Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Falcon reaches unscaled heights

  • By Kevin Hepworth
  • The Daily Telegraph
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image Ford has made some major improvements with the new Falcon's performance and looks. Photo Gallery

The new FG Falcon is the best car Ford Australia has ever built.

It is arguably the best car ever built in Australia and certainly the new benchmark for Australian family cars. The styling may not be a drop-dead revolution, rather a gentle evolution retaining all the cues of a line of Falcons stretching back eight generations, but dynamically the FG is a triumph.

More on the FG Falcon...

 

And now after months of drip feeds and look-but-don't-touch reveals the all-new FG Falcon range hit the roads this week and we were there to drive the entire range. Here's our verdict.

The immediate impression of the FG range, from the fleet special XT through to the G6E Turbo in the luxury stream, is refinement. The cabins look good, the materials and tonings are well thought out and even the XT's trim, while certainly cost effective, is not nasty.

Ergonomics are generally good with the restyled and repositioned central information screen easy to read with clear, well placed graphics. The seats are comfortable with the upper luxury models benefiting from a soft leather treatment while the sports line of XR6, XR6 Turbo and XR8 are fitted with a moderately bolstered sports seat.

Height adjustment on the seats is reasonable but the bottom of the range of movement is too high, particularly with the steering wheel tilt adjustment in need of more upward range.

However, it is when you fire up the FG that the real winning character of the car comes through. It is not the attributes of the 4.0-litre in-line six, even in its brilliant turbocharged state, nor even the 5.4-litre 290 Boss V8. It is what the engineers have done in three key areas of the FG that set it apart from the rest of the pack.

The improvements in noise, vibration and harshness are more than substantial, from the refinements to the front suspension through a virtual pivot control link, modifications to the control blade independent rear suspension and the use of monotube shock absorbers across the sedan range. Wind noise improvement is the result of an industry-leading inset door design perfected from earlier work done on similar design by Ford of Europe and Land Rover.

The result is the ability to carry on a normal tone conversation in the cabin at speeds above 100km/h on typical Australian rough-chip roads.

The third major step forward is in the use of the Bishop variable ratio steering system recently incorporated into the Mercedes-Benz SL roadsters. The Australian-developed system provides precise road feel, good on centre balance without any hint of nervousness while still providing ample assistance for slow speed parking or manoeuvring.

The full FG sedan range is:

XT ($36,490): May be the “fleet special” in the FG range but has not been punished for that. Shares the same inline six-cylinder engine and five-speed automatic drivetrain as the G6 and rides on the same platform as the rest of the range. Interior is more basic but drives with the same refinement as higher-spec cars.

G6 ($39,990): The entry-level model for the luxury sports line-up picks up a more up-market interior, a luxury sports suspension tune and 17-inch alloys. The engine/transmission package is the same as the XT with the ride more focussed through the sports tuning of the monotube shocks and control blade rear suspension.

G6E ($46,990): Gains further luxury interior trims with leather seats and reversing camera and curtain airbags as standard. The suspension tune and drive characteristics are the same as the G6 again with 17-inch alloys.

G6E Turbo: ($54,990): This is the prize in the crackerjack box. As Holden's Calais V stood out from the VE range as a special package, so does the G6E Turbo in the FG range. With a bespoke luxury performance suspension tune this car is a delight to drive. The ride is unfussed, power delivery smooth and wide-ranging and the general balance and manners of the car without peer in the large family sedan world.

XR6 ($39,990): The entry to the performance stream comes standard with the five-speed automatic, sports-tuned rear suspension and 17-inch alloys. Optional are a six-speed automatic, six-speed manual and 18- or 19-inch alloys. The XR rides tighter than the G cars but benefits from the NVH and general refinements.

XR6 Turbo ($45,490): Has all the creamy smooth power of the I-6 Turbo now coupled to a suspension and steering package that notably enhances the experience. Huge grabs of torque are on tap from way down in the rev range

right through to approaching peak revs. A six-speed manual is standard fit with the six-speed ZF automatic optional.

XR8 ($45,490): The Boss 290 V8 benefits from being coupled to the new 6-speed manual with shorter throws and more precise gates. It shares specification levels with the XR6 Turbo but drive characteristics all its own.

 

So what's the pick of the bunch? We asked new Ford Australia boss Bill Osborne for his choice.

“I liked all the cars I drove but the G6E Turbo is my personal choice. This car is an absolute credit to all the guys who worked to develop it.”

Following the static launch of the FG last month, Osborne predicted the Blue Oval would regain dominance over arch rival Holden in the large family car segment.

“It's something that's not going to be accomplished overnight,” Osborne said at the time. “But I think it [FG] is head and shoulders above our principle competitors in the market.”

 

 

SNAPSHOT

FORD FALCON FG

Price: from $36,490 (XT) to G6E Turbo $54,990

Engine: 4.0L/6-cylinder, 195kW/391Nm; 4.0L/6-cylinder E-Gas, 156kW/371Nm; 4.0L/6-cylinder Turbo, 270kW/533Nm; 5.4L/V8, 290kW/520Nm

Transmission: 5-speed auto (XT, G6; optional XR6); 6-speed auto (G6E, G6E turbo; optional XT, XR6, X8, G6); 6-speed manual (XR6 Turbo, XR8)

Economy: 10.5L/100km (XT, G6), 10.1L/100km (XR6, G6E), 11.7L/100km (XR6 Turbo, G6E Turbo), 14L/100km (XR8 opt 6-speed auto)

More on the FG Falcon...

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 31 comments

  • I have owned Holdens and Fords since able to drive.Current car is an EF Fairmont Ghia and a good car.I have put a deposit on a G6E Turbo and will get it Feb 2010.I have looked at most of the reviews about this car and mainly why I have ordered one.Can’t wait to drive it and to those who carry on about the far more expensive BMW’s,Mercedes and Lexus similar cars - That’s your choice but why knock this exceptional car?

    Ian Flint of Adelaide Posted on 19 December 2009 8:36am
  • jack of Qld you are a danger to the public who should be taken off the roads and put in a cell. shame on you.

    Stone Jack Posted on 27 November 2009 10:08am
  • Ford have always made the superior car but the G6E turbo outstrips all others by a mile. I own a V6 Ford cougar. It’s 9 years old but still drives and handles like a new car.
    As much as I love my car, I can’t wait to trade it in on a G6E turbo and then blow EVERYBODY off ! Safety and fuel-efficiency are important but people buy performance cars for performance and this is where Ford excels.

    donna martin of brisbane, australia Posted on 30 November 2008 5:12pm
  • Yes well i have owned fords from new and im not impressed much at all ,i ended up getting into the lexus range with that unreal v8 that goes really well and gets about 10 litres per 100 and sometimes on a trip gets even more 8 per with the 5 sp auto ,when you drive these cars you suddenly realise how far behind in quality aust is ,i have a soarer 32 as well ,supercharged thats just unreal to drive ,this was a 300,000 buck car and only 800 made when new and the handling is really something ,with the lexus the vteck v8 is just so good and although a 2000 model its still miles ahead of new aust cars ,and not one bit of trouble ,if you ever take the time to drive one you will sure see how much we have been conned .my next is a lexus sports .im just over the tinpot aust cars ,although i think the holden is better built than ford and much better on rough dirt roads ,just my opinion mind you ,i even owned a gtr v spec which was what i call a real sports machine but you needed a petrol bowser and huge bankroll to keep it going ,and lets face it where can you drive obove 200km per hr in aust? it cost me 5 grand in 1 week in fines but luckily not my licence ,it pays to register in a pty ltd i can tell you .

    jack of qld Posted on 29 November 2008 9:32am
  • The only reason why the Holden Commodore is the best selling large car are the fleet sales, the previous company I worked for had over 200 Commodores (standard, Berlina, Calais etc) and were updating them on a three year basis.  So no doubt Holden are pricing their fleet sales more competitively than Ford.

    JH of Sydney Posted on 02 August 2008 10:45pm
  • If you can find an xr6T that actually does 11.5L/100km i’ll drop me undies. The only time I have ever recorded that fuel consumption was on a weeks holiday down the country. General city driving is between 14.8—17.5 L /100km. Never believe Ford manufacturers specs. Gotta say the torque is simply AWSOME though…...
    XR6T Owner

    Col of Perth Posted on 01 August 2008 6:36am
  • I went to Bayford in Epping for the bbq they were holding for the launch of the fg series & I gotta say being a die hard ford man I was not really impressed by the ‘flagship’ xr8. It didnt hold any presence at all!! The G6E however did (which was abit unusual for me being a v8 man). Although I was suprised to find my older cousin (in his 30s) who loves his v8s as well actually asked for a brochure for the G6E!!! I don’t think Ford have hit the mark with the XR8 at all. Apart from that I found the rest of the range ok. Would I buy one if I could afford one? Yep but it would be an xr6 turbo.

    Lee Lemin of Sunbury Posted on 11 July 2008 1:10pm
  • I don’t realy like the look of the new Falcon, but lets be honest…it’s obviously better than the ‘commondoore’  in every respect now; safety, refinement etc.

    Ray Jones of Aus Posted on 02 June 2008 10:35pm
  • Hmmmm took a G6E and a XR6T for a test drive today at my local dealers and must admit I wasnt very impressed at all.  Felt, drove and handled too much like the old BF in my opinion. Taxi companies will buy them by the dozen which should help with sales tho. VE Calais or SS Commodore is still a more exciting and better looking car. That said, it’s still better than the very dated BF falcon

    chris keller Posted on 27 May 2008 7:15pm
  • FG FE FF Who really cares. Still playing catch up to Holden as usual

    Adrian of Perth Posted on 12 May 2008 7:25pm
  • RUBBISH who ever thinks the ford falcon looks the same to the BF when you see the fg out on the street i noticed that the fg made the bf look old and for holden they dont stand a chance holden is crap and ve looks like the bf hiolden lift your game because uve just been beaten

    john stevens Posted on 06 May 2008 3:15pm
  • I have no doubt that this is the best Falcon ever, but that isn’t saying much. This Falcon appears to be a good car (time will tell) although the Australian marketplace has moved on and left both the Falcon and Commodore behind. Small cars from both Europe and Japan are bigger, more powerful, economical and luxurious than they or large cars used to be, and are all most buyers need. For those who need something bigger there are an ever increasing number of light commercials, SUVs, 4WDs and people movers that make more sense and are more desirable to a lot of families. In addition to this the best reason not to buy a Falcon comes from within Ford’s own stable in the form of the Mondeo. This car offers just as much space as a Falcon while being both cheaper to purchase and cheaper to run, especially in diesel form if you do the miles. It will also be less likely to suffer depreciation to the extent that Falcons do. The FG will not be the saviour of Ford that some people seem to think it will be, not because it is a bad car but because it faces tougher competition than any Falcon before it.

    Jason Scott of Sydney Posted on 06 May 2008 4:29am
  • I don’t want to get into the “Falcon is better than Commodore” debate as it has been raging since I was a boy & will never be resolved.  One thing for sure though,  we have family sized Aussie sedans that can hold their head high in any company & getting better.

    For the BMW & Mercedes comparisons you need to consider the difference in purchase price & resale values.  Just out of interest I read somewhere that the FG XR6T is only 0.3 secs slower to 100 kph than a BMW M3 (something) & $115k cheaper!

    Diesel, yes they are more economical but around here we are paying on average 20 c/l more for diesel.  Diesel prices continue to rise quicker than petrol due to increasing world demand.  You then have to add in the additional purchase price for a diesel, say between $3k & $5k and suddenly the pay back period (even with better economy) starts to out strip the time the average new car buyer holds onto their vehicle.

    Support Aussie products, be proud of who we are & were we came from, we have some of the smartest engineers in the world!  Imported doesn’t necessarily mean better.

    Kim C of South Asutralia Posted on 30 April 2008 7:28pm
  • The best Ford ever in Australia?  RUBBISH.

    DGR Posted on 30 April 2008 7:00pm
  • I agree FORD could have made the Falcon considerably different from the BA.Having said that I do like the FG especially in GE guise.I just hope they have fixed the quality issues.

    Stephan.Jelenic Posted on 23 April 2008 9:10pm
  • You cant forget the marteting power of the V8. Ford was short a V8 for 5 or 6 years (i think?) up until the EB. recently Ford has showed less interest in the V8. The FG only has one V8 Model. The V8 can in installed in almost every Holden VE from berlina to Caprice. Recent sales show that The Holden V8 sales are up on what they were several years ago, despite the cost of fuel. Some people do want V8’s not turbo 6’s. It is about having the right product and knowing your market. Ford update your V8

    dave Posted on 17 April 2008 11:25am
  • FG looks & sounds good. My 2000 model stock AU Forte used less than 8L per 100 km on a recent trip to Melbourne 123;3000+km in 40 hrs]. City driving uses under 11L per 100 km. I hope the FG does as well. Given the price of fuel, I would not like to see my old banger getting towards 9L like the new 5 series & E classes. I hope Ford looks at alternative fuels rather than trotting out a grubby old diesel. Scarey, the price of diesel these days.

    Ken English of Cardwell Posted on 17 April 2008 8:50am
  • The reality is that with petrol reaching $1.50 per litre and $2 per litre not far away, the Falcon and Commodore will rapidly approach a point where their running costs will kill them off (like the Dinasaur). In stop start traffic use, both cars average closer to 14 litres per 100Km and try towing a loaded trailer, caravan or boat to see what it does to fuel consumption. The new generation of common rail diesel engines used in some of the current SUV’s are up to 30% more economical under similar driving conditions and it seems that neither Ford nor GM are prepared to go this route.

    Toyota seems to be following a similar path, as it also does not offer any diesels except in its larger 4WD vehicles and these are fairly agricultural engines when compared to the diesels available from the European manufacturers. In reality, Japanese diesels are a generation or more behind their European counterparts in fuel consumption and power output per similar capacity.

    A 2200 Kg diesel such as the BMW X5 is around 15 percent more fuel efficient than a 1600 Kg Falcon or Holden. No wonder Australians are downsizing in droves to more fuel efficient vehicles that (as a consequence) also hold their resale value far better.

    The Falcon and Holden are excellent cars on the open road and ideal for Australian conditions…..it is a pity that their engine options belong to a by-gone era.

    Peter saunders of Cassilis Posted on 17 April 2008 7:53am
  • Dave - yeah it has always amazed me that the BA series Falcons were so much better than the commondore but Australians still bought more commondores? Maybe if holden were honest and called themselves GM it would stop Australians feeling obliged to buy an (cough cough) Australian car. Or it could simply be great advertising….holdens marketing team do deserve a pat on the back.

    AJ of Brisbane Posted on 16 April 2008 4:53pm
  • The VE was never a catch up job.  Holden does not need to play catch up, when it is already number 1. Where are the FG V8 models? Hope the FG does well, it loooks good if you are after a nice 6. Should help the falcon regain the number 2 spot.

    dave Posted on 16 April 2008 2:05pm
  • I think that DAZ left this bit out - “And it definately won’t take much for it to be better than the commondore…..”

    AJ of Brisbane Posted on 16 April 2008 12:41pm
  • Paul French, I hope you haven’t actually seen the car in the flesh after making that comment that it’s the same car, because if you have stood next to it I would be really worried about your eyesight.

    You don’t need to put ridiculous wheel arches on a car to make it a new car. I have seen it at the motorshow and it’s a brilliant looking car in the flesh, inside and out, and hearing about how it drives I can’t wait to test it out.

    Bec Posted on 16 April 2008 10:20am
  • It wouldnt take much to make it better than any of the other fords

    Daz Posted on 15 April 2008 6:47pm
  • The VE was a billion dollar catch up job, and was only ever ahead of the BF because the Falcon was getting old. Now, on a more stringent budget, Ford has absolutely outclassed Holden. Great job guys!! Now export it and capitalise off the poorly built, boring American cars.

    Daniel of Sydney Posted on 15 April 2008 6:05pm
  • To Paul Fenech from Sydney - Sounds to me like you aren’t even going to give the new Falcon a chance!
    You have sure bought into the holden propoganda though….Seeing as the 6yr old design, series 3 BF Falcon was reported as only falling marginally short on the latest VE I am assuming that most of the 1 billion dollars must have been on advertising.

    AJ of Brisbane Posted on 15 April 2008 4:39pm
  • Ive been awaiting Fords saviour, but with great disapointment. Its a touch up of the last model and has had the under bonnet components tricked up to look a bit better than the previous models. This is a disater for Ford Australia. They must think that the Australian public are silly. We can can see that its the same car.

    Good on you Holden for spending the big bucks on the VE. I think that this car is still better than Ford’s ‘NEW’  release. I’ll be buying the series 2 VE thanks.

    Paul Fenech of Sydney Posted on 15 April 2008 3:15pm
  • The BA and BF Falcons (like the VE Commodore) before it appeared, on paper, to be able to make for a moderately interesting drive.  In reality they turned out to be heavy, soggy, and, well, boring!  Of course, nobody in the media would dare admit to that…  I’m somehow not convinced the FG will be any different…

    Michael Sheehan of Bayswater, VIC Posted on 15 April 2008 2:19pm
  • Ford and Holden really need to look at their engine range. They are years behind the Europeans and Japanese with refinement and economy. For example, look at the BMW and the Mercedes large sedans (apples for apples rear wheel drive comparison) simply in terms of fuel consumption. The 5 series and E class both use well under 9L per 100km for their entry level 6 cylinder models. The Falcon and Commodore both use over 10. Then look at the performance models - BMW is still under 10 combined, while the Mercedes creeps towards 11. Falcon and Commodore are pushing 14 - 15. That is absolutely pathetic. If the local manufacturers have no intention of refining their existing engines, the least they could do is offer a diesel range.

    Pierre of Perth Posted on 15 April 2008 1:35pm
  • I have been bagging the upcoming falcon for a while.  Looks like i might have to eat my words.  Time will tell though.  I cant help but feel Holden and Toyota are hjolding back on specs and extra competetive pricing at the moment.  At over 36k starting price, Falcon is the most expensive starter in this 3 way tussle.  Also, I wonder how fuel consumption will go in “real world” driving.  Aurion is very sharp in this area.  And finally, will the amazing reductions in NVH be lasting? Top build quality and Falcon dont normally belong in the same sentence.  Time will tell…..

    Sam of Cairns Posted on 15 April 2008 11:57am
  • Great comments Frank and i agree
    It looks great on paper and from reviews its a winner now it just need support from the public. Ford needs to export it to make some good money.
    Well done Ford.

    steve of Brisbane Posted on 15 April 2008 11:55am
  • Okay Australia, now it’s up to you. I can’t wait to sample one of these in the flesh.

    The G6E Turbo or XR6 Turbo specs look fantastic with amazing 11.5l/100km yet bags of power and tourque.

    I think the cars will look much better in person but some of the photos are great.

    So far both the national newspaper motoring writers have been gushing in thier comments so hopefully this bodes well for the FG.

    We need local manufacturing because of the jobs involved and we needed competetive cars to keep the rivalry up. Hopefully Holden will come back with a counter puch in the VE II so that interest is focused on these fantastic large cars.

    No one else in the world has such vehicles, go the exports !

    Frank of Coffs Harbour Posted on 14 April 2008 9:13am
Read all 31 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics