Porsche 718 vs Ferrari California

What's the difference?

If this is to be the end of the 718 as we know it, then it is an end to be remembered. Porsche has produced something special in the Spyder RS, a sports car that can compete with the 911 on any stretch of road - which is something so few cars can claim. The focus on performance has driven the entire concept of the car, but all the elements work in harmony, with form and function coming together.

The overall score doesn’t necessarily reflect how good this car is, but that’s because we have to factor in safety kit and equipment. Those things matter, sure. But if you really want a Ferrari Portofino, you’ll probably read the drive impressions and look at the photos, both of which should be enough to push you over the line if you’re not quite there yet.

The Ferrari Portofino 2019 model is not just bellissimo to look at, it’s also a more Italian offering. And that’s buonissimo. 

As the pinnacle of not only the current 718 range, but potentially the entire combustion engine era of the Boxster, Porsche has pulled out all the stops for the Spyder RS.

This includes major changes to the design, but none are purely for aesthetic reasons and instead are driven by the search for performance; and the fact they make the 718 look tougher, meaner and more purposeful than ever before is just a bonus.

It’s a comprehensive redesign that starts at the bumper with a new front lip spoiler to enhance downforce. Then there’s a pair of NACA ducts on the lightweight bonnet to improve brake cooling without compromising aerodynamic drag. The lightweight front fenders include wheel arch vents to stop any potential for front-end lift at high speeds.

And the fenders aren’t the only component that’s gone on a diet, there’s a lighter exhaust, lighter wheels, lighter bonnet, lighter roof, lighter door panels and even lighter carpets on the inside. All up, the Spyder RS tips the scales at 1400kg, which is 40kg lighter than a standard 718 Boxster.

If it’s still not light enough, you can opt for the optional 'Weissach Package' (which was fitted to our test car), which brings even lighter 20-inch forged magnesium wheels and carbon-fibre reinforced plastic for a range of parts including the front luggage compartment, rollover bars and ducktail spoiler on the Gurney flap – plus some cosmetic enhancements.

And we still haven’t even touched on the biggest design change yet - the rear half of the car. Starting with the roof, which Porsche actually calls a ‘sunshield’ and ‘weather guard’ because it’s a stripped down version of what the brand usually uses, to save weight and let the glorious engine noise into the cabin uninterrupted.

But it’s also necessary because the entire rear engine cover has been redesigned to accommodate the larger engine that Porsche has installed in the Spyder RS, a 4.0-litre six-cylinder instead of the usual turbocharged four-cylinder ‘boxer’ engines.

While the Spyder RS looks great with the roof/sunshield on or off, frankly the removal process is much too complicated and requires repeated viewings of a YouTube tutorial to still get it wrong.

While owners will (likely) eventually get the hang of it, it will always be a clunky and awkward process and that’s just the price of being so focused on performance, which you can accept or not.

Inside that ethos of performance over practicality continues, with sports seats, an Alcantara-wrapped steering wheel and even the previously mentioned lightweight carpet floor mats.

It’s a purposeful, rather than luxurious, cabin, but that perfectly suits the nature of the Spyder RS. Our test drive included several long stretches behind the wheel and at no stage did it feel uncomfortable or impractical, despite its stripped-down design.

It’s a more angry-looking entry-level car for the iconic Italian brand, but not in an ugly way. 

Sure, some angry faces aren’t pretty. But I bet if Elle Macpherson or George Clooney got cranky at you, you’d still probably find them attractive. And so it is with the Portofino, which has a mildly menacing front end, some scintillating curves over its taut metalwork, and a pair of high-set hips with bold tail lights. 

It is undeniably more muscular than the old California was. And filling the wheel arches are 20-inch wheels, which measure eight inches wide at the front (with 245/35 rubber) and ten inches wide (285/35) at the back.

This isn’t a compact car, either - with dimensions of 4586mm long, 1938mm wide and 1318mm tall, the Portofino is longer than some mid-sized SUVs. But boy, does it pull its size off well. 

And like many of the beachside manors in the seaside town for which the new model is named, you can shutter yourself in to combat bad weather. The folding electronic roof system takes 14 seconds to raise or lower, and can be operated at speeds up to 40km/h.

I actually think it looks better with the roof on. It’s not often you can say that about a convertible…

One area where the 718 range is starting to show its age quite dramatically is the in-car technology. While Porsche’s native system is relatively user-friendly, the lack of wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto in any capacity is deeply out-dated; and was frustrating for this Android using reviewer.

Given the age of the current 718 platform, and the impending arrival of the new model, it’s understandable that the multimedia system didn’t get an overhaul, but for a $350K car it does feel a bit behind the times.

In practical terms the Spyder RS is a bit of a struggle if you plan to go away with it. We managed to get a small suitcase and backpack in the under bonnet storage, but that was at capacity. While the addition of the larger engine removes any meaningful rear storage space.

You aren’t buying a Ferrari if you want the most practical car for the money, but that doesn’t mean there isn't some semblance of pragmatism to the Portofino.

There are four seats. I know, it’s amazing to think there’s a point in making the Portofino a 2+2 seater, but according to Ferrari, owners of the outgoing California model used those back seats about 30 per cent of the time.

I wouldn’t want to be in the back row that much. It’s designed to play host to little kids or small adults, but anyone nearing my height (182cm) will be very uncomfortable. Even tiny adult males (like fellow auto scribe Stephen Corby, for example) reckon it’s tight and not a pleasant place to be back there. (link to existing review). But if you have kids, there are two ISOFIX child seat anchor points.

The boot space is not huge, but with 292 litres of cargo capacity with the roof up, there’s enough room for a weekend’s worth of luggage for a couple (Ferrari says you can fit three cabin bags in that configuration, or two with the roof down). And - a tidbit for the actual customers out there- it has more luggage capacity than you get in a new Corolla hatch (217L). 

As for cabin comfort, the front seats are sumptuous, and there are some nice elements like the 10.25-inch infotainment screen, which is pretty easy to use, if a little slow to load when you’re skipping between screens or trying to key locations into the sat-nav system.

There are also two 5.0-inch digital screens in front of the driver, mounted either side of the rev counter, and the front passenger can have their very own display with speed, revs and gear on show. It’s a neat option.

While it may have some long-distance touring pretence, the Portofino isn’t a beacon of loose-item storage. It has a pair of cupholders, and there’s a small storage tray that will fit a smartphone.

It would be silly to think that people who can afford a Ferrari aren’t conscious of finance. Most people who can buy a car like this are very specific about what they will and won’t spend their hard-earned cash on, but according to Ferrari, about 70 per cent of projected Portofino purchasers will be buying their very first Prancing Horse. Lucky them!

And at $399,888 (list price, before on-road costs), the Portofino is as close to an affordable new Ferrari as you’ll get. 

Standard equipment includes that 10.25-inch media screen that runs Apple CarPlay (an option, of course) and includes sat nav, DAB digital radio, and acts as a display for the reversing camera with parking guidance lines, plus there are front and rear parking sensors as standard.

The standard wheel package is a 20-inch set, and of course you get leather trim, 18-way electronically adjustable front seats, plus heated front seats and dual-zone climate control, and there’s proximity unlocking, too (keyless entry) with a push-button starter on the steering wheel. Auto LED headlights and auto wipers are standard, as is cruise control and an auto-dimming rear-view mirror. 

Speaking of Ferrari’s fantastic Formula One-inspired wheel (with paddle shifters), the version with the carbon fibre trim and integrated shift LEDs fitted to our car cost an extra $8300. Oh, and if you do want CarPlay, that'll be $6793 (which is more than the best Apple computer you can buy), and that reversing camera will add $6950 to the price. WHATTTT???

Some of the other options fitted to our car included the Magneride adaptive dampers ($8970), the LCD passenger display ($9501), adaptive front lighting ($5500), a premium hi-fi sound system ($10,100), and a foldable rear-seat backrest ($2701), among plenty of other interior elements. 

The as-tested price for our just-under-four-hundred-grand Ferrari, then, was actually $481,394. But who's counting?

The Portofino is available in 28 different colours (including seven blue hues, six grey options, five red and three yellow paint choices).

The key stat for the engine is the cylinder count. Gone are the four cylinders and instead it’s a return to Porsche’s iconic flat-six.

Specifically, the same 4.0-litre six that Porsche uses in its 911 GT3, which is a lot of engine to squeeze into the middle of this lightened sports convertible.

In order to keep the 718 in its place (beneath the 911), Porsche has slightly detuned the engine, so it makes 368kW/450Nm (compared to 375kW/460Nm in the 911 GT3), but the German brand has never worried about a kilowatt contest and instead prefers to focus on driveability and the other elements that make a drive great.

To that end the combination of air-intakes next to the headrests and the lightweight stainless steel exhaust (which gets titanium tips on the Weissach Package) helps the Spyder RS sound like a Carrera Cup racing car when you really wind it up to its 9000rpm redline.

Not that the performance isn’t spectacular, though, with Porsche claiming it takes the Spyder RS just 3.4 seconds to run 0-100km/h, only 10.9 seconds to get from 0-200km/h and will hit a top speed of 308km/h.

The engine is paired to a seven-speed dual-clutch auto transmission (or PDK in Porsche-speak) that the company claims has “short-ratios”, but with peak power not hitting until 8400rpm and peak torque from 6750rpm, you don’t have to rush the ratio changes.

The 3.9-litre twin-turbocharged petrol V8 engine produces 441kW of power at 7500rpm and 760Nm of torque from 3000rpm. That means it has a sizeable 29kW more power (and 5Nm more torque) than the Ferrari California T it replaces.

Plus the 0-100 acceleration time is better, too; it will now hit highway speed in 3.5 seconds (was 3.6sec in the Cali T) and moves past the 200km/h marker in just 10.8sec, if you believe Ferrari’s claim.

Top speed is “more than 320km/h”. Didn’t get a chance to test that, sadly, nor the 0-200km/h time.

The kerb weight for the Portofino is 1664 kilograms, while the dry weight is 1545kg. The weight distribution is 46 per cent front, 54 per cent rear. 

Porsche says the 4.0-litre engine in the Spyder RS uses 13.0L/100km, which is a big number for what is a relatively small car. But that engine is highly-tuned and built for performance not efficiency, so it’s something owners will need to accept.

Our test drive included some long highway stretches, as well as some spirited driving and urban commuting, so a good mix across all conditions, and we saw consistent returns around the 15-16L/100km range.

It has a 64-litre tank, which means a theoretical driving range of around 490km, assuming you can hit the official claim.

The twin-turbo-V8-powered Ferrari Portofino uses a claimed 10.7 litres per 100 kilometres. Not that fuel costs are a big concern if you’re spending $400k on a car. 

But that’s more than, say, a Mercedes-AMG GT, (9.4L/100km; 350kW/630Nm) but not as much as a Mercedes-AMG GT R (11.4L/100km; 430kW/700Nm). And the Ferrari has more power than both of those, and it's quicker, too (and more expensive…).

Fuel-tank size for the Ferrari Portofino is 80 litres, enough for a theoretical mileage range of 745km.

I’m only giving it a nine out of 10 because perfection is hard for any car to achieve, but the 718 Spyder RS goes as close as any car I’ve driven. This is a masterpiece of modern sports car design, pushing the 718 closer to the 911 than ever before, which is something Porsche has clearly tried to avoid so as to not tarnish the image of its flagship.

But with the 911’s 4.0-litre flat-six in the middle of the 718, plus its more compact dimensions, the lightweight nature of the Spyder RS and the raft of chassis and handling enhancements, this really does leave you questioning ‘do I really need a 911?’

The steering is fantastically direct, the chassis responds to every input with precision and feedback and the braking is strong and consistent. Which helps because that engine is so good it launches you with ferocity and a glorious noise (as good as anything on the market today) whenever you squeeze down on the accelerator.

The highest praise I can give the Spyder RS is not that it was a dream to drive on winding, challenging roads, but that it was just as enjoyable on a trip to the shops or cruising down the freeway. Any drive in this car is a genuine pleasure.

Compared to the California T it replaces, the new model is stiffer, has a lighter all-aluminium chassis, gets a reworked transmission and also includes an electronically controlled limited-slip differential. 

It’s faster, has more tech - like electronic exhaust bypass valves to make it sound better - and it's gorgeous. 

So it's fast and fun? You bet. It has electronic power steering, which mightn’t be as tactile in terms of road feel as a vehicle with a hydraulic steering setup, but it is rapid in its reactivity, and arguably offers better point-and-shoot ability as a result. Old diminutive Corby criticised it for being very light and somewhat lacking, but I reckon that as an entry point to the brand, it serves as a very manageable steering setup.

The adaptive magnetorhelogical dampers do a magnificent job in allowing the Portofino to ride over rough patches of road, including pockmarks and potholes. It hardly ever feels ruffled, although there is some scuttle shake to the windscreen, as is often found in convertible cars.

The most surprising element to this Ferrari is that it is supple and reserved at times, but can turn into a manic machine when you want it to.

With the Manettino drive-mode dial on the steering wheel set to Comfort, you will be rewarded with sedate progress and cushioning from the road surface below. In Sport mode, things are all a bit more growly and rigid. I personally found the transmission in this mode, when left in Auto, was eager to upshift to help save fuel, but still responded pretty quickly when I put my foot down hard.

Turning Auto off means it’s you, the pedals and the paddles, and the car won’t overrule your decisions. If you want to see just how realistic that 10,000rpm tacho top is, you can test it in first, second, third… oh wait, you need to keep your licence? Just keep it to first. 

Its braking is tremendous, with aggressive application resulting in seatbelt-tensioning response. Plus not only was the ride comfortable, the balance and control of the chassis was both predictable and inherently manageable in corners, and there was plenty of grip, even in the damp. 

With the roof down, the noise of the exhaust is exhilarating under hard throttle, but I found it droned a bit under less-urgent acceleration, and in most instances of ‘regular driving’ it actually just sounded loud, rather than lush. 

Things that were annoying? The throttle response is dull for the first part of the pedal travel, making for some testing moments in traffic. Not helping that is the fact the engine stop-start system is exceptionally overactive. And that there’s no fuel use readout on the digital trip computer screen - I wanted to see what the car was claiming in terms of fuel use, but I couldn’t.

There is no ANCAP or Euro NCAP crash-test score available for any Ferrari model, and it’s fair to state that safety tech isn’t the reason you buy a Ferrari. 

The Portofino, for instance, has dual front and front-side airbags, and an advanced stability control system… but that’s about it. 

Things like auto emergency braking (AEB), lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert are all unavailable. 

It’s difficult to give the Spyder RS a clear score here because Porsche is cagey on the details. The public dealer websites indicate annual oil maintenance is required, with additional servicing every two years or 15,000km. 

How much that will cost is unclear, as despite the rest of the 718 range having publicly available prices, there were no such details for the Spyder RS (or even its Cayman sibling, the GT4 RS).

For reference, the 'standard' 718 requires oil maintenance ($895) for the first annual service and an inspection ($1500) the year after. Those costs continue to alternate annually out to eight years/120,000km.

Ferrari servicing won’t cost you a cent for the first seven years, and that’s whether you hold on to it or sell it - the new owner will have access to complementary maintenance for whatever is left of the initial seven-year period.

The standard warranty offer from Ferrari is a three-year plan, but if you sign up for the New Power15 program, Ferrari will cover your car for up to 15 years from the first registration date, and that includes cover for major mechanical components including the engine, transmission, suspension and steering. It reportedly costs $4617 for V8 models like this - a drop in the financial ocean at this price point.