Ssangyong Tivoli XLV VS MG ZST
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV
- Roomy back seat
- Big boot
- Diesel-AWD drivetrain a point of difference
- No petrol will mean few buyers
- Full specs to be confirmed
- Four-star safety (Euro NCAP)
- Improved design
- Great engine and transmission
- Standard spec
- Truly mainstream pricing
- Handling still needs work
- Still needs safety re-assessed
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV
The SsangYong Tivoli XLV is about as unknown to Australian customers as cheeseburgers are to the tribespeople of the Amazon.
That is to say, if I asked your opinion of the SsangYong Tivoli XLV, you’d probably have no idea what I was on about. You may be unsure of its origins, unclear of its intentions, and generally baffled by the concept of it. The Amazonians may well feel the same way about burgers.
However, if Korean SUV specialist SsangYong has its way, the Tivoli XLV will become as hip and desirable, as Instagrammable and indulgent as the most clickable cheeseburgers out there. Geez, I’m hungry.
The Tivoli XLV is essentially a longer, taller version of the shorter, lower Tivoli, which is also coming to Australia. It keeps the Tivoli part of the name because it’s largely very similar, but the XLV has some points of difference: it’s all-wheel drive only, it’s diesel only, and it’s clearly one of the most practical small SUVs in the class.
What does XLV stand for? According to SsangYong, the acronym represents “eXciting smart Lifestyle Vehicle”.
Scratch that. Think of it as the 'eXtra Large Version' of the brand’s smallest vehicle, and you’ll be most of the way to understanding just what this big small SUV is all about.
|Engine Type||1.6L turbo|
Re-booted MG has found success delivering budget alternatives to increasingly expensive popular mainstream models.
The new ZS variant for 2021, the ZST, aims to change this though, with new technology and a more comprehensive safety offering at a correspondingly higher price.
The question - does MG's ZS small SUV formula still work when the price and spec playing field is more level with its mainstream rivals? We went to the ZST's local launch to find out.
|Engine Type||1.3L turbo|
|Fuel Type||Regular Unleaded Petrol|
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6.5/10
Depending on the pricing and specifications, the SsangYong Tivoli XLV might well offer an interesting alternative to the mainstream small SUV crowd. The safety score is a bit of a deterrent, but that may not rule it out for all buyers.
It’s almost like this is a provisional review, because we simply don’t know much about the brand’s strategy ahead of the local range rollout in November.
One thing’s for sure: just like a cheeseburger or any good laboured pun, we can’t wait to get our hands on some of the finer details from SsangYong Australia.
Would you consider a car with a four-star Euro NCAP crash score? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.
The ZST is a much more well-rounded product than its predecessor.
It's especially nice to see the safety and multimedia offering improve alongside some welcome software tweaks and a notable jump in overall refinement. As always, the seven-year warranty will help to keep competitors on their toes, too.
What remains to be seen: Will MG's newfound customer base be willing to follow it into the realm of mainstream pricing? Only time will tell.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6/10
One look and you might think 'honey I shrunk the Stavic', and that’s not too bad of a summary. There are some ungainly touches to the design of the Tivoli XLV - as you might expect from a small SUV that has been stretched.
But from some angles, it doesn’t look too bad. The front end is quite fetching, I think, with those projector halogen headlights with LED daytime running lights cutting a different shape to many of its rival models sold in our market. However, the overtly lipped quarter panels aren’t to all tastes, and the curved, clear-lensed tail-lights aren’t going to win any beauty contests.
I don’t think it’s ugly in the same way the original Stavic was… but SsangYong let us in on a secret at the launch event in Korea: there’s an updated, facelifted version of the Tivoli XLV and the regular Tivoli due in June 2019. It may be worth waiting for, because not only will it bring a new, more modern look, it will probably add equipment and safety features.
Now, size: the XLV is essentially a stretched, more family-friendly version of the Tivoli. Both are built on the same line, and everything is pretty much the same from the C-pillar forward. It measures 4440mm long (which is 198mm longer than the standard Tivoli, both on a 2600mm wheelbase), 1798mm wide and 1635mm tall (Tivoli is 1590mm). The XLV is longer than any other small SUV it competes against.
Australian customers are expected to be able to choose between an array of eight body colours and a contrasting roof finish. One really smart combination is the red body and black roof, and high-spec models are expected to get flashy 18-inch wheels (with 16s on low spec models).
The benefits of the Tivoli XLV’s stretched body are clearest in the boot area, which beats some mid-sized SUVs.
The ZST is the first vehicle in MG's range to debut an interesting new design direction which does a little less borrowing from competitors.
I like the slick new grille, and how it's difficult to tell the base car apart from the top one with many of the contrast black design points carrying over. Full LED lighting is a welcome touch to draw this car's corners together. It's nothing groundbreaking in the design department, but we can at least say it looks just as good if not better than some other, far more dated, designs still on the market like the facelifted-a-million-times Mitsubishi ASX.
Inside the ZST notably improves on its predecessor with an impressive multimedia screen, some genuinely nice touchpoints and a simple but inoffensive overall design which has been gently tweaked to feel much more contemporary.
I did notice on my drive loop the huge multimedia screen was a bit too close for comfort but the software on it is much faster and less prone to glitches than it was in the previous ZS or even the larger HS.
The abundance of faux-leather trims in the cabin look good from a distance, but don't feel quite as good to the touch. With that having been said, at least most of the materials have padding beneath for critical touch areas like elbows.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV8/10
If you’re buying the Tivoli XLV, it’s arguably because it’s a compact SUV with the interior space of a bigger SUV inside. With a claimed cargo capacity of 720 litres (VDA), that makes sense. The XLV adds 297L more space (VDA) over the Tivoli, with a bigger boot than some very big SUVs.
In person the boot looks pretty big, but not as enormous as the numbers suggest. The fact there’s a false floor set-up is handy, though, and the packaged from SsangYong to be able to engineer so much boot space and still offer a four-wheel-drive system and multilink rear suspension is almost genius. Many brands can’t do it as well as SsangYong has. And going by SsangYong’s promise to fit a full-size spare wheel to all of its AWD models, the packaging is even more impressive.
It was handy for us to drive the XLV alongside the Musso and Rexton, both of which are newer-generation models that feel more modern inside. That isn’t to say the XLV feels old - it’s just not as special as its bigger siblings. Again, the face-lifted model due in 2019 could go a ways to fixing that.
If I had to compare the quality and design of the XLV to any car, it would be the old Hyundai ix35. You remember that small-to-mid-size SUV that came before the Tucson, which was on sale here from 2010 to 2015? Well, its cabin design and materials were fine, but nothing special. A bit like the Mitsubishi ASX, which launched around the same time as the ix35, yet is still sold today (and in big numbers!).
The front seats are pretty comfortable and the driver’s seat has good adjustment to it, but taller front seat passengers may lament the lack of height adjustment to the seat - especially in models fitted with a sunroof.
In the back there’s easily enough for a 182-centimetre-tall adult to sit behind their own driving position, with more knee room than most small SUVs, and reasonable shoulder and head room, too. The XLV is a five-seater, and three across the back is possible, but not enjoyable. There are dual ISOFIX child-seat anchors for outboard seats, and top-tethers across the width.
Despite essentially being a heavy facelift to the existing ZS platform, MG tells us the cabin has been significantly re-worked to increase the amount of space available. It certainly feels it.
Behind the wheel I have no complaints when it comes to the space on offer or visibility, but I did find it a bit of a shame there was no telescopic steering adjust.
Ergonomics are pretty good for the driver too, aside from the touchscreen being an inch or two too close. Instead of dials for volume and climate functions, the ZST offers toggles, which is a welcome step up from having to control climate through the screen as is the case in the larger HS.
Front passengers get two large binnacles in the centre console, decently-sized cupholders, a small centre armrest box and glove compartment, as well as decently-sized door bins.
There are five USB 2.0 ports throughout the cabin, two for front passengers, one for a dashcam (smart), and two for rear passengers, but there's no USB C or wireless charging.
Rear passenger space is excellent for the segment. Even behind my own driving position there was heaps of room for my knees, and no complaints for headroom either (I'm 182cm tall). The two USB ports are welcome, as is a small binnacle on the back of the centre console but there are no adjustable air vents or extended storage areas back here in either grade.
Boot capacity comes in at 359 litres – the same as the existing ZS and reasonable for the segment. There's also a space saver spare wheel under the floor.
Price and features
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6/10
We don’t know what price SsangYong is aiming to list the XLV model range at, because the company hasn’t yet confirmed pricing and specifications. So we can’t tell you what it will cost.
But we do know there will be manual and automatic variants available in four-wheel drive only (4WD/AWD) at launch, and it will be diesel only. The smaller Tivoli will be offered with petrol and diesel, and a more affordable front-wheel drive model.
There’s an expectation that the XLV will come well specified as standard, but that two trim levels will be offered.
The base model will likely have cloth seat trim, dual-zone climate control and a leather-lined steering wheel, while the top-spec will come with leather seat trim. All models will likely come with a touchscreen media system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, plus USB and auxiliary inputs and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming.
Seat heating, auto headlights, auto wipers, a sunroof, 18-inch wheels (as opposed to 16s on the base spec), push-button start and keyless entry could be offered standard in the high grade version - but we’ll have to wait and see.
Expect more safety equipment in the top version, too, but a reversing camera and parking sensors should be offered range-wide.
As a potential budget-conscious offering pitched against relative high-spec small SUVs, the Tivoli XLV prove intriguing. Think of a Honda HR-V VTi-L, which lists at $33,390, and has a 1.8-litre petrol engine and is front-wheel drive… a similarly specified diesel AWD automatic model could be tempting.
Ok, first things first, the ZST is not a full model replacement for the existing ZS. That car will continue at an even lower price for "at least a year" after the ZST's launch, allowing MG to experiment in a higher price bracket while maintaining its existing "value focused" buyer.
While it carries new styling, a new powertrain, and a significantly overhauled tech suite, the ZST shares its platform with the existing car, so it could be thought of as a very heavy facelift.
Unlike the existing ZS, pricing is less budget for the ZST. It launches with two variants, the Excite and Essence priced from $28,490 and $31,490 respectively.
For context this puts the ZST amongst mid-grade models of competitors, cars like the Mitsubishi ASX (LS 2WD - $28,940), Hyundai Kona Active (auto 2WD - $26,060), and the new Nissan Juke (ST 2WD auto - $27,990).
Tough company to not quite be undercutting. The ZST does deliver on spec though. Standard items on both grades includes 17-inch alloy wheels, full LED light clusters front and rear, a 10.1-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay, built-in nav, and finally Android Auto, too, faux-leather trim throughout with extended surface coverage when compared to the regular ZS, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and single-zone climate control.
The top-spec Essence adds a sportier alloy wheel design, contrast wing mirrors with integrated LED indicators, a digital dashboard, panoramic opening sunroof, an electrically adjustable driver's seat, heated front seats and a 360-degree parking suite.
The full safety suite, which has been improved out of sight to include a fleshed-out list of active items, is also standard across the two-variant range. More on this later.
Engine & trans
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV7/10
The XLV will come with only one engine option - a 1.6-litre turbocharged four-cylinder diesel engine. Hardly a horsepower hero, it produces 115kW of power (from 3400-4000rpm) and 300Nm of torque (1500-2500rpm).
It is available with a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic, with a standard-fit 4WD system known as 'Torque On Demand 4x4', which can sense the surface under the tyres and apportion torque to the rear axle to ensure better traction. SsangYong says it may offer a front-wheel drive XLV if demand necessitates.
A diesel engine isn’t unique, but it is rare in the small SUV class. But the fact of the matter is about 90 per cent of small SUVs sold are petrol-auto, so diesel could miss the mark for a lot of buyers.
The XLV offers a bonus element - towing capacity: the XLV can cope with a 500-kilogram unbraked trailer, and a 1500kg braked trailer - pretty strong for a compact SUV. Consider it competing against the Mazda CX-3 diesel AWD (640kg un-braked, 800kg braked) and Mitsubishi ASX (750kg/1400kg).
The ZST introduces a new and much more modern engine to MG small SUV range. It's a 1.3-litre three-cylinder turbo producing 115kW/230Nm, a notable increase on the sub-100kW outputs of either existing ZS engine and elevates the ZST to a much more competitive space in the segment.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6/10
The fuel consumption claim for the Tivoli XLV 4x4 auto is 6.3 litres per 100 kilometres. That’s not bad, and some small SUVs are better…
The Mazda CX-3 diesel AWD auto, which has a very low claimed consumption of 5.1L/100km (admittedly, it has a 1.5-litre engine with just 77kW/270Nm). But even the 2.2-litre turbo-diesel Mitsubishi ASX AWD auto uses less, at 6.0L/100km, and it’s almost a decade old. That engine has 110kW/360Nm.
The Tivoli XLV is a fair bit bigger than those two models, but even so, the fuel use should be a bit lower. It just goes to show the engine is working hard to deal with the weight of the Tivoli XLV, which in its heaviest guise, weighs 1535kg. Beefy.
This little engine doesn't claim to be a stellar fuel hero with a reasonable claim of 7.1L/100km in a combined urban/extra urban environment. While the launch drive loop covered about 200km of distance, the two sampled vehicles delivered between 6.8L/100km and 7.5L/100km, which seems spot-on to me.
The downside here is the ZST requires mid-grade 95RON petrol as the high sulphur content in our base 91RON fuel could potentially cause issues.
The ZST has a 45-litre fuel tank.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6/10
It’s difficult to learn what a car is all about over 29km, but that was the task I was handed in Korea, where I drove the Tivoli XLV from the hotel in Gangnam, Seoul, to a rest stop some 24km north of town. Then I jumped in some other models, before eventually getting a further - very illustrative - 5km stint behind the wheel at an off-road coarse later in the day.
There was some traffic, slow moving highway driving, and even a bit of higher-speed cruising. And it was fine.
The diesel engine was impressively refined and quiet, so much so that I initially thought it was a petrol. But after a couple of instances of traffic halts, it became clear there was a little more rattle from under the bonnet, and a more heft over the nose than you’d expect of a petrol.
That said, the performance was muted. With a torque output of 300Nm, you might think it would be potent - but it’s really not, and there’s some hesitancy from standstill, not to mention some sluggishness during roll-on acceleration.
The six-speed auto transmission did a good job, as far as I could tell, but a more arduous test loop will sort the facts from the feels.
As for the dynamic element, it’s hard to say anything other than the XLV felt smaller, more nimble and more fun to drive than either the Rexton or Musso models I also drive. The steering was adequate in its response, if a little lifeless, and the ride was a touch harder than I was expecting, but not sharp or punishing.
If you’re interested in off road specs, the Tivoli XLV is said to offer a 20 degree approach angle, a 20.8deg departure angle, and 17.0deg ramp-over. More of a problem, though, was the lack of ground clearance. The figure is just 168mm, which isn’t much more than some regular run-of-the-mill hatchbacks. Consider this: a Subaru XV has 220mm. Yep.
The suspension travel isn’t huge, either, with stiff-legged feel to the model we drove. Part of that could have come down to the stylish 18-inch alloy wheels and low-profile tyres, but it simply isn’t a soft and wobbly off-road SUV. It’s a monocoque chassis small crossover, so if you want a more serious SsangYong off-roader, the ladder-frame Rexton could offer a lot more appeal.
You can immediately tell the ZST has improved out of sight when compared to the previous car. The cabin is quiet and reasonably comfortable, offering good visibility, and a decent driving position from the get-go.
The new engine is responsive and while it's not going to knock anyone's socks off, the power delivery feels great for a segment filled with lacklustre 2.0-litre non-turbos.
I'm a fan of the six-speed automatic transmission, which was smart and slick, playing really nicely with the engine to make the most of its peak torque at 1800rpm.
It's impressive to see how far the drive experience has come for MG, given it was just the beginning of this year we drove the HS mid-sizer only to find the drive experience was possibly its worst attribute.
Rigidity has improved in the chassis for the ZST, and the suspension has also been worked on to provide a comfortable but far from sporty ride.
It's not all good news. While it's improved out of sight for the brand, and now feels very competitive, the handling still leaves a lot to be desired.
Steering feel was vague at best, and conspired with the spongey ride to give a feeling this SUV could easily approach its limits in the corners. The break pedal is also a bit distant and soft.
To be fair you are now spoiled in this segment with cars like the Hyundai Kona, Kia Seltos, Toyota C-HR and Honda HR-V having very well sorted chassis and engineered from the beginning to drive like hatchbacks. When compared with rivals like the Mitsubishi ASX, Suzuki S-Cross, and outgoing Renault Captur though, the ZST is at very least competitive.
One area where this car has also made a brand-wide improvement is in its safety suite. While the 'Pilot' suite of active features debuted on the HS earlier in the year, that car proved to be a bit overzealous and intrusive when it came to lane keeping and adaptive cruise.
I'm pleased to report the suite in the ZST has calmed a lot of those issues down, and MG's representatives said the HS will even receive a software update to make it more like the ZST in the future.
If nothing else the ZST is a big step forward for a brand which has had a lacklustre drive experience for some time. Hopefully those handling issues can be ironed out in the future, too.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV6/10
The Tivoli XLV doesn’t have an ANCAP crash test rating, but it was tested by Euro NCAP in 2016, where it scored a less-than-excellent four- out of five-star score. That’s in spite of the fact it was available with auto emergency braking (AEB), too.
According to SsangYong, the “top of the range Tivoli will feature AEB, lane departure warning, lane keep assist and high-beam assist”. We’ve heard that will be mirrored in Tivoli XLV flagship spec, too.
MG's 'Pilot' active safety suite consists of auto emergency braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross traffic alert, adaptive cruise control, traffic jam assist, traffic sign recognition, and adaptive high beams.
It's a stark improvement on the existing ZS range which had no modern active safety items at all. I'm sure MG is frustrated by the fact the ZST will share the existing cars four-star ANCAP safety rating despite these improvements, with a follow-up test to be conducted in the near future.
The ZST has six airbags, two ISOFIX and three top-tether child seat mounting points, and the expected stability, brake, and traction controls.
Ssangyong Tivoli XLV7/10
Nothing has been confirmed yet, but we suspect SsangYong could be working to match one of the best warranty offers in the Australian market in mimicking Kia’s seven-year/unlimited kilometre plan. In the UK SsangYong models have seven-year/150,000 mile (241,000km) cover, but an unlimited mileage offer is expected here.
If that’s the case, and models like the Tivoli XLV can be competitively priced for servicing, and with reasonable (read: not too frequent!) service intervals, then the score for this element of our test could increase in later reviews.
MG clearly aims to replicate the successful ownership strategy of underdog manufacturers which came before it (like Kia), by offering a seven year and unlimited kilometre warranty promise. Too bad Mitsubishi just jumped to a ten-year warranty otherwise the ZST would be tied with industry leaders.
Roadside assist is also included for the duration, and there is a service schedule which lasts the life of the warranty.
The ZST requires servicing once a year or every 10,000km and visits to the shop cost between $241 and $448 for a yearly average spend of $296.86 in the first seven years. Not bad.