Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

New 2008 Ford FG Falcon unveiled

  • By Karla Pincott
  • Townsville Bulletin
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image The all new Ford Falcon unveiled. Photo Gallery

Click here for more on our extensive coverage of the Falcon Launch.

After an $800 million spend and four years of development, Ford has finally lifted the wraps on the new Falcon it hopes will revive flagging sales in its large car segment.

And ensure the future of the company’s local manufacturing efforts in a market that is increasingly turning towards imports.

The big sedan and ute range goes on sale in May with a new name – FG – and a sharper look, more room with only a minimally larger footprint and body, tweaks to ergonomics and quality standards, and both new and revised drivetrains.

Ford says the engine revisions and new transmissions have resulted in improvements in fuel economy.

Petrol price rises have seen large car sales shrink in the past few years, and the Falcon has fallen victim to that trend, with a 20 per cent slump in 2007 seeing it attract less than 34,000 buyers. January saw the numbers fall to 1252 and out of the top 10, but a Ford spokesman says that kind of result is expected in run-out mode.


Click here for more on our extensive coverage of the Falcon Launch.


Exiting Ford Australia president Tom Gorman – who is taking a position with Brambles – still believes the big car has a strong future.
``We see the large-car market as 130,000 to 140,000 vehicles a year and if we get our fair share of that we're in a position to have a solid business,'' he says.

MODEL LINE-UP
The range has lost nameplates like Fairmont and Ghia, opting instead for alphabetic titles in three series, each of which gets an unique nose.

It starts with the more conservative base model XT, which is pitched squarely at the fleet markets that largely bolster Falcon sales.

The new G-Series targets private buyers with three more upmarket models wearing luxury sports cues:  The G6 which slots where the Fairmont exits as an entry to the G-Series, the G6E and the G6E Turbo, which are replacing the Ghia but continuing its claimed `European’ flavour. All have dramatic and bold front grille treatment, with the G6 being distinguished by silver mesh inserts. The G and G6 get 17” alloys, but can option the 18” ones on the Turbo.

The XR models – XR6, XR6 Turbo and XR8 -- continue as performance variants to cast a halo over the range, with a more aggressive nose with black mesh, and new wheels and spoiler. New 17-inch five-spoke alloy wheels are standard on the XR6, while the XR6 Turbo and XR8 feature standard 18-inch alloys.

Two new exterior colours have been added: Nitro is a metallic version of the former hero blue Bionic – reserved for performance models -- and Sensation is a darker blue available across the full Falcon range.

The Falcon wagon continues, but as the BF MkIII rather than in FG form, in XT level with dynamic stability control as standard and the choice of either petrol or LPG 4.0-litre six-cylinder engines mated to the existing four-speed sequential automatic transmission, and some wheel and tyre upgrade packages.

For the FG, there is a new V8 engine for the range-topping XR8 and upgrades to the six-cylinders for the new line-up, with two new transmissions -- a five-speed automatic replacing the previous four-speed, and a six-speed for all manual transmission versions. The lauded ZF six-speed auto continues all variants except the LPG one.

ENGINES
The company’s go-fast arm, Ford Performance Vehicles, hand-builds the new quad-cam 5.4-litre Boss 290 V8 from bare blocks and heads, adding plenty of hi-po features like cast aluminium cylinder heads, high compression pistons and forged steel crankshaft.

The revised exhaust system has a semi-active muffler, similar to those used by Aston Martin and Jaguar. At low revs the spring-loaded valve forces the exhaust gases through a series of baffles at low revs for a quieter cabin, then opens above 2800rpm to offer a wider path – and the full V8 voice.

The blueprinted engine hits 290 kilowatts of power at 5750rpm and 520 newton-metres of torque at 4750rpm, but Ford claims a large proportion of that is available over the entire rev range.

The naturally aspirated inline six-cylinder has been given a new intake manifold and a fast-burn cylinder head for better economy, while the engine calibration has been revised. Power is up 5kW to 195kW at 6000rpm, and torque has risen 8Nm for a 391Nm peak at 3250rpm.

The cylinder head also appears in the turbo version, which gains a new Garrett turbocharger developed specifically for the Falcon and larger intercooler, aimed at helping speed up boost by 30 per cent and increase pressure by 40 per cent.

The revisions raise power by 25kW to hit 270kW at 5250rpm while torque is up 53Nm -- more than 11 per cent – at 533Nm available from 2000-4750rpm.

A transient over boost feature that can give an extra 10 per cent dollop for several seconds has been introduced to improve overtaking manoeuvres. And the manual models get launch assist anti-lag technology for faster and smoother starts.

