Volkswagen Tayron vs Toyota HiLux

What's the difference?

The Tiguan Allspace was not really an iconic Volkswagen badge, not in the same way as the Golf, Polo or even just the Tiguan itself, so the brand has taken a smaller risk than many in changing names. But, to be blunt, it doesn’t really matter what the badge on the back is, as long as, at its core, it lives up to the Volkswagen attributes buyers expect - and the Tayron definitely does that.

This new seven-seat SUV is a very welcome addition not only to Volkswagen’s line-up, but to the entire family SUV segment. It’s competitively priced, enjoyable to drive and very practical. The Tayron has a lot to offer those in the market for family-friendly transport.

That doesn’t mean it’s best-in-class, and there are areas where it can be improved, but there’s no reason why the Tayron shouldn’t enjoy the same level of success the Tiguan Allspace enjoyed.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The HiLux’s age-defying sales and resale values confirm it’s still one of the top two 4x4 dual cabs on the market. However, its new V-Active technology feels underdone, as it adds weight (we reckon about 40kg) and complexity without gains in performance you can feel or economy you can meaningfully measure. Hopefully, Toyota’s next crack at a 'hybrid' HiLux will be more convincing.

Despite the name change, the resemblance between the Tiguan and Tayron is strong, largely because they still share a lot of commonalities.

From the front windscreen forward, they are the same, but the Tayron gets a different lower bumper treatment across the variants to give it a unique front, as well as squared-off wheel arches for further visual separation from Tiguan.

It’s a similar story at the rear too, with a unique lower bumper to make the pair look different when parked side-by-side.

But where you see the most obvious differences between the pair is from the side, with the Tayron 280mm longer than the Tiguan. 

Crucially, the wheelbase has been stretched from 2681mm for the Tiguan to 2791mm for the Tayron, adding an additional 110mm of interior space. This means the side profile of the Tayron looks longer too.

Ultimately, while the changes are obvious when the two are side-by-side, there’s still a clear visual connection between the pair, despite the different names.

The HiLux’s enduring appeal is the ‘unbreakable’ feel when you step aboard. Even though its curvaceous styling is increasingly dated, we can’t fault the build quality as it displays a peerless standard of fit and finish which never wavers.

Our only major gripe (since its launch in 2015) is the cramped rear seating. It’s particularly tight for tall people, giving that I’m 186cm and when sitting in the rear seat with the driver’s seat in my position, my knees are pressed into its backrest and my head rubs on the roof lining.

Shoulder room for three large adults is equally challenging and tolerable only for short trips. We reckon the Ranger’s more accommodating rear stalls are significant in its sales leadership.

Volkswagen’s reputation for being ‘semi-premium’ came in part because it offered an elevated in-car experience compared to many of its mainstream rivals. And that is very much the case with the new Tayron, which is loaded with the latest technology but still looks and feels like a Volkswagen.

The interior is dominated by the central screen, which at 15 inches on the 150TSI Elegance and 195TSI R-Line pushes to the very limits of how big and how high an multimedia screen like this can be practically and safely included in a car. While it’s not the biggest in-car screen, it sits right at the top of the centre of the dashboard and almost gets in the way of vision across the bonnet.

The (slightly) smaller 12.9-inch display in the rest of the range is obviously better, but both screens are generous in size and offer good touchscreen usability, with fast reactions and relatively straightforward menus.

However, what neither offers is much in the way of physical switchgear, so most controls need to be changed via the touchscreen, which is not the easiest or safest way to interact with a vehicle you’re trying to drive.

But overall the cabin design is nice and what we’ve come to expect from Volkswagen. The materials look and feel high quality and there’s a nice mix to create a more premium-feeling environment.

One notable element is the extra storage in the console between the front seats, which includes a clever spot for two smartphones to wirelessly charge, with a lid on top for added usable space.

As for the practicality, that really depends on your point-of-view and reasons for needing a seven-seat SUV. That’s because the Tayron, like the Tiguan Allspace before it, is not really a true seven-seater but rather more accurately described as a ‘5+2’ SUV. 

What that means is, the third-row seats are for occasional use rather than regular use. So, if you need something to carry five or more passengers (most likely a family with multiple children) on a regular basis, then the Tayron is likely too small for your needs.

If, however, you need a five-seater the majority of the time but would like the option to carry two more if the need arises, then the Tayron is very much worth considering.

Even then, it’s worth noting that the third row is both tight on space (even with the second row slid forward) and there is only limited storage and no air-con vents, charging outlets or even child seat restraints.

Space in the first two rows is good, though, with the second row able to slide backwards and forwards depending on how much space your passengers need.

As for the 150TSI Life, with its unique five-seat layout, well it takes advantage of one of the biggest selling points of the Tayron - it’s big boot. 

The five-seater gets 885 litres of boot space, thanks in part to some underfloor storage where the seats would normally be. So it will appeal to those who like a mid-size SUV, like the Tiguan, but need extra cargo room on the regular.

As for the seven-seat versions, Volkswagen claims the Tayron has 850 litres with third-row stowed and 345 litres with third row in use. The former is excellent, while the latter is adequate.

The addition of the extra seats means the Tayron is equipped with a space-saver spare wheel, rather than a full-size one.

With its 2150kg kerb weight and 3050kg GVM, the SR5 V-Active has a 900kg payload rating. It can also tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer but with its 5850kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) that would require a substantial 700kg reduction in payload to only 200kg, which could be used up by a driver and passenger alone. 

Alternatively, you could lower the trailer weight limit by the same 700kg to 2800kg (which is still a sizeable trailer) and retain the SR5’s maximum payload. We reckon most owners would do this anyway, given few (if any) would need to tow 3500kg.

The load tub is 1570mm long, 1645mm wide and 495mm deep with 1105mm between the wheel housings. Therefore, it can’t carry a standard Aussie pallet but will take a Euro-sized one. There are four load-anchorage points and we welcome the new lower/raise assistance for the hefty tailgate.

Cabin storage includes a large-bottle holder and bin in each front door, plus pop-out cupholders on either side of the dash, upper and lower glove boxes (with the upper having access to air-con) and an overhead glasses holder.

The latest centre console layout has a wireless phone-charging pad and vertical phone-storage slot, small-bottle/cupholder, a bin for small items and a box with padded lid that doubles as an elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a bottle-holder and bin in each door, pockets on each front seat backrest and a fold-down centre armrest with two more cupholders.

Only the narrower driver’s side of the 60/40-split rear seat base-cushion can swing up and be stored vertically as the passenger-side is now fixed, given the V-Active’s 48V battery resides beneath it and is ventilated by a louvered air intake in the passenger footwell.

The new electrically-assisted drivetrain is available only in SR/SR5 4x4 dual cabs and the Rogue, paired with the HiLux’s ubiquitous 2.8-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel and six-speed automatic.

Our SR5 V-Active 48V test vehicle has a list price of $63,260. It’s also equipped with the optional premium interior package, which for an additional $2500 adds black leather-accented seats and door trims, heated front seats and an eight-way power-adjustable driver’s seat. Its eye-catching 'Nebula Blue' premium paint option adds another $675.

Latest MY24 updates feature a redesigned front fascia with black ‘honeycomb’ grille, plus wireless phone charging, two USB-C ports in the centre console for rear seat passengers to use and a tailgate equipped with gas-struts to ease opening/closing effort.

 Otherwise, it’s the same SR5 with which we’ve grown very familiar. Standard equipment includes 18-inch alloys and 265/60R18 tyres with a full-size alloy spare, along with LED lighting, side-steps, sports bar, privacy glass and more, even though Toyota still won’t throw in a tub-liner.

Inside is remote keyless entry/start, dual-zone climate, an air-conditioned cooler box, multiple USB ports/12-volt sockets and a 220-volt outlet, premium-grade steering wheel and shifter-knob, driver’s 4.2-inch colour multi-info display, a 360-degree camera view and more.

 The 8.0-inch touchscreen for the multimedia system, including six-speaker audio, appears to shrink as each year passes, but is easy to use and offers multiple connectivity including Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and digital radio. It also projects imagery for the various camera views.

There are three powertrain choices for the arrival of the Tayron, but the company has also confirmed two plug-in hybrid variants are coming in 2026.

For now it’s an all-petrol-powered line-up. The 110TSI Life is powered by a 110kW/250Nm 1.4-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine. This is paired to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and sends all its performance via the front wheels only.

The 150TSI gets a bigger 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine making, you guessed it, 150kW and 320Nm. It also has a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic but adds all-wheel drive.

Finally, there’s the 195TSI R-Line, which VW claims offers ‘GTI levels of performance’, so it gets a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder unit pumping out 195kW and 400Nm. Once again, this is mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and gets an all-wheel drive system.

While the performance offered by all three powertrains is good, the lack of the hybrid option from launch does cost Volkswagen a point or two.

The venerable (1GD-FTV) 2.8 litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel with V-Active produces the same 150kW and 500Nm as the standard engine, driving through a six-speed torque converter automatic.

However, Toyota claims fuel economy gains of up to 9.5 per cent when this drivetrain is combined with the new hybrid technology, which comprises a 48-volt electric motor-generator, 48-volt lithium-ion battery and idle-stop system.

The turbo-diesel engine uses a silent-belt to drive the motor-generator, which charges the battery under the rear seat. This battery, which Toyota claims weighs less than eight kilograms with 4.3Ah capacity, also supplies electricity to the vehicle’s 12-volt system through a DC/DC converter.

This system can send up to 8.4kW of power and 65Nm of torque through the motor-generator to assist the engine. Toyota claims this delivers smoother and quieter yet more responsive performance and reduces engine load under acceleration. It also results in a small reduction in idle speed from 720rpm to 600rpm.

Deceleration and braking energy are also recovered, converted into electricity and stored in the 48V battery for later use.  Toyota claims “hydraulic braking combined with regenerative braking creates a more effective and natural deceleration feel and supports downhill manoeuvring.”

The idle-stop system does not use the starter motor like conventional set-ups. Instead, the electric motor-generator, which is permanently connected to the engine via its belt-drive, delivers this function with greater smoothness and quietness.

Idle-stop duration can also be extended by the driver and, when restarting the engine on inclines, the idle-stop system retains brake pressure until enough drive force is generated to ensure smooth acceleration.

In another first for HiLux, its part-time, dual-range 4x4 system (with switchable rear diff-lock) in V-Active variants is paired with 'Multi-Terrain Select' to enhance off-road ability.

The driver can switch between six traction control settings tailored to suit a variety of terrain including 'Auto', 'Sand' and 'Mud' (high- and low-range), 'Deep Snow' and 'Dirt' (high-range) and Rock (low-range).

Going with a line-up of turbocharged petrol engines means the Tayron isn’t the most efficient SUV in its segment, but the addition of the eHybrid PHEVs next year will change that.

In the meantime, what you need to know is that the 110TSI uses 7.6L/100km, the 150TSI has a  7.7L/100km claim and the 195TSI is unsurprisingly the thirstiest at 8.6L/100km.

Those are all relatively high when you compare them to key rivals, such as the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid, which uses just 5.6L/100km, the same as the Toyota Kluger Hybrid - and both of those are conventional hybrid systems. 

The saving grace for VW is the non-hybrid Santa Fe uses 9.3L, so it makes the Tayron look better. But until the Tayron plug-in hybrids arrive, VW is at a disadvantage.

As for driving range, the 110TSI has a 55-litre fuel tank, so a theoretical range of 720km between fueling stops. The 150TSI and 195TSI get a slightly larger 58-litre tank, which means the former has a 750km range and the latter approximately 675km.

We completed a total distance of 580km, which comprised a mix of city and suburban driving with an empty load tub and up to four adults on board, plus some freeway/highway running with a near-maximum payload.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our test, the dash display was claiming average combined consumption of 9.5L/100km, which was lineball with our own 9.4 figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings.

Both are higher than Toyota’s official 7.2L/100km figure but within the usual 2.0-3.0L/100km discrepancy between OEM ratings and real-world figures.

Interestingly, the last time we tested a 4x4 SR5 auto dual cab ute (without V-Active) in 2023, using similar routes and payloads, we achieved 9.6L/100km. So, the V-Active’s drop in consumption was only about 2.0 per cent, compared to Toyota’s claim of up to 9.5 per cent.

So, based on our real-world figure, you could expect a useful driving range of around 870km from its 80-litre tank.

Family-friendly SUV or not, a big part of Volkswagen’s ‘semi-premium’ reputation came from its more dynamic and engaging driving experience. While other brands have certainly caught up, and in some cases surpassed VW, it remains a core attribute.

That is very much the case with the Tayron, which has a very well-sorted powertrain and chassis, and that means good performance when you put your foot down and excellent response when you turn the wheel. 

Obviously nobody really buys a seven-seat SUV for its dynamic qualities but it’s a nice bonus, especially when you are paying this kind of money.

One downside of the dynamics is the responsive handling comes at the cost of firmer suspension, so it can feel busy on bumpy roads.

However, there was a bigger issue on the cars we drove at the official launch event, with several suffering from noticeable rattles from the doors, especially when the road gets choppy.

This is very much not a traditional Volkswagen feature, which typically have very solid build quality, so it will be worth listening for if you take a Tayron for a test drive. 

If you’re expecting a tangible difference in performance with the V-Active system, you’ll probably be disappointed. Fact is, after almost 600km of testing, on a variety of roads with a variety of loads, we could not detect any noticeable gain in acceleration, braking or smoothness compared to a standard SR5.

That’s not to say the V-Active system is not delivering up to 8.4kW of power and 65Nm of torque, as Toyota claims. It’s just that these gains are modest and delivered so discreetly that they are undetectable in real-world driving.

This was perhaps best demonstrated when we loaded 650kg into the load tub, which when combined with our two-man crew was a total payload of 830kg. That was only 70kg shy of the payload limit.

It made light work of our 13 per cent gradient 2.0km set climb at 60km/h by self-shifting down to fourth gear at 2250rpm, where it tapped maximum torque to easily haul this payload to the summit.

However, in our previous test of a standard SR5, on the same incline with 100kg more payload, the gear selection and engine rpm were the same as the V-Active. The same applied to engine-braking on the way down.

The HiLux achieved a maximum five-star ANCAP rating in 2019, so its six-year validity will expire next year. Even so, there are seven airbags plus AEB with pedestrian and daytime cyclist detection, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, lane keeping, active cruise control, speed-sign recognition, panoramic view/reversing camera and more.

The rear seat offers ISOFIX child-seat mounts on the two outer seating positions plus top-tether restraints on all three seating positions.

The Tayron is covered by VW’s usual five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty. While that’s not bad, per se, it also not particularly outstanding given the growing number of seven and 10-year coverages.

As for servicing, the Tayron requires a check-up every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. VW Australia offers either three or five-year Care Plans, which save you money compared to the pay-as-you-go offer.

For the 110TSI a three-year plan costs $1595 (saving $178) and the five-year plan $2910 (saving $528). The 150TSI and 195TSI cost the same, with three years $1891 (saving $211) and five years for $3550 (saving $554).

Toyota covers the HiLux with a five-year/unlimited km warranty which is par for the course in the mainstream market.

Service intervals are relatively short at six months/10,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price servicing for the first five years/100,000km totals $3889 or an average of $779 per year.