Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD vs Mazda CX-9 2WD

7 seater Car Reviews
...
Neil Dowling
Contributing Journalist
14 Oct 2013
4 min read
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD and Mazda CX-9 2WD go head-to-head in this comparative review.
 

value

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

$43,000

Well priced and well stocked with family needs, the Laredo is a spacious, practical, comfortable and even well-built wagon. Five-seat layout loses appeal against Mazda and it’s only $3000 less than 4WD. No capped-price servicing and services are six-monthly. Three-year/100,000km warranty, three-year roadside assist and a strong 59 per cent resale.

Mazda CX-9 2WD

$44,525

It’s a lot of car for this price. The CX-9 doesn’t necessarily need to go bush. Equipment similar to the Jeep but seven-seat layout adds an edge. Standard are cloth trim, six-speaker audio, 18-inch alloy wheels, multi-zone aircon and no-cost metallic paint. No capped-price for six-monthly services. Retained value is 54 per cent.

technology

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

Eight-speed auto makes a lot of difference to performance and economy compared with the outgoing five-speed. Jeep claims 10.1L/100km (not much off the 4WD’s 10.4L) from a big 93L tank. The 3.6-litre V6 (210kW/347Nm) drives the rear wheels. In-car electronics include easy-connect Bluetooth and voice recognition.

Mazda CX-9 2WD

Mazda’s only six-cylinder (3.7-litre V6, 204kW/367Nm) claims 11.0L/100km and drives the front wheels via a six-speed auto. It matches the Jeep’s infotainment spec, with voice recognition and Bluetooth. Flexible cabin’s sliding second seat row makes access to third row easy. The Classic tows 2000kg.

design

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

One of the best-looking big 4WDs, strong, well-proportioned - and a Clayton’s off-roader. Dual-mode rear tailgate, flat-fold rear seats and excellent cabin room with 782L (seats up) and 1554L maximum space. Tow rated for only 1600kg. Dash design is tops with decent storage, clear instruments and steering wheel controls. Foot-operated parkbrake is clunky.

Mazda CX-9 2WD

The Mazda family face helps disguise some of its bulk. Rounded body makes it less predictable to park, though standard rear camera helps. Dash is simple and functional, if dated, and park brake is foot-operated. All seats up, cargo space is 267L (1911L when folded almost flat). The CX-9 is longer by almost 30cm than the Jeep.

safety

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

No crash test (previous model, four stars). Standard are seven airbags, electronic stability and traction control, reverse camera, tyre pressure sensor, automatic dip bi-xenon headlights, auto lights and wipers and full-size spare.

Mazda CX-9 2WD

The CX-9 gets a five-star crash rating and has six airbags, electronic stability and traction control, emergency brake signalling, automatic headlights and wipers but has a space-saver spare wheel.

driving

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

Marginal difference in road-feel from 4WD version, particular in cornering with extra body roll and understeer, but basically it’s the same drive experience. Good layout of controls (parkbrake excepted) and well-weighted steering make it an easy drive. Ride comfort and driveline smoothness are hallmarks when driven normally but engine can get harsh towards the top of the tacho. Excellent visibility and a sense of safety prevail.

Mazda CX-9 2WD

The Classic’s 18-inch wheels endow a supple ride (more expensive versions have firm-riding 20-inchers) that is very family friendly. But the payback is more body roll and understeer. The engine is smooth and responsive but its choice of only six gears makes shift points far more noticeable than the Jeep with its eight cogs. The electric-assist steering is also quite light, a boon in city and suburban parking, though feels vague at speed.

Verdict

Jeep Grand Cherokee 2WD

Mazda CX-9 2WD

The Mazda wins the space war with excellent cabin design but the Jeep drives and looks better. Just buy the 4WD Cherokee - why lose brilliant off-road ability for the sake of $3000?

Neil Dowling
Contributing Journalist
GoAutoMedia Cars have been the corner stone to Neil’s passion, beginning at pre-school age, through school but then pushed sideways while he studied accounting. It was rekindled when he started contributing to magazines including Bushdriver and then when he started a motoring section in Perth’s The Western Mail. He was then appointed as a finance writer for the evening Daily News, supplemented by writing its motoring column. He moved to The Sunday Times as finance editor and after a nine-year term, finally drove back into motoring when in 1998 he was asked to rebrand and restyle the newspaper’s motoring section, expanding it over 12 years from a two-page section to a 36-page lift-out. In 2010 he was selected to join News Ltd’s national motoring group Carsguide and covered national and international events, launches, news conferences and Car of the Year awards until November 2014 when he moved into freelancing, working for GoAuto, The West Australian, Western 4WDriver magazine, Bauer Media and as an online content writer for one of Australia’s biggest car groups. He has involved himself in all aspects including motorsport where he has competed in everything from motocross to motorkhanas and rallies including Targa West and the ARC Forest Rally. He loves all facets of the car industry, from design, manufacture, testing, marketing and even business structures and believes cars are one of the few high-volume consumables to combine a very high degree of engineering enlivened with an even higher degree of emotion from its consumers.
About Author
Disclaimer: The pricing information shown in the editorial content (Review Prices) is to be used as a guide only and is based on information provided to Carsguide Autotrader Media Solutions Pty Ltd (Carsguide) both by third party sources and the car manufacturer at the time of publication. The Review Prices were correct at the time of publication. Carsguide does not warrant or represent that the information is accurate, reliable, complete, current or suitable for any particular purpose. You should not use or rely upon this information without conducting an independent assessment and valuation of the vehicle.