The LPG-fuelled E-Gas unit has been given new inlet and exhaust systems, a retuned throttle map and tweaked engine calibration, plus more durable valves and seals, and continues to deliver 156kW at 4750rpm and 371Nm at 2750rpm. 

TRANSMISSIONS
The ZF six-speed automatic transmission that was applauded for the refinement and performance it brought to the BF MkII experience – and is still considered one of the best on the market -- continues in the FG range on all models except the E-Gas.

The new 5R55S five-speed sequential automatic – built at the company’s transmission plant in Bordeaux, France, for the FG  -- is available with the naturally aspirated I6 engine.

Ford says the extra gear over the outgoing four, plus a wider ratio spread (2.51 between first and top, compared to 1.71 on the four) give better launch feel and more laid-back cruising.

Shift quality is said to be improved by closed loop adaptive shift control, while hunt prevention stops unwanted upshifts, and grade lock means the torque converter lock-up can be used in all gears for steep slopes or when you’re heavily loaded.

Peformance mode includes engine braking on the coast clutch and downshifts if acceleration is sensed during braking, while a shift inhibit function holds the gear instead of upshifting when the throttle is released quickly, to prevent `busyness’ and give better response when cornering.
The new Tremec TR6060 six-speed manual is an upgrade of the T56, and will be the only manual in the FG Falcon range. It comes in three versions: one each for the I6, I6 Turbo and V8, with the latter two having a different set of ratios designed to give sportier performance and feel.  
Ford says the revisions have resulted in smoother and more economical fifth and sixth gears, and a new synchroniser package – featuring triple synch on first and second, and double synch on the rest – has cut shift effort and travel, while freeing up space for larger and more durable gears that deliver better torque capacity.

The Turbo’s version get a larger clutch and a shorter first ratio (2.98 rather than 2.66) for better launch and acceleration.

A new, larger self-adjusting clutch for Turbo and V8 versions improves heat and torque capacity as well as durability.

FUEL ECONOMY
Ford has released some preliminary fuel figures, but says they are currently undergoing final ADR 81/01 certification rating – so therefore may change.

The naturally aspirated I6 mated to the new five-speed auto transmission has a fuel consumption figure of 10.5L/100km, a 0.2L or 1.9 per cent improvement in fuel economy over the previous engine. With the ongoing ZF six-speed auto, there is an improvement of 0.1L, or one per cent at 10.1L/100km.

The same transmission on the revised Turbo gives an improvement of 4.9 per cent, or 0.7L at 11.7L/100km, while the new V8 uses 14.2L/100km, a drop of 5.3 per cent or 0.8L less than the previous engine.

SPACE
Body and fit-out changes have resulted in more headroom all round, reaching a 13mm increase in the rear seat. Front and rear shoulder room are up 10mm and 24mm respectively, while front and rear hip room have increased 25mm and 22mm respectively. Rear leg room has increased by 10mm, and there is more driver knee room.

The standard space-saver spare wheel makes for a 535-litre boot capacity, but opting for the full-size spare will drop that to 505 litres.

SAFETY UPGRADES
Dynamic stability control continues as standard for all petrol Falcons, while the entire range now gets standard side airbags twin front beltminders, while curtain airbags and reversing camera will be standard on high series models and available on all others.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 51 comments

  • oh hoggboy..... ur going to buy a VE without even driving the new falc??? id bet my lefticle that it drives, rides and handles better than VE u werent even considering the falcon!

    troy s Posted on 18 February 2008 5:41pm
  • All that money spent, all that diatribe written about the huge power outputs of the engine range and the car still weighs in at over a tonne and a half. That's primitive. But then that's market engineering for you and the Aussie market is definitely primitive. In this day and age of scarce resources, a car with such space and strength that weighs in at a tonne or so would be a quantum leap. It would go faster with less, stop and turn much better, quicker, safer with more responsive handling and would cost much less to run for the average australian buyer and company fleets- the two target markets of the Falcon. Cmon Ford, use your brains for once and lead the way in weight reduction instead of masturbating about power. It's how the McLaren F1 of 1993 was the fastest car in the world for so long, never mind that bug shaped Bugatti....

    Todd of Perth Posted on 18 February 2008 5:18pm
  • Looks like the same car that is parked in the neighbours drive right now, where the heck did the $800 million go?? And in response to some, yes Holden & Ford do have a future because thankfully a large number of us enjoy big cars with big powerplants.

    Shane of Brisbane Posted on 18 February 2008 4:27pm
  • It has been said, but honestly how can you spend that much money and build a car that looks like a MINOR facelife. Mitsubishi hyped the 380 as the fantastic, totally new savior of the company and that didn't end well. I think we are looking at the last Falcon to be built in Australia, what a shame they couldn't have at least put some effort into it.

    Andrew Gosling Posted on 18 February 2008 3:55pm
  • Now I am convinced that I did the right thing getting out of an XR6T into a VE Calais V8 V. Stacks of extra's, totaly new dymnamics, even compared to the FPV Force6 the Calais was miles(kilometers) ahead on ride, comfort, grunt and value for money. As most have commented, it appears that $800mil just gives you cosmetics which is very disappointing - the Ford is still on a now a 7 odd year platform. I have been a ford fan all of my life (except the AU)until I took a VE Calais for a drive...end of story, end of Ford... RIP?

    Scotty of Adelaide Posted on 18 February 2008 3:13pm
  • love the look blows the VE's out of the water in looks and well every other thing too ok this is australia you will not fit an aussie family in a car that dose 5l to 100kms wake up any one going to take 3 kids on a 10hr drive in a car like that where are you going to put your bags? on the high way it would do 7 or 8L any way if not less not much fuel. Looks like the xr6T will kill the SS hopefully the xr8 is abit faster then the old GT. how much power are the F6 and GT going to have? love the G6E want one

    aaron purcell of penrith Posted on 18 February 2008 3:00pm
  • I was expecting something better than this! Can't believe we waited 4 years for it! This will be the car that kills Ford Australia.

    Robert Poole of Brisbane Posted on 18 February 2008 1:45pm
  • I hope theirs a diesel on the cards, otherwise a drop of 0.2l/100km's wont miraculously revamp sales figures. Looks strikingly similiar to the Mondeo. Why buy a petrol Falcon if you can get a Diesel Mondeo?

    Michael - Adelaide Posted on 18 February 2008 1:00pm
  • two BIG mistakes V8 only available in XR8 and GT,and australia still using the old 5.4L motor instead of the new 6.2 L. HERE COMES 1982 AGAIN

    warren austin Posted on 18 February 2008 12:42pm
  • Blue from Newcastle - I agree, it looks just like the old one at the front (just different curves). The rear is a tad different (like the headlights) but disappointed there was not quad exhaust like the ve. On the SV6 Holden Bluetooth and IPod comes standard whereas on the XR it's optional (need to get a technology pack). If I'm correct the XR6 has 17 inch wheels whereas the VE SV6 has 18 inch. I don't understand !!! Very disappointing

    Gary Posted on 18 February 2008 12:35pm
  • My first thoughts of this new car was wow.... the lines look so much like a mazda 3 its not funny. The door lines are almost identical. The interior is much the same looks like a slightly change mazda 3 inside. For something that took so long to create im very disapointed.

    Craig Martin of SA Posted on 18 February 2008 12:07pm
  • Mixed bag! Agree with most others that this is great to see Ford laying out the dosh on "new look" but did they forget to attach it to the BF we see here?! I'm a die hard ford fan, perhaps I'll need to see it in the metal but it's not much different and had hoped that FORD could change it's down-spiralling sales results of last year. On the flip side of my comments I have had a listen to the sound of the new xr8 on a media file on the net and it sounds horny!

    Matt of Melb Posted on 18 February 2008 11:56am
  • Money into the development of a car goes into more then the design and exterior. I am not overly impressed over the first pictures (although the GT does look the goods) but will reserve judgement until I look at the car in the flesh first, drive it then decide if it is bye bye Falcon or not.

    Brian of Newtown Posted on 18 February 2008 11:51am
  • Must be a lot of bogan holden fans here that can't see the difference! Open your eyes! Hopefully this car will knock the commodore off its perch that it doesn't belong on!

    AH of Vic Posted on 18 February 2008 11:47am
  • It is hard to comprehend how $800 million went into producing a car that still looks very much the same as its predecessor. A 1.9% fuel economy saving is not going to make this big car attractive at the bowser. No matter how good the car really is, I fear it will not bring a good return on the huge investment. The motoring public is likely to be underwhelmed, and will keep buying the more modern looking Holden, if not the stylish and fuel efficient Toyota Aurion. How could Ford misjudge the market so badly?

    Alan Keye of Perth WA Posted on 18 February 2008 11:46am
  • After years of hype, and near billions, Ford have come up with a sedan and ute that look incredibly similar to what they replaced - actually styling wise they came up with something that looks a cross between the AU and the BA!!! As for tradition - Why drop the Fairmont/Fairmont Ghia nameplates - with the Falcon of old, that meant something clearly upmarket from the common law Falcon... And the wagon - If Holden is coming out belatedly with AN ALL NEW VE wagon, why couldn't Ford answer? Keeping the BF will lose sales, as perception will see it immediately as 'dated'... Hopefully, just hopefully it at least gets a frontal update to match the sedans and utes - it was done years ago with the Mk2 Escort, when the sedans were rebodied, the wagons and vans simply were the Mk1 body with the Mk2 front. - I also have to wonder about it coming out as a base model only, when Holden are making their VE wagon in EVERY trim level... As for the car's export potential - not making the car setup for LHD has wasted many an export opportunity - something Holden is using to its advantage!

    Joh of NZ Posted on 18 February 2008 11:44am
  • From the point of view of a long-time Falcon owner, and assuming that the specs don't change between now and May, I think Ford may have missed the target with the new Falcon. The release information indicates lower equipment levels than people expect in today's highly competitive market; particularly at base level ( the one most in need of a boost and name change ). Also, the base 6 engine has missed all the headline figures ( despite supposed extensive upgrades & a new 5 speed auto which appears to have yielded a staggering 0.1 l/100 km improvement in fuel economy ! ). On 91 RON, it needed to achieve 200 KW, 400 NM & more importantly, 9.9 Lt/100 KM.( or better ) Even stranger, it has achieved only a minute 5 KW increase , but peak power has been shifted from 5250 to 6000 RPM. A miniscule increase for such a high increase in revs. The only positive is the XR6 Turbo has finally been lifted to compete with the Holden 6 litre- a very impressive improvement on paper. Finally, a couple of spec observations. Curtain airbags should be standard on all cars ( like Aurion ) and 18 inch wheels should be standard on XR 6 ( like SV 6 ) Like everyone else, I await the release of further information, but the early impressions are of a good overall package, but not good enough for 2008 , particularly in light of current and coming competition.

    Peter Tansey of Victoria Posted on 18 February 2008 11:29am
  • Looks good, 5 speed auto on base model is great, sure it rides and handles well will probably be the safest car in its class.. But I doubt if anyone will ever get close to 10.5 litres/100 km in real world driving conditions..more like 14-15 litres at best! Where is the diesel alternative? A TCDI Falcon would have fitted in perfectly with the Mondeo and Focus diesel models and I bet the tradies would love to have a diesel engine in a ute! I think Ford has missed the boat to offer economical and affordable large car motoring to the masses. A mid-spec (similar to the old Fairmont) dedicated LPG variant I believe would also appeal to "working" families..Sorry to use the Kevin Rudd line..

    peter of Melbourne Posted on 18 February 2008 11:02am
  • Looks and sounds good enough to ypgrade my 2004 XR6 turbo to a Typhoon.

    Dan Connolly of Keppel Sands Posted on 18 February 2008 11:01am
  • To Matthew - Melbourne 17 February 2008 7:14pm - Ford is not going to spend a huge amount of money on an engine to improve it's fuel economy, when the engine is (sadly) due to be replaced with a brand new V6 from the states in 2010. Remeber it was all over the news last year as the engine plant in melbourne will be shut down. But people don't read about this stuff, they jump to conclusions and automatically assume the worst.

    Nathan of Sydney Posted on 18 February 2008 10:33am
  • The new Falcon has came out cool & great. The Fairmont will hold the top range from now to then. No new Fairlane or LTD for a While. Let hope Falcon does good now along side Focus & Mondeo.

    Coolio Hunt Posted on 18 February 2008 10:16am
  • Ford Falcon you are the weakest link. Good bye.

    Gavin of Hervey Bay Posted on 18 February 2008 9:46am
  • As a car lover I have to say I am disappointed. To compare against the Holden VE, I have to say that this ford has nothing going for it. It looks like the last falcon which happens to look like the old VZ commodore. There is stuff all changes to the engines and the "creature" comforts are nothing but what should be standard these days. If this was the car ford needed to sell to keep the falcon alive, they have gone horribly wrong! Shame FORD shame, you are out of touch with your market.

    tony of SA Posted on 18 February 2008 9:43am
  • looks good, any idea on final pices? hope the large car market dont die...

    David Woods Posted on 18 February 2008 2:49am
  • They spent $800 mil and could only come up with this??? The styling is bland. The Commodore looks like a decade-newer design. I wouldn't consider buying one. I was looking forward to the next Fairmont Ghia - in BF Mk II it's one of the best looking cars on the road. But the G6E (what a shocking nameplate!) looks confused at the front - lines going every direction - and doesn't have any connection to the rear styling. Summary: this will be, sadly, the last ever Falcon.

    Michael H Posted on 17 February 2008 9:09pm
  • Is it just me... this thing looks JUST like the old one. This car will be lucky to take ONE sale from the new Commodore. Holden made the new commodore look.. well, modern, but more improtantly, WANTABLE. Has Ford Australia actually seen their own new Mondeo??? The Falcon should have looked like a bigger version of that car.. as it is... I have waited an eternity for this new car, bu... Bye Bye Falcon. Mondeo TDCi it is for me.

    Blue of Newcastle Posted on 17 February 2008 9:05pm
  • As i commented previously on this forum the new ford falcon is just another ford falcon, there has been no change to that box under the hood (the engine), it's all very well to make changes everywhere else (safety and creature comfort), but the engine has to change as oil is now hovering in the $100 US a barrel, you can't expect to survive in the long term if it costs a fortune in petrol to run an average car. Where's the ford hybrid, diesel, lpg diesel? it seems these sort of cars won't be built in australia will ford and holden go down the same path as mitsubishi building big cars no one wants?

    robert hesketh of hobart Posted on 17 February 2008 8:25pm
  • 10.5L/100 km... they are kidding right? With the threat of Climate Change and Peak Oil now upon us how can Ford seriously consider this to be a good economic investment? With strict fuel economy standards being brought in around the world (5.0L/100 km in Europe from 2012) where does Ford intend to be exporting these vehicles to? Such lack of foresight is the beginning of the end of Ford in Australia.

    Matthew of Melbourne Posted on 17 February 2008 8:14pm
  • looks ok

    joe funky of moama Posted on 17 February 2008 7:12pm
  • Anyone got any ideas when the specs of the FPV line up will be released?

    Lee Massey of Melbourne Posted on 17 February 2008 6:51pm
  • doesn't look that different. where did they spend the money?

    neil Posted on 17 February 2008 6:20pm
  • looks like a good car, but i dont beleive that this will get that many wore sales. the VE hasnt blown the world away liked many had hoped, despite its R+D pricetag. new falcon is no doubt a good car, and looks great, but will it sell well?

    Aaron of Victoria Posted on 17 February 2008 6:15pm
  • I am a Ford fan and I think the car has a improved shape and all the other improvements inside and on the outer will make it better car. Hoping it will do well

    RON CAMPBELL of WENDOUREE Posted on 17 February 2008 5:43pm
  • Sad to say i'm on my way to buy a new commodore on Monday!From the photos i have viewed i cant see much EXTERNAL difference from the last model.

    Hoggboy of Williamstown-S.A. Posted on 17 February 2008 4:48pm
  • sounds great and will be a better car than the VE. Since the ford has released the falcon will that mean holden will have a mark 2 of it car.

    Davo Posted on 17 February 2008 4:26pm
  • looks the same. what a waste of time and money.

    Hollland.J Posted on 17 February 2008 4:19pm
  • What the Hell!!!! Obviously FORD have lost it, this will be the last falcon, its just a BA falcon with the edges smoothed over. Have they just given up, or are they only interested in fleet, hire cars and taxis? The design department has to be joking, do they even have a deginer? I waited all last year for a new falcon, and I am sad to say I am off to holden, goodbye FORD is was great to know you.

    shayne of sydney Posted on 17 February 2008 3:47pm
  • How does a company like Ford spend $800 million developing a new model and end up with a car that is barely distinguishable from the previous model? And the minimal changes only serve to make it slightly more Commodore-like. R.I.P. Falcon.

    Adam Spence of Blacktown NSW Posted on 17 February 2008 3:32pm
  • Well after all the hype, I'm somewhat disappointed based on the photos. It looks much the same. I just hope the car looks better in the flesh. If that's the best they could do, then they really should have made the decision on the V6 motor a lot earlier as there doesn't appear anything that's really new in the car. Whoopee, we tuned the donk and got an extra 0.2l/100km better consumption. That's really gonna bring the buyters back to a big car. As much as I hate to say it, GM spent their $1b a lot better on the Commodore than Ford spent its $800m on this rehash of the BF.

    Mike O'Connor Posted on 17 February 2008 3:02pm
  • want so different about this car.fuel down but not enough.commoder roof lining.even if it gets 5 star rating.it looks the same.i still reakon the mondeo will be a pain in the side for the new falcon

    matthew gosson of qld Posted on 17 February 2008 1:56pm
  • best car since the model T!!!

    henry ford of detroit Posted on 17 February 2008 12:21pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics