Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

LandCruiser 200 series: cruise control

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image Toyota LandCruiser Sahara turbodiesel V8 4WD motor car.

Toyota's new 200-Series LandCruiser maintains the big off-roader's position at the top of the four-wheel-drive wish list.

The prospect of time behind the wheel of the new LandCruiser was much anticipated as I'm a 100-Series owner. I'm starting at the top of the range, the turbodiesel Sahara, a descendant of my Cruiser.

Chief among the differences is what's under the bonnet and attached to the wheels. The 200 gets an upgraded version of the twin-turbodiesel V8 already seen in the new Troopy, but now offering a more than useful 195kW of power (up from 151kW) and an indecent 650Nm of torque - a decent hike from the Troopy's 430Nm.

While not surpassing the staggering 750Nm of the V10 Volkswagen Touareg turbodiesel, it's enough to shift a big chunk of Japanese off-roader without apparent effort.

The turbodiesel V8 is a double-overhead cam unit that complies with Euro IV and is a quiet and refined unit, with a nice “trucky” V8 soundtrack.

It's also frugal, with claims of 10.3 litres/100km - I was getting around 14 litres/100km - but it's 4.2 litres/100km better than the petrol V8, while generating fewer emissions and pumping out 240Nm of extra torque.

The six-speed auto is generally smooth but sometimes feels a little confused about its job, jumping between ratios and losing its cool a little.

The argument for diesel was pretty good in the 100-Series, but the 200's added refinement and increased power and torque make the $10,000 price difference almost irrelevant.

The kinetic suspension, developed in Western Australia, is an all-new feature that lives up to the hype.

Combining with a torque-sensing centre-differential, the hydro-mechanical semi-active anti-roll bars front and rear allow for maximum suspension travel and traction in off-road conditions. The suspension keeps good wheel contact when off-road, but its sealed-surface abilities are remarkable for such a large 4WD, with good body control on the bitumen.

Ride quality is firm - little ripples are more of a problem than the bigger bumps - but all-round on-road abilities defy the ladder-chassis setup.

Toyota has seen fit to remove the adjustable nature of the suspension, both in height and ride comfort - perhaps it needed something to differentiate the 200 from the upcoming Lexus version.

While I'm griping about the changes, the chilled centre console might be a little deeper but it appears a little smaller overall when compared with the 100-Series.

But the absence of a 12-volt plug in the cargo space at the back is inexcusable in a serious off-road machine.

The Sahara also suffers for its extra underbody mechanical bits with a reduction in fuel-tank capacity - the fuel-tank size drops from the GXL's 138 litres to 93 in the VX and Sahara.

The test car also had a squeaky left-hand front door and there was also a solid clunk in the driveline, something Toyota said was an ex-factory lubrication issue afflicting the bulk of the 200s and was being fixed. The noise was the only blight on an otherwise impressive drive.

Cabin space is unchanged and still good (it sits on the same wheelbase as the 100-Series) and the extra cargo space from the added length doesn't do any harm. As is expected with the 200-Series flagship, there is no shortage of equipment - leather-wrapped reach'n'rake adjustable steering wheel, variable-ratio power steering, cruise control, trip computer and auto-dimming interior rear-vision mirror.

There are a few flashings of fake woodgrain trim - including the top and bottom of the steering wheel - that look a little out of place; the wipers are variable intermittent and the headlights have an auto-off function, but neither are automatic - again a concession to Lexus?

The eight-seater also gets nice leather trim, quad-zone climate control, keyless entry and start, a sunroof, power windows, alarm, anti-lock brakes, stability control, dual front, side and curtain airbags and a six-CD in-dash sound system. There's a reversing camera, which offers a good view and guidance, but no standard parking sensors, which would make a better team when manoeuvring such a large beast.

There's no question about the LandCruiser's 4WD abilities, but the foremost 4WD manufacturer has tidied up the on-road manners further to produce a complete all-rounder.

Some niggles remain, but the 200-Series has set a new benchmark.

 

 

SMALL TORQUE

Toyota LandCruiser

Sahara Turbodiesel V8

From: $104,990

Engine: 4.5-litre twin-turbodiesel 32-valve DOHC V8.

Transmission: Six-speed automatic, constant four-wheel drive, lockable Torsen limited-slip centre differential.

Power: 195kW at 3400rpm.

Torque: 650Nm at 1600rpm.

Fuel consumption: 10.3 litres/100km (claimed), on test 14.3 litres/100km, tank capacity 93 litres.

Emissions: 273g/km.

Suspension: Independent double wishbones, dampers, dampers, coil springs, hydro-mechanical semi-active anti roll bar (front). Live axle, trailing arms, coil springs, Panhard rod, dampers, hydro-mechanical semi-active anti roll bar (rear).

Brakes: Four-wheel ventilated discs with four piston calipers (front). Single-piston rear calipers.

Dimensions: Length 4950mm, width 1970mm, height 1905mm, wheelbase 2850mm, track fr/rr 1640/1635mm, ground clearance 220-225mm, cargo volume 700 litres, weight 2720kg.

Wheels: 17in alloys.

 

 

CLASS COMPETITION

Volkswagen Touareg V10, From $121,990.

Audi Q7 4.2 TDI, From $123,900.

Range Rover Vogue , From $142,900.

Nissan Patrol Ti, From $66,240.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 10 comments

  • mum bought the diesel after we smashed our old one, the 100seris keep us safe, a ute coming the other way at 120 ran into us when we were going 120, the other cars involved were trashed, could barley tell what they were and the peoplpe were seriously injured, the 100’s cabin keept its shape, the font taking the full impact, knocking the engine and drive train clean out, snapping the front axle, yet the rest of the car escaped unscratched, but it was still a write off.
    the new 200 series is great, so much more power, and the handling is as great as previous models. But the new 200’s isn’t as Australian or as hardy as the 100, or previous models, its almost too nice to take out bush, but a car is car. it handles off road great, river crossings, sand dunes and general tearing about. it is abit pricey, but its well worth it,athough its losing its roots, it becoming less of a 4x4 and more of a people mover/sports car SUV.

    Jelly Mann of west coast Posted on 19 November 2009 2:18am
  • Having read much about the 200 series and being very familiar with 60/80 and 100/ 105 series Cruisers I recently had the opportunity to drive one in the Katherine NT region for a few days. Liked the sheer torque and power of the V8 diesel, seats are great but…...no auxilliary fuel tank, no aux power outlets for the fridge etc, driveline noise, a vibration through the steering column, and it’s thirstier than claimed! Toyota needs to rethink this model for it’s traditional Australian rural and remote market, Looks as though Toorak and Double bay got their wish list, woodgrain, IFS front (read reduced wheel travel) and lots of bling.  Probably designed more for the North American market ! But wait don’t they always complain about a lack of a live front axle and diesel, a non standard aux fuel tank,.....well they’ve got a diesel now.
    A previous comment regarding the 200 shape…a Kluger on steroids is quite appropriate, I felt the Kluger was the ugly duckling of the Toyota 4WD range but for me it;s now the Landcruiser. Gone are the fine smooth uncluttered lines of the 80 and 100 series now it a bits and pieces busy stitch together from the spare parts bin.
    My next Toyota may be a 90 series or even a late Tubo 100 but the 200 doesn’t have the basic long range between fuel stops i require and except for the brilliant engine doesn’t do it any better than its previous model.

    Ross Wood of Lillian Rock NSW Posted on 22 February 2009 11:56pm
  • I have been driving Landcruisers since the mid 70’s and have refused to buy anything else. Sadly Toyota have lost the plot with the design of the new 200 series. Who wants to pay around $100,000 for a vehicle to travel this big land without a factoty fitted spare tank.  KDSS should come standard on all models and a 12 volt plug for the engel should be included. I want to buy now but will wait until these issues are addressed.

    Ken Benbow of Broome Posted on 12 November 2008 2:23pm
  • Just bought a new Sahara 200 landcruiser worth every dollar i paid   it is a brilliant
    Vechile tons of power and so Quiet to ride in even Quieter than my wifes 200k cls 500 merc   ride not quiet as good but no worries front seats on a long trip the best for comfort when you look at other suvs up to 120k the cruiser is a bargain and comes with the lot sensors are the only problem on the front but not costly to fit build quality the best better than mercs congratulations for building such a great touring machine also looks better than the older models
    vechile purchased 29th september

    Norm Healey of Echuca Posted on 15 October 2008 1:22pm
  • i cant believe these other comments i think the new lc 200 is amazing it nearly has everything as standard which comparing it too other euro 4wd i was up for another 30k.

    ben ades of melbourne Posted on 03 March 2008 12:23pm
  • How could Toyota have got it so wrong? I have been to my local dealer twice to buy a new Landcruiser but have left both times without placing an order. I just don’t believe they are offering good value, particularly in the GXL Turbo where you have to pay $2,500 extra for the KDSS. No seat height adjustment, no 12V plug in rear, fixed third row seats.As my dealer said, “If it wasn’t for the Landcruiser name we wouldn’t be able to sell them”. Sorry Toyota but I can’t bring myself to give you my hard earned cash!

    Brian Hamilton of East Perth Posted on 26 February 2008 4:49pm
  • No extra fuel tank, no 12 volt plug in the cargo area, no dust deflector or insect guard screen. What are Toyota doing? The design is ulgy. Looks like a Kluger on steroids. Need some sort of protection on the sides to stop the shopping centre park “door bangs”. Sorry Toyota, I am so dissappointed.

    mark driscoll Posted on 18 February 2008 8:51pm
  • They have lost the unique Landcruiser look and image. I have a 1995 80 series Landcruiser Advantage and along with the 100 series look the part. The new Landcruiser sounds like a technilogical marvel along with the glamour and glitz . Have they lost touch with repeat buyers. We have four Landcruisers in the extended family and all are disapointed with deseign and cost of the new model

    Laurie Page of Melbourne Posted on 28 January 2008 10:32pm
  • They now look a lot like the Pajero’s . I liked the previous models lights and size but these ones dont look quite as grand as before?

    kjf of Redlands Posted on 25 January 2008 10:42am
  • Why did they even bother with the Lexus LX???

    All its done is set back the Landcruiser, and who honestly would buy an LX over a Sahara anyway…....
    Well, at this ridiculous price I cant see anyone buying a Sahara, but thats not the point im making.

    The LX never sold before, it was constantly ridiculed, and this time its holding the Landcruiser back.

    Tomas Rivera of Brisbane Posted on 24 January 2008 9:38pm
Read all 10 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics