Toyota Prado vs Toyota Landcruiser 70 Series

What's the difference?

While no doubt the hybrid would appeal to some buyers, given the limits in towing capacity and higher fuel consumption, the extra performance doesn’t really make the i-Force Max a compelling proposition for the LandCruiser/Prado. Australian buyers have made it abundantly clear they’re happy with the Prado already on sale, so it’s hard to see the hybrid having too much success here alongside the diesel engine.

Life is full of compromises and the 76 Series wagon is no exception. The payback for accepting its minimal cabin storage, comfort-challenged rear seat, no ANCAP, high purchase price, high servicing costs etc is that you get a genuinely heavy duty 4x4 wagon with huge GVM/GCM ratings unmatched by its ute-derived rivals.

The V8 manual or four-cylinder auto have different characteristics but similar competence, with the manual obviously requiring more physical effort, so it comes down to personal preference. And we’re sure, given its long history, there’s plenty of emotional attachment driving the bulging V8 order book. Either way, with its enormous fuel tank and revered off-road prowess, this rugged and dependable wagon has a proven ability to take you and your crew deep into the wilderness – and get you home again.

The Prado and LandCruiser largely look the same, but the 1958 we drove did have a few standout elements from a design perspective.

The most obvious are the retro round headlights of the 1958, which are meant to hark back to the original FJ Cruiser. The retro theme is helped by the round light framing the large rectangular mesh grille with ‘TOYOTA’ in big, bold letters.

Personally, I really like the round lights and think it’s a shame the Australian-bound Prado misses out, purely for the aesthetics.

Inside the cabin also feels like a throwback in time, but not to the 1950s, rather the late ‘80s and early ‘90s with the grey cloth trim. It’s a brave decision from Toyota to ditch a more modern look and feel, but, again, I really like it. It feels hard-wearing and suits the nature of the Land Cruiser in the US market, where it has to woo buyers away from Bronco and Wrangler.

One design choice of note is the US-spec version has ‘LandCruiser’ embossed on the dashboard ahead of the passenger, something else we miss out on here with our Prado.

The 76 Series wagon has the shortest wheelbase of the four-model 70 Series range at 2730mm, which makes it the most responsive to steering input.

It also has the shortest overall length (4910mm) and in GXL form the tightest turning circle (13.2 metres) which can make life easier in tight situations, from busy car parks to challenging bush tracks.

Off-road credentials include 33 degrees approach and 23 degrees departure angles, plus 290mm of ground clearance. Curiously, Toyota does not publish a ramp break-over angle.

The interior is B for basic, in true 70 Series tradition, with seat fabrics and colours reminiscent of circa-1990s Toyotas.

The most noticeable differences between the four-cylinder auto and V8 manual cabins are that the V8 version has an extra pedal and misses out on the auto’s full-length centre console, which offers additional and much-needed storage space.

There’s ample headroom but that generosity does not extend to rear seat comfort, at least for tall people like me (186cm).

The entry pathway between the B-pillar and rear seat base cushion is narrow and, when sitting behind the driver’s seat in my position, my knees are pressing into the front seat’s backrest.

So, it’s not possible for two big blokes to sit one behind the other without the ‘one’ behind feeling squished.

Fortunately, the 60/40-split rear seat allows adjustment of backrest angles and for those seated in the centre there’s a nice flat floor with no transmission tunnel to straddle. However, the centre passenger’s back/backside are directly over the 60/40 split, which is quite a wide gap (about 15mm) that's intolerable for anything longer than short trips.

Rear shoulder room for three adults is also squeezy, so keep these rear seat issues in mind if planning an adventure for five.

As the entry-grade variant in the US range, the LandCruiser 1958 is more utilitarian than pampering. That translates to a cabin that has plenty of usability, just like the Australian-delivered LandCruiser Prados we’re used to.

There’s nothing overtly different about the US-spec model, with good space and small item storage in the front and decent room in the second row.

The multimedia system is the same as the one used here too, which speaks to Toyota’s strength for consistency of product around the world. It means anyone driving a Toyota - whether it’s in Australia, the US or elsewhere - has a sense of familiarity immediately.

It also helps that Toyota has stuck with a large amount of physical buttons and switchgear (I counted nearly 50) in addition to the touchscreen. While other brands look to cut controls to save money at the expense of usability, Toyota is sticking with what people know and enjoy.

However, the US version of the Prado has the same riser box inside the boot, which limits its cargo capacity in the same way as it has done here. It's still a reasonable size, but the riser does eat into space and compromises practicality.

Our GXL V8 test vehicle’s 2355kg kerb weight and 3510kg GVM results in a Herculean payload rating of 1155kg.

It’s also rated to tow up to 3500kg of braked trailer and with its towering 7010kg GCM (or how much it can carry and tow at the same time), that means it can tow its maximum trailer weight while carrying its maximum payload, which is impressive.

These substantial load ratings make the 76 Series a popular choice for hardcore adventurers that need to carry a crew and everything else (including the kitchen sink) when venturing far off the beaten track for extended periods.

The absence of a third row of seating creates a spacious rear load area, accessed through asymmetric barn-doors, the larger of which carries the spare wheel/tyre.

The rear seat backrests can fold flat to provide more load volume and their base cushions can tumble forward to create even more space. The GXL’s load floor is carpeted and equipped with four anchorage hooks for securing load straps or cargo nets.

Cabin storage for personal items is in short supply, as the driver and front passenger only get a narrow and shallow bin (more like a document holder) at the base of each door, with a small bottle/cupholder in the passenger side bin.

There’s also a glove box, single small-bottle/cupholder next to the gearstick and a tiny console box between the seats.

Rear passengers only get mesh pockets on the front seat backrests, as there are no bins or bottle/cupholders in the rear doors.

There’s also no fold-down centre armrest, so no bottle/cupholders to be found anywhere. We reckon aftermarket cabin organisers would be popular purchases by 76 Series owners!

The 76 Series wagon is available in work-focused Workmate grade, or premium GXL, as per our example. Equipped with the 4.5-litre turbo-diesel V8 and five-speed manual transmission, it has a list price of $83,900.

The GXL costs $8300 more than the Workmate V8 equivalent and for that extra spend you get an expanded menu of standard equipment including front and rear diff-locks, 16-inch alloy wheels and 265/70R16 tyres (with a full-size spare), wide front mudguards, wheel arch flares, LED front fog lights, aluminium side-steps and chrome bumpers.

Interior enhancements include keyless entry and central-locking, fabric seat and door trim, carpet flooring, power windows, front seat back-pockets, four-speaker audio and two USB-C ports (we’re surprised Toyota did not provide the usual choice of USB-A and USB-C ports).

These GXL features are in addition to standard equipment added as part of the recent 70 Series upgrade, including a redesigned front fascia with LED lighting including DRLs and auto high beam, 60/40-split rear seat (wagon only), multi-function steering wheel controls, a 4.2-inch driver’s multi-info display and upgraded multimedia with a 6.7-inch touchscreen display, digital radio and wired Apple and Android connectivity. Safety has also been upgraded with lane-keeping and speed sign recognition.

This is the heart of our review, the unavailable hybrid engine, the so-called 'i-Force Max' hybrid powertrain. This is because the US market has never embraced diesel engines, which are so beloved by Prado owners in Australia, so in the search for greater efficiency, Toyota USA is leaning on hybrid technology.

The set-up in the LandCruiser combines a 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine with an electric motor in the bell housing between the engine and eight-speed automatic transmission. The combined output of this petrol-electric hybrid is 243kW of power and 630Nm of torque, which is significantly more than the 150kW/500Nm offered by the 2.8-litre turbo diesel offered in Australia.

The catch is, despite the additional power and torque, the LandCruiser is only rated to tow slightly more than 2700kg compared to the 3500kg towing capacity offered by our diesel Prado.

Toyota’s (1VD-FTV) 4.5-litre turbo-diesel V8 produces 151kW at 3400rpm. More importantly, its 430Nm of torque is served at full strength across a vast 2000rpm-wide torque band between 1200-3200rpm. This showcases its remarkable flexibility for heavy load-carrying, towing and off-road slogging.

This engine is paired with the equally popular (H152F) five-speed manual transmission, which features an ultra-short first gear ideal for low-speed off-road driving or getting heavy loads moving. By comparison, the overdriven top gear provides long enough legs for economical cruising at highway speeds.

Its part-time, dual-range 4x4 transmission offers a 44:1 crawl ratio, combined with Toyota’s outstanding active traction control, automatic-locking front hubs and (standard on GXL) front and rear diff locks. This is a formidable off-roader.

Obviously one of the biggest reasons for offering/choosing a hybrid engine is fuel efficiency and on that front the LandCruiser runs into the classic problem of big car, small engine. The official combined urban/highway fuel economy figure for the hybrid is 10.2L/100km, which is well behind the official claim for the diesel-powered Prado of just 7.6L/100km.

Drilling in deeper, the LandCruiser hybrid can drop as low as 9.4L/100km on the highway but rises to 10.6L/100km in a purely urban environment, which is typically the opposite to how hybrids excel.

The other major difference between the LandCruiser and our Prado is the size of the fuel tank. The US model only gets a 67-litre tank compared to the 110L offered in Australian models. That, naturally, has a major impact on range, with the LandCruiser hybrid only able to go a theoretical 656km on a single tank, compared to nearly 1300km for the Prado diesel.

Toyota’s official average combined cycle consumption figure for the V8 manual is 10.7L/100km. The dash display was claiming 10.9 when we stopped to refuel at the completion of our 276km test, which comprised a mix of city, suburban, highway and dirt driving with a variety of occupant loads.

Interestingly, the dash readout was identical to our own 10.9 figure calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, which confirms the accuracy of the LandCruiser’s fuel calculations and the efficiency of its relatively large V8 in a vehicle weighing more than two tonnes in mostly urban driving.

So, based on our figures, it has a vast 'real world' driving range of more than 1100km from its huge 130-litre tank.

While it may be a hybrid, the LandCruiser is no urban ‘show pony’ and Toyota USA is adamant that it is tough enough to live up to the reputation of its famous nameplate. It’s built on the same TNGA-F platform as our Prado - as well as the Tundra pick-up and others - so it has the foundations for rugged adventure.

It comes standard with locking centre and rear differentials, rear coil springs, full-time four-wheel drive, a two-speed transfer case, ‘CRAWL Control’, a 2400W AC inverter and standard trailer brake controller, which are all must-haves for anyone planning a serious off-road trip.

While we have little reason to doubt the off-road ability of the LandCruiser, our test drive was limited to the urban jungle of Los Angeles, which allowed us to really focus on the powertrain.

Not surprisingly, given its similarities with other Toyota hybrid set-ups, it felt very familiar, albeit in a very different vehicle than the RAV4 and Camry we’ve driven previously. Despite its big on-paper numbers, there was some noticeable lag on initial acceleration and the engine sounds like a modern four-cylinder - a bit gruff when revved hard.

It certainly has enough performance to pull the LandCruiser along, but it isn’t over-endowed with power and torque. At least not in the way its stats suggest.

For the most part, around town, it did a good job of quietly motivating the big SUV around with a minimum of fuss.

The aluminium side-steps, along with handles on the A- (and B-) pillars, assist climbing aboard and all-around vision is good thanks to large glass areas, sizeable door mirrors and a reversing camera, although the rear seat headrests partly block vision through the central rear-view mirror.

It’s the best off-road driving position an adventurer could ask for, combining good comfort with a commanding view over the bonnet and out each side, which allows accurate vehicle placement in all terrain.

The ride quality is firm, as you’d expect in a vehicle that can legally haul more than seven tonnes, but supple enough to absorb bumps without jarring. This is aided by the relatively baggy sidewalls of the GXL’s tyres.

Old school recirculating-ball steering is low-geared and lightly weighted with ample free play off-centre to soften off-road blows, which is highly valued by loyal customers.

The wagon’s shorter wheelbase, tighter turning circle and shortest overall length than its 70 Series stablemates provides enhanced steering response and manoeuvrability, combined with four-wheel disc brakes giving ample stopping power.

Given the V8’s torque band is as wide and flat as Lake Eyre, it will accelerate smoothly in top gear from under 1000rpm, so there’s no need to shift your way through all five cogs from each standing start. In fact, for road use without a load, we always drive it like a three-speeder, using only first, third and fifth gears.

Noise levels are reasonably low in city and suburban driving. However, they do become more intrusive at highway speeds, when engine, tyre and wind noise combine to require raised voices, even though the overdriven top gear ensures a relatively low 2200rpm at 110km/h.

We also detected some squeaks and rattles emanating from the rear of the vehicle on bumpy roads, which suggested it was coming from the spare tyre mounted on the back door.

No ANCAP rating for the wagon, as the single cab-chassis version is still the only 70 Series variant to have achieved five-stars and that was back in 2016.

And although the wagon has AEB with day/night pedestrian and daytime cyclist detection plus driver and front passenger front airbags, it misses out on side-curtain and driver’s knee airbags.

New safety features include lane-departure alert with steering assist, speed sign recognition and auto high-beam control. There are no ISOFIX child seat anchorages in the rear seat, but there are three top-tethers above the rear barn-doors.

One big plus for the LandCruiser over the Prado is Toyota USA offers two years of free servicing - a nice bonus.

It does have different warranty coverage for different components though, the overall vehicle warranty covers the first three years, the powertrain is covered for five years but the hybrid components are warranted for 10 years.

The LandCruiser is covered by Toyota's five-year/unlimited km warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every six months/10,000km whichever occurs first.

Capped-price servicing of $525 applies for each of the first 10 scheduled services, which is a pricey $1050 per year or $5250 over five years.