new Seltos in Australia. Overseas examples have a 1.6-litre turbo-petrol engine, which produces 105kW and 265Nm, so we can use this as a guide. The car will be available with front-wheel- or all-wheel-drive. The brand stated its move to hybrid only has been directed by the need to meet Euro 6d standards and also to stay within New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES) emissions regulations in Australia.There will still be a petrol variant of the car sold elsewhere in the world, but we will not see it Down Under.  One of the other major changes to the next-generation Seltos is that the car has grown in every dimension but height, where it has shrunk slightly. This has increased headroom and legroom in the car as well as rear storage space, which is now at 483L.Elsewhere inside, there is a single panel of a central touchscreen, digital driver display and climate control screen spanning much of the dashboard. The Seltos is expected to launch in Australia in the fourth quarter of this year, with further details, including price to be announced closer to then.