BYD Shark 6 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

What's the difference?

The Shark 6 breaks new ground with its PHEV technology and impresses with not only its whisper-quiet and rapid acceleration but also engaging chassis dynamics, build quality, fuel economy and generous standard equipment for a compelling price. However, its modest payload and tow ratings may be deal-breakers for some tradies and recreational buyers with bigger loads to haul.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug-in Hybrid EV is an interesting inclusion for the brand, especially as it is typically considered a ‘value player’ in the market.

But with negligible real-world fuel consumption benefits if you drive beyond the limited EV range and a high price premium over the non-PHEV models, it’s important you see if the sums add up for your particular needs.

Primarily going to use the car for running around town? Cool. Think the 50-ish-kay EV range will work for you and make you happy? Amazing. Sold on the look of the car? Hat tipped.

But let me say this - if you are considering the Eclipse Cross PHEV, there are some alternatives you should also have on your list, including the MG HS PHEV, the Hyundai Ioniq PHEV, Kia Niro PHEV, and - the one I’d buy - a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. For me, plug-in hybrid tech is a bit of a halfway house, in most instances offering too high a price premium for the range you’re getting to drive electric. Heck, a Kona Electric isn’t much more than the top-spec Exceed PHEV, and I’d have that if I wanted a real day-to-day EV experience.

Our test vehicle rides on a 3260mm wheelbase and is 5457mm long, 1971mm wide and 1925mm high, so it’s in the same ballpark as a Ford Ranger 4x4 dual cab ute.

The Shark 6 features traditional body-on-frame truck chassis design, double-wishbone coil-spring front and rear suspension, rack-and-pinion steering and four-wheel disc brakes.

It also has a compact 11.0-metre turning circle and its off-road credentials include 230mm of unladen ground clearance, 700mm wading depth and 31 degrees approach/17 degrees ramp-over/19.3 degrees departure angles. A large metal bash-plate protects the underside.

Looks are subjective of course and even though there’s too much external black plastic for our liking, we reckon it still passes the pub test on styling with its chunky and purposeful appearance.

The bold grille and headlight design appears to draw inspiration from full-size US pick-ups, but with a ‘technical’ look consistent with its high-tech powertrain.

The predominantly grey interior has a high-quality finish and looks good. It also appears to draw inspiration from rivals, in this case the Ranger Raptor with its contrasting bright red air-vent/cupholder surrounds and exposed stitching along numerous seams.

You’re going to be able to tell the PHEV model from its more conventional counterparts by those oversized ‘Plug-in Hybrid EV’ badges on the front doors, and if you want to tell those behind you what you’re driving, there’s also a ‘PHEV’ badge there, too. Wait, wasn’t the plan to do away with the term ‘PHEV’, Mitsubishi? 

But aside from that, the outside features just the different 18-inch alloy wheels (which are the same on all PHEV models, no matter the cost - I think that’s a bit lame, because if I’m spending $7500 on the Exceed I’d like a different wheel design!). Oh, and the Aspire and Exceed get that different lower front splitter, too.

Plus the PHEV has two fuel filler doors - one on each side of the car over the rear wheels. The driver’s side one is the EV charging ports (x2 - detailed below), and the passenger’s side one is for the petrol. Note: while the EV port is push-openable, the petrol cap still requires you to lift a lever in the driver’s footwell. 

It may be categorised a small SUV but at 4545mm long, riding on a 2670mm wheelbase, 1805mm wide and 1685mm tall, it’s big for its boots. The popular Mazda CX-5 is only 5mm longer, and it plays in the midsize SUV segment!

Inside there are some design differences, with a specific gear joystick-style selector, and a different instrument panel.

It is impressive how the brand has managed to shoehorn a petrol engine, two electric motors, a battery pack and more into the car, but there are some practicality implications. Read about them in the next section.

With its hefty 2710kg kerb weight and 3500kg GVM, the Shark 6 has a 790kg payload rating which is less than some turbo-diesel rivals.

It’s also rated to tow up to 2500kg of braked trailer which is 1000kg less than the category benchmark. And BYD does not publish a GCM (Gross Combination Mass) rating, so we don’t know how much weight the Shark 6 can legally carry and tow at the same time.

The load tub is almost square with its 1520mm length and 1500mm width. And with 1224mm between the rear-wheel housings, it can carry either Aussie or Euro pallets. Its 517mm depth results in 1.2 cubic metres of total load volume.

There are six load-anchorage points but those located in the sidewalls at the front and centre of the tub are too high for securing low-profile loads. Anchorage points located near floor-level are preferable, as they can secure loads of all heights.

The tub’s internal surfaces are protected by a spray-in liner and there’s bright internal lighting and a hydraulic strut to ease tailgate operation.

Seating for the driver and front passenger is spacious and comfortable. The rear bench seat shares similar qualities, given I’m 186cm tall and when seated behind the driver’s seat in my position I still have ample kneeroom.

Rear seat passengers also enjoy sufficient headroom, even for tall people seated in the least popular central position who also have a nice flat floor given the absence of a transmission tunnel. However, shoulder room for adults sitting three-abreast is tight and best limited to short drives.

Cabin storage for front seat occupants includes a large-bottle holder and bin in each front door, overhead glasses holder plus a dash storage shelf and glove box on the passenger side.

The centre console has two small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a lidded box at the back.

Rear passengers also get a large-bottle holder and bin in each door, plus pockets on the rear of both front seat backrests and a fold-down centre armrest with two small-bottle/cup-holders.

The bench seat’s base cushion can be raised and stored vertically if more internal luggage space is required, but there’s no under-floor storage.

Up front, the cabin is a pretty smart place, with nice enough materials and finishes, and a few good storage options. There’s a cubby in front of the shifter, but oddly enough it doesn’t have a wireless charger (there are 2x USB 2.0 ports above) and isn’t quite big enough for a smartphone (even the smaller ones don’t fit there all that easily), and there are cup holders between the seats, a decent covered centre console bin, and door pockets large enough for bottles.

The PHEV models get a different instrument cluster dial for EV driving readout info, but all have the old-school 4.2-inch TFT colour display that lacks the size and usability of some rivals with larger info screens - the MG HS PHEV, for instance, has a 12.3-inch digital display, which shows you a lot more info than this tiny little screen does. Heck, there’s not even a digital speedometer in there - and you only get one if you buy the Exceed model, which has a head-up display (HUD).

That’s part of the problem with the way this car’s interface operates. If you want the most detailed information you need to use the touchscreen media system, but that negates the usability of the media functions. On multiple occasions I found myself switching between Apple CarPlay phone calls and searching for that particular driving info screen I found most useful (there are about 15 screens to choose from, and plenty of them are hard to decipher).

It’s a huge disappointment for a customer who might want to see all that detailed information but also listen to a podcast, answer a call, follow their phone’s mapping or just have anything other than the hybrid info come up on the infotainment screen. The screen itself - an 8.0-inch unit, with sat nav integrated into the top spec only - is fine, but small compared to today’s rivals.

In the back seat, there’s a compromise for cabin space. The leg room is good, but the seat has been bumped up to accommodate some of the electrical hardware and the petrol tank, meaning someone my size (182cm/6’0”) will find they’ve got enough room for their legs but not their head, and those even larger will really need to take care getting in and out. While pre-facelift examples of this car had a clever sliding second row seat, that’s gone. It was never a feature in any PHEV version, and undoubtedly the layout of the battery pack has something to do with that. 

The double pane sunroof no doubt eats into the space in the rear to a degree as well, and in the Exceed it likely feels a bit more cramped because of the black headliner. 

While three adults could potentially fit across the back row for very short trips, there are dual ISOFIX and three top-tether points for child seats. The Exceed is the one you want if you’re aiming to treat your rear-seat passengers right: it has heated rear outboard seats, rear directional air vents and two USB ports for charging - the ES and Aspire miss out on all that stuff.  

Boot space is 359L (VDA) for PHEV models, which is a step down from the 405 litres (VDA) for the non-hybrid models. There is extra hardware under the floor, and you don’t get a spare wheel in the PHEV models either - instead there’s a tyre repair kit. For context, we only just managed to fit all three CarsGuide hard suitcases (124L, 95L and 36L) in the boot of the PHEV version, while it was far less of an issue in the non-PHEV.

Oddly, no model comes with a power tailgate. 

The 2022 Eclipse Cross PHEV line-up is expensive compared to the petrol-turbo models.

The ES AWD has a list price (all prices MSRP, before on-road costs) of $46,490, while the mid-spec Aspire costs $49,990 and the top-end Exceed lists at $53,990. 

I know they’re not like-for-like in every instance - the ES and Aspire petrol-turbo models are 2WD, not AWD, for example, and there are some specification differences, too - but the price jump from each respective non-PHEV version is $15,500 (ES), $14,250 (Aspire) and $12,500 (Exceed).

Yikes.

You’d really, really have to want the EV driving experience to justify that additional expenditure, right?

Here’s a rundown of the specifications across the three PHEV grades.

Standard for the $46,490 ES grade are 18-inch alloy wheels, LED daytime running lights, halogen headlights, keyless entry and push-button start, cloth interior trim, manual front seat adjustment, an 8.0-inch touchscreen media system with Apple CarPlay and Android auto, a reversing camera, a four speaker stereo, digital radio and a rear cargo blind.

Step up to the $49,990 Aspire and you score LED headlights and fog lights, a lower body kit, heated front seats, faux-leather and microsuede trim, auto wipers, adaptive cruise control, an eight-speaker stereo, surround view camera, front and rear parking sensors, and an array of safety equipment that we’ll cover off in the safety section.

Choosing the range-topping $53,990 Exceed model nets you leather seat trim, a heated steering wheel, a head-up display - making it the only grade with a digital speedo! - as well as sat nav, a dual pane sunroof, and a black headliner in the cabin.

The Shark 6’s hybrid drivetrain with permanent all-wheel drive includes two electric motors, with the front motor producing up to 170kW/310Nm driving the front wheels. The rear motor produces up to 150kW/340Nm and drives the rears.

These motors are teamed with a 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine producing up to 135kW/260Nm, which serves dual roles as a generator to maintain charge in the 29.58kWh lithium-ion battery (in addition to regenerative braking) and to assist with driving the front wheels as required. It can also perform both roles simultaneously.

The combined output of electric motors/petrol engine is up to 321kW and 650Nm. There are also three selectable drive modes comprising Eco, Normal and Sport, plus different terrain settings to optimise performance in Mud/Sand/Snow/Mountain.

The plug-in battery can be charged using either the AC (7.0kW) or DC (55kW) ports. Cables for both were supplied with our test vehicle and stored in a carry bag behind the rear seat.

The plug-in hybrid version runs a non-turbocharged 2.4-litre Atkinson cycle petrol engine producing just 94kW and 199Nm.

Meagre outputs, but the petrol unit is backed by two electric motors - the front motor has outputs of 60kW/137Nm, while the rear motor produces 70kW/195Nm. It’s all controlled by a single-speed transmission.

There is no ‘combined power output’ figure, but there is a 13.8kWh lithium-ion battery pack as part of the equation as well.

The engine can power the battery pack in series hybrid driving mode, so if you want to top up the batteries before you get to a city, you can. And there is regenerative braking, of course. More on recharging in the next section.

BYD claims combined average fuel consumption for the petrol engine as low as 2.0L/100km with 25-100 per cent SoC (State of Charge) which spikes to 7.9L/100km when SoC drops below 25 per cent (see Driving).

BYD also claims an NEDC battery-only driving range of up to 100km (with 25-100 per cent SoC) and up to 800km when combined with the petrol engine in hybrid mode.

We covered 522km during our test which was a mix of city, suburban and regional roads plus some highway driving, of which about one fifth of that distance was hauling a near-maximum payload.

At the completion of our test, the Shark 6’s onboard computer claimed average petrol consumption of 6.6L/100km with 204km of range remaining, which suggests a real-world driving range of at least 700km is credible from its 60-litre petrol tank.

The Eclipse Cross PHEV has an official combined cycle fuel consumption figure of 1.9L/100km. That’s astounding, really, but you need to realise that the test calculation is only for the first 100 kays - there’s a really good chance your real-world consumption will be a lot higher, as you can only deplete the battery charge once before calling on the engine (and your petrol tank) to juice it back up.

Electric driving range is stated at 55km based on NEDC cycle testing, while the WLTP rating is a more realistic 45km. In our testing we fell between the two during our “fully charged” 100km run, in which the electric charge initially ran for 50km. But, over the 100km run, the dashboard info screen said the car used “82 per cent” electric driving, while somehow also showing 3.9L/100km for petrol consumption.

I did the numbers at the fuel filler, and the actual return was 4.5L/100km. That’s okay, but not nearly as spectacular as you might hope, and I’ve seen very close in a RAV4 hybrid - which in most instances is cheaper than the Eclipse Cross despite being bigger and, frankly, a lot better.

I also ran the car for a further 100 kays without plugging in, just to see what the ‘worst case scenario’ might be - and it wasn’t too bad, with the fuel consumption jumping to a real-world return of 5.5L/100km. But again, that’s worse than you’ll likely get with a RAV4…

When it comes to charging/recharging, there is available AC charging using a Type 2 plug that can fully recharge the battery in as little as 3.5 hours, according to the brand. DC fast charging with a CHAdeMO plug should fill from zero to 80 per cent in 25 minutes. Maximum charge input is 3.6kW.

Like me, you’ll want to do the maths to see what is going to be the most economical way to run your car - aside from just plugging it in at the office and hoping nobody notices.

A standard 10-amp household plug - which should take about seven hours to replenish the batteries - could cost as little as $1.88 to get back your circa-50km EV range - that’s based on overnight charging, off-peak, on an average 13.6c/kWh electricity price. Of course, if you’re considering a PHEV, you might have a solar array and the electricity could well be free. Good for you.

But remember, there’s more to it than just the electricity costs - you need to also consider the additional purchase budget required just to get into the PHEV model over a regular Eclipse Cross. 

The seating is comfortable and supportive and the driving experience is enhanced by the head up display, large left footrest and thick-rimmed leather wheel.

It’s quiet to drive and the ride quality is outstanding, with refined and disciplined suspension tuning combined with responsive steering and braking. It all adds up to handling agility on winding mountain roads that belies the fact it’s a high-riding 2.7-tonne ute.

Rapid acceleration from standing starts (BYD claims 0-100km/h in just 5.7sec) is also effective in masking its bulk, as instant torque from the dual electric motors gets it rushing towards triple-digit speeds with unrelenting ease, regardless of gradient.

We did most of our test in the ‘Normal’ (default) drive mode, as it provides a happy medium between the heightened response of ‘Sport’ and the slightly subdued ‘Eco’ modes.

To test its GVM rating, we loaded 650kg into the load tub which with driver equalled a 750kg payload that was only about 40kg less than its legal limit. The independent rear suspension compressed about 60mm, but there was no bottoming-out detected as it competently hauled this load on our test route.

Although the ‘Energy Manager’ on the touchscreen allows drivers to pre-set a minimum SoC between 25-70 per cent, we didn’t enter any setting as we wanted to see how the hybrid system performed without these inputs.

Fact is, it did not allow the SoC to drop below 20 per cent, even during highway driving when there was minimal charging assistance available from regenerative braking.

As displayed live on the energy manager, the petrol engine maintained the battery charge needed to feed the electric motors while also providing intermittent drive to the front wheels as required.

At times the little 1.5-litre turbo engine sounded like it was working very hard doing this, but it did prove effective in performing these dual roles.

The hybrid system also produces minimal engine-braking (even with maximum regenerative braking) which is an important consideration if you regularly carry and/or tow heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain.

With a traditional turbo-diesel and multi-speed transmission, a low gear can be manually selected to allow the engine on overrun to assist the brakes in restraining loads on steep descents. However, with its single-speed transmission and small petrol engine, the Shark 6 must rely on brakes alone.

If you’re after that electric car thrill of near-silent, almost mind-blowing acceleration, the Eclipse Cross mightn’t be the right car for you

But if swift progress and the buzz you get from taking off from the traffic lights without any hesitation at all is more your thing, it could be great for you. And if you’re not quite ready to go “full EV”, then it’s probably something you’re considering.

The EV driving mode is the best driving mode in this car. You can run it just on the petrol engine to ensure you save your battery range, and you might choose to do that when you’re driving on the freeway and know you’re approaching an urban area where the EV goodness will be better used. Or you could have it so it's using battery and petrol power, and that’s where you’ll get maximum combined performance.

But running the car in the default, EV-prioritised mode means you will make the best of this powertrain's strengths, because - for the fifty odd kays you’ll get out of the battery - it’s pretty good.

It’s also impressive the way this powertrain dips between petrol engine, battery pack or both at higher speeds. When the battery range had depleted on my test drive, the engine kicked in almost imperceptibly, working to power the car and also generate more electricity for the battery pack. It then dipped out of petrol, back to battery, and so on and so forth, multiple times during my drive. 

The best thing about the way it did so was that it was smooth. There is barely any vibration from the petrol engine, the transmission doesn’t have any gears to fumble with, and overall the refinement is really good.

There are drive modes - Eco, Normal, Snow, Gravel and Tarmac - and in my test I kept to Normal. I did fiddle with the regenerative braking reactiveness, though, using the paddleshifters to dial up or down the aggressiveness of the energy recoup system. It doesn’t feel as aggressive as some pure electric cars, but thankfully it has a decent pedal feel and progression when you apply the brakes yourself. 

The steering is light and lacks feel, and doesn’t offer that much engagement or involvement. That might matter to you if you’re like me. I wish it was more fun. But at least it’s easy to park.

While the suspension is fine and comfortable on the highway, it can feel wooden and the ride is quite lumpy at low speeds. It never really feels all that well resolved for urban driving, which is a bit of a downer considering that’s likely where a car like this will spend most of its time

The tune of the suspension - being a bit firm at lower pace - surprisingly doesn’t have any payoff when it comes to cornering, as it lacks a bit of body control, shifting its weight side to side. 

All in all it is a decent plug-in hybrid offering – and will be perfectly suitable to someone who wants some EV driving as a part of their lifestyle. It’s just a matter of doing the maths as to whether it will work for you.

All Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross models have been awarded a five-star ANCAP crash test safety rating based on 2017 testing for the pre-facelift model. 

The range has increasing levels of safety technology the more you spend, but all variants have forward autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with forward collision warning (operates between 5km/h and 80km/h) and the AEB includes pedestrian detection (between 15km/h and 140km/h). 

Standard on all grades is a reversing camera, rear parking sensors, seven airbags (dual front, driver’s knee, front side, side curtain for both rows), active Yaw control, stability control, and anti-lock brakes (ABS) with brake force distribution. Lane departure warning is standard too.

Spend up on the Aspire for adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and front parking sensors. From Aspire up to Exceed, there’s the addition of the brand’s Ultrasonic Misacceleration Mitigation System, which can dull throttle response to prevent potential low speed collisions.

No speed sign recognition is available, and therefore no smart cruise control either. Plus there is no lane centring system fitted either, and nor is there a driver attention monitoring system, so it’s falling behind on the tech front.

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is built in Japan.

The Shark 6 is covered by BYD's six-year/150,000km warranty and an eight-year/160,000km battery warranty.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/20,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-pricing for the first six scheduled services totals $2945 or an average of $490 per year.

There’s a huge 10 year/200,000 kilometre warranty on offer - but it’s valid if you maintain your car with Mitsubishi’s dedicated dealer service network over the 10 years/200,000km timeline, or else you get a five-year/100,000km plan.

But while the rest of the car will be covered by that decade-long warranty if you service it with Mitsubishi, the battery is only covered for eight years/160,000km, no matter where you have the car serviced.

Maintenance is due every 12 months/15,000km. But just a note - the more complex powertrain means higher service costs than the regular turbo-petrol versions. The annual fees are: $299, $399, $299, $399, $299, $799, $299, $799, $399, $799; so an average cost of $339 for the first five years, or $558.90 per visit over 10 years/150,000kn. 

Included for customers who service their car with the brand is four years of roadside assist.

Do you have questions over reliability, issues, concerns, recalls, automatic transmission problems, or anything else of that ilk? Check out our Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross problems page.