Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Test drive: Holden Statesman AFM

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
Holden Statesman AFM Fuel Guage Holden says its Statesman AFM can save at least one litre per 100km fuel consumption. Photo Gallery

There aren't many bigger passenger cars than the Holden Statesman so when you say it has fuel-saving technology, eyebrows raise.

There's no EcoLine Active Fuel Management badge on this pilot-build Statesman but one of the digital displays within the instruments is telling me it's switching between four and eight cylinders.

Holden says it can save at least one litre per 100km on fuel consumption - more if there's a lot of open-road cruising; the feature will be introduced as standard on all auto-V8 Commodore models from next month.

My right foot will test that theory – a fuel economy world-record-holder I am not.

The 270kW/530Nm V8 Statesman at launch laid claim to a 14.4l/100km combined fuel use figure, which with some mid-life tweaking was down to 13.9, with 330g/km CO2 emissions - there's no official emissions figure yet but the fuel consumption claim drops to 12.9l/100km.

The V8 engines Holden have been using in the latter stages of VZ and into VE were capable of running the Active Fuel Management system.

Interestingly, the V8 remains in eight-cylinder mode at idle, but drops to four on part throttle cruising, even around town.

The change is largely imperceptible, overshadowed in this particular car by a grumpy, sporadic, part-throttle 2nd-3rd up-change that is not typical of other cog-swaps.

A 160km loop up the freeway saw the trip computer's metro-average of 16.2 (at 34km/h average speed) drop to 15.5l/100km.

The flat-road highway work only requires a fraction of the engine's output to overcome wind resistance, drag and maintain momentum.

Instead, a return trip via the hills roads - more corners, less flat bits and lower speeds - did no harm to the numbers, with the trip computer offering 15.1l/100km and the average speed was up to 40km/h.

Not quite hybrid or diesel levels of frugality, but try getting four adults and appropriate luggage from A to B with the same level of comfort and space.

As the rest alert reminder piped up on the information screen, the comfort of the seats was apparent - two hours without a stop and no numb bum or lower back complaints.

The Statesman is not quite the old codger of the Holden range but it's certainly set up to appeal to those empty-nesters who like comfort over cornering.

The five-metre pollie favourite still steers nicely but the suspension and the rubber is most certainly set up for comfort, moving around more on its underpinnings.

Once settled it corners but the lean is certainly more than the Caprice - a comfortable ride is the trade-off and it soaks bumps up without any issues.

The AFM system comes only with the six-speed automatic and there's also a drop in power and torque - down 10kW to 260kW of power and torque has been reduced from 530 to 517Nm.

It cruises quietly and even under full throttle there's only the distant sound of V8 thunder.

In terms of cabin space and metal for the money, there are not too many passenger cars under $200,000 that will provide similarly cavernous cabins.

At a little over 5.1 metres long and 1.9 metres wide, the Statesman is a mammoth vehicle, with a 3009mm-wheelbase and a commanding road presence.

The rear seat space is considerable - particularly legroom - so you'd have to get long-wheelbase examples of a Mercedes-Benz S500, Audi A8 4.2 or BMW 750i to match the grunt and the space.

The boot is quite sizeable and easily copes with a Christmas day load of presents, strollers and the like - it isn't overly deep but the length is considerable.

Of course, the Europeans have the local beaten for fuel economy - even with the AFM - but the $200,000-plus imports are also chock fuel of gear and features.

There's no standard satnav, xenon headlights, memory for the power-adjustable driver's seat, TV or DVD player or some of the other high-end features of ze Germans in the Holden.

The Statesman does get parking radar front and rear, stability control, 17in alloy wheels, dual front, side and full-length curtain airbags.

Given the size of the cabin the ventilation to the rear is a little lack-lustre, and the aircon takes a while to cool the large passenger space.

Perhaps the climate control with added grunt that is used in the Middle East export versions needs to be employed in its home market as well.

For those who still yearn for space, comfort and the ample torque of a (slightly less thirsty) V8, the long-wheelbase Holden range is a worthy addition to your garage.

Price: from $65,990.
Engine: six-litre 16-valve OHV Active Fuel Management alloy V8.
Transmission: six-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive.
Power: 260kW @ 5700rpm.
Torque: 517Nm @ 4400rpm.
Fuel consumption: 12.9litres/100km

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 24 comments

  • A little unknown fact A C200 OR A 320I in the same price range has a Focus or Astra Sized Engine.

    franz chong Posted on 08 March 2009 7:05pm
  • At first i was puzzled at why it runs all 8 cylinders at idle? Then I realised, who does not love the sound of a V8 at idle. Nothing like the sound of a V8, even at idle.
    Good work Holden.

    Dave Posted on 20 February 2009 12:36pm
  • “There’s no standard satnav, xenon headlights, memory for the power-adjustable driver’s seat, TV or DVD player or some of the other high-end features of ze Germans in the Holden.”

    Yeh, that would be in the Caprice you ditz. Still a third of the price of the Germans.

    Samuel Mir Posted on 20 February 2009 12:18am
  • I am intrigued by the fact that GMH Australia (Statesman/Caprice) is so far behind the rest of the world. These cars are VERY expensive to maintain. The Mercedes, BMW and Audi can be bought for less money and they are less expensive to maintain and service.
    I have owned the Statesman and the Caprice until five years ago when I bought a Mercedes C180. Chalk and cheese? My word it was. The Mercedes is far more economical, just as comfortable and one-third the cost to maintain and service.
    As you know, GMH and Ford fit export vehicles with modern computers, safety features and general equipment that we could only dream about. Even the export engines are better built to cope with the higher grade fuels used by almost every other country and they consume, on average, two litres per hundred less than the crap we are forced to accept here in Oz.
    As for the ‘new’ technology in engine management, the Oz industry is about ten years behind the rest of the world.
    By the way, Matt Melbourne, the local pub is not where you will get up-to-date information on the Australian motor industry and don’t assume that everyone is like you….still stuck in a tree and unable to walk.

    Errol Morris Posted on 07 February 2009 12:24pm
  • Sad that not one of you guys talk about keeping jobs in Australia.

    I have a Caprice 6.0L V8 and I lurrve it. 14 months and not a problem. I could have bought a cramped Bimmer or Audi for the same price… I did look at them… then I looked at the maintenance charges, lack of space and no V8 grunt.

    It’s horses for courses…. if you want space and grunt AND plenty of features, as well as help employ more Australians all at a reasonable price, get a Statesman or Caprice…. if you want a shoe box with ample performance and want to be a brand snob, buy an Audi/BMW/MB.

    AN Aussie of Canberra Posted on 19 January 2009 7:55pm
  • Why bother with a V8 these days?  Ford and BMW have both proven that a turbo 6 will give you the performance of a V8 (or even better) with a fraction of the cost in fuel.  Plus, due to less weight in the front, it handles better.  The sooner the V8 dies and is used only in “proper” performance cars and not rubbish Commodores, the better…

    Alex King of Perth Posted on 17 January 2009 10:58pm
  • whoopti doo! lets make a big deal because holden is using fuel saving technology that other manafacturers have been using for years. Honestly who really gives a shit! Just because it’s holden everyone makes a big deal about it! Get over it.

    BM Posted on 17 January 2009 1:52pm
  • well, this new technology does seem all good….. but what on earth happened to Holden making V8’s that can be converted to LPG ????!!!!
    it is this very reason I am still driving an older V8 (it has ABS, but not airbags due to age) as it was already converted when I bought it.
    I can honestly say, Ive got the power to overtake with comfort and ease anywhere (yes, even on the freeway) and tow without any worries at all… YET - BEST PART HERE: I am getting the same economy of a corolla or similar small car (without the towing or overtaking capability).

    It was a shame when Holden chose to make thier intake manifolds out of a polymer part (that can rupture under LPG use) rather than steel like in the good old days when my baby was rolled out of the factory.

    rather than sink all this money into technology (which yes, can be good but its more to break down etc) why not stick to a good thing they had going for them already.

    I would be happy to buy a new Holden V8 that runs on all 8, as long as it could be converted to gas to offset the extra fuel cost.

    Having said that, I remain a true Holden fan…. but my next car may not be a V8…. Im now looking at the fuel consumption figures of the TD Rodeo’s.

    David Ellis of Sydney Australia Posted on 15 January 2009 11:01pm
  • OK, so fuel prices are crippling are they? try $1.75 for PULP for a high price. Despite this I drive a VX SS Commodore. A great deal of its work is done on the highway and last time I did a long highway trip (to Uluru and back) I averaged about 8 l/100km. From a 5.7l V8!!! Despite sitting on (or slightly above) the speed limit all the way. I’d like to see the figures for a 4cyl Camry doing the same trip.
    At this economy had I bought an equivalent euro as a family car which uses 1l/100km less it would take 115000km to make back the $200k+ extra I would pay for the equivalent size car for my family. Simple economics says that you’re better to pay that into an appreciating asset which I have!
    Plus I kept Aussies in a job and spent as little time as possible on the wrong side of the road overtaking.
    It’s sad to see all the Aussie bashing we do. The Calais and Statesman do a very good job of keeping the others honest as a value for money proposition. The big V8 is an Aussie tradition and from a fit for purpose point of view is ideal for our long straight roads.
    I’ll be looking at a new car this year. Brand new VE V8 Calais V (or SS-V) vs 5 year old E500/540i. A difficult choice but warranty and the fact that it’s new (and $10k change) is probably a fairly convincing argument. Especially since the fuel economy figures are nearly identical.
    We don’t all have a lazy $300k lying around. Good on the locals for providing an alternative I say. They should be praised for trying, not flamed.

    Adam of Country SA Posted on 15 January 2009 1:25pm
  • @Matt in Melb,

    I think what Thommo was trying to say is that you could by merc c200 or BMW 325 (granted not a V8) but feel like your driving a luxury car unlike recent “luxury” holdens.  I used to drive Holdens till I brought my first BMW. Its true my BMW’s have been cheaper to maintain then any of my holdens (EG break service new rotars and pads holden $1200, BMW $990), and the service you get from the dealers is far better then I have got from a holden dealer. Thats just my opinion, if holden built a better car and lifted there service levels I would switch back after all I am an Aussie.

    BMW Driver of Gold Coast Posted on 14 January 2009 6:27pm
  • WIth the greatest respect Geoff:  Part Quote: ‘When will you guys get it fuel isn’t that dear any more and the big Holdens are not that much dearer to run’........

    I am flabbergasted, staggered, whatever…............

    Deejay51 of Gold Coast Posted on 14 January 2009 6:07pm
  • This test sucks big time. Playing around with Cylinder De Activation, (CDA has been around a long time GMH) and minor engine ‘refinements’ CANNOT HIDE THE FACT that the V8 lineage has had its day for general use, stop tinkering, adding AFM, pretty badges or whatever and change the power plant! 

    The article in part states: ‘The V8 engines Holden have been using in the latter stages of VZ and into VE were capable of running the Active Fuel Management system.’  Why are we the buying public only hearing about this now and why the delay in implementing the total package to offer some fuel savings to VZ/VE V8 Owners??

    This vehicle had to be tested in the real world against an identical spec current model without CDA to at least offer a comparison to current owners, shish. I am totally whacked as to why the CDA does NOT run on 4 cyl at idle, 6 as needed and 8 when really needed, all that is required is a smarter black box and sensors to monitor load/throttle/gear settings etc. and control the EFI accordingly. This is 2009 Y/N?

    I owned a reasonably powerful Brock Commodore for many years, recently I took the opportunity to drive an Audi A4 (Automatic) 2 LITRE TDI, bloody hell. I really got a shock the way this somewhat standard Audi from their range performed and used very little dino stuff. Around town unspectacular (which is cool) on the highway (in a word WOW). Oh, and it handled!!! OK not by any means physically the same size as the Statesman BUT readers should just try a smallish Turbo Diesel Semi Auto from opposition Manufacturers before investing in another Aussie Dino Fuel Guzzler.

    The day is here, (no, its passed) when the Aussie Sedans/Wagons/Utes of all persuasions should have been optioned with a Diesel Turbo and Dual Clutch Semi Auto boxes in lieu of fuel sapping torque conv. autos.

    Deejay51 of Gold Coast Posted on 14 January 2009 5:59pm
  • @ DOG WHO KNOWS NO FEAR:

    So YOU are one of those people who do 90 on the freeway - shame!!

    “Interestingly, the V8 remains in eight-cylinder mode at idle, but drops to four on part throttle cruising, even around town.”  I’d imagine that it takes off the same when you give it the right boot.

    Matt of Newcastle Posted on 14 January 2009 5:11pm
  • Unless you want to transport 190cm people in the back on a regular basis (and lets face it, who does?) whats the point of this car.  For $65k there are far better vehicles with loads more equipment, sufficient space, refinement and fuel econony. I think this dinoursour is on it last legs. Just look at resale values for 2 yr old version, lucky to get 40%.

    JH of Brisvegas Posted on 14 January 2009 4:21pm
  • May Isuggest that the Chrysler 300C CRD turbo diesel offers a better solution to the comfort-space-economy-environmental responsibility-performance equation!

    I regularly better 10 litres per 100km in city suburban driving.

    John Fitzpatrick of Adelaide Posted on 14 January 2009 3:59pm
  • Thommo- I have no idea what you are talking about! You say you can buy any model of BMW, Audi, etc for $65k. These cars go up around the $300k mark so really have no idea what you mean. Plus you say a Statesman costs a small fortune in maintenance, and that servicing European cars are cheap to service.

    Do you walk on your hands? I think you have got the wrong end of the stick.

    Matt Melb of Melbourne Posted on 14 January 2009 12:48pm
  • Good report, although I look forward to reading more about Holdens new V8.  I drive a WH Long Wheel Base model and love the look of the new models, I find servicing cheap and maintainance no more expensive than a regular Commodore. Still great value with prestige looks.

    Dave Posted on 13 January 2009 1:24pm
  • I used to buy statesman when they were big impressive icons of Australian Motoring.  When you drove the WB you were driving a proper big Aussie Luxury Sedan.  Now days they are unimpressive to look at and you have to work hard to see the difference between them and the base model sedan. So for $65 K I can buy any model of BMW, Audi etc and people at least recognise the car as a luxury sedan.  And have you owned a Statesman lately they cost a small fortune in maintenance .  So the European car is cheap to service has good fuel economy and looks like a prestige car. So I vote with my wallet,  and in this case and I won’t be buying an oversized Commodore that’s for sure!

    Thommo of Stuck on the carpark called the western freeway Posted on 13 January 2009 8:52am
  • As usual local car industry bashing especially Holden. When will you guys get it fuel isn’t that dear any more and the big Holdens are not that much dearer to run. Local cars are sold world wide so thay can’t be that bad…....... and it’s about the jobs the industry creates

    Geoff of Toowoomba Posted on 11 January 2009 11:38pm
  • I could have written this article if I had a drive. Where is the expert?

    Shaun Stanyer of Sydney Posted on 09 January 2009 11:11am
  • Holden should put a decent turbo diesel engine in their Statesman/Commodore and then check out the fuel economy.

    All the big European brands have a diesel option across the range, and they have some fantastic fuel economy figures. 

    C’mon Holden, be the first of the big aussie manufacturers to offer a turbo diesel option in the big family car, and you’ll do well with that!!

    CDTiFAN of QLD Posted on 06 January 2009 7:18pm
  • I also have a Gen3 (VY) with about 80000km, and get reasonable fuel economy from it.  On a trip it can get into the high 8’s per hundred km if driven gently and not too many hills, and can get below 10l/100km on a trip without any trouble at all.  Around town 13l/100km.  I would be interested to know the real world consumption figures of the Holden with AFM under similar conditions.  It’s interesting to note the drop in torque.  Carsguide - any comment on how the engine felt at varying revs compared with the non AFM 6.0l engine?

    VYBerlinaV8 of Canberra Posted on 06 January 2009 4:24pm
  • I agree, not a great article. I have one on order and wanted a bit more detail. Does it still take off well, are the engine’s characteristics improved, reduced or remain the same ?
    All petrol heads know a new car needs time to settle in. My current Gen3 gets better fuel economy at 80,000km than it did new. I’m pulling 14.5 - 15.4L/100km around town without AFM… so I’m expecting to see an improvement.
    PS - It’s are hard pull up the freeway @ 90-100kph over the hills so it’s not an easy economy run.

    DOG WHO KNOWS NO FEAR of Grounded in Reality Posted on 06 January 2009 1:15pm
  • Another rubbish article.  Given that the focus of the story is fuel economy in a large car, couldn’t you at least have taken the vehicle for a decent highway cruise (several hundred kilometres), and then measured the fuel economy at the pump, rather than simply relying on the trip computer (which can be badly calibrated and otherwise unreliable).  Once again, no performance figures (would have been good to have compared to V8 Statesman model without this fuel saving technology), and no commentary on how the vehicle drives compared to the full time V8 version.

    VYBerlinaV8 of Canberra Posted on 06 January 2009 11:38am
Read all 24 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics