Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Petrol will hit $2 a litre within two years

  • By Joshua Dowling in Detroit
  • Carsguide
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image Petrol prices to hit the $2 per litre mark.

Petrol prices will soar in the next couple of years.

One of the world’s leading experts on alternative automotive energy believes the wholesale price of petrol will return to more than $US100 a barrel within two years – the last time it was that expensive, the retail cost came close to $2 per litre in Australia.

“Petroleum we believe is going to plateau around $US100 a barrel,” says Larry Burns, the head of General Motors Research & Development and Strategic Planning.

“There are some very fundamental things that indicate to us that the petroleum that’s coming on line in the world is becoming ever more expensive to gain access to.

“In addition to that we have the biggest countries in the world gearing up to introduce carbon taxes, so we are definitely going to see high petrol prices again soon … within the next two years at the latest.”

Burns has spent his 40-year career working on advanced technology since he joined the company as a graduate when he was 18.

He is regarded as the pre-eminent expert in his field and his life’s work has become of particular importance to GM and the auto industry in the past few years as car makers have realised they need to reduce their dependence on oil.

Two years ago Burns established a team within GM – the Global Energy Systems Intelligence Centre – whose sole purpose is to track the current and future price and availability of oil and “other energy supply chains”. Burns claims his eight-member outfit of experts plucked from various parts of the energy industry are the best in the business.

He says petroleum will become increasingly more expensive as oil companies drill deeper to retrieve lower quality crude – which, in turn, is more expensive to refine to today’s quality standards. “In other words, the oil companies will need to drill more crude at the same time as supply is drying up.”

But GM does not believe the internal combustion engine will ever die. Burns says the number of electric cars will grow significantly, and they are part of the solution, but they ultimately will not completely replace cars and trucks with internal combustion engines.

“We think the internal combustion engine is here to stay,” he says. “Motorists are going to be spoiled for choice between electric powered cars and cars powered by internal combustion engines, depending on which one best suits each application.

“There are more than 800 million cars and trucks around the world with internal combustion engines, so they’re not going anywhere,” he said, adding that trucks and other heavy machinery would likely run on bio-diesel rather than electricity.

“The trap we get into is we keep thinking ‘all or nothing’, but the future of the car is one with a choice of many types of alternatives to petrol,” he says.

GM is working with at least two companies that are developing new ways to create ethanol fuel that does not involve food crops. The use of grain-based ethanol, such as that derived from corn or sugar cane, has received criticism in recent years because there isn’t enough land in the world to feed its entire population as well as power all its cars.

One method transforms household waste into ethanol and is so effective Burns claims it could see an end to landfill. The other uses a special type of grass that requires little to no maintenance as it grows quickly and easily, even in adverse conditions. GM is so convinced about both systems that it has invested heavily in both companies working on them.

Burns says ethanol should be of particular interest to countries, such as Australia, that regularly experience water shortages. “It takes two or three gallons of water to make a gallon of gasoline, but using these processes it takes less than a gallon of water to make a gallon of ethanol.”

In Australia, most of our ethanol-blended fuel is currently derived from sugar cane waste, rather than crops grown specifically to be used as fuel. But, through Holden, GM is looking to assist with the introduction of an ethanol refinery in Australia that transforms waste into fuel.

Ethanol won’t become a magic solution, however, until cars are redesigned to get the most out of the fuel.

Burns admitted ethanol has about 50 per cent less energy than regular fuel, so you need to burn more of it to travel the same distance as a car powered by unleaded petrol.

“That’s ok though,” he says. “Cars will get bigger petrol tanks so motorists can travel the same distance between refills, and engineers are going to have to design cars with more efficient engines and use more lightweight materials.”


Find the cheapest petrol in your area.

The 2009 Detroit Motor Show

 

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 15 comments

  • Ok so you will believe it when you see it, well maybe not by xmas, but for show by the following xmas, and it will get a lot worse then $2 after that too. It's costing more to get the oil to start with, and the oil is only the starting point of petroleum products...including petrol. It has to be refined, and that cost is going up because the world has just about run out of light sweet crude, all the heavy shit costs a lot more to refine, and you get less product out of it. This is something even the peak oilers haven't considered much.....85 million barrels of oil ain't what it used to be in usable products of the same quality. eg....if the world had to run off tar sands entirely......we would need 255 million barrels of oil per day to equal the 85 million barrels of crude.......why.....because mining and producing oil from tar sands uses two thirds of the energy obtained in extracting it....so you only have a net energy gain of 1 third what you get. Also, refining the extracted crude oil, is more expensive, so it's obvious that tar sands can never replace conventional oil,at best, it is a very expensive,very environmentally destructive, very small gap fill.

    Paul Anderson of Melbourne Posted on 23 August 2009 8:37pm
  • What about bio-diesel? It almost has the energy content per litre as regular diesel and is renewable.

    Simon Posted on 23 January 2009 7:32pm
  • I doubt petrol will hit $2 a litre within 2 years because the global economic recession is getting worse, reducing demand everywhere. Millions of people will be unemployed and will drive less. Air traffic is also falling rapidly as spending is reduced. I think petrol will hover around $1 a litre for 2 to 3 years. Longer term (perhaps 5 years), petrol hitting $2 would not surprise me, but people will get used to it, when it happens (as has happened in Europe). Meanwhile, new cars are getting more fuel efficient, especially those in Europe.

    Tony of Melb. Posted on 21 January 2009 11:33am
  • THIS MORNING I GOT UP TO GO TO WORK PUT ON THE TV FOR THE MORNING NEWS ON 7 AND LOW AND BEHOLD OIL $35.00 US A BARREL ,BEEN UNDER $50 FOR A FEW MONTHS NOW .I JUST CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY ON THE WAY TO WORK THE FUEL PRICE IS $1.13 PER LTR. WHAT ARE WE MISSING HERE? WHILE WE ARE GETTING RIPPED OFF WITH THESE PRICES THE COUNTRY FALLS DEEPER IN THE POO.NO ONE UNDER STANDS THAT THIS COUNTRY RUNS ON TRANSPORTATION .EVERTHING WE BUY HAS TO BE TRANSPORTED .WE DONT NEED TAX CUTS WE NEED CHEAPER FUEL TO BRING DOWN ALL OUR COSTS IE FOOD BUILDING MATERIAL AND SO ON INTREST RATES SHOULD BE 2% LEES THAN WHAT THEY ARE AS THE MONEY BANKS LOAN FROM AMERICA IS AT 0.75% IF FUEL AND INTREST RATES WERE LESS PEOPLE WOULD HAVE MORE MONEY IN THERE POCKETS AND THE BIG SUPER MARKETS SHOULD THEN PASS ON THE SAVINGS AS WELL ,BUT AT THE MOMENT ALL I CAN SEE IS GREED AND THE OPINION OF ALL FORIEN OWNED COMPANIES THAT IS STUFF THE AUSSIES WE DONT CARE THEY GOT NO CHOICE BUT TO PAY WHAT WE WANT . THIS IS LOGIC THIS IS WHY WE SUFFER PROUD TO BE AN AUSTRAILIAN

    BILLY C of wyong Posted on 19 January 2009 9:09pm
  • Petrol $100 a barrel? If that's a 200 litre barrel then that is 50 cents a litre (US). Come on Journalists! You mean crude oil $100 per barrel right?

    Phil of Barossa Posted on 18 January 2009 7:43pm
  • instability in the mid east a low aussie dollar production cuts by opec and uncertain economic time make $2/litre much more of a possibility. the era of cheap oil is well and truly over

    np Posted on 17 January 2009 12:37pm
  • did anyone notice who said this and what his job title is?? Larry Burns, the head of General Motors Research & Development and Strategic Planning. i think a little wink wink deal will be held between gm and fuel manufacturers very strategic especially when your on the brink of collapse

    peter s of adelaide Posted on 16 January 2009 9:59pm
  • yeah.... we've heard this song and dance before. The reason why there is a recession??? Cause everyone got greedy and now the big boys are paying for it they had no choice but to lower the costs to us. And I still think are still ripping us off, using this poor economic times to push out the minor competition so we can get screwed in the future. Economists didnt predict the recession to be this bad. And if you want to have a larger supply of oil, tell the US and other idiots to stop invading countries and using up the oil for military use. Thats why the US is broke and there is a shortage of oil since 2002.

    K of Sydney Posted on 16 January 2009 5:15pm
  • I wish the news wouldnt show articles like this, all it does is fan the fire and prepair people for the rise but it also makes the oil companys think oh well lets jack the price up.

    Andrew of Adelaide Posted on 16 January 2009 5:14pm
  • Eventually, petrol will hit $2, but by then Hybrids will be more common, and more LPG and Ethanol options will be available. In a few years time we will have more options for our fuel source than ever before. It is not always about downsizing you car but having smarter options (eg lpg)

    Dave Posted on 16 January 2009 2:31pm
  • Yeah yeah yeah, heard this rubbish about petrol being $2 a litre by Christmas, whoops!!! That and interest rates being double digits by Christmas. Are these the same economists that said that the enconomy was strong????? Face it, if your an economist, shut up for a bit, we dont wanna hear it.

    Drew of Country SA Posted on 15 January 2009 11:57pm
  • big deal even at $2 a litre it is cheap. Petrol would be far more expensive if it kept up with inflation. Europe has been paying far more than this for years and they get on fine. Maybe Aussies need to drive better and drive less places. Further, buy smaller cars.

    David of Buderim Posted on 15 January 2009 12:51pm
  • I'll believe it when I see it. Fuel was also "predicted" to go up to $2 a litre by Christmas last year and look what happened there..

    Ben of Brisbane Posted on 15 January 2009 11:52am
  • @John Bu I think you missed the point of the article. The oil they will be extracting will be of lower qaulity, meaning higher refining costs, which is why they qouted the $2 per litre.

    Luke K Posted on 15 January 2009 9:05am
  • USD$100 per barrel of crude oil will NOT equal to $2 per litre of petrol in Australia. Crude oil hit USD$148 a barrel mid last year. Given that the Australian Dollar was at near record at say ~0.95, retail petrol prices topped at ~$1.70. Given that the AUD has fallen back to its historical average of ~0.70 or say 30%, I fail to see how petrol will hit $2.00 a litre. The only way petrol will hit $2.00 a litre is in the unlikely event of crude oil reaching USD $100 a barrel and the AUD being valued at below USD$0.50.

    John Bu Posted on 14 January 2009 4:59pm
Read all 15 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics