Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Test drive: Holden Calais V8 AFM

  • By Neil Dowling
image January marks the debut of the Holden Calais' 6-litre V8 with Active Fuel Management (AFM). Photo Gallery

There are usually no half measures at Holden.

Plans for an Aussie-built hybrid Astra, future cars with a wider choice of fuel types and exports of Pontiacs back to the US show Holden certainly isn't doing things by halves.

Except when it comes to its V8 engine.

January marks the debut of the 6-litre V8 with AFM (Active Fuel Management) that cuts off the fuel supply to four cylinders when coasting.

It will only be fitted to the automatic transmission V8 models of the Commodore, Ute, Sportwagon, Statesman and Caprice.

A Calais AFM this week on test showed the system simply slips the car into and out of its standard V8 mode when sensors detect varying engine loads.

But it's not as active as I expected. Certain traffic situations could call for a four-cylinder mode, yet repeatedly the dashboard signalled it was remaining as a V8.

When it was working -- primarily freeway coasting or long country downhill runs -- the `4-cyl mode’ tag would illuminate and there would be a slight change in the engine feel. As if, suddenly, the car was driving over tiny road ripples.

Check the instantaneous fuel readout and it would fall from about 11.5 litres/100km to about 7.5 l/100km.

It could make a bit of a difference on the longer haul but if you're route is freeway commuting, it's not time to pop the champagne.

Holden conservatively say AFM will reduce thirst by 1 l/100km. In the Calais' case, that's down to 13.3 from 14.4 l/100km. If you're the average 15,000km annual motorists and fuel is $1 a litre, you'll save $150 a year.

Considering the Calais just cost you $51,290 plus on-road charges, $150 is the equivalent of an annual cafe meal and wine with the wife. Which makes you feel good but leaves you with a nagging feeling that you could have done a lot better.

But AFM is on the right track and made more welcoming by the fact that Holden hasn't raised its V8 prices.

More importantly, it gives near-V6 consumption with all the party tricks of a V8 as close as a press of the foot.

AFM doesn't change anything for the driver or occupants. The Calais is still a great blend of European and Australian engineering that results in a solid, well mannered and safe car that has the performance to deliver a few smiles.

But it is a heavy car and there are times -- notably at slower speeds and in tight parking bays -- when it can feel ponderous and show its 1700kg-plus dry weight bulk.

The steering is heavy and the gearchange lever sometimes feels as firm as a railway track-changing lever.

Then there's the handbrake lever from hell with a release action that is determined to pinch the skin on your left hand.

But the seating is cushy while being supportive and there's room in the back for three proper adults.

The boot is big -- but not as big as many front-drive small cars -- while the space-saver spare is standard (a full-size tyre is optional) and the fold-down rear seat merely exposes a small hole for carrying skis.

It wasn't that long ago that this VE series hit the streets with such acclaim. Yet now the cabin, more specifically the dashboard, has aged badly and looks decidedly old fashioned.

It's still ergonomically sound -- except the handbrake -- and easy to operate, but the rivals have accelerated faster and seem to have a better handle on pastel hues to brighten the interior.

There's not, however, much to dislike about the engine. It starts like a bear out of hibernation yet punches a lot of weight that perfectly suits the six cogs.

Play the game and use the manual sequential shift and the engine perks up a bit more.

If you're not the son or daughter of an OPEC executive, the engine is best run up to about 4000rpm and the next cog selected.

Sure, the exhaust note is exhilarating as the tacho needle spins towards 6000rpm but the thrill is directly equated to the thickness of your wallet.

As a tourer, it needs a full-size spare and a tank-full of standard unleaded and it will simply gobble up the kilometres.

Around town it's bit awkward but always comfortable and self assured.

 


Snapshot

Holden Calais V8 AFM

Price: $51,290

Engine: 6-litre, V8, OHV, 16-valve, Active Fuel Management cylinder cut-out

Power: 270kW @ 5700rpm

Torque: 530Nm @ 4400rpm

Economy (official): 13.3 litres/100km

Economy (tested): 14.5 litres/100km

Greenhouse: 320g/km (Corolla: 175g/km)

Transmission: 6-speed automatic, sequential; rear-drive

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 23 comments

  • After all, the Holden VE Calais 2006-2010 is an excellent car, and i mean the V8 version!

    Dave S of NSW Posted on 05 January 2010 2:02pm
  • Ford and Holden can easily match what ever the overrated and very expensive imports have to offer.

    For example .... Fairlane G220/G8/LTD, Fairmont Ghia .... I6 and 5.4L V8 are excellent cars and are a match for more $100000-150000cars in terms of luxury and quiet ride/comfort.

    A Base Commodore/Falcon have better ride/comfort and levels of quietness than a BMW 7 series or some $500000 Mercedes.


    Put it this way ..... Steven .... i think that you are missing a point really.


    A Calais and for example G6E or now gone “the Fairmont Ghia” , are basically an extended hand of a Commodore Executive/Omega and a Ford Falcon XT

    they are simply a large family car based on an XT and Omega….

    with leather, luxury and additional safety.

    They are large, comfortable, powerful and very reliable .... specifically when talking about the L76/L98 6.0L V8 and Fords superior I6 4.0L engine.

    Locally produced cars such as Falcon and Commodore, will and are always going to be the best choice, best option and value for money.

    an example….. a typical Calais making 270kW is de-tuned for even further reliability and life….

    with a simple ECU tune the car can make close to 600Nm and over 320kW!

    Dave S of NSW Posted on 05 January 2010 1:58pm
  • Sash - are you saying we cannot criticise Australian made cars or point out their shortcomings simply because they are Australian?! Body and frame strength are key components of the safety testing - its not just a case of loading a vehicle with sensors etc. Both Ford and Holden seem to be constantly struggling to match imports for technology, economy and style in their locally-produced cars. They are very dependent on the loyalty and patriotism of their customers to overlook the flaws of their vehicles.

    Steven of Melbourne Posted on 01 January 2010 3:26pm
  • and PS: the AFM 6.0L does not make a peak of 270kW and 530Nm , it makes only 517Nm and 260kW, it is actually de-tuned and is a lot slower than a 6 speed manual 270kW/530Nm version , in fact on a cold day a 270kW 6.0 makes close to 290kW and just a little over 550Nm.

    Jason of Perth Posted on 02 December 2009 12:23pm
  • V8 Berlina 5.7L from VTII to VZ series one does not have a better fuel economy than a BA/BF XT, FUTURA, FAIRMONT, FAIRMONT GHIA, SR, XR6 XLS AND XL Falcons, it is physically not possible. In real life a typical BA/BF/FG 4.0L 3984cc DOHC will get you anywhere between 50-60ks more per full fuel tank plus is more drive able than any 5.7L LS1 from idle to 3500rpm and feels a lot more livelier and has more efortless acceleration under part throttle inputs. Get your facts straight, don’t come here and post lies.


    The most fuel economical out of all Fords ever so far is a 3V 5.4Liter Barra220 and Barra230 specially when coupled with a 6 speed ZF.

    think about it.

    Jason of Perth Posted on 02 December 2009 12:21pm
  • It is sad that we are always hard on Australian made cars. I used to be like that as I thought all Aussie cars were basic as taxi cabs. A recent visit to a Canberra Holden dealership changed that. After owning a BMW X5 Diesel and a 3 Series 6 cyl BMW, I also just bought a VE V8 Calais with AFM for my business manager’s car and a Diesel LX Captiva for my wife to drive. We have never been so happy with our cars. Running costs are far lower overall, comfort and power is the same and we advanced in the cabin creature comforts compared to the speced up 2005 X5 features. I am a country user and am averaging 7.8-8ltrs per 100km in the Calais and the same in the 4cyl Diesel Captiva, both on open road highway (@110kmph or a bit more)and about town. (We have one set of traffic lights in the main street). A V8 is a pleasure in the country to drive, especially when towing is a frequent requirement. Buy a 4cyl if you live in metro places. My advice is to test drive the newer Aussie made vehicles, (Captiva is an import from Asia unfortunately), but the Calais is on par, at less than 50% of other luxury cars costs to buy and run, and is stylish and performs as well or better.

    Peter Male of Bowral NSW Posted on 24 April 2009 11:15pm
  • I’ve recently received a new role providing me with a car allowance.  After speaking with the accountant and doing some sums the Calais V comes up a winner.
    Rather than settling for a base model exec i get better return on investment after 3 years on the trade in.  Any depreciation is written off as an expense.  Servicing an Australian made car is still the most value for money.  Try getting a small euro or jap car serviced and see how expensive it gets…  Sure the higher fuel costs are there but the savings in servicing and lower insurance negate nearly all of that saving.

    As for the review of the AFM the review misses the point, considering most larger cars spend more time on the freeway runs the net benefit is far greater than 1lr per 100..

    Nathan Kantis Posted on 02 April 2009 7:14pm
  • I am about to buy a VE V8 Calais Sportswagon so let me tell you why.  Main reason SUPPORT AUSSIE JOBS…..

    My current drive is a Subaru Forester XT and I bought it because of the resale value. Bad idea, as it has gone down more than research prior to buying it stated it would. After 2 years I will be lucky to get $25k so nearly 50% drop. The seats lack adjustments like lumber support so my back kills me after a long trip. The fuel ecomony is 10.5to 11/100klm and this dosen’t change much on the open road due to the lack of a 5h or 6th gear. Put your fot into it abit and you’ll get 14-15/100klm. The options in the Subaru are much less than the Commodore even if you compare it to the omega option.  Remeber the Forester XT new was $48K. Rear seatting for midgets is fine but don’t try to put 2 adults, let alone 3 in the back unless they are under 60kg and 5ft tall.  Put 2 car seats and all you can get in is the 2 kids and thats it.

    Does anyone remeber when the VE Calais first came out and it beat the BMW and Merc?  How much do they cost?

    A friend has the SSV manual wagon and he gets 500-550klms around town for about 60-65 liters and 700 on the open road.

    My previous car was a V8 Berlina and according to the fuel reports it got better fuel economy that all the XR6’s in the fleet.

    As for the carolla comparision all I can say is WHY? That’s like comparing an F1 with a gocart.

    Good on you Holden for giving us a V8 with power yet great economy and handling. Keep up the good work. Ohand I forgot a 5star ancap rating.

    Adrian T of Melb Posted on 15 March 2009 9:19pm
  • I have had a VE Calais V for 2.5 years. Can I say, I’m tired of seeing you reporters copying one another, None of you show any originality (except for Peter Robinson and Stahly on occasion). The handbrake bit is well overdone. Please move on from it. Some people, myself included think it is quite ingenious. Whatever you think it is not worth mentioning anymore. Please. As for pinching your left hand…you’re kidding right. It has never happened nor ever come close to happening to me or anyone I know.

    The one main problem I have with VE is something not one reporter has mentioned. I think the indicator staying on for a couple of seconds after a short push on the indicator lever is a problem. I think it is potentially dangerous, particularly if you change your mind about turning or changing lanes. I really believe ADRs should not allow such operation.

    Samuel Mir Posted on 19 February 2009 11:56pm
  • I own a HSV VZ Senator with the LS2 (297kw) engine, I love the power and the car but drive it sensibly. On a trip (highway) the car always returns low 8 litres per 100km and around town high 11’s. I recently borrowed an Elantra with 2.0 litre engine and did my same route and the fuel consumption surprised me, highway high 7’s and city low 10’s. For my money the 6.0 litre will stay in the garage.

    Jeff Gibbs of Sydney Posted on 22 January 2009 11:56am
  • what is this reviewer clown on about with the handbrake pinching his hand??
    Either he has grizzly bear paws for hands or is unco, i have owned a VE SS for over 2 years now and have never once even come close to loosing a finger.
    The handbrake also looks neat when released tucked into the console.
    And all these hippies worrying about pollution, some people NEED a large car and also need a vehicle that can easily overtake trucks as not all people live in the city.
    Oh, and other people actually ENJOY driving and dont just see it as a mode of transport. You wont enjoy driving a corolla compared to a V8 plain and simple

    SS driver Posted on 11 January 2009 1:07am
  • People that buy a new car simply on the fuel economy are not thinking the purchase through.  Car A uses 15l per 100KM Car B uses 11l per 100KM.
    At current Melbourne prices you are basing your purchase solely on $4 extra per hundred kilometres..  insane.  Depreciation and interest is way more than extra fuel will be.  When buying a new car get the one tah best suits your needs, for the present and the near future. no point buying a little buzz box if your kids are about to finish primary school and go onto secondary school, they are getting bigger, sports and recreation gear to carry plus their friends, Why buy a buzz box only to sell it 2 years down the track,  cop the depreciation and then buy a bigger car.  Assess your needs and buy the right car first off.

    Mark O'Sullivan of Melbourne Posted on 10 January 2009 10:30pm
  • I’d recommend checking the kerb weight of a Corolla, a Commodore is nowhere near double it’s weight.  Also, the power and torque have been reduced in an effort to detune the engine to improve fuel economy.

    I’d also suggest that build quality of Holden is nowhere near that of the good Japanese brands, but is probably on par with most Euro brands.  Having driven a number of Fords over the past few years, their build quality is terrible, which is a real shame because they are very good to drive.

    VYBerlina of Canberra Posted on 08 January 2009 2:48pm
  • This actually seems like a pretty good development.  If you look at the numbers quoted then the v8 is actually quite efficient for what it delivers.  Its giving almost 3 times the power of the corrolla’s 1.8L while being a bit more than 3 times the size with twice as many cylinders and producing less than twice the emissions.  Any way you look at it thats pretty good for a v8 car that weighs almost twice what a corolla does and is more luxurious.

    Kato of Canberra Posted on 05 January 2009 11:57am
  • Why does the AFM story say the automatic V8’s power output is 270kW, when Holden’s website says it is 260kW? Torque has gone down too, now 517Nm. Why weren’t we told this?
    Doug

    Doug Lloyd Posted on 04 January 2009 9:33am
  • sad to say, most of us can’t see the point of owning a 6.0l V8 pushing around 1750kgs of iron, pretending we’re helping save the world’s oil reserves by having the AFM gimic.

    isn’t it time each of us simply looked at getting what we really need. Sure, get the most fun you can within those parameters, but why buy a slurping dinosaur with horrible depreciation?

    Holden sixes are course, the 4 speed auto very ordinary and their V8s thirsty. What’s to like with the Commodore range, particularly when a mid size diesel in a 1400 kg car will give the same instant response and drivability of an 8 and the economy of a good little 4?

    Like most people I would prefer GMH and Ford Australia survive, but being subsidiaries of American companies they just don’t seem able to change quickly enough. That’s why extinction occurs in the natural world!

    Alfred of inner west of Sydney Posted on 03 January 2009 9:36pm
  • If it was not for the fleet industry the Commodore and Falcon would be dead in the water. That we know to be a fact. The ALP Government now wants to kill of the fleet industry and that means killing off the Aussie car industry. The issue is really how to make a big car economical to run for the private consumer and not have the backside fall out of the residual value. On a long rune the Aussie car are very economical but around the city they are terrible. Diesel is an obvious answer but the high price for diesel is an issue. The irony is that without a real inducement from the Australian Government to reduce the price of diesel the big Aussie car will never be economical in the city and that means the consumer will continue to look to the imported smaller more economical car. The Falcon with the same family diesel engine as the Jaguar would be a world class vehicle, not that it is not now in many ways. It is rubbish to suggest the consumer would not move to diesel if the fuel price was an incentive. Ford and Holden marketing have completely missed the boat. AFM for a V8 does nothing for around the city fuel economy.

    John Ralph Posted on 31 December 2008 1:56pm
  • I could not agree more with you Sash. Everybody is just discrediting the Australian Car Industry. I am a Holden fan but i beleive that sales success of the new FG falcon isnt because its a bad car, its far from it, but from the media saying oh its a gas guzzler. The corolla sems to be a bit of a banchmark against all cars except when it comes to the corollas bad points. ie. anything that doesnt involve its price or fuel economy. Why is the corolla the bnchmark, we can all take the s!@# out of corolla’s because they truly are below average cars but we seem not too. Why can’t we say well you get v8 power with lower economy and more green credentials without extra price over a standard v8. It’s not 100% there yet but we are on our way.

    TOO SOME MEDIA we dont want total demise and a lack of acknolegement of hard work and engineering brilliance. so give the australian car industry a break. And hopefully damage wont be done to the extent that was put on Mistubishi and theTonseley park manufacturing plant.


    OFF RANT IN 5

    oran park addict of Oran Park Posted on 28 December 2008 12:09pm
  • Holden maybe finally “doing something right”, however they had the opportunity to do “something right” with “AFM” all the way back to the LS2 which had all the “AFM” gear on it ready to go.  They just chose not to, instead they decided “let’s use and even bigger engine”.  I’m sorry, as much as I would like our local industry to keep going as they build some of the best value for money cars around, this ‘caring for the environment’ tact Holden is now using was not a choice.  It was more thrusted upon them due to the fall in sales of the Commodore and they are scared of what the future brings if they don’t start doing, or be seen to start doing something serious.  Holden is the best marketer of their products over 3 locals and Holden will try anything to sell their product (Toyota is just as Australian as Ford and Holden).  On a side note, take away fleet sales and the Commodore isn’t even in the top 5 best selling car.  Also, if you are saying the interior plastics in a Commodore are of superior quality to a Falcon you are a great comedian!  PS, I have owned more Holdens than Ford so don’t retort by calling me a Ford lover!  I can look past the blinkers and give credit where it is due.  grin

    Devil's Advocate Posted on 28 December 2008 10:54am
  • Sash you add:  what do Australians want with their cars? Sash, do Aussies still want to buy massive thirsty 6 litre V8’s in numbers?  If so why are so many people buying smaller fuel efficient vehicles?  And if the Calais is so good why did the 2008 Falcon beat it in the “car of the year awards”?  No doubt Sash is a devoted General Motors fan and cannot accept criticism of their cars.

    bill harris of gawler s.a Posted on 28 December 2008 8:27am
  • I will not buy a Commodore not because it is not a good car.  It just depreciates too much too quickly.  Part of the reason is that there are too many of them on the road.  The same goes for Falcons.  I don’t want to loose $10-12k just on the first year alone for a $50k car. Just have a look at how much a late 07/ early 08 Calais would cost now…

    Peter of Melbourne Posted on 28 December 2008 7:44am
  • Yes this is a very nice car I love Commodores and this is right out there. I don’t know the price range but I’m sure it’s worth every penny. If I had the money thats what I would bye. Very very nice.

    Craig Jackson of Townsvillle QLD Posted on 27 December 2008 8:56pm
  • Once again an Australian company is doing something right by going “green” and all we can do is put it down…i mean what do you and people out there want the Holden Commodore has been Australia best selling car for 13 years, had better fuel consumption then any Ford V8, and its fit and finish of its interior is as good if not better then most cars out the: example Ford and Toyota…not as much plastic inside as them. And if you and people out there want the Australian Auto Industry to shut down keep putting down the Australian built cars.
    And also instead of comparing the Greenhouse of the Commodore and Corolla why not compare it to the Astra, its a much better car then the Corolla, like with a 7.2L/100km and CO2 at 172g/km VS Corolla’s 7.4L/100km and CO2 at 174. Figure base on green vehicle guide website, so stop favouring import brands of locals.

    Sash of Melbourne Posted on 26 December 2008 12:09pm
Read all 23 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links