Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

VW Golf R32: good car, bad fit

  • By Jonah Wigley
  • Carsguide
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image The 3.2 litre V6 R32 reaches 250km/h. Photo Gallery

Whenever I mention the VW Golf R32 to people, those who have driven it, groan that it’s not that much better than the GTi.

An interesting reaction you might think, given that the GTi has been one of the outstanding hot hatches of the last decade. But that’s the thing you see. For the R32 to park confidently as the performance-mobile in the Golf range, it shouldn’t just be the one up from the GTi, it should be the excitement machine. It should be goose-bump raising adrenalin on four tyres - and worth every cent of the extra several thousand dollars spent.

With all this in mind and not one to judge to quickly, I thought I’d better decide for myself.

Exterior
A completely new radiator grill fronts the R32 and comprises two shiny, aluminium twin strips instead of the black honeycomb pattern of the GTi. A polished R32 badge sits to the left. The grill rests above 3 huge air intakes, and between self adjusting, bi-xenon headlamps.

Assisting in the achievement of a sporty look, body-coloured bumpers and door handles, together with a 20mm lower chassis give the car its aerodynamic aspect. Centrally-mounted, twin exhausts plus rear roof and deep front spoilers make up the muscular, aggressive form one expects from a true performer.
 
Interior
Generally, Volkswagen does its best to style interiors that will date well. They do this by coupling quality materials with simple design. R32 badging, ‘engine spin’ aluminium trim and a great looking instrument cluster - unique to the R32, are the only subtle differences that separate it from the rest of the Golf range.

Everything is solid and tight with not a hint of poor workmanship or potential for rattles.

Engine and Safety
The 3.2 litre V6 petrol engine gives you a nifty 184 kW at 6300 rpm, which is about 40 more than the GTi, and a solid 320 Nm of torque at around 3000 revs. Power is distributed to all 4 wheels via Volkswagens 4 MOTION system which aims to achieve better traction and improved safety.

The R32 achieved 5 stars in its Euro NCAP crash testing program and comes standard with ABS, EBS, ESP and a comprehensive airbag package.

On the road
I was keen to give the R32 a good run, even after hearing that it wasn’t hugely different from the GTi, and after the first few k’s along a vast stretch of car-less, winding road, I was having a lot of fun. The exhaust note was guttural and raw. The four wheel drive and big 18 inch wheels, stuck the car to the bitumen on the tightest of turns, and braking and acceleration was precise and true. I was expecting the lowered suspension to be stiff, but not as jarring as I experienced, even with the support of Vienna leather or Recaro seats. It became uncomfortable after a while and I suspected the everyday driver might become a little miffed having to scour the floor every hour for dislodged fillings.

Noise from the slightly rough road was quite loud inside the cabin and the steering wheel, same as other cars in the range, was too far away with no option to readjust.

Ours was the Direct Shift Gearbox (DSG) version but you can choose regular manual if you wish. Personally I prefer the good old fashioned gear stick over paddle shift but you can get 6.2 seconds for the 100 kms with the DSG, rather than 6.5 with the stick. I could probably take or leave that but I will welcome the better fuel economy you get with the DSG at 9.8l/100 kms.

I didn’t get the same adrenalin rush that I did in the WRX STi for example, or the Evo – and I was really hoping I would, considering all three are the ‘performance’ cars in their line ups. I wanted my stomach to fill my throat but there was none of that.

Perhaps it’s the 200 odd kilos that the R32 has over the GTi, or that I had held my hopes a fraction too high. But there was nowhere near enough notable difference in performance or looks that I thought there should have been, for the R32 to fit comfortably and justifiably at the top of the grid.

Pricing
You can get 3 and 5 door versions of the R32. Pricing starts at $54, 990.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 17 comments

  • The reviewers findings are so bizarre i have to comment…

    Ride quality: We have owned a MKV 3 dr R32 for well over a year and driven it on various roads, commuting, choppy qld backroads, tight windy stuff, freeways… the suspension on this vehicle is in a different class to most sports cars - it is compliant enough to do Bris - Syd in a day. Taught enough to do Reefton spur or MtGlorious.. And far more comfortable than any WRX or EVO.

    Value - If you want AWD and luxury options like leather and bixenons - this car is a no brainer. Spec up a GTI to that level and then compare prices, you will basically end up with a 2wd pressure cooker at a similar price to an AWD with an understressed engine.

    Power: As above - this car could easily handle another 20 kw (and it is attainable with tuning), where do you stop though? there will always be something more powerful. The one thing you will be sure of is the longevity of an understressed normall aspirated motor. Sure you can chip a 2ltr gti over 200kw - for how long is it going to provide that though?? and in a warmer climate etc… A standard 0-100 around 6 seconds is more than enough, and the roll on power is brilliant.

    Style: Not the greatest looking car on the block, IMO looks far better in 3dr than any other golf…. and it is likely to still be there when you come back to the carpark, it doesnt scream out steal me..

    I think the value comparisons should be purely with other AWDs, try comparing it to a 3.2 Audi AWD (Same drivetrain) or even the Alfa 3.2..

    MrCurlywhirly of Brisbane Posted on 16 December 2008 10:43pm
  • As now the proud owner of an R32, it’s disappointing to see the comments.

    As has been stated, this model is a niche category model. Sure the performance isnt best in class, or the price is a little bit overwhelming for what you get, but the car is a mini grand tourer. There are so many GTi’s floating around on roads now, that you then have to wonder about resale value of these.

    Car’s are never an investment, they are there to be enjoyed. The R32 has performance, comfort, and typical refinement I expected. Im not there to smash land speed records, just enjoy the ride, windows down on a summer day headed to the beach. What could be better.

    Paul Nielsen Posted on 24 November 2008 4:16pm
  • I own a MKIV r32, and i raced my GF’s MKV GTI and it kept up, i was expecting to blast the thing of the road. i still won by a bonnet, but considering the GTI was a big jump in performance than the previous model GTI. The MKV R32 on the other hand is only 7kw more than the previous model R32, and the styling is not so different from a glance from the GTI. the only reason why i would buy the current R32 over the GTI would be for the AWD system. But is it really worth the extra $10k.  Personally i think thats the only real worth while factor in buying the R32 over the GTI. The MKV R32 is priced to much considering the GTI is so good. Then again they will no longer be producing the R32 in the MKVI version, so if you considering a future collectable R32 is worth it.

    Olly of Sydney Posted on 09 September 2008 5:41pm
  • What? Couldn’t see the adjustment for rake and reach of the wheel, guess where? The same place it always is, steering column.

    R32, best bang for your buck car on the market. Optioned up GTI is about the same price, so why would you buy a GTI, when every turkey has one, or it’s on the way?

    DC of Melb Posted on 04 August 2008 11:17pm
  • Now the old MkIV R32 was a revelation, brilliant in every respect, considering the GTi of similar vintage was a wheezing, underperforming pretender. The new MkV R32 hasn’t moved the boundaries a great deal - the engine is only mildly more powerful and the chassis is a great deal heavier than the old model it replaced. No wonder that people are chasing after the much improved GTi.

    I don’t know where the ‘hot hatch of the last decade’ line comes in because as far as I’m aware, the old Golf IV GTi was a 123kW disappointment compared to the 148kW model. The old car was dowdy, uninspiring, softly sprung and had dismal understeer qualities and is widely regarded as having been the worst GTi to date.

    It’s just a pity that the R32 didn’t make the same leap of performance between Mk IV and V as the GTi did. We’d be looking at a 300bhp R32 if that was the case…

    Sonny Heeps of Melbourne Posted on 23 May 2008 3:38pm
  • Hello sapphire black,

    I’m not entirely sure what you are getting at with the ‘one-eyed assessment’ comment because I seem to remember praising the car on a number of occasions.

    The ‘GTI v R32’ argument has been done to death, probably because it’s an issue worth considering I would have thought.

    You may have a point about the GTI v GT Sport argument too but I was reviewing the R32.

    Cheers,
    Jonah

    Jonah Wigley of carsguide Posted on 15 May 2008 1:56pm
  • Judging by the number of Mk V R32’s on Sydney road these days, I’m glad most people out there don’t disagree with your one-eyed assessment. This ‘GTI vs R32’ argument has been done to death on the VW forums…you think there’s a $15k gap between the two, well niceties like leather and xenons are optional on the GTI….

    The fact of the matter is the two cars are aimed at different clientele….and using a similar logic to yours, is the GTI worth $5k more and that much ‘differentiated’ from a GT Sport? And is the GT Sport worth the extra price premium over a Polo GTI?

    sapphire_black of Sydney Posted on 14 May 2008 11:32pm
  • I’ve just bought a GTI for same reasons given, cost.  But I’d still prefer the R32 for one reason - it’s not Front Wheel Drive.  Out of a corner the GTI loses most of it’s performance it struggles with the power it’s got.  I’m impressed that the GTI traction control is aggressive enough to allow some slip to the inside wheel while feathering the throttle without the computer cutting the power and fun completely.  R32 4WD or a limited slip dif option would be so much better.

    Steve Posted on 13 May 2008 4:43pm
  • My thoughts exactly - this should be priced around 45-48K not over 60K on the road. Nice car, but after all its still a hatch with a big engine in it (and you get VW dealer arrogance and poor customer service thrown in as well!). You can go up a whole other class with 60K.(but then again, I did see that some C’dore SS’s are now about $67K on the road!!) Gee if someone gave me $65K to spend, hmmm…. BMW 3-series, Lexus is250, Alfa 159, Audi A4, Benz C200 and so on (either with spare change, or options, or in some instances both!). Or as others have said, save yourself the cash and go into a Mazda dealer.

    Cam of Bundoora Posted on 12 May 2008 2:56pm
  • Dennis obviously you didn’t drive R32 drive it and then compare to mazda.I bought gti price vise and there is not a big differences.You can tune it by oettinger for $2000 and get 180kw and 350nm torque and beat the performance of R32

    max Posted on 11 May 2008 10:43pm
  • I saved another $5000 and got the GT Sport TSI. It has much the same features as the GTi and R32. It uses less fuel, is more environmentally friendly and has all the power really needed for “oomph on Aussie roads”.

    Rick of ♠♦ Posted on 07 May 2008 11:11pm
  • the R32 to me is a car that has everything: style, comfort and performance. the only problem with it, as mentioned in the article, is that it is too expensive and i don’t know why volkswagen is selling them at over $50K. if the price was lowered, then there would be a lot more sales. i actually have a volkswagen golf and it is a great car. i would have bought the R32 at the time but it was too expensive. so basically, if the R32 was cheaper, then it would get more sales

    Joni Levine Posted on 07 May 2008 9:48pm
  • Jonah, the steering adjusts for reach as well as rake.  Not sure why you couldn’t get yours to move.

    For the ‘agression’ look, it’s down to colour.  The black looks quite agressive but that grey just doesn’t cut it in comparison.

    In spite of an even higher price, I prefer the Audi S3 over the R32.

    elephino Posted on 07 May 2008 4:17pm
  • Kohan - look at the other german cars with the same power and size, yes, the R32 is well priced. it’s well built, so what do you expect? jap cars don’t generally have as nice interiors, built well, yes, but lacking something. i drive a both vw and subaru and find, as the article says, the vw still has the edge on design hands down.

    Hitman Posted on 07 May 2008 11:32am
  • How boring really, I had a 1976 Mini SS Show special, with a sprintex supercharged 1312cc cooper S lump,  it would do 237KPH (corrected) and a 14.8 quarter - it would still get under 5 litres/100 cruising at 100-120kph   and with the live rear axle, coil overs and koni adjustables was easy to setup for whatever I wanted to do.  These days I could get the same 165hp without the supercharger - but that’s modern tech for you - cost about $20K, but man if you want a mile on your face - and it did have air-con (under $2K) and a 5 speed box - couldn’t afford the 6 speed.  It was lightened and only weighed 850Kg (less driver)  and ran dual 20 litre tanks-  fun ?  - 100% - useable 100%  cost - could get 3 for the price of the R32 - or even 2 for the price of my new cooper. - basic fun cheap ! - and it’s agility saved my life at least 3 times

    perrie iles of brisbane Posted on 07 May 2008 11:21am
  • If it’s the same performance you are after, buy the Mazda MP3 and save 16000 or dollars

    Dennis Williams Posted on 07 May 2008 11:01am
  • good car but too expensive

    kohan Posted on 06 May 2008 10:28pm
Read all 17 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics