Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Alfa Romeo Giulietta QV: review

  • By Chris Riley
  • News Limited Community Newspapers
  • image

    The car sits well on the road and cruises easily and frugally in top gear, with plenty of torque to keep it there.

Chris Riley road tests and reviews the Alfa Romeo Giulietta QV.

You've got to hand it the Italians, they know a thing or two about style. Nowhere is this more evident than in Alfa Romeo's new Giulietta, a replacement for the aging 147. It simply oozes the stuff.

VALUE

Priced from $41,990, this car certainly has what it takes to steal some hearts from Volkswagen.

DESIGN

Here's hoping the Giulietta breaks the mould, that it proves to be every bit as robust as the Volkswagen Golf with which it competes. The name Giulietta is a borrowed from Alfa's heyday, a series of compact, sedan, coupe and convertibles built over a decade during the 50s and 60s.

Unlike its namesake however this one is a five-door hatch, but like the 156 before the rear doors feature concealed door handles, giving it the appearance of a sportier three-door. Finished in white with elegant 18 inch charcoal alloys, our test vehicle bore more than a passing resemblance to the smaller Mito with its beak like grille and wide-eyed stare.

The interior, with its metal gear knob and prominent, large round climate controls is a work of art. Standard features are generous. The Cloverleaf model gets 10mm lower sports suspension, sports seats in mircofibre and leather with red stitching, Bose sound, tinted windows, red brake callipers and dark titanium 18 inch spoke alloys.

TECHNOLOGY

Giulietta comes in two guises, powered by two different engines, a 125kW 1.4 or 173kW 1.7-litre four - both of them turbocharged. Our test vehicle, the top of the line Giulietta QV clover leaf edition reminded me strongly of the oft lamented 147 GTA - a real ball tearer of a car.

The figures are similar too. The GTA's 3.2-litre V6 produced 184kW of power at 6200 revs and 300Nm of torque at 4800 revs. In comparison the Giulietta's 1750 TBI engine delivers 173kW of power at 5500 revs and 340Nm of torque at 1900 revs in dynamic mode.

The two share a similar top speed of about 240km/h, but the GTA was still a little quicker from 0 to 100km/h, at 6.3 seconds versus 6.8. The good news however is that the QV uses just 7.6 litres per 100km - the GTA used twice that figure on a good day.

SAFETY

Alfa's DNA dynmaic ride control is standard, letting you choose between normal, dynamic and all-weather modes. In dynamic mode extra torque is available lower in the rev range and the electronic stability system is less intrusive, the throttle is also more responsive, the steering becomes heavier and the electronic diff is activated.

The Electronic Q2 differential and the Vehicle Dynamic Control are standard on this model, along with six airbags and a five-safety rating.

DRIVE

Jumping into the car for the first time we discovered it has the same feel and propensity for spinning the front wheels, but none of the GTA's heaviness or awkwardness. The 1.7-litre engine is hooked up to a six-speed manual that is generallty easy to use but baulks at going into first occasionally.

The car sits well on the road and cruises easily and frugally in top gear, with plenty of torque to keep it there. Slipping it into dynamic mode, you can feel the difference immediately, as the front wheels fitht to maintain contact with the road. You can drive it hard or you can drive it easily, it's a car for both occasions.

VERDICT

We love driving Alfas but take comfort in the knowledge that at the end of the day we can take them back. If only they were more reliable.

ALFA ROMEO GIULIETTA QV

Price: $41,990
Warranty: 3 years, 100,000km, roadside assist
Resale: 65%
Service interval: 20,000km or 12 months
Economy: 7.6 l/100km; 177g/km CO2
Safety: six airbags, ESC, ABS, EBD, EBA, TC.
Crash rating: 5 star
Engine: 173kW/340Nm 1.75-litre turbo-petrol
Transmission: Six-speed manual
Body: 5-door, 5 seats
Dimensions: 4351 (L); 1798mm (W); 1465mm (H); 2634mm (WB)
Weight: 1320kg.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 14 comments

  • When will journalists, and I use the word carefully, ever think for themselves. The Mito has been around for over 2 years and is running at around 1% warranty claims .. numbers most car makers only dream of..  I have a 150 tbi ti and with 25,000k on it cost $436 is servicing..  total.. perhaps the writers need to catch up on the past 10years…

    Colin Rawson of Melbourne Posted on 12 March 2012 4:01pm
  • Ask any aftermarket warranty company which make and model they hate the most due to the number of claims and costs and it is the VW Golf.  Journalist bag the Alfa, but if you look carefully at all the articles they are a re-hash from one article that one Journalist did originally.  So if he bags the car they all do. Go and drive an Alfa, then you will know how good they are!

    Brad of canberra Posted on 14 February 2012 1:34pm
  • The writer was 100% correct on every point bar one, Alfa’s are reliable but please don’t let this get out, I love the fact they are not the norm! smile I have owned 3 alfas in 7 years, first my 147 GTA - beast of a car, loved it to death and used to race it at wakefield and blew away subies, mercs, bmw’s and in the wet. Just learn how to drive front wheel drives, power power power always! Then I bought the Spider 3.2..lovely car in every way..just no room, but handled like nothing else! Now I have the cloverleaf Giulietta..like a grown up GTA..got it last week and love it!! smile Took it to the track and once you let it loose…oh how much fun it is! I’ve been smiling for 7 years now and continue too! But to all who consider an Alfa, please learn how to drive, these are drivers cars! Not play things..and thats what I love about Alfa smile

    Stuart Lawson of Sydney Posted on 11 February 2012 9:43pm
  • Really am getting tired of the stereotype of poor quality from people who have never really driven Alfas. I have owned 2 Alfas and 2 BMWs over the past 16 years and will challenge anyone on the question of Alfa quality versus BMWs. My Alfa 166 was a dream with absolutely no faults for the 4 years I owned it. Can’t even remember the number of times strangers in the street wanted to look inside or sit in it. I have driven my 159 Ti for 4 years now and it has been immaculate. No problems whatsoever. Compare this to my BMW 525 which was an absolute dog in terms of electrical reliability and so uncomfortable I had to get a chiropractor to fix my back from sitting in its uncomfortable seats. I will never buy a German car again. Looking forward to the new Alfa Giulietta once the TCT Diesel is available here. The test drive just reinforced my past experiences in driving Alfas. Great performance, great technology, great interior and a real head turner. Based on my experience I really don’t know how Chris Riley can justify the last comment “If only they were more reliable”.

    Joe of Sydney Posted on 07 February 2012 8:25pm
  • What a lazy piece of writing. I wonder if the man even really drove the vehicle. Alfa reliability has not been an issue for quite some time now. Perhaps Mr Riley would care to let us know what occurred during his supposed “test drive” that provoked him to make such a comment. Or is it just a lazy regurgitation of things past?

    Sick of Lazy Journos of Austrlia Posted on 31 January 2012 11:29pm
  • Good news, Chris. Alfas are as reliable as any other car. My Brera is almost 3 years old and as tight as a drum. The worst problem I’ve had with it is a puncture, in every other way it has been 100% reliable. This whole Alfa thing is a hang over from the 70s but these days everybody builds cars the same way and the Guilietta sits on a brand new global platform. You can see the benefits of global platforms with the MiTo, which is built on the same platform as the Opel Corsa and a raft of Fiats. No-one bags Corsa for being unreliable so there is no reason to believe a MiTo would be, either. I would not hesitate to own another Alfa and, realistically, the Brera has probably spoiled every other brand for me in the future. e.g. I test drove a Megane RS250 and whilst it was much faster than the Brera and would probably be brilliant on a track, I didn’t think it was nearly as much fun, nor as comfortable. Neither would it handle peak hour traffic with anything like the aplomb of the Brera. Yeah, I think I’m stuck with Alfa Romeo for the rest of my driving life. I can think of worse fates and will possibly buy a Giulietta this year.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 23 January 2012 9:37am
  • Never Ever Own another Euro car for the foreseeable future again, massive headache with the Citroen C4. 5 warranty claim, unreasonably high service (normal: circa $300-500+, Major: $2,000+), bits fell off while driving, engine ceased a month after a service (dealership log book). Trade in for a Japanese car after 2yrs of having enough and nothing has to be done to it beside from regular maintenance.

    phuong of act Posted on 17 January 2012 4:08pm
  • The funny thing about reputations, they are normally right.  Whilst I don’t think VW reliability is anything to go by , they have got to be better than Alfas. Combining very complex electronics systems and Italians is a disaster waiting to happen (owning an Italian motorcycle and having worked on European cars before, I can make this comment). Unlike Johnno & John who are obviously apologists for the brand, I think there are too many stories in the media about what great cars (driving and looks) without any warnings about the reliability, servicing costs etc. Just like people who smoke a pack a day and live to be 100, some people buy an Alfa Romeo that is reliable and long lasting. If they are so reliable why don’t you see any 10 year old Alfa Romeos on the road that are not driven by enthusiasts (who forgive their faults)?  If you want flair, passion, performance and character, maybe Alfa Romeo is the way to go, however if you want primarily a cheap, reliable easy to service car (with some style and driving pleasure) which will last 10 years, bypass Alfas.

    Jason of Sydney Posted on 16 January 2012 3:14pm
  • I also wish that journalists would stop it. Alfa’s have been perfectly reliable for more than 15 years as my 2001 156 can attest to. VW’s? Ask anyone who owns one as to their “robustness”!!!

    Joe of Melbourne Posted on 16 January 2012 8:51am
  • Having owned an Alfa 156, I agree with the concerns over reliability. Mine had problems its whole life, needing a new transmission after 3 years, fuel gauge never worked, lights worked intermittently etc. Loved driving it and would consider an Alfa again, but could never recommend it to a friend. Currently own a golf as does the wife. Mine is great, no problems, my wifes car has had plenty of problems including needing expensive gearbox work just out of warranty (which VW kindly paid for). Servicing is expensive but VW still far better than an Alfa.  Japanese cars are the cheapest to own and best built.

    Craig of sydney Posted on 13 January 2012 2:41pm
  • I to am very sick of these reliability comments. I have had 2 spiders in the last 9 years and other than an issue with the retractable roof on the first which Alfa fixed free of charge, I have never had the slightest problem. I found they are great cars to drive, won’t go past them now! Alfa or VW? No contest!

    John Ponturo of Brisbane QLD Posted on 13 January 2012 8:57am
  • I have the current model Golf 118 and it has to go back in to the service department for at least a week to sort a camshaft tensioner issue .. engine sounds like a chain saw on start up. After only 22K km… absolutely appalling. If only the Golf was a more reliable car! And that is not to mention the awful NVH issues after just 5K km. Disgraceful for a “premium” brand. If only the Alfa dealer network was up to par with Volkswagen but definitely yes Chris, get over the Alfa reliability thing..

    John of Melbourne Posted on 11 January 2012 8:13pm
  • Errrrrrrrrr, being as reliable as a Golf?It is a step BACKWARDS!
    Get back to us when VW gets itself off the bottom of owner satisfaction and no braindamage ownership, DSG is garbage as are lots of software issues and VERY expensive service/parts
    If you meant reliable you mean Japanese, Corolla, Lancer etc

    DavidZ of AUS Posted on 11 January 2012 7:25am
  • Chris - get over the reliability thing. Sure, some cars are going to have problems, however every manufacture has them. Every JD power survey from Germany to England over the last 5 years has ALFA either better or comparable than its Euro competitors. The biggest problem for Alfa are the journalists and lay man whom keep trying to perpetuate the reliability issues of the 70’s, 80’ and to a lesser extent the 90’s.

    Johnno of Sydney Posted on 10 January 2012 10:04pm
Read all 14 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links