Volkswagen Tayron vs BYD Shark 6

What's the difference?

The Tiguan Allspace was not really an iconic Volkswagen badge, not in the same way as the Golf, Polo or even just the Tiguan itself, so the brand has taken a smaller risk than many in changing names. But, to be blunt, it doesn’t really matter what the badge on the back is, as long as, at its core, it lives up to the Volkswagen attributes buyers expect - and the Tayron definitely does that.

This new seven-seat SUV is a very welcome addition not only to Volkswagen’s line-up, but to the entire family SUV segment. It’s competitively priced, enjoyable to drive and very practical. The Tayron has a lot to offer those in the market for family-friendly transport.

That doesn’t mean it’s best-in-class, and there are areas where it can be improved, but there’s no reason why the Tayron shouldn’t enjoy the same level of success the Tiguan Allspace enjoyed.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.

The Shark 6 breaks new ground with its PHEV technology and impresses with not only its whisper-quiet and rapid acceleration but also engaging chassis dynamics, build quality, fuel economy and generous standard equipment for a compelling price. However, its modest payload and tow ratings may be deal-breakers for some tradies and recreational buyers with bigger loads to haul.

Despite the name change, the resemblance between the Tiguan and Tayron is strong, largely because they still share a lot of commonalities.

From the front windscreen forward, they are the same, but the Tayron gets a different lower bumper treatment across the variants to give it a unique front, as well as squared-off wheel arches for further visual separation from Tiguan.

It’s a similar story at the rear too, with a unique lower bumper to make the pair look different when parked side-by-side.

But where you see the most obvious differences between the pair is from the side, with the Tayron 280mm longer than the Tiguan. 

Crucially, the wheelbase has been stretched from 2681mm for the Tiguan to 2791mm for the Tayron, adding an additional 110mm of interior space. This means the side profile of the Tayron looks longer too.

Ultimately, while the changes are obvious when the two are side-by-side, there’s still a clear visual connection between the pair, despite the different names.

Our test vehicle rides on a 3260mm wheelbase and is 5457mm long, 1971mm wide and 1925mm high, so it’s in the same ballpark as a Ford Ranger 4x4 dual cab ute.

The Shark 6 features traditional body-on-frame truck chassis design, double-wishbone coil-spring front and rear suspension, rack-and-pinion steering and four-wheel disc brakes.

It also has a compact 11.0-metre turning circle and its off-road credentials include 230mm of unladen ground clearance, 700mm wading depth and 31 degrees approach/17 degrees ramp-over/19.3 degrees departure angles. A large metal bash-plate protects the underside.

Looks are subjective of course and even though there’s too much external black plastic for our liking, we reckon it still passes the pub test on styling with its chunky and purposeful appearance.

The bold grille and headlight design appears to draw inspiration from full-size US pick-ups, but with a ‘technical’ look consistent with its high-tech powertrain.

The predominantly grey interior has a high-quality finish and looks good. It also appears to draw inspiration from rivals, in this case the Ranger Raptor with its contrasting bright red air-vent/cupholder surrounds and exposed stitching along numerous seams.

Volkswagen’s reputation for being ‘semi-premium’ came in part because it offered an elevated in-car experience compared to many of its mainstream rivals. And that is very much the case with the new Tayron, which is loaded with the latest technology but still looks and feels like a Volkswagen.

The interior is dominated by the central screen, which at 15 inches on the 150TSI Elegance and 195TSI R-Line pushes to the very limits of how big and how high an multimedia screen like this can be practically and safely included in a car. While it’s not the biggest in-car screen, it sits right at the top of the centre of the dashboard and almost gets in the way of vision across the bonnet.

The (slightly) smaller 12.9-inch display in the rest of the range is obviously better, but both screens are generous in size and offer good touchscreen usability, with fast reactions and relatively straightforward menus.

However, what neither offers is much in the way of physical switchgear, so most controls need to be changed via the touchscreen, which is not the easiest or safest way to interact with a vehicle you’re trying to drive.

