Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Subaru Outback diesel: review

  • By Kevin Hepworth
  • The Daily Telegraph

Kevin Hepworth road tests and reviews the Subaru Outback diesel at its Australian launch.

Oils well that ends well ... that could well be the lesson from Subaru Australia's painfully drawn out entry into the diesel market.  The arrival this week of an oil-burning Outback powered by a 2-litre turbocharged boxer diesel is the culmination of more than a decade of global Subaru's slow and steady approach to developing the world's first flat four diesel for passenger use.

"The diesel was completely done in house," Subaru Australia's Nick Senior says. "There were a couple of reasons for the extended wait and just one of those was that a diesel engine is, by definition , quite an expensive engine to design and to build."When you are putting a business plan together you need to see a return on your investment and the major markets around the world that Subaru compete in — Japan and the US — are not big diesel markets."

Senior says that while Europe and Australia had always shown interest in the engine Subaru sales in those markets did little to encourage head office to push ahead with the development.  "There was well over a decade of just studying the European market before they could establish a business case. Then they basically had to start from a clean sheet of paper because there is no passenger car boxer diesel anywhere in the world. Subaru set out to be innovative, do it all themselves and design it in-house."

Senior says Australia started to push seriously for the diesel "a few years ago".  "We knew we wanted the car and I was fortunate enough to drive it about three years ago at the proving ground. That was back-to-back against some well-known European brands and it was obvious then that they had produced a car that was as refined as the Europeans and head-and-shoulders above some of the Japanese models that were there.

"In some ways it was fortunate that we waited until now as we have the new platform and the six-speed automatic rather than the five-speed that was on the first generation 18 months ago."

Pricing
The Outback 2.0D sits on the same new-generation platform as the current Liberty and Outback petrol models and shares the same equipment and trim levels but will come with a $2500 premium over the 2.5-litre petrol wagon. Not surprisingly, Subaru has worked out that driving 25,000 kilometres a year with the 6.4L/100km economy that premium will be returned in fuel savings in 20 months.

The entry-level 2.0D manual is $40,490 (plus onroads), the Premium is $43,990 and the Premium with satellite navigation is $46,490.  While only available in a six-speed manual, Senior doesn't believe the lack of an automatic will be an issue despite the almost 70 per cent of all cars sold being automatic.

"I don't know whether that is a problem," Senior says. "There is no automatic so there is no point getting hung up about it. We will just concentrate on selling the six-speed manual.  "Obviously they will look at an automatic in the future, but it is not a short-term thing."

Senior says early reaction from the market has been very positive with dealers already holding orders ahead of this week's launch, although supply is expected to be restricted at least until the first quarter of next year.  The diesel will roll out into the Forester around the middle of next year but that will be the last of Subaru's to get a diesel, at least in the short term

"For now it will only be offered in the SUVs," Senior says. "It will be a great fillip for our rural dealers and those customers are the ones where there is a greater propensity to consider a diesel ... and where much of the pre-launch excitement has come from."

Driving
On the road the horizontally opposed diesel boasts all the benefits of the more traditional compression ignition engines — good economy and huge urge through the mid-range chief amongst them — and has a level of refinement that may not have been expected from a first effort.  It is not benchmark for quietness and smoothness — it is actually some way off the very best of the modern high-end diesels, but in the value market where it lives there are few better.

With 110kW of power and 350Nm of torque, that maximum urge is available only from 1800-2400rpm but a large percentage of it starts earlier and hangs around later, the 2.0D is not rocket but it does make for a relaxed drive with the six gear ratios well suited to the engine.  For all intents and purposes the 2.0D drives very much like its petrol stablemate, the extra weight of the engine kept low by the boxer design and ably handled by the refined suspension set-up in the new generation Outback.

Equipment levels are exactly the same as the equivalent petrol model, the diesel gets the same five-star safety rating and air-bag count as the petrol models ... the only real difference is the extra noise when the engine is cold, considerably reduced as it warms to the task, and the lack of an automatic.
For fans of diesels these are not new characteristics and certainly will not equate to any form of discouragement.

Subaru Outback 2.0D
Price: From $40,490
Engine: 2L/4-cylinder turbocharged Boxer diesel; 110kW/350Nm
Transmission: 6-speed manual
Economy: 6.4L/100km (combined cycle)

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 32 comments

  • I will wait for the auto diesel or get some other make if not available in a years time.

    Rob Norcross of Denmark wa Posted on 22 July 2011 9:02pm
  • I love driving cars with manual gearboxes not auto transmissions. I would never buy an auto, they’re so boring to drive. DSG… maybe. I’m looking at either a Forester, Outback or Mazda 6, all in diesel and all 6sp manuals.

    paul of sa Posted on 08 August 2010 1:40pm
  • I could not believe Nic Senior would import Outback diesel over Forester diesel, doesn’t this bloke watch his own commercials on TV. Australias best selling SUV, Forester, so he disregards all his distributors who have customers waiting for the diesel and goes for Outback. I wonder if he bothers to read these posts, obviously not. Now John from NZ tells us that they have the Forester diesel. HELLO NIC, wakey wakey, Good onya Santa Fe, you’ve got my bucks. When I read and watched videos of the Europe Forester diesel, I waited and waited, got sick of waiting and listening to a general manager who has no idea and is brother to the bozo who said, Nissan will not be importing an X-Trail diesel only to find 3 months later, a 150 diesel X-Trails sitting on our wharves. I am getting a headache bashing my head against stupid reasoning. AUSTRALIA runs on diesel, through transport, rail, SUV,4WD, coaches, buses, etc etc.

    CarlMc of Taree Hinterland Posted on 02 April 2010 10:36pm
  • After 30 years of owning only Mazdas - the last of them a 2003 Atenza (6) wagon (5spd manual), I have purchased a diesel Forester (6spd manual). The economy is impressive - I have done about 3000km with economy ranging from 7.01 - 5.93 l/100km (the roads aren’t flat around here either!).  It’s not as much of a drivers’ car as the Mazda, but it feels livelier than the performance figures suggest. The torque is impressive and the low 1st gear means a separate hi-lo gear stick isn’t necessary. At about 50km/h/1000rpm in 6th, it cruises nicely at 100km/h (the Mazda was doing about 3000rpm). I test drove a Kia Sorento 2.2R diesel (which I liked) but it was a little larger vehicle than I wanted (and more expensive). The diesel Forester (IMHO) is the best of the small SUVs (although later in 2010 when Kia and Hyundai bring out their new Sportage & Tucson models with the 2.0R engines they’d be worth a look). I’m sure Subaru will couple a CVT auto with their diesel engines sometime, but I’m happy with the manual gearbox. I prefer the Forester to the Outback - so be patient Aussies, the Forester diesel is worth waiting for.

    John Stark of Nelson, New Zealand Posted on 11 March 2010 6:54pm
  • After several months of research my wife and I came down to the Outback diesel, the Mazda 6 Diesel and the VW Passat - discounting several others from Skoda, VW, Ford, Toyota et al along the way over seating space, luggage capacity, transmission options, finish, drive/handling etc. We loved the Passat but it was too much above budget. We have gone with the Outback and are loving it. The engine is just soooo deceptive - power delivery is smooth and clean, with a little turbo lag but nothing dramatic and pulls well low in the rev range. You really need to watch your speedo but because it seems to not be working at all, yet the needle hits the 100k mark so easily. Handling is great - found it more positive than the Mazda, with better feedback from the road and just more stable and solid. I have colleagues at work asking for test drives most weeks. Some reviewers etc have panned interior finish/fit and design, as well as external appearance. I am happy and looking forward to a long life with this vehicle. BTW, happy with manual - my lifelong preferred option, and much better than the old Isuzu powered Diesel Landrover’s driven in a previous life for work

    Darryl King of Toowoomba Posted on 27 February 2010 2:04pm
  • I had the pleasure of driving one with 15,000km on it.  I have been looking for a newer oil burner since i have always driven the nissans with there built tought truck mentality.  The newer ones are made cheap and just dont cut it anymore.

    This new subaru actually caught my attention,  It doesnt feel fast but actually is quicker then the 2.5L petrol.  Its deceptive due to a nice flat torque curve.

    It is made as a cross over meaning tarmac and dirt use.  Anyone of you that have ever gone off the road will know that the auto’s just suck, they change gears all the time under load (increasing wear on the bands etc)and when going up hills at moderate pace with a little wheel slipage they cant make up their mind what gear they want to be in let alone the four wheel drive portion of their systems.  Which for the most part seams to overheat and fail.

    Towing with an auto can be a pain at best let alone the oil coolers that should be used when needing to tow anything of any weight. The larger 4WD’s just dont stack up to the comfort of a V8 petrol sedan either.  So with the outback you are getting good grunt with very good comfort which i believe is the strong suit of the outback

    Nick Absalom of Adelaide Posted on 11 February 2010 4:46pm
  • I have test driven the outback and LOVE IT!! This will definitely be our family car. As for the lack of auto, if you don’t drive a manual you aren’t really driving!

    Malcom of NSW Posted on 01 February 2010 7:27pm
  • BIG mistake Subaru - a modern hi-tech diesel engine deserves a modern hi-tech cog shifter.  The torque multiplication effect of the auto box also helps to mask any of the mark and turbo lag issues.  To top it off the 6 cog self shifter / clutch combo is good but not great.
    The CVT with 2.5 petrol is a good drive with improved fuel economy, but not quite diesel economy.

    Merv of Barooga NSW Posted on 31 January 2010 3:47pm
  • Refer my comments 11th November 2009, I have since test driven a “2010” Santa fe Highlander,it is a very nice vehicle…........that said my 2003 Subaru 3.0R premium is a far better drive and is heads above the new Hyandai.

    Now I have to eat crow, whilst the Hyandai was a very good drive I did notice the following:-

    1. Going over a pot hole revealed a ripple like feedback throught the stearing wheel
    2. It may well have 6 fwd gears but first almost jumps into 2nd upon hard acceleration,
    almost seems pointless
    3.Massive stearing torque when turning when turning under power, so the power does get to the road evenly or even close, thats an issue on a so called awd

    Otherwise a very nice smart conventional vehicle.

    I would rather have the great subaru AWD system in the manual, that said I will nevertheless wait for the auto diesel subie
    before I purchase my repalcement vehicle

    Kim Williams of Benalla Vic Posted on 22 January 2010 3:18pm
  • I was interested in replacing my petrol Outback with a new diesel… until I found out that they were not being offered as automatics. Now I’m looking at other makes including the XC60. Clearly Subaru has totally misread the market.

    Robert Davies of Perth Posted on 04 January 2010 12:29am
  • I also disagree with the view that the lack of an automatic is not a problem. I have just returned from 12 years in the UK and diesel coupled with automatic is very popular. If you look at some of the European versions available here - Volvo XC60 for example - it is only available in diesel/auto. It looks like I will be buying elsewhere as I definitely want a awd, diesel, automatic. Many other brands have this combination and it looks like the Hyundai Santa Fe will get my business at the moment. Sorry Subaru - big mistake!

    Rob Smid of Perth WA Posted on 30 December 2009 5:59pm
  • It’s amazing how different individuals experiences can be! I have test driven the diesel on 3 occassions and have found the manual gearbox smooth, easy and exciting. Completely adds to the driving experience, not a negative at all. And as far as the Outback’s looks go - I think the majority of modern cars don’t look that great these days,so it’s not as much a priority really, it’s all about the interior appointments and the overall performance which you have to agree, the 2010 Outback excells at.

    Bruce of Manly Posted on 11 December 2009 11:17am
  • I was patiently waiting to replace my current Forester with a new Outback diesel, but there is no way that I will go back to fiddling with no less than 6 gears. Shame on you Subaru.

    Roland of Byron Bay Posted on 03 December 2009 11:34am
  • I have been waiting to update my outback to a diesel automatic and am disappointed also. I recently drove an Merc manual diesel in Italy and it was totally unforgiving of my rusty clutch changing technique. Otherwise I enjoyed the car but it really put me off going to a manual diesel car.

    Paul Weston of Adelaide Posted on 02 December 2009 4:35pm
  • We bought a MY04 Outback (6 cyclinder Premium) in late 2003 and it was a terrific car - albeit a bit on the small side and with a performance hole in the mid range. We were looking to upgrade to the new Outback diesel - however we baulked at its looks and of course the lack of an automatic box. So reluctantly we looked at alternatives and decided to upgrade a bit and bought a Land Rover Freelander 2 TD4 Automatic - to say we are totally satisfied would be an understatement, it is a fantastic car which in our view leaves the Outback (and Forrester) behind in every way.

    Kim Abercrombie of Pennant Hills Posted on 30 November 2009 8:47am
  • Yes, god forbid you’d have to change gears and actually drive a car.  Automatic cars produce automatic drivers.

    what the of cbr Posted on 23 November 2009 2:40pm
  • I totally agree with the others, I am ready to retire and buy a new car and caravan, why would I wast my time to buy a manual car. I have had an automatic car now for 25 years. By the time Subaru comes out with an automatic I will have bought another brand,  one car less for them to sell

    Alex of Adelaide Posted on 19 November 2009 11:48pm
  • Not sure how Subaru came up with this idea re the auto. I wonder what decade they did their market research? No automatic is definitely a problem for me and I imagine a lot of others.

    Mark of Armidale Posted on 17 November 2009 3:42pm
  • It may not be Nick Senior’s fault but, he has apparently accepted the fact that there will be no auto in any Subaru Diesel. Nick, go and drive your manual diesel Outback for three months mate and then we’ll see what you think. I used to own a Mazda 6 diesel wagon, sensational car, but like others in this post, 6 gears with that much torque just means you’re always changing gears to keep the engine in the sweet spot. It would have been better with 5 gears and a good tall diff ratio. Both Subaru and Mazda with the CX-7 are going to wonder why they bothered with the diesel as the sales will be very slow until they get good quality 5 or 6sp auto’s behind their engines. I have access to a nearly 3 year old Astra diesel auto, it only has 285nm of torque but because it is auto and the 6 ratios are pretty good, it fly’s. I would personally NEVER EVER buy a 6sp manual diesel again and recommend my friends and family do not either.

    Wiffco of Lilydale, Vic. Posted on 17 November 2009 12:14pm
  • I fully agree, there has GOT to be an auto.

    Col Smith of NSW Posted on 15 November 2009 8:58pm
  • I currently have two Subarus and want to buy a diesel Forester - but no joy. I could buy a diesel Outback - but it looks awful, and it will probably take 12 - 18 months for Subaru to do the usual emergency makeover of its latest styling atrocity.

    Edward Roy Posted on 14 November 2009 5:41pm
  • I really wanted to like this car. Demo’ed the Outback 2.0D the other day and came away dissappointed. Yes the styling is somewhere between Kia and Chrysler, but I can live with that, but the diesel felt truly uninspiring. We own two cars, an MY07 Liberty GT wagon and a Golf GT diesel. I’d hoped the new outback would have the grunt and urge of the Golf with the space and practicality of the wagon, but for all that torque, I just thought it felt sluggish. Maybe it was the engine with so few kms on it, diesels do loosen up, I don’t know.
    I also agree with others comments about an auto gearbox. I’ve always been a manual driver, both my other cars are manual. But I wish I’d got the Golf with the DSG. Those new clutchless manuals mate very well to diesels where you actually have a very narrow usable power band if you’re trying to accelarate quickly.
    Feel like I should take one for another drive, maybe I was expecting too much, but I get the feeling this new Suby will not be in my garage any time soon.

    Mike of Newport Posted on 14 November 2009 6:41am
  • Six months and Subaru will have the Auto. They always release vehicles this way. Then lots of owners of Manual vehicles will trade them in for Auto.

    As far as paddle shifts go, leave it for sports cars that change gears in the 0.0001 of a second. Paddle shifts on normal autos are terrible.

    Peter of South Australia Posted on 13 November 2009 3:28pm
  • Pickup in 2nd. Gear is pathetic at low speeds & RPM.It desperatly needs VW Tiguan Style, 6 speed responsive rapid change
    Auto box to keep engine in its effective but very narrow power Band. Subaru could have had
    a giant killer of a unit with a 2.8 or 3.0 diesel which would satisfy the needs of those customers looking for higher performance & towing capability.

    Alastair rourke of Freshwater Posted on 12 November 2009 8:45pm
  • I live in Sweden, browsing the web to look for a hint that maybe Subaru will include an automatic with the diesel. Sorry to say, Subaru is dead wrong with the stubborn idea not to manufacture an automatic. Europeans want diesel and automatic too!

    Hunter of Sweden Posted on 12 November 2009 2:07am
  • Subaru increasingly have NO idea. VW and Ford for example have been selling auto diesels easily in Europe, and strangely enough other companies make good looking cars that are 5 star. Is everyone that works at Subaru the last 5 years blind??
    I waited to see the new Outback in the flesh hoping it didn’t look as bad as the photos. It’s a pig, just like the Impresa and Tribeca. I promptly bought an MY 2009 Outback, a beautiful car still.

    Rob of WA Posted on 12 November 2009 12:48am
  • Pitty no Auto! What’s the problem? the auto on 2.2lt petrol is suberb!!  With 50% more torque on the diesel it would be even better.
    Sorry , after 12 years Subaru, one car, 150000km I have to see the competition.

    Flix Swisse Posted on 11 November 2009 11:44pm
  • I think the diesel should have come out in the Forester first.  I don’t care if it’s manual, I would rather a manual anyway.

    Janice Posted on 11 November 2009 6:33pm
  • It’s not actually Nick’s fault, it’s the Europeans fault. All ANZ Jap diesels are sourced from Europe and they seem to like manuals (Toyota Rav4, Corolla, Mazda 3/6) so there aren’t actually autos to be had. Funnily enough VW, Peugeot, Ford etc seem to be able to make and sell their diesels with autos! I’m another who would put my hand up for an Outback Diesel auto, but can’t even be bothered test driving the manual.

    Alfonso Delgardeo of Halfway betweent the ski-field and boat-ramp. Posted on 11 November 2009 12:56pm
  • We too were awaiting the arrival of the automatic, big mistake Nick, I had the displeasure of driving (on loan) a 3L diesel Prado manual. We towed our boat to Bermagui and back, what a pain in the a—- it was changing gears. Subaru have relied to much on its loyal supporters and its famous AWD. Others have caught up and now offer great diesel auto’s (with stearing wheel paddles) and with more features at a lower price. In a way I am glad this has occured, as now I am less biased and prepared to shop elsewhere and whilst it may not bear the name of Subaru it will be actually be a far better package at a much lower cost, for example the new 2010 Hyandai Santa fe, guess what the caravaning community recomend, yep the Santa Fe

    Kim Williams of Benalla Vic Posted on 11 November 2009 9:13am
  • We too were looking to update our current Outback with the new diesel automatic. If Nick Senior thinks this is not going to be a problem, he is dead wrong as are his market research advisers.

    Nick Posted on 10 November 2009 3:03pm
  • I disagree totally with the view that the lack of an automatic is no problem. I was waiting to update my outback with the new diesel but am now shopping for other brands as I definitely want a awd, diesel, automatic. I am very disappointed as many other brands have this combination, i.e. Mitsubishi, Nissan, Peugeot, Citroen, Hyundai and the list goes on….. Sorry Subaru but you lost my business with this decision not to include an automatic with the diesel engine

    Richard Shannon of Yamba Posted on 10 November 2009 12:38pm
Read all 32 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links