Browse over 9,000 car reviews

Nissan Juke 2016 review

Ewan Kennedy road tests and reviews the Nissan Juke with specs, fuel consumption and verdict.

Already a standout vehicle, even more so in the bright yellow model we've just stepped out of, Nissan Juke is now even more radical thanks to a major makeover that arrived a couple of months back.

Nissan Juke is all big curves and unexpected angle. While not to all tastes, indeed only suited to those who like to be different, we fell in love with it when we first saw a swag of them during several European trips.

So radical was the style, with huge fog lights that look like driving lights, and headlights that sit on top of the front guards (and look like blinkers) that Nissan Australia decided not to bring it downunder.

That is until other mini SUVs with interesting shapes arrived – Ford Kuga and Holden Trax being standouts – that Nissan decided it was time to bring it to our market.


Juke Series 2's frontal makeover is based on the Nissan so-called 'V-Motion' shape which gives it a big huge area and a slimmer upper section.

The Nissan designers tell us the headlights are based on a boomerang shape, we struggle to see any resemblance, perhaps the designers should be sent downunder for a while to do a rework! The front and rear wheel arches bulge up and out and seemingly last forever.

Juke's cabin isn't as radical as the body, but continue the exterior's curvaceous theme.

Juke can be mistaken as a crossover of an SUV and a two-door coupe thanks to its disguised rear door handles. The rear bumper is bigger and the tail lights, again, have what Nissan calls a boomerang design.

Juke's blinkers previously sat on the top of the headlights. Many drivers found this distracting at night, so as part of the facelift the designers have shifted them to a conventional position in the door mirrors.

New colours have added, including Bumblebee Yellow (as on our test Juke), Magnetic Red and Ink Blue. It's great to see a bit of colour coming back into cars in recent times. Juke's cabin isn't as radical as the body, but oversize instruments, the centre console and gear lever housing continue the exterior's curvaceous theme.


There have been major changes under that bold bonnet. The biggest is the use of a 1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine. Fitted in the entry level 2WD Juke ST it produces 85kW and 190Nm, it is mated to a six-speed manual gearbox. We found this combination performed well in the relatively light 2WD Juke.

The previous 1.6-litre non-turbo engine is still fitted to the 2WD Juke ST and has had some upgrades. It produces also 86kW, but not being a turbo it doesn't have the grunt, making just 140Nm, which isn't reached until a highish 4000 revs. It drives through a CVT automatic so is kept in the correct ratio virtually all the time.

Nissan Juke grips in corners and it will take a harsh driver to upset it, in which case the electronic aids will step in.

The topline Juke Ti-S was our test vehicle. It has a turbocharged 1.6-litre petrol that's also seen in the Nissan Pulsar SSS and produces up to 140kW and 240Nm. This torque is spread over an impressive range, all the way from 1600 to 5200 rpm. Most owners will therefore be getting peak grunt virtually all of the time. With 2WD this 1.6 turbo-petrol comes with a six-speed manual, but the AWD uses the CVT auto.


All Juke models get front, side and curtain airbags; stability and traction control; ABS brakes with electronic brakeforce distribution and brake assist; ISOFIX child seat anchorages; and a reversing camera.


There's good front headroom and the driver's seat is comfortable and supports well in bends. The lack of telescopic steering wheel adjustment is a surprising omission. The rear seat has reasonable legroom but it will sometimes be necessary for tall people in the back to do a deal with those in the front on longer trips.

The original Nissan Juke with front-wheel-drive used the same rear underbody as the all-wheel-drive and there's a big empty space under the floor of the 2WD where the rear differential wasn't fitted.

Sanity has prevailed and Juke's with 2WD have gained a whopping 40 per cent more luggage space, at 354 litres. The Juke with AWD still has the smaller 251-litre boot of the first model. Folding rear seatbacks, with a 60/40 split, are used with both drivetrains.

The comfort/ride balance is good for most owners. Nissan Juke grips in corners and it will take a harsh driver to upset it, in which case the electronic aids will step in and help save them. However, if you're looking for the sort of sportiness which Nissans often produce it's best to look elsewhere.

Click here to see more 2016 Nissan Juke pricing and spec info


Nissan Juke dares to be different – really different – so polarises opinions. We like it like that, vehicles in which no one has any real opinion one way or the other are usually sensible but boring; two words you are unlikely to see in any review on the Juke.

How does the Juke compare to the Trax, Kuga and CX-3? Tell us what you think in the comments below.

Pricing guides

Based on 49 cars listed for sale in the last 6 months
Lowest Price
Highest Price

Range and Specs

ST (fwd) 1.2L, PULP, 6 SP MAN $11,100 – 16,280 2016 Nissan Juke 2016 ST (fwd) Pricing and Specs
ST N-Tec (FWD) 1.6L, PULP, CVT AUTO $12,500 – 18,040 2016 Nissan Juke 2016 ST N-Tec (FWD) Pricing and Specs
Ti-S (FWD) 1.6L, PULP, 6 SP MAN $14,100 – 19,910 2016 Nissan Juke 2016 Ti-S (FWD) Pricing and Specs
Ti-S (AWD) 1.6L, PULP, CVT AUTO $16,000 – 22,330 2016 Nissan Juke 2016 Ti-S (AWD) Pricing and Specs
Disclaimer: The pricing information shown in the editorial content (Review Prices) is to be used as a guide only and is based on information provided to Carsguide Autotrader Media Solutions Pty Ltd (Carsguide) both by third party sources and the car manufacturer at the time of publication. The Review Prices were correct at the time of publication.  Carsguide does not warrant or represent that the information is accurate, reliable, complete, current or suitable for any particular purpose. You should not use or rely upon this information without conducting an independent assessment and valuation of the vehicle.