But overall the cabin design is nice and what we’ve come to expect from Volkswagen. The materials look and feel high quality and there’s a nice mix to create a more premium-feeling environment.

One notable element is the extra storage in the console between the front seats, which includes a clever spot for two smartphones to wirelessly charge, with a lid on top for added usable space.

As for the practicality, that really depends on your point-of-view and reasons for needing a seven-seat SUV. That’s because the Tayron, like the Tiguan Allspace before it, is not really a true seven-seater but rather more accurately described as a ‘5+2’ SUV. 

What that means is, the third-row seats are for occasional use rather than regular use. So, if you need something to carry five or more passengers (most likely a family with multiple children) on a regular basis, then the Tayron is likely too small for your needs.

If, however, you need a five-seater the majority of the time but would like the option to carry two more if the need arises, then the Tayron is very much worth considering.

Even then, it’s worth noting that the third row is both tight on space (even with the second row slid forward) and there is only limited storage and no air-con vents, charging outlets or even child seat restraints.

Space in the first two rows is good, though, with the second row able to slide backwards and forwards depending on how much space your passengers need.

As for the 150TSI Life, with its unique five-seat layout, well it takes advantage of one of the biggest selling points of the Tayron - it’s big boot. 

The five-seater gets 885 litres of boot space, thanks in part to some underfloor storage where the seats would normally be. So it will appeal to those who like a mid-size SUV, like the Tiguan, but need extra cargo room on the regular.

As for the seven-seat versions, Volkswagen claims the Tayron has 850 litres with third-row stowed and 345 litres with third row in use. The former is excellent, while the latter is adequate.

The addition of the extra seats means the Tayron is equipped with a space-saver spare wheel, rather than a full-size one.

With its hefty 2710kg kerb weight and 3500kg GVM, the Shark 6 has a 790kg payload rating which is less than some turbo-diesel rivals.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer which is 1000kg less than the category benchmark. And BYD does not publish a GCM (Gross Combination Mass) rating, so we don’t know how much weight the Shark 6 can legally carry and tow at the same time.

The load tub is almost square with its 1520mm length and 1500mm width. And with 1224mm between the rear-wheel housings, it can carry either Aussie or Euro pallets. Its 517mm depth results in 1.2 cubic metres of total load volume.

There are six load-anchorage points but those located in the sidewalls at the front and centre of the tub are too high for securing low-profile loads. Anchorage points located near floor-level are preferable, as they can secure loads of all heights.

The tub’s internal surfaces are protected by a spray-in liner and there’s bright internal lighting and a hydraulic strut to ease tailgate operation.

Seating for the driver and front passenger is spacious and comfortable. The rear bench seat shares similar qualities, given I’m 186cm tall and when seated behind the driver’s seat in my position I still have ample kneeroom.

Rear seat passengers also enjoy sufficient headroom, even for tall people seated in the least popular central position who also have a nice flat floor given the absence of a transmission tunnel. However, shoulder room for adults sitting three-abreast is tight and best limited to short drives.

Cabin storage for front seat occupants includes a large-bottle holder and bin in each front door, overhead glasses holder plus a dash storage shelf and glove box on the passenger side.

The centre console has two small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back.

Rear passengers also get a large-bottle holder and bin in each door, plus pockets on the rear of both front seat backrests and a fold-down centre armrest with two small-bottle/cup-holders.

The bench seat’s base cushion can be raised and stored vertically if more internal luggage space is required, but there’s no under-floor storage.

The BYD Shark 6 is available in one model specification which combines two electric motors with an internal combustion engine, single-speed transmission and plug-in rechargeable battery for a list price of $57,900.

Our test vehicle is finished in 'Great White' (yeah, we get it) and comes with a standard equipment list as long as an extension ladder. There’s 18-inch alloys with 265/65 R18 tyres and a full-size steel spare, roof rails, side-steps, heated door mirrors, rear privacy glass, 360-degree camera view, front and rear parking sensors, LED lighting, fog lights and (useful for tradies) three 230V V2L (Vehicle to Load) three-pin outlets in the tub to power everything from tools to camping accessories.

Step aboard using the keyless entry/start and you’ll find synthetic leather-appointed seats with the front buckets offering heating/cooling and multiple power adjustment.

The driver also gets a genuine leather-wrapped steering wheel with multiple remote functions plus a 10.25-inch LCD instrument display and head-up display.

There’s also dual-zone climate control, wireless phone-charging, USB-A/USB-C ports and 12V/230V V2L power outlets plus premium 12-speaker sound for a multimedia system offering voice assistance, digital radio and wired or wireless connectivity for Apple CarPlay/Android Auto devices.

Media and many other vehicle functions are controlled by a large 15.6-inch touchscreen on the dash, which can power-rotate between landscape and portrait positions according to personal preference.

There are three powertrain choices for the arrival of the Tayron, but the company has also confirmed two plug-in hybrid variants are coming in 2026.

For now it’s an all-petrol-powered line-up. The 110TSI Life is powered by a 110kW/250Nm 1.4-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine. This is paired to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and sends all its performance via the front wheels only.

The 150TSI gets a bigger 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine making, you guessed it, 150kW and 320Nm. It also has a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic but adds all-wheel drive.

Finally, there’s the 195TSI R-Line, which VW claims offers ‘GTI levels of performance’, so it gets a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder unit pumping out 195kW and 400Nm. Once again, this is mated to a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and gets an all-wheel drive system.

While the performance offered by all three powertrains is good, the lack of the hybrid option from launch does cost Volkswagen a point or two.

The Shark 6’s hybrid drivetrain with permanent all-wheel drive includes two electric motors, with the front motor producing up to 170kW/310Nm driving the front wheels. The rear motor produces up to 150kW/340Nm and drives the rears.

These motors are teamed with a 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine producing up to 135kW/260Nm, which serves dual roles as a generator to maintain charge in the 29.58kWh lithium-ion battery (in addition to regenerative braking) and to assist with driving the front wheels as required. It can also perform both roles simultaneously.

The combined output of electric motors/petrol engine is up to 321kW and 650Nm. There are also three selectable drive modes comprising Eco, Normal and Sport, plus different terrain settings to optimise performance in Mud/Sand/Snow/Mountain.

The plug-in battery can be charged using either the AC (7.0kW) or DC (55kW) ports. Cables for both were supplied with our test vehicle and stored in a carry bag behind the rear seat.

Going with a line-up of turbocharged petrol engines means the Tayron isn’t the most efficient SUV in its segment, but the addition of the eHybrid PHEVs next year will change that.

In the meantime, what you need to know is that the 110TSI uses 7.6L/100km, the 150TSI has a  7.7L/100km claim and the 195TSI is unsurprisingly the thirstiest at 8.6L/100km.

Those are all relatively high when you compare them to key rivals, such as the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid, which uses just 5.6L/100km, the same as the Toyota Kluger Hybrid - and both of those are conventional hybrid systems. 

The saving grace for VW is the non-hybrid Santa Fe uses 9.3L, so it makes the Tayron look better. But until the Tayron plug-in hybrids arrive, VW is at a disadvantage.

As for driving range, the 110TSI has a 55-litre fuel tank, so a theoretical range of 720km between fueling stops. The 150TSI and 195TSI get a slightly larger 58-litre tank, which means the former has a 750km range and the latter approximately 675km.

BYD claims combined average fuel consumption for the petrol engine as low as 2.0L/100km with 25-100 per cent SoC (State of Charge) which spikes to 7.9L/100km when SoC drops below 25 per cent (see Driving).

BYD also claims an NEDC battery-only driving range of up to 100km (with 25-100 per cent SoC) and up to 800km when combined with the petrol engine in hybrid mode.

We covered 522km during our test which was a mix of city, suburban and regional roads plus some highway driving, of which about one fifth of that distance was hauling a near-maximum payload.

At the completion of our test, the Shark 6’s onboard computer claimed average petrol consumption of 6.6L/100km with 204km of range remaining, which suggests a real-world driving range of at least 700km is credible from its 60-litre petrol tank.

Family-friendly SUV or not, a big part of Volkswagen’s ‘semi-premium’ reputation came from its more dynamic and engaging driving experience. While other brands have certainly caught up, and in some cases surpassed VW, it remains a core attribute.

That is very much the case with the Tayron, which has a very well-sorted powertrain and chassis, and that means good performance when you put your foot down and excellent response when you turn the wheel. 

Obviously nobody really buys a seven-seat SUV for its dynamic qualities but it’s a nice bonus, especially when you are paying this kind of money.

One downside of the dynamics is the responsive handling comes at the cost of firmer suspension, so it can feel busy on bumpy roads.

However, there was a bigger issue on the cars we drove at the official launch event, with several suffering from noticeable rattles from the doors, especially when the road gets choppy.

This is very much not a traditional Volkswagen feature, which typically have very solid build quality, so it will be worth listening for if you take a Tayron for a test drive. 

The seating is comfortable and supportive and the driving experience is enhanced by the head up display, large left footrest and thick-rimmed leather wheel.

It’s quiet to drive and the ride quality is outstanding, with refined and disciplined suspension tuning combined with responsive steering and braking. It all adds up to handling agility on winding mountain roads that belies the fact it’s a high-riding 2.7-tonne ute.

Rapid acceleration from standing starts (BYD claims 0-100km/h in just 5.7sec) is also effective in masking its bulk, as instant torque from the dual electric motors gets it rushing towards triple-digit speeds with unrelenting ease, regardless of gradient.

We did most of our test in the ‘Normal’ (default) drive mode, as it provides a happy medium between the heightened response of ‘Sport’ and the slightly subdued ‘Eco’ modes.

To test its GVM rating, we loaded 650kg into the load tub which with driver equalled a 750kg payload that was only about 40kg less than its legal limit. The independent rear suspension compressed about 60mm, but there was no bottoming-out detected as it competently hauled this load on our test route.

Although the ‘Energy Manager’ on the touchscreen allows drivers to pre-set a minimum SoC between 25-70 per cent, we didn’t enter any setting as we wanted to see how the hybrid system performed without these inputs.

Fact is, it did not allow the SoC to drop below 20 per cent, even during highway driving when there was minimal charging assistance available from regenerative braking.

As displayed live on the energy manager, the petrol engine maintained the battery charge needed to feed the electric motors while also providing intermittent drive to the front wheels as required.

At times the little 1.5-litre turbo engine sounded like it was working very hard doing this, but it did prove effective in performing these dual roles.

The hybrid system also produces minimal engine-braking (even with maximum regenerative braking) which is an important consideration if you regularly carry and/or tow heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain.

With a traditional turbo-diesel and multi-speed transmission, a low gear can be manually selected to allow the engine on overrun to assist the brakes in restraining loads on steep descents. However, with its single-speed transmission and small petrol engine, the Shark 6 must rely on brakes alone.

The Shark 6 was awarded a maximum five-star ANCAP rating in 2025. It has multiple airbags including front and rear side-curtains, AEB including cyclist and pedestrian detection, lane-keeping, adaptive cruise control, front and rear parking sensors, rear cross-traffic alert, blind-spot monitoring, a 360-degree camera view and lots more. The rear seat has top-tether and ISOFIX child-seat anchorages for the two outer positions.

The Tayron is covered by VW’s usual five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty. While that’s not bad, per se, it also not particularly outstanding given the growing number of seven and 10-year coverages.

As for servicing, the Tayron requires a check-up every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever comes first. VW Australia offers either three or five-year Care Plans, which save you money compared to the pay-as-you-go offer.

For the 110TSI a three-year plan costs $1595 (saving $178) and the five-year plan $2910 (saving $528). The 150TSI and 195TSI cost the same, with three years $1891 (saving $211) and five years for $3550 (saving $554).

The Shark 6 is covered by BYD's six-year/150,000km warranty and an eight-year/160,000km battery warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/20,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-pricing for the first six scheduled services totals $2945 or an average of $490 per year.