Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Suzuki Swift: review

  • By Craig Duff
  • Herald Sun
  • image

    IT'S a case of back to the future for the newest incarnation of the Suzuki Swift. Photo Gallery

Craig Duff road tests and reviews the all new Suzuki Swift.

image image
  • Great chassis
  • Safety
  • Interior
image image
  • No tacho (base)
  • Four-speed auto
  • No bluetooth

image

The current car has been a mainstay for Suzuki with two million sales since its launch in 2005, so a major overhaul of the light car is reserved for the mechanicals and chassis. The visual style is a modern interpretation of the previous model. The base price is also based on the previous model: at $15,990 it is the same as the 2005 model cost.

VALUE

The new Suzuki Swift is a mainstay of Suzuki Australia's operations. The company has sold 65,000 of the existing model cars and is Suzuki Australia general manager Tony Devers says new model, with the catchline "More Swift", will account for a 10 per cent sales boost.

The base-model GA (there's no model-specific badging on any Swift model, so pick them by look) comes with steel 15-inch rims, plain door handles and side mirrors, power windows and mirrors, a four-speaker sound system with USB and iPod connectivity, a five-speed manual transmission and drum rear brakes. It also packs seven airbags and electronic stability control into the mix.

Step up $700 to the mid-spec GL there's 15-inch alloys, a body-coloured door handles and mirrors, mirror-mounted side indicators, a leather steering wheel with audio controls, and a six-speaker sound system. There's also a tacho, which will be more important for manual owners than those who spend the extra $1700 for the optional four-speed automatic.

The top-spec GLX costs $18,990 and adds all-round disc brakes, 16-inch alloys, Bluetooth connectivity, a steering wheel that adjust for reach and height, keyless entry and start/stop button and front fog lamps.

TECHNOLOGY

The "New Swift" is more, and in some cases less, of the same. And that's good for buyers. The engine has been downsized from 1.5 to 1.4 litres, but the new powerplant is lighter, helping to offset the drop to 70kW and 130Nm, from the 1.5's 74kW/133Nm. The flip is petrol use is down from 6.3 litres/100km to 5.5, which puts the Swift at the top of the class on fuel use. CO2 emissions are 132g/km.

All cars now have the electronic throttle control previously reserved for the sporty Swift S model. The chassis is lighter and stronger and the MacPherson strut front and torsion beam rear have been overhauled.

Cruise control isn't a option, yet. Devers says he's aware how important it is in Australia "and the company is working with us", suggesting it will be an option sooner rather than later. All cars come with iPod/USB connectivity.

STYLING

An Italian interpretation on the original design led to the latest look for the Swift. Suzuki sent two teams to Europe (one to France and one to Italy), to conceive a new style for the Swift and it was the Italian-based team's modern approach to evolving the design that won.

The result is a glass profile that progressively narrows from the front windows the rear, a bigger front grille, front and rear lights that now sweep around the top side edges of the car and a much smarter interior.

Silver highlights help break up the black dash and while the plastics aren't at Euro-touch softness, they look durable and the fit and finish is typical Suzuki standard. And the front dash pockets may help break up the lines, but I wouldn't be putting anything heavy in them ...

SAFETY

The Swift is a safe bet. There are seven airbags (the driver picks up a knee bag in addition to the dual front, side and curtain units), ABS brakes with brake assist and brakeforce distribution, stability control and front seatbelts with pretensioners and force limiters. It is a five-star car and the 40mm wheelbase spurt in size gives rear seat passengers more legroom.

DRIVING

Hairpin turns with short straights are made for cars like the Swift. That explains why Arthur's Seat is the launch venue, the chassis/suspension are in their element on the tight bends and bumpy roads.

The ride is firm but not harsh and it sits flat and composed under acceleration or brakes. The light and low weight means it holds its line in turns and responds to throttle or brake if the driver's overcooked it.

Uphill runs expose the engine's lack of torque and the four-speed auto's lack of ratios. The pair work OK around town, but won't be the enthusiasts' choice, especially as there's no option for manual shifts.

The five-speed manual's extra cog helps get the most out of the engine, like most Suzuki units, this 1.4-litre will happily rev at the top of the tacho and the mid-range is strong, so work ing the manual can result in reasonably quick runs.

The GLX undoubtedly has the better brakes, bu the rear drums on the GL didn't lock up once and will be more than good enough for most owners.

Rear seat room will encourage you to pack adults in for a short trip, they'll moan, but survive, and pre-teen kids won't complain at all. Boot space is tight, but at 210 litres to the bottom of the windows you can fit the weekly luggage in. A removable tray covers a smaller compartment, and the space saver spare, below, but I'd ditch it for the extra boot depth.

The Swift is chasing sales off the Toyota Yaris, Ford Fiesta and Mazda2 and the first impressions are the extra interior sophistication will earn it more fans. Enthusiasts will have to wait until next year for the 1.6-litre S model.

VERDICT

A good car done better. Price and build quality are on the money.

SUZUKI SWIFT

Price: from $15,990
Engine: 1.4-litre four-cylinder
Power: 70kW at revs
Torque: 130Nm at revs
Body: Five-door hatch
Seats: Five
Suspension: MacPherson strut front; torsion beam rear
Brakes: Disc fronts, drum rears (GA and GL), disc rears (GLX)
Fuel use: 5.5 litres/100km; (auto 6.3 litres/100km)
Fuel tank, type: 42 litres, regular unleaded
CO2 emissions: 132g/km; 147g/km 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 15 comments

  • Suzuki Australia Customer Service Centre has confirmed that Swifts manufactured after January 1, 2004 can be operated of fuel containing no more than 10% Ethanol (E10).

    Steve Johnson of Barrington, NSW Posted on 22 December 2011 12:52pm
  • The Swift can use E10 Fuel contrary to Debbie Garson?s comment. This information comes from the owners? handbook in the new Swift 2011. It is also ok to use in the previous model 2005 onwards.

    Michael of Brisbane Posted on 25 May 2011 9:42am
  • I’ve just realised from looking at the Federal Chamber of automotive Industries’ website that no Swift (current model or earlier) can use E10 petrol. That’s a pretty big negative that no reviewer seems to be picking up on.

    Debbie Garson of Sydney Posted on 25 April 2011 7:13pm
  • Thank you Don we were about to test all the cars you had so you have saved us the time as we will first look at the new Swift. The Golf was also what we were looking at for our daughter but it would have to be a used one as it is too pricey.  The Swift seemed to be great value so will look forward to test driving one.

    Kathy V. of Sunshine Coast Posted on 19 March 2011 8:44pm
  • Ollygt of Brisbane thinks it’s a bit rich calling it a new model. There isn’t a single carry over body panel between the two, structural rigidity is improved by over 40% and the engine is completely different with variable valve timing. The interior is totally new and improved and the suspension has been revised. If that doesn’t make it a new model, what does?

    Don Royle of Carrum Downs Posted on 25 February 2011 4:46pm
  • The Swift was the last car of its class we tested, the others being the Golf, Polo, Corolla and Fiesta. The Swift was only in contention because of its price, I wasn’t even aware that a new model had been released even after walking passed it in the showroom. But I have to say the closer I looked at them both the more differences I saw, inside and out. There doesn’t appear to be a single body panel or interior fitting that is a carry over. Driving the two back to back only reinforced my initial impressions on the improvements Suzuki has made to the car. I have to say I was very impressed at the value. The Golf and Polo were initially our first and second choice, the Polo for some reason felt cramped inside and myself and my wife, who the car is for, are below average size. Which left the Golf. The Golf is unquestionably the better car, but it’s no where near 50% better, which is the difference in the drive away prices. I am no impulse buyer, we have been looking at and researching cars now for over three months and considering looking at the Swift was mainly out of curiosity, speaks volumes of the impression it gave us. We bought one on the spot and saved $8,000 in the process.

    Don Royle of Carrum Downs Posted on 25 February 2011 4:22pm
  • Don’t know what you on about Sam, I purchased one on the weekend as it is exactly what I wanted. Cheap to buy very fuel efficient and cheap to service.

    It drove as close to the Polo Tsi as I could find and it was nearly $6k cheaper with technically more features.

    What you need to state is they are not making cars that YOU want and unless your willing to buy 10’s if thousands of them yearly they probably never will!!

    Chris of Reality Posted on 22 February 2011 2:47pm
  • Make something new for the Suzuki Swift add more hop to it add more strength more advance technology something new would be amazing.

    kevin. chock of melbourne Posted on 16 February 2011 9:45am
  • Where is the diesel?  They make one, but like Toyota, don’t bring it here.

    Alan of Logan Posted on 09 February 2011 9:13pm
  • All Devers ever does it make excuses about why Suzuki aren’t currently delivering what the public want. Take a look at the Kizashi… It flopped… So rather than sell it on its merits or adjust the price he made up a wonderful tale about the potential turbo AWD version that the media inhaled with enthusiasm… Yeah right. No cruise control? They had massive dramas with the original RS415/RS416 New Swift… Surely they should have learnt their lesson then. It wasn’t until the second generation you could get cruising that had factory fitted quality… Before then people were putting up with dealer fitted crap. As for the new Sport, you have an M18A from the Liana use it. A high comp version of that (much like the Swift Sport is a high comp 1.6 original Liana motor) might actually be worth driving. Please don’t put a lethargic J series or repurposed Jet Ski (K series) motor in the new Sport, it deserves better. I am sorry, but Devers needs to stop talking and start delivering… The way he is going he is better suited to the local campaign trail.

    Sam of RedlineGTi Posted on 08 February 2011 10:51pm
  • Out-dated. Get a KIA instead…

    MARK WOO of MELBOURNE Posted on 08 February 2011 9:50pm
  • Yawn!

    max W of Springvale Vic Posted on 08 February 2011 6:32pm
  • Calling it “all new” is a bit rich.  It’s just a style upgrade and a revision on the handing and engine, and most people would be hard put to tell the difference between it and the previous model. The engine may return more on fuel economy but due to less power extra throttle will eat up that increase in fuel economy. The weight saving is not enough to account for the power/weight ratio loss. The Swift, like its competitors, highlights a problem with new small cars which is a terrible lack of cargo room even with rear seats down and high tailgates unlike small cars of the 90’s. The plus is they are more comfortable but suffer from being overweight due to feature creep.

    Ollygt of Brisbane Posted on 08 February 2011 5:55pm
  • The previous S model were never the Sport model, but actually the “safer” model, just above the standard low model, it came with more airbags, leather steering wheel and fog lights at the front. The sport model is called Swift Sport… Try to do better research…

    Brian of melbourne Posted on 08 February 2011 5:04pm
  • Time for a turbo awd version with wings and fat 18s?

    adam of Mappa Tassie. Posted on 08 February 2011 3:29pm
Read all 15 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links