Skip navigation
36179 Visits Today

Used car review Ford Falcon BF/BFII 2005-2007

  • image

    The BF Falcon was to be the cure Ford needed to get sales of the Falcon moving again after a painful period of stagnation with the unloved AU.

Graham 'Smithy' Smithy reviews the used Ford Falcon BS/BS II - 2005-2007, its fine points, its flaws and what to watch out for when you're buying one.

The BF Falcon was to be the cure Ford needed to get sales of the Falcon moving again after a painful period of stagnation with the unloved AU.  It followed the BA, which was Geoff Polites' bold move to reinvigorate Falcon sales following on from the disastrous AU.

Had the AU been a runaway success the BF probably would have been the model that followed, but tough times call for bold measures and Polites pulled forward the Falcon program and launched the BA earlier than he would have liked.  It worked, the AU was forgotten and the BA embraced. Ford appeared back on track.

But if the letters and e-mails received at Carsguide HQ are an accurate reflection of the state of play at Ford the BA was a good car, but flawed.  Owners generally liked them, but were frustrated by the niggling problems they encountered, and Ford's apparent lack of interest in helping fix them.

The BA suffered a myriad of build quality and reliability problems, all of which suggested the program had been rushed in an effort to put the AU blues behind them as quickly as possible.  The BF was the first major update of the Falcon after the BA launch, by which time most of the issues that affected the BA seem to have been addressed.

MODEL WATCH

Viewed from afar it was easy to conclude that Ford did little in moving from the BA series to the BF. Discerning the differences required a keen eye.  Externally the BF was little changed, but it didn't need changing. In the course of the BA model change just about every panel was changed, and the result was a much more appealing look.

Three years on it still looked fresh so there wasn't much incentive to spend heaps on panel change.  If you cared to look closely you might spot revised bumpers, wheels, taillights, trim and paint colours, but not much more.

The main changes were made under the skin where the six-cylinder engine underwent further development and came out with more performance and better economy.  The 4.0-litre six got a more advanced valve timing system that altered the intake and exhaust camshafts independently for better efficiency and a reduced idle speed. Power jumped from 182 to 190 kW.

Ford's popular turbo six also grew legs, with power climbing to 245 kW and torque jumping 30 Nm to 480 Nm.  The fuel miser in the range was the E-Gas dedicated LPG version of the 4.0-litre six, which delivered a much more economical motor with a punch of 156 kW and 372 Nm.

There were also two 5.4-litre V8s on offer. The entry-level three-valve engine boasted knock sensors, which allowed more spark advance, and the performance grew by 10 kW and 30 Nm to 230 kW and 500 Nm respectively.  The sportier four-valve Boss 260 V8 remained unchanged in the XR8.

The base models continued with a revised four-speed auto, but the real talking point at the time was the new ZF six-speed automatic transmission on some of the premium models. It was the first time an Australian car had a six-speed auto and it was one shared in common with cars like the BMW 7-Series and Jaguar XJ.

Fuel economy was a major talking point when the BF was launched; the BA was the thirstiest of the big cars and Ford needed the BF to be better.  So it was. The volume-selling models improved 5.2 per cent to claim a combined fuel economy figure of 10.9 L/100 km.

With no call for major visual changes Ford made few alterations to the interior, apart from making some minor changes to the interior plastics.
The model range began with the XT and added the Fairmont and Fairmont Ghia on the prestige side, and the XR6, the sizzling hot XR6 Turbo and rumbling XR8 on the sporty side.

Ford released a MkII BF in 2008 with more fuel economy improvements, and extended the availability of the six-speed auto to the base model XT.

ON THE LOT

Traditional big Aussie cars are on the nose with buyers so it's a good time to go shopping if you have the cash to splash.  Values have slumped in recent months so shop around and shop hard. Dealers are struggling under the pressure of the economic meltdown and will do deals.

Look to buy a BF/BFII XT for $14,000-$18,500; add $5000 for a Fairmont six or $8000 for a V8; or step up to the Fairmont Ghia by adding $7000 for the six or $8500 for a V8.  For the thrill of the BF/BFII XR range pay $18,000-$22,000 for an XR6; add $2500-$3000 for an XR6T; or add $3000-$3500 for an XR8.

IN THE SHOP

Build quality was an issue with the BA/BF Falcons, although it was less of a problem with the later model.  It was particularly noticeable on the inside where the fit and finish wasn't up to scratch.

The six-cylinder engine is robust and reliable, having benefited from years of development. Fuel consumption is a concern.  Generally the V8s are smooth and pack the sort of torque wanted, but there are lots of reports of problems extracting the spark plugs from the three-valve engine come service time. The plugs break easily while mechanics attempt to remove them and it's then a case of lifting the heads to get them out.

Noisy diffs in XRs are a common complaint and it's nothing to hear of cars having two, three or more diffs. Ford usually replaces them with new diffs up to a point, but then reverts to using used diffs as replacements.  Noisy brakes are annoying and there seems no answer for complaint cars. The noise is a rubbing noise as if the pad is constantly rubbing on the disc.  Warped discs can also be a problem, more so with the performance models.

IN A CRASH

An Electronic Stability Program was a key improvement on the BF, although the XT and Futura models missed out.  Front and side airbags were available for a comprehensive crash package.  The BF was rated at five-stars for crashworthiness.


AT THE PUMP

The BA was criticised for its relative lack of fuel economy compared to its competition, but Ford hit back with significant improvements in the BF.  Depending on the drivetrain Ford claimed 10.2-10.9 L/100 km for the volume-selling six.  Ford's six can readily be converted to run on LPG.

OWNERS SAY

Wesley Hartley bought his 2007 BFII XR6 six months ago with 24,000 km on the clock. While he loves its looks and its handling, he's not so convinced of its build quality. It's been back to his dealer several times with diff issues. The original diff was replaced, and the replacement was also replaced because it was noisy. There have also been ongoing problems with noisy brakes.
 
Paul Raudino took advantage of the pre-FG run-out deals on the BF earlier this year and traded his AU on a 2007 BFII Falcon ES. The BF and is far better to drive than the old AU, he says. The six-speed auto makes it great to drive and it gives great fuel economy on a trip.

Two years ago, after 40 years driving V8s, David Walker bought a six-cylinder BF wagon. He's been impressed by the power and smoothness of the engine, and even more so by the fuel economy. To date it has only been back to the dealer for its scheduled logbook services  -- everything is just spot on after 40,000 km.

James Lehane and his wife have owned a second-hand BF XR6 Turbo for just over a year, and both love the car, even though they admit it's a bit of a gas-guzzler. They bought it because they say the BA/BF XR is the best looking Aussie-made car of the period, the six-speed auto is hard to fault, and the Turbo is a fast and satisfying daily driver. If they could they would improve the steering feedback, reduce the weight, and the fuel consumption, fit discs that don't warp, and improve the fit and finish of the interior plastics.

LOOK FOR

o Family-sized motoring
o torquey six performance
o new six-speed auto trans
o sizzling turbocharged XR6T
o variable build quality
o noisy diffs


RIVALS

o VZ Commodore — 2004-2006 — $12,000-$24,000 o Mitsubishi 380 — 2005-2007 — $12,500-$26,000 o Toyota Avalon — 2003-2006 — $10,000-$22,000 THE BOTTOM LINE o Plunging prices make BF Falcon good value for money buying.


RATING

o 70/100

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 6 comments

  • This car is a Australian masterpiece. Proud to be part of Australia so proud to drive a Australian car also. This car has beautiful build quality and it performs exceptional. I cant "brag" enough of how well the Australian car industry has given its people such a good car. I have never had any brake issues whatsoever but I dont abuse my car for it will abuse you in the end with a bill for repair. Known brake hub issues are attributed to air ratchet guns that torque the hubs up to specification in a single jolt possibly whilst hot or warm. Likewise tyre places do not tighten the nuts up in a sequential fashion nor do they follow a correct pattern sequence when tightening. The result damages warped hubs as the metal cools down or heats up. This results in warped components. Holdens have the same brand parts on them as do the Fords eg DBA rotors and same branded calipers as many cars and bosch components grace imported and local cars. So to say one is far better than another is like taking the same placebo and believe a altenator on a ford is better than that on a holden. LOL. Im a mechanic and lots of parts are found on many models. Bloody Ford altenator packs up so FORD is crap! LOL

    john Posted on 24 February 2013 5:20pm
  • I bought a 2006 BF XT in December 2010... I owned it for just over a year and it had done approximately 120,000 when I bought it from the auctions. Over a year, I did about 7,000kms and treated it well. I despised this car so much that after a year I bought a VE SV6 late 2007. The Falcon had so many build quality issues it amazed me that such a popular car could be like this. For a relatively new car which was said to be all good by a number of mechanics... there were so many niggling things. The brakepads warped quickly... so the car was always jumpy now and then when braking. The transmission seemed like it was stuffed... it would hold onto gears when cold and took warming up for it to be okay. It would make a knock sound... which I was told was something initiating and normal for a ford... no other car I've driven has been like this... the steering is extremely heavy, not a nice car to drive around town. The accelerator is stiff, and the car feels very heavy to drive, the SV6 is much nicer to drive. I would not recommend buying a BF Falcon, there are better cars out there. I now understand why they are so cheap... either buy a smaller car, or keep saving!

    Shaun Posted on 28 April 2012 10:57pm
  • I own a 2005 BF XR8 and the only comlaint I have is the brakes.They make a humming noise sometimes when stopping.In regards to fuel consumption what do people expact when they purchase a V8. The Fords are no worse than the 6.0 Litre holden and I would have to say I have no intention of getting rid of the BF for a long time. I thoroughly enjoy driving this car. For those who want to improve their economy may I suggest that the fitting of 2.5 inch twin pipes plus BPR CAI(cold air intake)will also markedly improve the cars performance.

    Gary of parkes Posted on 07 March 2011 9:20pm
  • Anyone care to comment on the "heavy" steering and front tyre noise when parking? I thought the power steering needed attention but have been told my the dealer that it is "normal" Our old 1996 truck is lighter on the steering. Still, it's a good hiway ride. Maybe I'm just used to "Holdens"

    Jules of Ipswich of QLD Posted on 14 September 2010 9:54am
  • The BA makes 182KW and the BF makes 180KW. not much of a difference, although some will say the BF is much smoother in gear changes and for daily driving, although still having more power and torque than the BA.

    Glen Posted on 18 January 2010 2:18pm
  • the differences between the BA naturally aspirated six 4.0Liter DOHC and BF 4.0L DOHC are literally zero, both are 100% identical mechanically. Both make 190kW, BA made it in the 1st place. It is only a marketing game. In fact BA XT 4.0 N/A makes 190kW/383Nm on RON95 petrol , both BA and BF/BFII XT 4.0L make 182.4kW and 381Nm on RON91. It is a fact.

    John of QLD Posted on 13 December 2009 2:32pm
Read all 6 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Share your feedback