Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Toyota Prado 2010: review

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
  • image

    The Toyota Prado 2010 is more luxurious than ever for suburban work and tougher and more flexible for off-road use. Photo Gallery

Paul Gover road tests and reviews the new Toyota Prado at its Australian launch

The middle child of the Toyota SUV family is new again.  The Prado has had a complete workover in almost every area, from the chassis and body up through the V6 petrol engine and the camera protection systems.

It's now more luxurious than ever for suburban work and tougher and more flexible for off-road use. As you would expect with a seven-year gap between model changes.

Toyota Australia claims everything from improved fuel economy to better value and improved refinement, but it all comes at a cost.  The new Prado has put on at least 150 kilograms from the previous model and the starting price is up by more than $4000 to $55,990. In fact, only two of 14 Prado models now hit below the Luxury Car Tax threshold and the top-line seven-seater Kakadu turbodiesel auto costs a whopping $88,990.  But more than 1500 people have placed orders and Toyota is expecting to have trouble satisfying early demand. 

The fourth-generation Prado is longer, wider but lower than its predecessor and, for the first time, there is a three-door model. But it's not a stripped-out bush-basher, coming with the seven airbags, ESP stability control, airconditioning, cruise control, smart-start system, alloy wheels, USB input and Bluetooth, and power steering that is standard on all models.

"We wanted comfort and peace of mind, anytime and anywhere," says Prado's chief engineer, Makoto Arimoto, speaking at the Australian press preview in Orange over the weekend.  The range runs from the basic GX through GXL and VX to Kakadu, which even gets a standard sunroof and leather trim.

The Prado is available as either a five or seven-seater and Toyota has tweaked the cabin with a sliding second-row seat in the five-door models. There is also an electrically-operated third-row system in the luxury cars.

Like every new model from Toyota there are hundreds of changes and updates in the suspension and engines and electronics and entertainment systems, and it's all important stuff.   But the styling is . . . questionable. The basic body is basically bland and the final finishing, particularly the grille, is overpowering.  So it's a good thing that around 50 per cent of Prado buyers add a bullbar.

Driving

The new Prado is everything you expect, and more. It is just plain phenomenal in the bush, where the latest range of driver aids - but particularly the 'Crawl' system and driver-selectable multi-terrain package - mean it can practically drive itself. You only have to steer as it walks up and down the toughest terrain.  There are also cameras to check obstacles anywhere around the Prado, provided you pay enough to get the right package, and the transmission has the low-range setting and differential locks you need for serious stuff.

Pay enough and you can also have height-adjustable suspension, an extra diff lock and the multi-terrain deal which means you choose the sort of conditions - from sand through to rocks - and let the electronic brains decide the best settings for fuss-free travel.  Get back on the bitumen and the suspension feels more plush, there is more 'stuff' to enjoy, and the cabin is a little more roomy and significantly more practical.

The latest V6 has definitely got more go that you can feel for more of the time, even if less than 20 per cent of Prado buyers go for petrol power. But the turbodiesel does not cope as well with the extra weight in the new car and overtaking performance is fairly ordinary, with relatively leisurely acceleration from standstill.

So the biggest question on the new Prado is the price. More than $55,000 for a starter car is a lot of cash for any SUV buyer, and the top-end stickers are right in the luxury car class. It's a good thing, but is it that good?

Toyota Prado

Price: From $55,990
ANCAP safety score: Not tested
Safety equipment: seven airbags, ESP, traction control, anti-skid brakes with brakeforce distribution Fuel economy: from 8.3L/100km
Emissions: Not available
Body: 3-door wagon, 5-door wagon
Seats: five, seven
Engines: 3.9-litre V6, 3-litre four-cylinder turbodiesel
Power: 202kW/5600revs, 127kW/3400revs
Torque: 391Nm/4400 revs, 410Nm/1600-2800 revs
Transmission: Six-speed manual, five-speed automatic, constant switchable all-wheel drive

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 32 comments

  • as a proud 2001 diesel prado owner, i feel as if i should mention that compared to its other, cheaper rivals, that the toyota exceeds in its unrivaled reliability (if serviced regulary), and enviable build quality. As for slow in overtaking which was mentioned in a previous comment, even my lower powered prado, overtakes just fine, considering 90% of my driving is on the freeway. People need to realise that the diesel prado is not going to be as quick as a V8 turbo like in the 200 series, and people need to realise that for a 2 tonne car its only powered by a 3.0 litre diesel, having said that, its power is quite impressive. People are complaining about price, then saying they want the new twin turbo sahara engine, which if you were to buy a sahara would set you back, new, $104000. The car is a great compromise, and anyone complaining about on road dynamics, is obviously not aware that they are driving a car nearly a tonne heavier than your standard sedan, its not a bloody sports car, and no matter how good the engine, suspension, and brakes are, you can’t escape the laws of physics eg. high centre of gravity and high speed cornering don’t go hand in hand.

    Brad Hogan of melbourne Posted on 19 March 2010 2:27am
  • Very expensive , I d rather buy L/C VXR than PRADO
    GOOD LUCK Toyota

    Abdullah of Riyadh-KSA Posted on 16 March 2010 10:18pm
  • I was going to upgrade to the Prado 2010 ( presently own Prado 2007 diesel ) however I don’t think I could face the interior design each day of this new model ..to me looks very cheap and tacky only part leather s/wheel , under powered motor ( I tow a c\van ) , 150kg heavier ,don’t like the way the rear seats are configured and the GXL is way over priced ,.....I will wait for the next model ...or have a look around for a better model\brand…..shame I liked Toyota

    Robert Catt of Au Posted on 05 March 2010 6:41pm
  • I have a 2005 td prado, I will not be updating to a 2010 for lots of reasons. back seats take up too much room, could not look at that dash board for long, same old td donk, that big new bar holding the back door open, Price. The new td land cruser is much better. Toyota need to lift their game.

    Martyn Posted on 20 February 2010 12:50am
  • I have the new Parado Kakadu and as for the over taking and “grunt” it is not an issue to overtake as you can just put the automatic from drive in to a manual mode and tap up or down through the gears. We do a lot of highway driving due to living in the country and have found it has great pick up for overtaking. As for the fuel consumption our car is sitting on about 9L/100KM so again really good on fuel, turbo diesel too. Dont knock this car until you try it I am so impressed and happy with it and all the features.

    Marnie of Queensland Posted on 28 January 2010 12:35pm
  • I own a 2004 V6 VX Prado and will be updating within the next 12 months. I love the reliability & quality build, but the driveability (drives like a bus), sheer weight and fuel consumption will be pointing me in other directions.
    I was thinking along the lines of a diesel VW Tiguan or Outback.

    Mark McNichol Posted on 20 January 2010 1:51pm
  • Paul, in a recent review of the 3.0 litre diesel version of the new Prado that you did for a newspaper, from memory, you said that at 90 kph the vehicle had “very little left for overtaking”. Imagine three hefty mates and a rear end full of camping gear, it would probably have nothing left for overtaking! Imagine if you were towing a camper trailer as well! To me this down right unsafe. If you are attempting to overtake,with the camper in tow you would need to have a clear run/vision for a good many kilometres. To me, this is an instance of the vehicle being overweight for the motor or the gearing being set for optimum fuel consumption. It reminds me of the days of the VW Combi. If you saw one overtaking coming towards you, you knew you had to hit the dirt or brake to allow it to complete its safe return to the correct side of the road. Too little power is as bad as too much!

    Old Dog of Adelaide Posted on 14 January 2010 10:34pm
  • i have a 2005 grande V6 and recently drove to WA from SA. down the south west and all around brilliant averaged 13.7 L/100 i believe the new model does not have as big a fuel tank and has electronic 4WD engagement bad move toyota my prado is just about to be kitted out with all the gear to tow a van terrific car

    paul of adelaide Posted on 13 January 2010 9:36pm
  • I bought my Prado grande 3 l Diesel 2008 model in april this year,i could not be happier any more The best car i ever had in fact help me quering my bad back,drove to Townswile and back belived or not 7.5 liters p 100km that is real good,also in the city i tested i drive around 1600 km and i never turn the engine of, as for the price also a very good deal so in all very happy customer,usualy change car every 10 years.

    Chris Kostadinov of Brisbane Posted on 07 January 2010 8:04pm
  • I bought a new 2007 model. Love it! Looked at the 2010 model and thought I could get a good deal on an upgrade. Wrong! Considering the 2010 is heavier, diesel lower performance, smaller fuel capacity and more $$, I’ll keep my 2007 and mod it, which was my original plan. (Cb, Snorkel, Rear draws, Suspension, A/T Tyres, blah, blah.

    Nigel Turton of vic Posted on 31 December 2009 12:04am
  • I have been giving very serious thought to upgrading my 2005 petrol VX, but the value equation with the new model doesn’t stack up. I drove the new diesel and it really is a bit ordinary. I also noticed that the leather seats in the new VX and Kakadu include some vinyl parts. It’s a bit cheap and nasty when the price is right up there with the Europeans.
    To conclude, I visited Toyota UK website and noticed that their Prado (Land cruiser) models have a neat looking lift up tailgate (no ugly tyre) that includes a hinged back window like the Kluger. I wonder why we don’t get this version.

    James of Sydney Posted on 20 December 2009 8:07pm
  • I’ve still got the first Prado 4 cylinder model with 2nd motor & hope to upgrade when its 15 year old. But please add the V8 4.5 litre turbo diesel & 3500kg braking for towing soon.

    Jesse of Helensburgh Posted on 17 December 2009 10:21am
  • Thank you Toyota!!
    You have just made my 2007 GXL Prado far more valuable. I’m hanging onto mine and will avoid the new Fugly.

    'Reddo of Newcastle Posted on 17 December 2009 7:18am
  • We had a previous Generation Prado VX with the Petrol Engine.  Fuel ecconomy of around 13L/100km when driven hard and it goes like a rocket.

    In the Prado I dont see any point in going diesel, that Petrol engine is an absolute Gem.

    Nathan of Brisbane Posted on 16 December 2009 6:54pm
  • Was looking forward to the 3 door but with the rubbish diesel engine theres not chance.  Hopefully Toyota will listen soon and provide a decent donk!  The landrover 4 looks to eb the go!

    Tim Newson of Perth Posted on 16 December 2009 4:51pm
  • Diesel engine is still a liability.  Styling worse than the outgoing model (same as the Landcruiser).  A pity because it was a formality that I’d upgrade to another Prado.  Now I need to seriously look at other contenders.

    Mark W of Adelaide Posted on 15 December 2009 11:46pm
  • I have had 4 Prado & 4 100 series Turbo Diesel units. I have hauled bogie axle 18.6 full size caravanes throughout Aust. I cannot fault the Toyota. Since retireing to the City I found the 100 L/C much too large to park etc. & have found the Prado an excellent unit. It is comfortable on long trips, fuel efficient & quite capable of hauling a 2.300t B/A C/Van. In my opionion, & as the new T.D Prado has less power, is heavier & costs more for what is little more than a facelift,I will seriously consider the new petrol unit,that is, if I stop with Toyota & if I change at all.

    Mark Pratt Posted on 13 December 2009 6:32pm
  • I’m very disappointed in the poor spec of the turbodiesel and think the extra weight is a poor outcome.  I retire soon and want to tow a small van & do not want the acreage & lard of the Landcruiser for only two of us.  Toyota this is a very poor outcome for an updated model in these times.  A decent diesel please & soon.

    Christo Posted on 11 December 2009 1:50pm
  • Can any one point out which is better for Middle East (Dubai)? Prado 2.7 - 4 Cylinder or 4.0 6 Cylinder (2010 Model). I want to know the differences related to the driving comforts. The 4.0 Ltr is AED 20K to 30K (Approx US$ 5500 to US$ 8200)costlier than 2.7 Ltr version.  Kindly advice me to take a right decision.

    VM Subair of Dubai Posted on 09 December 2009 7:13pm
  • What to buy, Discovery 4 or new Prado???? have a Discovery 3 diesel at the moment, wonderful car, but bad resale value!...We love travelling in Botawana, Namibia, Zambia and Mozambique, and have done so very comfortably in the Discovery 3, ... to change or not?

    Jill Howitz Posted on 09 December 2009 1:35pm
  • currently own a Disocvery 3, and due to update, had a look at the new prado and was impressed with some of the bling, came to the following conclusions why I would not buy, the diesel motor is to under powered and will have to be updated in the next year or two, 3rd row seats to small and rear payload to small when compared to the D3,but most importantly Toyota have over priced by most likley 10-15%. I don’t really like the look of the D4 and will keep the D3 a bit longer, and take the family on a nice overseas holiday with the money i won’t spend on a new car.

    tgl of qld Posted on 04 December 2009 10:28pm
  • I purchased a new 1996 prado grande and traded it on a new 2003 prado grande which I still drive. I will nor upgrade to the new model, price too high while the aussie dollar has improved so much. A new 3.6 subaru outback is on the horizon.

    Rossco Maher of Tweed Heads Posted on 03 December 2009 10:06pm
  • Come on Toyota, you should price this vehicle a little better, cut down the models (5 door range), give the GX vinyl floor and optional traction aids for fleet buyers and make the Kakadu look different or flasher to the other models

    Bren Posted on 29 November 2009 2:17pm
  • I sprayed my vegetarian meatlovers pizza over my keyboard when I saw the new prado

    Ben Dover of Mars Posted on 28 November 2009 11:25pm
  • Whoa!  Just looked at the Discovery - and people say the Prado is ugly???

    Ferret Posted on 28 November 2009 2:59am
  • It’s time Toyota gave us the diesel engine we deserve in the Prado, the 4.5 Litre V8 diesel as appears in the Landcruiser 200. Without this I will be buying a new Discovery 4 twin turbo diesel.

    Tony current Prado driver Posted on 25 November 2009 7:47pm
  • is it just me or is this car BUTT UGLY!!! all the current toyota 4x4’s are ugly looking they look way to asian for my liking

    Mark K Posted on 24 November 2009 6:57pm
  • Brilliant vehicle on road (Neil of Newcastle). I sprayed my gluten free muesli all over the keyboard when I read that one.

    Howard Posted on 24 November 2009 4:23pm
  • It’s 200+kg heavier then the previous model, what the hell is Toyota thinking? Despite what the marketing blurb says, this will equate to bigger fuel consumption, tyre wear, suspension wear, and poor handling in corners.

    Jeff Walker of brisbane Posted on 24 November 2009 8:45am
  • Was driving the old model and turbodiesel was not coping well. Will be even worse with extra weight in new model. Would really expect V6 turbodiesel in new model.

    Peter Bevc Posted on 23 November 2009 10:42pm
  • Prado’s have always been a brilliant vehicle ion and off road, but I’m thinking they are pricing themselves away from the average family?!Don’t car manufacturers realise interest rates are going back up. Ah well, I guess the 2010 model will be a used car by 2011. n

    Neil Davies of Newcastle Posted on 23 November 2009 2:22pm
  • Other than “more plush”, there is no indication of what it is like to drive on the road, which for 95% of drivers is where the vast majority of kilometres will be done. Steering, handling, braking anyone?  Not good enough for a review from Cars Guide.

    Michael Noonan of Summer Hill Posted on 23 November 2009 1:01pm
Read all 32 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics