Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

First look: Nissan 370Z

  • By Chris Riley
  • News Limited Community Newspapers
image Under the bonnet the new 370Z is a reworked version of Nissan's awarding winning VQ engine with 243kW of power and 366Nm of torque. Photo Gallery

We were wondering how Nissan could possibly follow up a stunner like the 350Z.

To tell the truth, we were a little concerned they'd muff it - but as it turns out we needn't have been.

Unveiled at this week's Los Angeles motor show, the Zed's successor, the 370Z, looks every bit as good . . . if not better.

In fact, it's a better looking, much more elegant device than Nissan's brutish, Porsche pummelling GT-R.

We were there in 2007 for the unveiling of the GT-R in Tokyo and the new 370Z received the same kind of rock star welcome when the wraps came off as the first cab off the rank in LA.

You see not everyone can afford a GT-R, but the iconic and delectable Zed is within striking distance of the average motoring enthusiast and is easily the best all round package in its price bracket.

The new model takes its name from the larger, more powerful 3.7-litre V6 that can be found under the bonnet.

It's a reworked version of Nissan's awarding winning VQ engine, this time with 243kW of power and 366Nm of torque on tap, and revving all the way to 7500rpm.

The car's smaller and lighter too, which means it's going to be quicker and it will use less fuel.

The previous model produced 230kW and 358Nm and was good for 11.7 or 11.8 litres/100km depending on transmission.

To go with the new engine is a revised close ratio six-speed manual or seven speed automatic transmission, with paddle shifts.

In line with Nissan's “anywhere, anytime, anyone” philosophy, the 370Z is also going to be easier to drive, in manual form at least, with the world's first syncronised downshift rev matching system, so even the biggest bogan won't muff a gear change.

The “SynchroRev Control” function automatically matches engine speed when changing gear to the exact speed of the next gear, essentially blipping the throttle to smooth out any down/up shifts.

Eagled-eyed observers will notice the upturned rear quarter window of the 370Z, a styling cue from the original 240Z.

The “barbed” headlights and matching tail lights give the car a more aggressive look, with four-pot front brakes and standard 18 or optional 19 inch forged alloys.

As with other models Nissan has also put a lot of work into upgrading the interior, with a starter button, larger easier to read dials and the use of higher grade finishes.

There's a new factory fit navigation system and 240watt Bose sound system with two subs and a 9.3Gb hard drive, along with bluetooth and iPod integration.

The cockpit is arranged in a three-layer design which groups items in the order that the driver sees and uses them, to give the driver a completely connected feel whenever they drive.

At 2550mm the car is 70mm shorter than the one it replaces, with a 100mm shorter wheelbase.

But it is 33mm wider and has a 55mm wider rear track.

Those familiar with the current model will immediately notice the absence of the strut brace behind the seats.

Because of the lighter, stronger chassis it is no longer necessary.

The 3.7-litre DOHC V6 features has a longer stroke and higher compression, with Variable Valve Event and Lift Control (VVEL).

It has been constructed using 35 per cent new parts.

Underpinning the car's performance potential is an electronic stability control system, viscous limited slip differential and anti-lock brakes with brake assist.

Safety equipment includes active head restraints with front, side and curtain airbags.

The new 370Z is due to arrive in the first half of next year, with price and specification still to be confirmed.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 9 comments

  • You all wish you could drive a car like that.

    Chris Posted on 20 April 2009 11:17am
  • i have owned a 350 since july 08 love it, ithink they look better than a Boxster

    Bruce Davies of Melb of taylors lakes melb. Posted on 19 April 2009 2:00pm
  • I am afraid I do not agree with you on either the 350 ond the new 370 the have no visual appeal whatso ever a poor imitation of a porche
    having owned a porche sold to buy my first 300 in 91 then my 2nd in 94 (still have it) totally dissapointed in the visual appeal of current models
    why the ever changed the design to as I said a poor imitation of a porche is beyond me my 94 model was an Australian model bought new from a nissan dealer & I love it I will drive it till I can no longer I am 63 and have been into cars since I could hold a spanner

    Brian Savage of brisbane Posted on 30 March 2009 2:23pm
  • Meh the 350z needs a bodykit to look good anyway, the 370 looks a little better… still a shame nissan decided to go the naturally aspirated route and not go forced induction.

    Luke Posted on 20 February 2009 2:40pm
  • This is excellent. Nissan seem to have gone back to their roots. The new Z is a drivers car first, and an executives car second.
    Most drivers will probably add strut braces, modify the lights and add a body kit anyway, so the base model is just a canvas to start with.
    Most people who just want a standard car to drive from home to work in while showing off their cash and “edgy” car will probably end up looking elsewhere.
    Fine with me.

    Kozeyekan Posted on 27 January 2009 12:23pm
  • It’s too bad that the 370Z IMHO looks like a predecessor to the 350Z - externally. I’m all up for upgraded interior, engines etc but I wished that Nissan would keep the 350Z appearance and just upgrade it.

    The 370Z reminds me of a prototype of a 350Z - ironically in a book published about the Z cars itself!!! Rear windows look terrible, gone are the rounded windows, and it really does look like a squished up version of the 350Z!

    Bambang Wiyono of PERTH WA Posted on 12 January 2009 4:38pm
  • I really like it, even more than the 350Z. Definitely one to check out when it arrives. Can’t wait!!

    Roger Kuah of Sydney Posted on 17 December 2008 5:47pm
  • I picked up a 350z at the start of the year and I’m happy that I did, the front of the car I don’t mind but the back looks terrible… so terrible in fact, it’s all the convincing I need not to upgrade… not really worth the extra bit of displacement and power for that ‘style’.

    Jerry D of Brisbane Posted on 27 November 2008 10:42pm
  • The barbed headlights make the car look more aggressive? Surely Nissan marketing spiel! They look daggy and horrid and marr the look of a nice car. Looks more like the designer’s pen slipped and due to some unexplainable gaff it made it into production. Still looks like a squished up version of it’s predecessor. I’m sure it goes though!

    Corey of Bris Posted on 25 November 2008 3:12pm
Read all 9 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links