Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Mercedes-Benz C200K: hits the battle field

  • By Paul Pottinger
  • The Sunday Telegraph
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image The latest incarnation of Mercedes' C-Class is faster and handles better.

This latest competitor to the 3 Series is no longer a 'try hard.'

For two years now, the best entry-level 'German' type junior prestige car has come from Lexus. The luxury arm of Toyota's global octopus specifically developed the IS series as a riposte to the dual monopoly enjoyed by BMW's class defining 3 Series and Mercedes-Benz's C-Class.

Since the IS250's launch in 2005, Lexus has had it well and truly over the 320i and the old C180K in the circa-$60K stakes.

Consider six cylinders against four, rear-wheel-drive dynamics that approach Bimmer and surpass Merc, plus standard kit and equipment that show up both the Germans as parsimonious.

Although it's never bothered badge tragics that you have to go far north of $70K to get a petrol Bimmer or Merc with a real engine, the best thing about the 2007-generation C200K is that while you may be a try-hard, the car itself no longer is.

The E-Class's version of the supercharged 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol engine has been bequeathed to the C200K so it achieves if not rapidity then at least respectability.

With 135kW and 250Nm (30 more units of each than previously) driven through a five-speed automatic, the C-Class gets to 100km/h from rest in a feasibly claimed 8.6 seconds. That's barely removed from IS250 territory and more than a second ahead of the sleepy 320i auto.

All right, it's not going to trouble anyone with the readies to buy a V6 C280 or anyone with the sense to get the diesel version, but at last this entry-level Merc sedan has spark.

It still sounds like an adenoidal Hoover, though. To get a Mercedes with a decent engine note do you really have to auction one of your organs so you can afford a V8?

Still, the enhanced response, especially when set in sport mode, is backed by dynamics and body control that are altogether sharper these days.

That's in keeping with the marque's desire to capture buyers further from the verge of senescence than has long been the case.

No, the C-Class is not 3 Series-sharp, due in part to its hefty 1490kg kerb weight and light steering.

But though it lacks the 320i's razor-keen turn-in, the Merc keeps up with the game in most circumstances.

In real-world deployment, there's daylight between them, the Mercedes riding the raddled roads that encapsulate the Nero-like neglect of the Iemma era with the suppleness you've every right to expect. The contrast with the run-flat-tyred BMW doesn't flatter the latter.

Much; far too much; has been made of the dual shapes assumed by the latest C-Class.

There's the SLK-evoking Avantgarde range, with a tristar badge on its nose(supposedly for the young and hair-highlighted).

Then there are the Classic and Elegance models that, with the star mounted more traditionally on the bonnet, won't frighten the fogeys and the follicle-challenged.

Whichever, the main thing is the C-Class provides better value than previously, as evinced by a more obviously upmarket interior and an options list that fits easily on one page.

If the ask is still steep for what is, after all, merely a mid-size four-potter, the C200K rivals the Japanese car as the best 'German' around.

 


Snapshot

Mercedes-Benz C200K Classic

Price: $56,990

Engine: 1.8L/4-cylinder

Supercharged: 135kW/250Nm

Economy: 8.8L/100km (tested)

Transmission: 5-speed automatic

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 5 comments

  • It may not as sharp as BMW 3 Series on Handling,but it certainly not far off…It has so much improvement than previously…I have driven both car since E36 vs W202, E46 vs W203, till now E90 vs W204..

    One thing really make me unsatisfy was the Run Flat tyre, it really isolated the sense of the feedback from wheel to your steering… So much disappointed on E90 loss too much feeling…loss alot of fun!!!

    Moreover,the funny C.Brangle design, certainly not my taste. it make the BMW so plain and no detail. It look not much different than a Korea low market car..very poor design…It should follow the bloodstream as E36 make more detail and stay as their prestiage sharpe…Double hump interior make narrow the vision and look horriable…it should make the i drive a lot easy to use…

    Jacky Posted on 19 December 2008 1:51pm
  • The interior of the new 2008 C-Class is hardly what I would call “upmarket”. The leather has the look and feel of vinyl and the console appears to be made out of rubber. Also, the openly exposed dual cup holders are something I would expect in an Impala but never a Mercedes. All of my car enthusiast friends have seen (and test driven) the new C-Class and love the CL-like front and overall styling. But the unanimous opinion is that the interior has definitely been cheapened, so much so that I have dropped it from consideration as my next car. It’s a shame but I now prefer the Lexus ES or Cadillac CTS for this price range.

    Carlos Flores of Miami, FL Posted on 16 December 2007 6:43am
  • I don’t understand why people are willing to buy this car.
    Mercedes cars are very very extremely overpriced is Australia.

    Take a look at C280. Here the RRP is AU $85K. In the US (known as C300) the RRP is US $32K.

    Some of you might say that I can’t convert the currency directly to determine RRP as US market is much bigger. You’re right. But lets have a look at this:

    US $32K is equal to AU $42,666.66 (assuming $1 of our dollar buys 75cents US. The reality is our dollar is closer to 90cents US)

    Then lets say the government charge 10% import tariff and another 10% of GST. This bring the price to AU $51,626.665 (I get it from 42,666.66 * 1.1 * 1.1)

    Now lets say, since our market is smaller, benz want to get extra profit percar. Let’s say another $10K per car. This bring the RRP t0 around $61K

    Remember I get $61K based on AU $1 A buys 75 cents US. If we use 80cents exchange rate, the price should be less than $61K

    But how come benz in Aussie charges $85K? WTF, this is a rip off.

    Unfortunately, there are far far too many MORONS in Australia who are willing to pay big bucks for the sake of brand.

    I can afford to buy a benz (pay cash. no finance) but I’ll never buy it at this price. This is one of the biggest rip off

    Jerry Tan Posted on 14 December 2007 1:45pm
  • yeah i love the “adenoidal Hoover” description, that’s exactly what they sound like. somehow other manufacturers make 4cyl engines that sound hotter than Merc’s sixes.

    Paul McDonnell Posted on 14 December 2007 10:45am
  • Ordinary looking vehicle unless you spend $12000 on the AMG Kit. Over priced options and poor quality plastics.

    DAVID of BUDERIM Posted on 13 December 2007 8:08am
Read all 5 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics