Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Holden SIDI Commodore: review

  • By Mark Hinchliffe
  • The Courier-Mail
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
  • image

    Mark Hinchcliffe roadtested the SIDI sportswagon, and reckons the transmission may be great for performance, but not necessarily for economy or driver fatigue. Photo Gallery

Mark Hinchliffe road tests and reviews the Holden Commodore SIDI V6 sedans and ute.

Fuel economy has more to do with your mind, the size of your right foot and the type and colour of car you are driving.  Yes, you can do all the maths and physics and work out on paper how an engine, transmission, aerodynamics, weight and other factors can affect economy, but these are theoretical.  They make a statement on paper, but they don't make much of a statement in the real world.

Drivetrains

I recently drove three Holden V6 vehicles with the new 3.0 and 3.6-litre spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) engines.  The Omega and Berlina of all body styles get the 3.0L engine and the rest of the range has the 3.6L.

Holden quotes fuel consumption figures for the Omega 3-litre at 9.3 litres per 100km, down from 10.7L/100km in the superseded model, while the SV6 Ute has the biggest improvement for the 3.6-litre, down 13 per cent to 10L/100km.

I drove a grey Berlina Sportwagon (3.0L) which returned 10.5L/100km, an even greyer Calais sedan (3.6L) which yielded 10.7L/100km and a bright-coloured Ute (3.6L) which failed all economy tests with a poor 12.3L/100km.

I can't claim to have driven to the standard conditions as laid out for official ADR fuel consumption figures and I can't even claim to have driven the same distance or type of road conditions for each. Yet these figures still reveal a lot about the cars' performance and economy.

SIDI Sportswagon

The first thing of note is how good the economy figures are for the Sportwagon which is heaviest with its big cargo area which I utilised with a loaded-up trip to the dump.  It's not the 9.3L/100km quoted by Holden but it's quite respectable and included the commuter crawl to work for five days, weekend shopping and errands, and very little highway driving.  It's also nowhere near the 6.48L/100km it achieved in the recent Global Green Challenge from Adelaide to Darwin.

SIDI Calais

The Calais is also worthy of note. It performed much the same ‘real-world’ duties — albeit no trip to the dump — and returned almost the same economy figures as the Sportwagon.

Both cars appeal to my family nature with their roomy cabin and functional design. Consequently I drove like a family man who needs to get home to his family in the 'burbs every night.

SIDI Ute

Then along came the ute. It was fitted with a tow bar and there was our old beer fridge that blew up and needed carting to the dump, so it was in for some punishment. Plus there was circle work to be done ...

Well, not exactly, but with the lighter weight and the bigger engine, it seemed to sprint off the line a little more willingly and dance around in an entertaining fashion in the corners. All this, plus the vibrant metallic orange colour ($500 extra), got me all excited all the way down my trousers to my big right foot.

The result was fuel figures that seem to call Holden a liar.  So unless you are competing in the Global Green Challenge, fuel economy is largely going to rely on your attitude.  It also helps to have a sedately coloured family sedan or wagon.

If economy is not your soul goal, but simply a happy side benefit, then you may be pleased to note that these new engines are also more powerful.  Holden claims the power output from the 3.6 is up 15kW to 210kW. And even though the new 3-litre is the smallest Commodore engine in more than 20 years, it still develops a healthy 190kW.

Driving

The engines sound quieter and more refined. That is until you stamp on the loud pedal and then they wick up the volume quite pleasingly.  Cabin noise may also be decreased by Holden's use of new low-rolling-resistance Bridgestone tyres and the 50rpm reduced idle speed on the 3.6. It all helps economy and comfort levels.

It should also be good news that they now all come with a six-speed automatic transmission rather than some of them being hitched to the old four-speed sludge box.

But it isn't.  I can't believe I am saying this, but I don't like the six-speed transmission.  It feels like it has an overactive thyroid gland, too willingly dropping down one or even two gears at the hint of extra throttle.

That may be great for performance, but not necessarily for economy or driver fatigue.  I found it quite annoying how much the transmission jumped around, even though it is quite smooth in its changes.

There is simply no need for such volatile gear changing. After all, the small engine has 290Nm of torque pulling power and the bigger engine has 350Nm, up 30Nm from the previous engine.  Surely this torque can be used to draw the car up a hill or cope with a little extra throttle without shifting gears.

Holden Commodore SIDI

Price: $44,490 (Berlina Sportwagon), $48,290 (Calais), $39,490 (SV6 Ute)
Engine: 3L/V6 190kW/290Nm; 3.6L/V6 210kW/350Nm
Transmission: 6-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Economy (tested): 10.5L/100km (Sportwagon), 10.7 (Calais), 12.3 (Ute)

How green are you?

Make One Degree of difference today by calculating your carbon footprint and finding out what you can do to reduce it, use the carbon calculator.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 25 comments

  • my 3.6 sidi 6speed manual ute is better than the vx (vu) 3,8 auto, th eve ute does,      8.8lts/100ks on run to armidale and back,then around town its around9.6 to 10.4 depending on the load ,traffic volume,its a 68klm round trip to and from work each day and here is where its at,8.9ltrs / i00klm ,its getting better now that its travelled just over 3000ks

    johnno foster of urunga nsw Posted on 03 March 2010 6:56am
  • Holden SIDI models are marketing ‘hoopla’. Economy is subjective having many variables. Presumably a vehicle is selected to meet personal tastes and perceived requirements. Also personal driving competency and usage plays a large part in achieved economy. The latest Commodores are a catch up compromise of globalisation in car manufacture and what’s in the GMH global parts bin, nothing else. Smaller capacity V6 engines with claimed increased power, is only achieved at higher, unusable rpm. This factor alone will compromise economy performance as engine/transmission combinations have to rev harder to achieve meaningful acceleration. What ‘modern’ automatic car engine revs anywhere near it’s claimed best HP rev range. Due to auto calibration, it waffles along well below best torque numbers as well. It is no secret that the “old” Commodore/Falcon engines that ran happily at 1500/2000 rpm could return good fuel consumption figures with normal, competent driving habits. Low rpm delivered max torque will always achieve good all round fuel economy returns, when driving an auto box no matter how low-tech).

    My point, modern car marketing is all ‘smoke and mirrors’ Buyer’s beware.

    Anthony of Maitland NSW Posted on 15 February 2010 12:32pm
  • The only way there going to get 900 km,to a tank is put a 90 litre tank in and nurse it all the way put it in neutral down hills and you just might make it I had a vp years ago and it was timed to half an inch of it,s life and i couldn’t get any better than 700klm,s to a tank.

    David of toowoomba Posted on 02 February 2010 8:03pm
  • Have a SIDI Omega through fleet. So far in 7000 km the brakes squeal like you wouldn’t believe, the seat belt alarm goes off at random (drove 120km with it on the other day),when engaging drive or reverse at ramdom a massive thump comes from the gearbox and the whole car jolts. My son could beat this car off the mark on his push bike and the gearbox is a shocker. Sounds like I’m a whinger but this is the worst Holden I have driven and I’ve had every model since the VL!
    Must say I am getting on average 8.5 litres per 100km

    Dissapointed of Mudgee Posted on 20 January 2010 11:01pm
  • I have an elderly 96MAGNA, sold eventually…
    I have most certainly got my thumbs up for the Holden, which I going to look for

    jimT of parkwood 6147 Posted on 02 January 2010 3:58pm
  • I have been a Holden Man all my life But?? The new Falcons are great and my next car will be a ford the engineers have finaly got it right for ford.Better fuel,ride,and alot smoother through the gears.

    Big G of Ashgrove Brisbane Posted on 18 December 2009 2:36pm
  • I dont understand why the Falcon wins the peoples choice award but still gets outsold. I would have a Falcon because its a Ford, but I wouldnt have one because the lack of multiple DIN spaces for an aftermarket stereo. This is a big oversight considering the garbage stereo you get as standard

    DW of Brisbane Posted on 15 December 2009 4:37pm
  • SIDI technology “HA”.... The FG FALCON still beats the commy for fuel economy and POWER!!!!!

    Wazza of Adelaide Posted on 01 December 2009 10:34pm
  • so Mark, you thrash a ute around and expect good economy figures?

    Darren King of Brisbane Posted on 01 December 2009 8:48pm
  • in reply to flix swisse, i would be more upset with spark ignition, invented more than 100 years ago, used on petrol engines for some time now, more marketing dollars spend than development dollars no doubt

    jeremy sims of brisbane Posted on 30 November 2009 1:33pm
  • Stephen Wise ? What planet are you on ? Go to the holden web page and you can choose a brand new SV6 with 6 speed manual !

    Captain of . Posted on 30 November 2009 12:35pm
  • in 1975 the DS23 had direct fuel injection!!!
    The locals re inventing the wheel again, 3 and a half decades later and call it new.
    .

    Flix Swisse Posted on 27 November 2009 1:46am
  • Perhaps the answer for the “jumpy” auto would be for Holden to offer the great 6 speed manual previously fitted to the SV6 version.  As a fuel economy aid, and better driveability, I can’t believe that Holden are not offering a manual in the SV6 performance cars - it is now a V8 only option!

    Stephen Wise of Wamboin Posted on 26 November 2009 8:01pm
  • I have two cars.  A 4 cyl 1990 Mitsubishi van and a 5.7 V8 2005 Statesman.  The Statesman uses less fuel than the van.  I drive the van as gently as possible, it doesn’t have air con or pwr steer draining the engines pwr ... but still uses more fuel.  I recently had the carby recond, which improved the economy alot, but still worse than Statesman.  But most importantly, if I’m ever in a bad prang I want the Statesman with it’s big car safety.  Heaps of cars have 5 star safety ratings, but are too small and you’ll die anyway.  Moral of the story ... nick off and leave me and my V8 alone.

    V8 of ADELAIDE Posted on 26 November 2009 6:01pm
  • Gordon from Adelaide I guess its courses for horses and horses for coursers if you like a Holden then you buy one if you like a 4 cyl Camry you buy one me I have always been a Toyota man loved the Camry’s but now the Holden looks more modern than Toyota I would buy the Holden Now the Camry looks to close to the Aurion

    Hervey Bay ite of Hervey Bay Posted on 25 November 2009 12:02am
  • its only more economical because of a 6 speed auto. seven speed is where its at these days. it is nearly 2010 isnt it?

    nanna of nannaville Posted on 24 November 2009 10:58pm
  • 10.4, have you never driven a Aurion, I have returned as low as 7.4, but a normal week of driving is in the low 9’s.

    Terry Posted on 24 November 2009 8:50pm
  • if you don’t like it changing gears….GET A MANUAL!

    T.C Posted on 24 November 2009 8:01pm
  • SIDI. What a load of bollicks. Mitsubishi had the same technology 10 ago in the Japanese Magna. They called it GDI. Gasoline Direct Injection.

    Mike Posted on 24 November 2009 2:57pm
  • I got over 1000kms from a 75l tank in a 1988 2.3l Volvo 740GL 5 speed manual in the 80’s oil price shock. Petrol hit 80c a litre in Adelaide! 900kms 21 years later? Rubbish!

    John M of Western Sydney Posted on 24 November 2009 2:33pm
  • Sorry Jenny of Cockatoo, I don’t get your point. Are you saying 10.4 l/100 kms is good? If so, maybe you need to re-assess your priorities, because compared to most cars on the road, that’s lousy economy. There are lots of more economical cars around that will pull a loaded trailer, without the need for a V6 or V8. Sure, if you are pulling a van around Aust, then a bigger engine is reasonable, otherwise, why waste petrol?

    Gordon of Adelaide Posted on 24 November 2009 1:52pm
  • Kind of shows up the farce of ADR fuel consumption equations! Back to the old city/highway figures, and I don’t really care that the car companies don’t like them! Who’s buying the damned car anyway?

    swanny Posted on 24 November 2009 12:37pm
  • Our 2008 SV6 gets 10.41L/100, even with a kick in the guts every once in a while, plus two days of 100 klm round trips along the Monash “Freeway” car park.

    Jenny's car of Cockatoo Posted on 24 November 2009 11:40am
  • So does this put a lie to Holden’s marketing of getting 900 km from a tank in a new Commodore? Or was that projected from the same fairy figures as the above quoted consumption figures? Or have they just installed huge tanks?

    DJ of Koondoola Posted on 24 November 2009 11:38am
  • What an interesting story - after seeing Holden’s TV ads, I thought that they had finally found the answer to providing fantastic fuel economy, while at the same time giving performance and comfort. Now we find out that their idea of economy is no better than I get out of my 3 y.o. petrol Camry, which I drive with a heavy foot. In fact their figures look even worse when you consider I get 8 l/100 kms on the highway, loaded with family and lots of luggage. The picture is even worse when you read about the new MB E250 CDI - that has a claimed economy of 5.3 l/100 kms (yes, 5.3 l). This car wouldn’t be any lighter than the Berlina, and probably gives similar performance (I get more performance from my 4 cylinder Camry - who wants to burn their tyres at the lights?) and the MB would have better quality and comfort.
    Ford have recently announced their new Fiesta Econetic whic gives 3.7 l/ 100kms.
    Come on, Holden, get with the game. It’s time you got serious about addressing the real needs of the majority of drivers, and forgot about the race track. Other manufacturers can do, why can’t you?

    Gordon from Adelaide Posted on 24 November 2009 11:35am
Read all 25 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics