Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

The best bowser beaters

  • By Paul Pottinger
  • Carsguide
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image Lean and green: the Toyota Prius.

You don’t have to sacrifice style, comfort and fun to save money on fuel bills.

We live in strange times — or at least under a Federal Government that has some strange ideas about things on four wheels.

A big, heavy luxury SUV cops less tax than a more efficient, cleaner imported car. Diesel is less expensive to produce than petrol yet costs more at the pump than premium unleaded. Diesel cars are more fuel efficient than petrol equivalents, yet continue to command a price premium.

Perhaps the only surprise is that Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan hasn't stuck an import duty on the cars we present here for being too efficient. It would be in keeping with the logic of his budget.

All cars listed here offer official or claimed fuel consumption of less than five litres per 100km (56 miles per gallon by the old measure) in ideal conditions.

Fiat 500 1.3 JTD Pop

$25,990

4.2L/100km

Such was the demand for diesel that Fiat Australia has expanded its availability to the top of the 500 range's Lounge trim.

If the existing Pop lacks the Lounge level of spec, it has all its desirability and efficiency. In fact, official figures place this immensely cute and quite practical re-born 500 as the most fuel-efficient auto on the Australian market.

The smallest of the Fiat Group's turbo diesel, the 1.3 is a shade laggedly but winds up nicely to provide a cruisability that belies itscapacity.

The DINK's city car par excellence: if the 500 doesn't raise a smile, then it's you that's wrong.

Citroen C3 HDi

$23,990

4.4L/100km

While the French marque's reputation for reliability gets nowhere near Japanese surety, Citroen does chic in a way that, shall we say, Toyota doesn't.

That Prius-equalling consumption is achieved with 65kW/215Nm 1.6-litre turbo diesel that utterly erases the petrol C3s for efficiency and performance.

It typifies the “downsizing but upspeccing” paradigm that has seen sales of light and small cars overwhelm the “Falcodores”.

While we do try to be enlightened, we gotta to say that if the C3 is chic, it's also for chicks. Sorry.

Toyota Prius II

$37,400

4.4L/100km

The world's most successful automotive marketing exercise, one which has caused denuded whole forests for paper devoted to its praise, the Prius is synonymous with lean and green motoring.

Another paradox is that being as visually appealing as a chunk of cheddar has enhanced rather than damaged its appeal. It's distinctive and that's what counts. What's the point of making an eco-statement if no one knows you're making one?

The Prius comes into its own in commuter traffic, where the constant throttle needed to extract the best return from diesel is hard to maintain. If anodyne to drive in the Toyota fashion, it's by no means awful with quite responsive and reasonably direct handling. Too dear, though.

Fiat Punto 1.3 JTD

$25,490

4.5L/100km

Rather more practical than the 500, the larger Fiat achieves its frugal consumption via a robotised six-speed sequential manual; one that does without a clutch pedal and provides an automatic drive mode, minimising the emission spikes that occur when gear changing in a conventional manual.

If you can do without the rear seat headroom and don't mind joining a queue, take the 500. Fiat have invested too much in this car for it to flop qualitively.

The Punto's interior does not inspire the same confidence.

Audi A3 1.9 TDIe

$38,900

diesel 4.5L/100km

This hugely efficient and incredibly clean (119g of CO2/km) turbo diesel is absolutely a Prius rival, both in terms of its figures and mad pricing.

An eco-conscience can come with a considerable cost but, in this instance, at least you get a decent badge for your splodge (never you mind that it's all Volkswagen Golf underneath).

We've yet to test this particular car — that comes in a few weeks — but on the basis of other Golf/A3 diesels, the 77kW/250Nm provided by this unit promises to make being green slightly easier to bear.

Citroen C4 SX HDi

$30,990

diesel 4.5L/100km

Again you've got to go for the sequential/robotised transmission to realise this figure from the 1.6-litre 80kW/240Nm diesel — which is probably no hardship given how most of you bleat about having to change gears for yourself. Harden the frack up, Australia ...

Anyway, this version of Peugeot's 307 in a smarter suit is a cleverly-designed number that manages to afford more usable passenger space than certain bigger cars.

You'll not quickly tire of instruments and features that initially appear quirky but are indeed highly practical.

Though not the most composed drive on RTA roads and never in danger of providing excitement, the C4 would probably be the family pick from those here.

Honda Civic Hybrid

$32,990

4.6L/100km

This Honda would run the Citroen close, though.

A 1.3-litre petrol-electric hybrid that's much cheaper than the Prius, the Civic attracts infinitely less attention just by virtue of the fact it looks like a common-or-garden Civic, rather than an advertisement for itself.

A good but almost forgotten thing, we'll be revisiting the hybrid Honda in depth in the coming weeks.

Hyundai i30 SX CRDi

$21,490

4.7L/100km

Carsguide's Car of 2007, in case we haven't mentioned it recently, at least with the $1300 safety pack that includes stability control and the full complement of airbags.

With its responsive 85kW/2455Nm 1.6-litre diesel, the i30 is a spacious, European-designed hatch that dispels any lingering notions about Korean cars. If such doubts do linger, there's always its five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty.

Steering feel and standard rubber leave something to be desired, but we liked it. So will you.

 

What do you think about hybrid cars, bio fuels and all things green? Have your say.

 

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 26 comments

  • Gen Y.......youv'e made a wise choice!! that 308 diesel is a cracking car.....shame we are being ripped off with diesel prices in Australia! but other than that you have brilliant car for the money.

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 21 May 2008 5:14am
  • elephino.......if you buy a one year old Falcon then depreciation becomes less relevant in that equation, the servicing intervals are in favour of the falcon...(Falcon e-gas is every 15,000 Ks and from memory the Yaris was sightly more expensive and every 10,000 Ks) , tyres are obviously a bit dearer for the Falcon BUT you will probably need to spend a small fortune on chiropractor's to fix up the back problems after driving in that cramped Yaris with it's rock hard suspension.......other than that it's a matter of personal taste and ability......what i mean by that is, some drivers don't feel confident driving and parking large cars but if you appreciate comfort and can reverse a car without "freaking out ", then in my personal experience an LPG large car will be just as cheap if not cheaper to run that a Yaris or similar........cheers!

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 21 May 2008 5:07am
  • I looked at changing our ageing Commodore for a smaller more efficient car like a Honda Jazz, but instead spent about $350 (after the rebates) getting the Commodore converted to gas - works out roughly to be costing the equivalent of around 5.5 to 6L of petrol per 100km - bargain! Considering the depreciation costs on the newer more efficient cars, (including battery replacements), and the energy costs of actually making the cars and getting them to Oz, I think it is not only the most efficient but also the most green option available too.

    Nick Martin of WA Posted on 20 May 2008 8:47pm
  • I dont understand why LPG cars are not included in this round up. From the figures for all of the so called economical cars my 3ltr navara on LPG at < $10- per 100km is cheaper to run and operate.

    John of Colac Posted on 20 May 2008 7:19pm
  • Carl, this question is genuine curiosity not in any way for or against your vehicle choice. What is the difference in non-fuel running costs between the Yaris and Falcon? I definitely agree that showing the non-combined fuel consumption figures will be sort of good. Of course, if someone is truly interested in the fuel consumption they would at least check the separate figures which just about all cars have available in the brochures. If nothing else, the combined figure leans too far to the country driving and that's ignoring the actual test itself.

    elephino Posted on 20 May 2008 2:51pm
  • Go Daniel Phillips in the Datsun! Rocket launcher that is! I have the Pug 308 XTE HDI, 2L diesel. Unbelievable power for economy of 6.8L combined. Happy with that! This is the car that can still put you back in your seat and yet doing something good for the environment. I suggest you test drive this if you in the market for anything 35 - 50k range. It really is a disgrace that we have slim pickings in the fuel efficient range. Technology is out there and yet we are well behind the ball with where we should be right now with driving technology. I want a flying hydrogen car already!

    Gen Y of Sydney Posted on 20 May 2008 1:44pm
  • Daniel Philips, I've heard a bit about the hydrogen on demand system even seen on U-tube a filipino guy that claims he to produce enough hydrogen to run it only on hydrogen without anything else........before people risk their warranties on a 2008 model we need people like yourself to spread the word as much as possible on how this works because governments can't TAX "hydrogen on demand" so they will ignore this technology for as long as it stays underground as it seems to be up until now!!! So please if what you say is true keep spreading the word until it becomes mainsteam!!!!

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 20 May 2008 10:57am
  • Seant, Vehicles such as the Audi A3 TDI, VW Golf TDI, Citroen C4 HDI and Peugeot 308 HDI are of a similar size to the Toyota Prius, and achieve similar economy figures. Peugeot will be releasing an electric-hybrid version of the 308 HDi diesel in 2010, with an expected fuel consumption of 3.4L/100km and producing only 90g CO2/km. Diesel is typically priced similarly to premium (95 or 98 octane) unleaded petrol, which is required by many modern high-compression petrol engines.

    Wordsmith Posted on 20 May 2008 6:27am
  • Oh i forgot to say that later this year all car makers will be forced to show city and highway cycles separately and that will really show up the Achilles heal of petrol hybrids compared to the diesel hybrids!

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 20 May 2008 5:44am
  • omn1 potent...........i agree with you totally, I'm currently driving an e-gas Falcon and am loving it!!!!!! i sold the Yaris that misled me with it's claimed fuel consumption and bought a 12 month old Falcon with 13000ks for less than that uncomfortable and tiny Yaris and the big comfortable Falcon costs me $2 less every 100ks in the city and $4 dollars less on the highway cycle.......I'll never buy a Toyota again!!!! i wouldn't buy a petrol hybrid but would definitely buy an LPG hybrid.....makes sense to use the cheapest fuel in a car that's supposed to save you money.....diesel would be my second choice because although we are being ripped off in Australia with diesel prices it is more efficient than that petrol guzzler in the Prius / Yaris!!!!

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 20 May 2008 5:28am
  • Something that I am very surprised about, is that long range truckies have been using a small amount of LPG into the diesel/air mixture, and getting really fantastic results for some time - and this still is not being used in diesel cars. There is a company in Queensland called DieselGas technologies that has been fitting these conversions to 4WD vehicles like Patrols, Navaras, 300 TDi Discoveries and so forth, that has been getting great results in power improvement and economy. Based on this, it makes a lot of sense to to have an electric / diesel/ LPG hybrid, that could feasibly turn a 1.6 litre vehicle into having a 2.4 Litre / 100km economy rating. The other way to get this economy, is to use HHO gas, created by electrolysis, straight into the carburettor - something already being done with both diesels and more often petrol motor vehicles. Simple, affordable to install, and incredibly cheap raw fuel - potable water! I am reliably getting 3-4 litres per 100km using this technology with a 28 year old Datsun 1.6 litre 3 speed auto Stanza - so why not use this in a 2008 model?

    Daniel Phillips of North Sydney Posted on 19 May 2008 10:03pm
  • Absolutely agree with omn1potent. Ford should wake up and realize that it's only taxi drivers who want their lpg cars because they only make lpg taxi's. I too would be very interested in a high tech lpg with a decent transmission and decent fuel range from a tank that doesn't use up half the boot like the aftermarket conversions. Diesel isn't the answer for oz though gas/diesel might be worthy of some r&d;funding.

    traction avant of nicholson Posted on 19 May 2008 6:31pm
  • LPG, why no LPG in the list? Out of all the fossil fuels mentioned, LPG is cleaner than Petrol or Diesel? What about a Hybrid LPG, the first to be developed in the world (calling Ford, Holden and Toyota), the technology is here, now, and honestly, it is not that expensive to develop, as car makers make lead to believe (global resourcing, government grants available and what about the hundred of thousands of dollars used for one off concept cars?). It is disappointing to see that the new Ford FG does NOT offer LPG (aka E-GAS) across the range (including FPV). I am equally disappointed to see that Holden only offers duel fuel on there base Commodore. Why the VE isn’t offered LPG across the range (including HSV). Toyota, oh yes you’re not going to get away with it, why no LPG on Corolla, Camry or Aurion? In addition with rising fuel prices and the environmental issues, this is ideally the fuel (LPG) of the future for Australia (not a perfect solution, but a good short-medium gap, but less emissions than either petrol or diesel, and reserves for hundreds of years); so why isn’t the new Ford FG available with the new, more efficient vapour gas injection system (greater economy and power), along in combination with the wonderful ZF 6sp auto? Instead it’s only available in the archaic throttle converter system in combination with the ancient 4spd auto, and you wonder why private buyers don’t buy in this alternate fuel, very disappointing indeed Ford. I was waiting to purchase a XR6 ZF 6sp auto vapour gas injection system FG Falcon, or an FPV LPG GT, do you want my deposit now?

    omn1potent of melbourne Posted on 19 May 2008 4:04pm
  • Carl, You think Toyota didn't have the idea of diesel hybrid? You know little. It's just that it's too expensive. And about all diesels beat the Prius? One: are they the same size? Two: How much is a litre of diesel compared to petrol? Three: Ugly? Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Your car is absolutely ugly in my eyes, mate. LOL.

    seant Posted on 19 May 2008 1:50pm
  • What about Peugeot? Didn't they achieve 2 fuel economy world records with the 308 recently?

    Jonathan Cheng Posted on 19 May 2008 12:55pm
  • Haha.......just about all the diesels beat the over priced ugly Prius.......when the diesel hybrids come out Toyota will have egg on it's face for using the wrong fuel!!!!!!

    Carl of Sydney Posted on 19 May 2008 12:19pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics