Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

New Commodore?s engine keeps more dollars in tank

  • The Daily Telegraph
image Save money: Holden is to release a more fuel efficient Commodore.

Australia?s favourite car - the Holden Commodore - will be cheaper to run from next month.

The Commodore has had its V6 engine tweaked to improve economy and cut emissions, with the V8 to follow in January with a major technological change which will cut cylinders during low-load running for even greater efficiency.

Official details of the engine update will be announced by GM Holden later today, but the company claims a cash saving of more than $1.50 a week for an average family Commodore running an average of 20,000km.

The improvement could mean a 60-litre saving on fuel use a year, with a CO2 reduction of close to 170kg.

But there is a price to pay — the V6 will lose 5kW of power, reducing output to the level of the 2004 Commodore at 175kW. It means the Holden will trail well behind the rival Ford Falcon, even though it easily outsells it in showrooms.

“You would have to be a race car driver to feel it. The fuel economy benefits far outweigh it,” GM Holden spokesperson Kate Lonsdale said last night. “The big focus at the moment is on fuel efficiency and emissions.”

Ms Londsale said the improvement in economy is up to 0.4 litres/100km, or more than 2.5 per cent.

The LPG Commodore has received an even bigger tweak with an improvement of 1.3 litres/100km for the sedan, and slightly less for other models.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 29 comments

  • no comments on performance figures? If you're concerned about fuel consumption/prices, then you should go for the lpg option. It seems a little ridiculous to drop power output. Ford seems able to improve output and lower consumption - why can't Holden? Looking at the new Accord Euro, which is bigger, heavier, more powerful, but with lower consumption, one would expect that is the norm. It appears to be a stop-gap measure that reeks of laziness.

    chuckovski Posted on 01 November 2008 12:11pm
  • I have driven both the Falcon and the Commodore - the Ford is far superior all round, but both cars are loosing market share as small cars are becoming more popular. The large cars will need a diesel for around the city economy.

    John Ralph Posted on 01 November 2008 12:21am
  • They are joking right??? the whole idea of technology in engines these days is efficiency. Whilst using the fuel to the best of its abilty an engine designed well, it will make lots of power and use less fuel, are they planning to REDUCE the efficiency of this engine? commodore will still be below fords more powerful ( and heavier!! ) falcon, and toyotas more powerful aurion. youd think the money, technology and development put into the new alloytech engine, that they would have ended up with an efficient engine. as most commodore drivers seem to have something to prove, by constantly accelerating hard, and dangerous traffic antics, i think they might have to restrict the opening of the throttle to acheive better safety too!! and with this 5kw less, a commodore owner will be able to save $75 a year??? hahahah!! people worring about those tiny numbers will already have a prius. knock 5kw of the SS V8 if you are serious hahahah!! watch the bogans revolt!

    troy of townsville Posted on 31 October 2008 10:18pm
  • This reprinted Holden Press Release very neatly fails to mention that Falcon also has a Fuel Economy advantage, at the same time as providing better performance.

    Shabby Haftu Posted on 31 October 2008 5:13pm
  • big deal!!!!

    anthony Posted on 31 October 2008 2:59pm
  • Great to see the 6 and the LPG models getting more economical. No one likes to lose power, but those after power will go for the 195kw V6 or the V8 models anyway. A small but important change.

    dave Posted on 31 October 2008 2:17pm
  • Please get a clue and get your head out of Holden's a**ses. You write a positive article about holden reducing power & fuel economy when this means it now trails futher behind in power, and still has the worst economy of the 'big 6's'. How about some articles being critical of Holden being so far behind the times in technology. Compared to the falcon the commodore now has ~22% less torque, ~12% less power & ~5% higher fuel consumption. So the Ford has a bigger engine, that is more powerful and more fuel efficient, but where are the positive articles about this? I think Holdens "Billion Dollar Baby" meant 75% of that budget was spent on media crap. I'm amazed how dumb the public is.

    Gaz Posted on 31 October 2008 1:31pm
  • How about some weight reduction and the direct injection version of the V6??

    Rod of Melbourne Posted on 31 October 2008 1:19pm
  • Why dont they just trim some of the weight, ford managed to reduce the weight of the FG over the BF, less lard , less fuel

    Tam Arms of Melbourne Posted on 31 October 2008 1:12pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links