Jayco Swift vs Jayco Penguin

What's the difference?

Overall, the Swift is pretty good value. It’s got a sensible layout, a clever process to set up and offers quite a lot of comfort within a cosy package.

Given the price and the layout, it’s worth considering if you’re also shopping for a forward-fold camper-trailer, which likewise offers an internal living area.

At nearly $25,000 the Penguin can't really be called cheap, but what does make it worth a look is the completely contained living space – the sitting, sleeping and cooking are all done inside, and that's a boon when the weather turns.

It's ideal if you want the comfort of a caravan without the bulk of one, and the ease of towing a more traditional camper-trailer offers, without the struggle of set-up.

The camper’s interior is quite cosy, but there’s room to move around or to relax in the dinette, and the beds will become de-facto play areas for young children.

The dinette converts into a small bed, but if you’re thinking about using it as a full-time bed for a child, opt for one of Jayco’s larger campers.

Inside, the layout is simple, but comfortable for two people. The rear of the camper is dominated by the east-west oriented bed.

The dinette, to the front of the camper, is cosy and only good for two people. It does actually fold down into a second bed for a third body (or a second body who's not allowed in the first bed), but although there's sleeping for three, seating that many would be difficult. Maybe a small grandchild, occasionally. It's comfortable, though and both seats lift up to reveal a little extra storage. There's even a hidey-hole behind the driver's side back-rest.

Typical of all campers of this sort, the bench heights are low and will frustrate taller people who need to stoop to use them.

This camper has a canvas skirt, but really there's more see-through plastic window than actual canvas, so it's quite panoramic inside. It's not hard to gain a bit of privacy, though; there's a dark tint to them so it's hard to see through during the day, and all the windows have curtains, so you can shut everything out, easily enough.

Lighting is simple, with just two LED lights in the roof, although unless you pay extra for a battery, they'll only work at powered sites.

Because the Swift Touring is so small and light, modern utes and SUVs are able to tow it pretty comfortably. With the Ford Ranger, for instance, as a tow vehicle I can see over the top of this camper-trailer to the traffic behind, and because it is so narrow, vision back along the side is quite generous, too.

The Swift’s weight has little impact on a dual-cab’s performance, and there’s only a slight rise in fuel consumption as the Swift doesn’t have similar aerodynamics to a large caravan.

Also, as its ball weight is so light, the Swift doesn't cause too much rear-end sag in the tow vehicle, even if it’s behind a passenger car.

Another advantage of the Swift’s slightness is that it’s easy to move around at camp, or drag onto the tow-ball if you have to hitch solo or don’t have a reversing camera.

Because the Penguin is so light – as mentioned above – and because the towing height is just 1660mm, lower than the roof of most cars and certainly below that of SUVs, it's easy to tow, even if you don't have the largest 4WD to haul it around.

The Subaru Forester I tested this camper with, for instance, did the job quite well and would be ideal if you towed the camper down the coast a few times a year.

Underneath, the camper's got a simple beam axle with leaf slipper springs and shock absorbers. They do a commendable job and, as this is a purely on-road camper, there's no need for it to be anything else.