Jayco Swift vs MG MG QS

What's the difference?

Overall, the Swift is pretty good value. It’s got a sensible layout, a clever process to set up and offers quite a lot of comfort within a cosy package.

Given the price and the layout, it’s worth considering if you’re also shopping for a forward-fold camper-trailer, which likewise offers an internal living area.

What it lacks in driving panache it does make up for in terms of space and equipments, and there really is room for seven decent-sized humans on board. Combine that with a decade of warranty coverage, and the MG QS will no doubt be appearing on family shortlists.

The camper’s interior is quite cosy, but there’s room to move around or to relax in the dinette, and the beds will become de-facto play areas for young children.

The dinette converts into a small bed, but if you’re thinking about using it as a full-time bed for a child, opt for one of Jayco’s larger campers.

The MG QS is a smidge under five-metres long, just over 1.9m wide and just under 1.8.m high, which puts it right in the seven-seat SUV ballpark.

That pays dividends in the backseat. I’m 175cm tall, and I had heaps of room to spread out, and I don’t only have my own air vents, but I have my own temperature controls, too.

It’s a big and airy space, and I’d have no problem spending some serious time here on a longer road trip.

But the big question is, what do those dimensions mean for third-row riders, and does it live up to its promise of being a true seven-seater?

Well, yes and no. The fact that the middle row is on rails helps massively, because you can slide it forwards to maximise leg room for backseat riders, and the one-touch entry (which folds the middle row up and forwards) makes actually climbing back there pretty simple, too.

But... it's still a space in which I wouldn't want to spend too much time. Its big enough for shorter trips, but it's still best for the smaller kids in the family.

Now, as is often the case with three-row cars, how much boot space you get very much depends on how many people you have onboard. With all three rows in place, you get a miserly 203L, fold the third row and you get 517L, drop both rows and you get 1052L.

Because the Swift Touring is so small and light, modern utes and SUVs are able to tow it pretty comfortably. With the Ford Ranger, for instance, as a tow vehicle I can see over the top of this camper-trailer to the traffic behind, and because it is so narrow, vision back along the side is quite generous, too.

The Swift’s weight has little impact on a dual-cab’s performance, and there’s only a slight rise in fuel consumption as the Swift doesn’t have similar aerodynamics to a large caravan.

Also, as its ball weight is so light, the Swift doesn't cause too much rear-end sag in the tow vehicle, even if it’s behind a passenger car.

Another advantage of the Swift’s slightness is that it’s easy to move around at camp, or drag onto the tow-ball if you have to hitch solo or don’t have a reversing camera.

It all comes down to what you're looking for in your large SUV. Is it a vehicle that – against all odds – manages to somehow stir your emotions from behind the wheel, whether you're flying solo or you're riding with seven on board? Well, the MG QS won't do that.

But if you're looking for something big, comfortable, nicely trimmed and with just about every feature you can think of, then the MG QS ticks those boxes and then some.

But let's start with the not so good. The steering in the MG QS is super, super light, leaving it feeling largely disconnected from what's happening beneath the tyres, and giving the drive experience a weird and artificial vibe.

Now, it must be said that some drivers like that. A big car with light steering makes manoeuvrability easy in car parks and the like. But I don't. It makes me feel uninvolved in the drive experience.

The QS is equipped with Sport mode that does add heft to the steering, but which also appears to make the gearbox way to eager to shift down and hold a lower gear, adding a harshness to the drive.

It's also not a big engine, and this is a big car, and so there's a bit of delay when you first plant your foot as the engine figures out its next move, and you're always aware of the engine working fairly hard to get the QS moving along – though MG has done a good job of deadening much of that sound before it enters the cabin.

But if that's the not-so-good, there are still plenty of ticks in the MG's plus column. It's a largely smooth-riding, sweet-shifting proposition, the QS, and the space in all three rows is impressive, especially when the sliding second row is utilised to maximise the space where you need it.