Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

First drive: 2008 Honda Accord Euro

  • By Chris Riley
  • News Limited Community Newspapers
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
Honda Accord Euro The new Honda Accord Euro’s bigger footprint means it sits more securely on the road but it also means an increase in weight. Photo Gallery

Have they improved on the original?

It's bigger, more powerful and technically more advanced.

But we can't help wonder whether Honda's new Accord Euro is as much fun to drive as the original?

Not that it matters because for $1000 less it's going to sell its socks off anyway.

The new Euro joins the new larger `mums and dads' Accord, with which it still shares a name, priced from a very appealing $32,990.

If Honda Australia had any say in the matter, the word `Accord' would have been dropped from the badge.

But alas that's the way it comes from the factory, so we're just going to have to live with the confusion.

 

BODY

At 4740mm the second generation Euro is 65mm longer, 80mm wider and 5mm lower than its predecessor, with a 65mm wider track and 35mm longer wheelbase.

The bigger footprint means it sits more securely on the road but it also means an increase in weight, with the car opening its account in base manual form at 1525kg — 130kg heavier than before.

Despite the extra weight Honda has somehow been able to reduce fuel consumption to 8.9 litres/100m for both manual and auto (down from 9.1 and 9.2 respectively).

It should be noted however that the car takes more expensive 95 strength premium unleaded petrol.

 

SPACE

The larger dimensions are evident in the cabin where there's more room between the seats, 65mm more shoulder room to be exact.

Rear legroom wasn't overly generous and if there has been any improvement here we have difficulty in seeing it (and Honda certainly doesn't quantify it).

Along with a 5mm lower ride height the floor has also been dropped 10mm and it gives the cabin a more enclosed feel.

The boot is also worth a mention.

Although generous, in models with 17-inch wheels, it is compromised by the retrofitting of a full size spare that raises the floor height by about 8cm.

Models with larger 18-inch wheels get a space saver instead (the larger diameter wheel won't fit in the wheel well).

 

ON THE ROAD

the new Euro feels like the larger car that it is, not as light on its feet and perhaps not as nimble.

Although the two cars share the same size 2.4-litre four-cylinder engine, it generates more power this time around and the car feels heavier in the front end.

The steering is precise and well weighted, but lacks the driver feedback of the previous model.

That's not to say the car doesn't handle, because if anything it probably performs better in this department.

 

DRIVETRAINS

The DOHC i-VTEC engine generates 148kW of power at 7000rpm and between 230 and 234Nm of torque at 4200 or 4300rpm, depending on whether it's the manual or automatic model.

It's hooked up to a six-speed manual or five-speed automatic with steering wheel-mounted shift paddles.

In typical Honda fashion the engine doesn't really start to deliver the goods until you've got at least 4000rpm on the dial.

And it can exhibit a lack of torque coming out of corners — not a lot but enough to notice.

 

HANDLING

The Euro sits flat and controlled in corners with the occasional thump from the firm but not harsh suspension.

Pushed to the limit the car will ultimately understeer, but the vehicle stability assist (VSA) system will catch it long before things get out of hand.

Our pick of the trannies is the auto, which in manual mode delivers a greater spread of useable torque in second gear, just the ticket for the corner to corner stuff.

In comparison the manual change feels heavier and notchier than the previous model that was such a sweet thing.

Having said this, it's early days yet and the manual will no doubt loosen up with use.

In summary, we'd say the Euro is another quality, good looking car that delivers plenty of fun. As good as it was, the previous model feels dated in comparison.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 16 comments

  • I bought a 2006 Accord Euro Lux with SatNav in Silver and Black interior under car allowance for work purposes. Great car and nice handling. Has a bit of rough ride due to the low profile tyres. The only problem is the low trade in / retained value. Especially compared to the Mazda 6 of the same year. Its worth almost 10 -11 % less ! Another issue is that there are heaps of them around. Maybe my perception ! Anyway with the new released model having a price cut, its not going to do anything for the older models…. Might go for a used Lex IS250 this time round….

    Andrew Hoh of Sydney South. Posted on 09 November 2008 5:21pm
  • I had a Toyota Azura and now have gone in for a 2.4 litre Accord Euro Luxury with Sat. Navigation and reverse camera, do you think that I made the right decision to go in for this Honda?

    Alroy Fernandez of sydney Posted on 08 October 2008 8:33pm
  • Honda Euro is a great car. I own a 2007 model. Considering that Honda already has the bigger Accord, why did they stupidly go and make the new Euro bigger?
    Looks like the old model on steroids. It will stop me purchasing another Euro.

    Eric Hocking of nsw Posted on 21 August 2008 1:19pm
  • Traded Calais (lounge chair on wheels). Bought luxo-no nav Just driven Melbourne Sydney return Fuel eco 7.4l/100k (averaging 8.4l/100) passing trucks showed great turn of speed with minimal fuss and noise. (I have always wondered why people crawl past trucks waiting for the accident) Love the cruise control and grade logic as well as paddle shifters. Great sound system. Seriously comfortable seats. Boot a bit small for 2 sets of clubs and wheelie-cases. Was close to buying IS 250 or Audi but price package (have you looked at AUdi add-ons list!) and legend of bullet proof longevity swayed me.

    Bill of Melbourne Posted on 12 August 2008 10:45am
  • i agree with allan,same thing happened to me
    been in car market for a while now, looking to spend around 50-60k, first i was looking for is250 but after the euro’s picture appear on internet(acura actually) from the us website, i was so excited to see euro finally comes with grey (or olive trim).pretty sure will order one as soon as it landed in australia,
    so i went to the dealership stright away as soon i saw one ( as the dealership is only next door to my office).
    and i was so disappointed when the sales man told me that they only come in 1 trim which is black, and according to the sales person, the reason is because they sold black the most from the previous model.
    yeah you right most doesnt mean all.not gonna order one and go to lexus insted

    Garry Posted on 04 August 2008 5:17pm
  • A good compromise against the Europeans; I have taken my C-class back to Merc at least a dozen times for the same fault. A new cigarette lighter was $135, for my other car (a Mazda) $13 !!! But why oh why only a black interior ? The salesman told me ‘everyone wants black’ well Honda, I DON’T and won’t buy one for that reason. Singapore with a population of 4million gets a choice, why not Oz?

    Allan Menzies of Brisbane Posted on 31 July 2008 10:42pm
  • black interior only, what a booring stuff
    really disappointed

    garry Posted on 23 July 2008 5:53pm
  • Looks like Hyundai or Kia??
    Just been to test drive the Euro looks n drive nothing like the ‘inferior’ Koreans.
    It’s an insult to Honda really.
    Am I going blind or cookoo ?

    Fred Seow of Sydney Posted on 08 July 2008 7:18pm
  • Test drove this car yesterday and you have to see it in the flesh. Much better than the pics. ( The car looked average from what I had seen on the Net )

    I own the previous version Euro Luxury and this car feels a huge improvement over my05 model. Sit in the drivers seat, it is beautiful to behold, even the paddle shift feels great ( I hate auto’s ) much more precision and promptness than previous model auto gear change.

    Everything that the last model came up short on is bettered or added to this model.
    Memory Electric Seats, Thicker Steering Wheel, better sound system; Ipod friendly;
    quieter in the cabin, suspension not as harsh and the terrible delay of the previous model’s auto change.

    The grip is phenomenal ( no Salesman on board ). If you throw this car into the bushes, your an idiot. ( Even with the VSC deactivated, bottom right of dash )

    I’ve been looking at the Merc C220, BMW 320d ( Only for the low down torque ) and the Mondeo XR5. It wins by a mile on price compared with the euro cars where the standard fetures in the Euro Lux Nav would be $12,000 to $14,000 extra on the sale price. ( around $30,000 total cheaper on the road )

    The best test drive was the C220, but not $30,000 better.

    ( No I don’t work for Honda ) See the car live, you’ll see what I mean….......

    Andrew of Melbourne Posted on 06 July 2008 12:44pm
  • It lookslike a Hyundai or Kia because both those companies have been almost exactly copying Hondas and Toyotas especially in the Accord, Corolla models. Since they first started.

    Ollygt of Brisbane Posted on 27 June 2008 7:26pm
  • Just traded 2006 Euro luxury for a Accord V6 Luxury. Agree with Brian. New Euro, in looks, is a Hatchet compared to a Samurai sword. Did love the dash on the 06. Speedo easy to read and all info readily available - no pushing dash buttons to toggle, it was all on the steering wheel. Definately agree with Tony re the tyres. I got tired of the low profile crash, bump and jiggle. The new Euro Lux. has it also. That’s why I went to the Accord.

    rob Posted on 26 June 2008 10:59am
  • It does look a like an Elantra from the back!  Even though its called “Euro”, its looking alot more American (*and less sproty) - probably its main market. And the option for a tan interior has been dropped. No thanks.

    Why is most reviewers critise cars that are fitted with space savers, but then also complain when a full-size is fitted, but impacts on boot space?

    Steven Leitch of Melbourne Posted on 25 June 2008 7:31pm
  • Tony - Melb you get that one right .. about the space saver tyer he he

    amiaq of ?? Posted on 25 June 2008 6:18pm
  • A price drop of $1,000 across the range and more equipment in every model, assures successful sales. Honda has decided to raise the level of competition in this growing mid size car segment. Well done. I am looking forward to see how Wheels Magazine compares this against the Mazda 6 for “Car of The Year” contenders later this year.

    I would prefer to have 17 inch tyres and a full size spare in the top end model, instead of the space saver tyre. The 18 inch tyres will cost more at replacement time.

    Tony of Melb. Posted on 25 June 2008 12:04pm
  • Brian, how did you see any similarities with Hyundai or Kia? Oh well, your loss. If you’ve seen it yourself in flesh, you’ll be amazed. Especially the interior, it’s very nice and classy. Much better than the previous gen.

    Iggy of Melbourne Posted on 24 June 2008 8:07pm
  • Looks like a Hyundai or Kia.  Larger & heavier…... no thanks.  I’d rather the outgoing model

    Brian of Melbourne Posted on 24 June 2008 2:18pm
Read all 16 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics