Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Water-fuel Honda Clarity turns the tide

image Powered by hydrogen . . . Honda's new FCX Clarity. Photo Gallery

Honda FCX Clarity points to petrol-free future.

Honda's new zero-emission, hydrogen fuel cell car rolled off the production line this week to a star-studded greeting. The FCX Clarity, which runs on hydrogen and electricity, emits only water and none of the noxious fumes believed to induce global warming.

It is also two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid and three times that of a standard gasoline-powered car.

Honda expects to lease about 70 units, principally in Hollywood, this year and about 200 units within three years. The car is available on a three-year lease costing about $600 a month, including maintenance and accident insurance.

Among the first customers are actress Jamie Lee Curtis and filmmaker husband Christopher Guest, actress Laura Harris, film producer Ron Yerxa, as well as businessmen Jon Spallino and Jim Salomon.

“It's so smooth,” says Harris, who played villainess Marie Warner on the hit TV drama 24. “It's like a future machine ... but it's not.”

Yerxa says he's excited to show off the garnet-coloured, four-door sedan and says there is plenty of interest in the car.

The FCX Clarity has a range of about 435km per tank with hydrogen consumption equivalent to 3.1 litres per 100km, according to the carmaker. The 1630kg vehicle can reach speeds up to 160km/h. It is powered by a fuel-cell stack that uses an electrochemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen to convert chemical energy into electricity to power the motor.

It is an improvement of its previous-generation fuel cell vehicle, the FCX, from 2005. A breakthrough in the design of the fuel cell stack, the unit that powers the car's motor, allowed engineers to lighten the body, expand the interior and increase efficiency, Honda says. The fuel cell draws on energy synthesised through a chemical reaction between hydrogen gas and oxygen in the air, and a lithium-ion battery pack provides extra power.

Honda has been working on fuel cell systems since 1989.

It was the first manufacturer to receive commercial certification for a fuel cell car and has 10 previous-generation fuel cell vehicles in experimental use around the world.

However, the company's short-term focus is continued development of its petrol-electric hybrid vehicles.

Honda Australia senior director Lindsay Smalley has called on governments to offer incentives for hybrids.

“As with any new technology, it will take time for hybrids to be widely accepted,” he said.

“Honda believes abolishing federal import tariffs and cutting stamp duty and registration on hybrid vehicles would greatly assist their presence on our roads and give consumers a wider choice of hybrid motoring options.”

Honda was the first to sell hybrids here with the Insight in 2000. It now sells the Civic Hybrid, but another hybrid vehicle is expected next year.

This new car is smaller and is expected to cost about two-thirds of the Civic price, making it the cheapest hybrid on offer in Australia.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 17 comments

  • Hydrogen cell powered vehicles with hydrogen coming from solar/wind/tidal powered industrial plants ... the only way forward. Enough talking, let's start the conversion. We have to overcome opposition from vested interests!

    Robert Reed of Melbourne Posted on 23 August 2010 9:49am
  • Last time I checked Lithium was a known carcinogen, It may be zero emission but the technology to make the car is questionable at best where do all those end of life batteries go, landfill mostly, not to mention the emplacement costs would be huge. We have plenty of gas reserves what about CNG its low emission and compatible with existing technology.

    Dirk of Regional Qld Posted on 25 August 2009 10:32pm
  • The car may be zero emission, but where does the hydrogen come from. It would be produced by emmission producing industrial plants.The much simpler battery car would be a much less expensive proposition and also zero emmission as far as the car is concerned. The infrastructure required already exists to a great extent and any additional infrastructure required would be much cheaper and safer than hydrogen.

    Gerry Muirhead. of Brisbane. Posted on 14 April 2009 3:17pm
  • this is some good information thanks

    diy hydrogen of diy hydrogen Posted on 14 March 2009 1:09am
  • "Once again, Honda has shown a 'green' car doesn't have to be ugly!" - are we looking at the same picture, Paul?

    Tim Posted on 22 December 2008 9:04am
  • Brasil is doing well in alcool/etanol production. Sofisticated engines are always delayed here, but I believe it's the future.

    João Marques of Brasil Posted on 05 July 2008 11:33pm
  • Further to my earlier comment.......Below are links to sites with some very good information on the pros and cons of the hydrogen powered cars and other alternatives. The Wikipedia site gives a very good insight into the whole hydrogen powered vehicle dispute that seems to be developing. After doing some quick research I think it's more about the economic advantages to the major players. Who's backing who at this stage for long term gain. The more cars, the more fuel, the more taxes. The market being targeted is the biggest market and the one that is going to give the maximum return on investment. That market is us the general public. From a business point of view to all who benefit that makes sense. Why not target heavy/mass transport vehicles, eg. shipping, trucking, aircraft, trains etc. A lot less infastructure needed. The cost will still be passed onto us the consumer but I'll take the risk of guessing that cost would be cheaper than the possibility that we may all be forced into buying hydrogen powered cars if there is no other alternative. The following is taken from Wikipedia........More recently, The Wall Street Journal reported that "Top executives from General Motors Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp. Tuesday expressed doubts about the viability of hydrogen fuel cells for mass-market production in the near term and suggested their companies are now betting that electric cars will prove to be a better way to reduce fuel consumption and cut tailpipe emissions on a large scale." In addition, Ballard Power Systems, a leading developer of hydrogen vehicle technology, pulled out of the Hydrogen vehicle business in late 2007. Research Capital analyst Jon Hykawy concluded that Ballard saw the industry going nowhere and said: "In my view, the hydrogen car was never alive. The problem was never could you build a fuel cell that would consume hydrogen, produce electricity, and fit in a car. The problem was always, can you make hydrogen fuel at a price point that makes any sense to anybody. And the answer to that to date has been no." Replacement of the existing extensive gasoline fuel station infrastructure would cost a half trillion U.S. dollars in the United States alone. It seems that there are better alternatives to the hydrogen powered cars and still reduce fossil fuel emissions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_vehicle#Hydrogen_production_cost http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/business/worldbusiness/17fuelcell.html http://berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/17_fuels.shtml

    Brian Mitchell of Caloundra Posted on 04 July 2008 12:03pm
  • The following is an excert from Daily News-Los Angeles. 26-6-2008. 'Los Angeles City Council member Bill Rosendahl and Graeme Sweeney, Executive Vice President for Shell Future Fuels and CO2 were among those who participated in today's dedication ceremony of Chevrolet's Project Driveway. The station is the third Shell Hydrogen vehicle refueling stations in the U.S.' Hopefully as more fuel cell powered vehicles end up on our roads we will have access to refuelling stations other than those that will provided by the likes of Shell. Unfortunately, I don't think so. Who can afford to set up new station sites. Shell/Coles, Caltex/Woolworths etc. already have the sites. They just need to change pumps etc. So who will control the price we pay. Can the Federal Government introduce laws now so that the price we pay won't be dictated by profit driven large companies. Bring on the 'Zero-emmission vehicles'. I'm sure we all agree that we need them for environmental reasons. With technology improving and mass production the vehicles will become cheaper hopefully! Will we still pay more for our fuel than its real worth and will it be cheaper than petrol or diesel. ??????????

    Brian Mitchell of Caloundra Posted on 04 July 2008 10:03am
  • Great car and great technology. This is one of the first fuel cell cars, it's not a hybrid. Hybrid are cars which still have a conventional combustion engine combined with an electric motor...that's why it's called a hybrid. This car has no combustion engine anymore. Only an electric motor, getting the power through an battery, which itself gets the energy of the fuel cell. why only available on lease? Because most probably no normal person can afford to buy that car.

    Daniel Stromski of Hamburg, Germany Posted on 02 July 2008 4:34am
  • my guess on the leasing is so as many (celebs) can try it out as possible, before being launched to a wider market. but also to ensure the cars are maintained in peak condition while they're in a public testing phase. I like the design a whole lot more than the Prius or the typical boring Honda designs, it's much more reminiscent of the current model Citroen sedan.

    Kris Posted on 02 July 2008 12:36am
  • Ok well done Honda, BUT what about a car for the family. I have a disabled child with a wheelchair and need lots of luggage room e.g stationwagon size. But I want to be green too and no one is developing a family car , sorry a realistic family car (large) and a forrester doesn't count too small and the territory not big enough in the back. So come on you car companies what about it ?????????????

    Terry Corby of Albury/Wodonga Posted on 01 July 2008 11:25pm
  • Once again, Honda has shown a 'green' car doesn't have to be ugly! This is certainly the way of the future. This is what the government should be investing in rather than Hybrid vehicles. Let's make Australia a leader in Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology!

    Paul Regel Posted on 01 July 2008 7:04pm
  • It would be nice to think that the government is willing to lose money on fuel excise & GST.

    Alec of Bundaberg Qld Posted on 01 July 2008 5:29pm
  • dave, I believe that they will only be going to Hollywood because they have a hydrogen refuelling centre there. To my knowledge, there is no such beast in Australia? I'm happy to be corrected if this information is inaccurate. Cheers

    Simon Grounds of Brisbane Posted on 01 July 2008 5:08pm
  • This looks promising, zero emission is just what the environment needs. I guess just like any new technology, it takes time to be widely accepted. But if both govt and manufacturers are willing to speed things up, I am sure with current fuel price, consumers will warm up to this concept really fast. If it is available here in Australia, and at a reasonable price, I will sure to acquire one. I am all for zero emission, not only it benefits the environment, it also benefits us.

    Jason Posted on 01 July 2008 4:54pm
  • Dave, where would you go to fill it up in Australia? There are Hydrogen filling stations in some parts of the US, Japan and Germany. Outside of those areas and you're in trouble. It's not the great enviromental masterpiece they would make you assume though, it takes 1.6 times the energy to create Hydrogen than is released when converted to water with Oxygen so all these vehicles will do is use more Power Station derived energy than we use at the moment.

    Andrew of Adelaide Posted on 01 July 2008 4:05pm
  • Looks better than many new hondas. Why are they only available on lease? Regardless of tariff and taxes, Honda should bring some to Australia, let us decide for ourselves. The details look great, look forward to reading more about this car and others like it.

    dave Posted on 26 June 2008 11:34am
Read all 17 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links