Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Industry protests Luxury Car Tax hike

  • By Jonah Wigley
  • Carsguide
image ...Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan's Luxury Car Tax hike angers the industry.

Carmakers have spoken out strongly about the jump in Luxury Car Tax.

In his first Federal Budget, Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan has implemented a luxury tax hike that will affect cars priced at $57,000 and above.

In a budget that claims to protect lower income earners, the new car tax jumps from 25 to 33 per cent and will precipitate a price rise in around 105,000 cars yearly.

Luxury manufacturers unhappy with the government’s tax hike, argue that it is their investment in new technologies that makes cars safer and greener - and that mass market brands enjoy the benefits of such investment without having to fund research and development.

Mercedes-Benz Australia spokesman David McCarthy can’t understand why the Rudd Government has focussed on cars only. “You can go out and buy a one million dollar speedboat and a two million dollar helicopter and they are not subject to anything but GST.

“The government’s mantra is working families. Do they assume that you’re not a working family if you can afford a $57,000 car?”

McCarthy was unhappy at the speed at which the government imposed the tax and doesn’t think they have given enough thought to the thousands of jobs in importation, distribution and services, that luxury brands provide. “This is a tax on equity, a tax on safety and a tax on technology.”

BMW Group Australia managing director Guenther Seemann backed McCarthy’s stance. “Over the years, luxury brands pioneered new safety technologies such as airbags, ABS brakes, and Electronic Stability Control. Today, mass market brands and their customers reap the rewards”.

“Likewise, luxury brands are today at the forefront of engineering cleaner cars which emit less CO2 emissions.”

However, the government is unlikely to budge, considering its stated plan to reduce inflation and support the battler - struggling to cope with already crippling interest rates.

Audi managing director Joerg Hofmann also spoke out against the tax change. “The Government has a direct interest in making cars safer and cleaner, yet has effectively put this kind of technology at risk for Australian buyers, a move that seems directly at odds with its green agenda “

“For years now, our global headquarters have also invested heavily in important research and development. One key development has been the systematic reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions for its vehicles. This year, Audi will introduce the world’s cleanest diesel technology in its new A4 3.0 TDI quattro sedan – a new car with a 90 percent reduction in NOx emissions.”

Imported cars will make up 90 per cent of those affected but the locally produced Holden Statesman and Caprice - as well as other prestige Australian-made cars - will also be in the firing line.

How much more will you pay for luxury cars?

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 28 comments

  • This tax has not gone far enough. There should be more tax on fuel guzzling cars, then use all this money to make fuel efficent cars such as hybrids and turbo diesel's cheaper. The money raised by the taxes could also be used for r&d;to make locally built large cars more efficent or put into our roads to make travelling time quicker which would save on fuel costs in another way. People say petrol is already dear, but there is still clear demand for big petrol guzzling cars! I work for a company that manufacturers large cars and my job is in the firing line with these taxes, but so what its a small price to pay for the right thing to do.

    Aaron Posted on 14 May 2008 12:15pm
  • Once again we are being treated to a load of hypocritical nonsense from the "luxury car industry". The vehicles they are talking about tend to be grossly overpriced so what difference will a relatively small amount extra pay make. People who buy them tend to worship status and think they will somehow be better if they can flaunt so called superior goods. Why dont these car sales people come clean and admit that their real concern is that they may not make as much money from sales commissions. In any case those who chase the illusion of status in this way are not likely to be put off by relatively small price changes. On the contrary they'll feel even better because they've paid more! All the pitiful nonsense about developing higher safety standards blah blah blah is just that. i.e it is marketing hype that has little if any substance in fact. The luxury car makers didn't invent or even substantially develop much of the safety equipment now quite readily available. They only introduced it on some of their models to assist in being able to gull the rich, the wannabees and like fools into paying even more inflated prices for a badge on the front of their car. I drive a small toyota that has the same level of safety equipment as most of the luxury cars costing 2, 3, 4, 5 and more times what I paid. And guess what, I'm a millionare as is my wife . Now thats real status as distinct from an overpriced heap of metal that'll not be worth much in 5 years time.

    Michael of Melbourne Posted on 14 May 2008 10:19am
  • I agree on the increase Im afraid if the luxury importers are woried about market share then look at developing a more affordable version for the local market bring it in under the luxury tax threshhold and keep the quality and wathc your sales go through the roof there is the chalenge to BMW Mercedes and the likeas for people movers there are plenty under the luxury car tax limit hyundai kia just to name a few nothing wrong with these cars either as there are plenty of familys using them these days, once again the challenge is now for the makers like toyota chrysler and the rest to make a product that meets their so called higher satandards and sell it for a price under the luxury tax limit and as I said before watch their market share and profit climb as more people switch to their brand because they could now afford it.

    Troppo Posted on 13 May 2008 3:44pm
  • I dont see what the fuss is. Years ago there was a luxury car tax. If I was buying a luxury car a few thousand more would not make that much difference, since I would already be borrowing a lot of money. You still get pleanty of nice cars under $57 000

    dave Posted on 13 May 2008 2:16pm
  • hm... why even waste time discussing this dumb new law... its just another stupid ridiculous unbelievably dumb law the government has put out... just like those dumb laws on p platers that don't make any sense and contradict themselves... you do know the government does not know anything about cars.....

    TOMMY Posted on 13 May 2008 11:23am
  • So whats the problem. Only 10% of veichles sold in Australia are over the 57k luxury car tax threshold. Now if you ask me the people buying these cars need to pay more tax sicnes they have dodgy accountants anyway. And the crap about the safety features being veveloped in luxury cars is a joke. People who want these overpriced veichles will still buy the. BMW boss is an idiot since airbags where devloped for cars by an American and first used in fords. ABS was developped for aircrafts. And the statemnt about green cars and fuel economy is a laughable statement. Most of your 57k+ cars are the worst green cars. That Audi and BMW boss should get there heads checked out since last time I checked cheaper Japanese cars are much greener then there overiirced Audis and BMW's!

    Luke of Sydney Posted on 13 May 2008 8:50am
  • Whilst I agree partly to the tax lets get right. $57000 is not a luxury car and the threshold needs to rise to at least $80000. We heard from Labor that medicare thresholds need to rise as they had not in 10 years so why luxury car tax. Further Labor is getting a chop of tax with the GST. Why is the community and government for fixated on the so called rich, good on them. As a parent I would love my child to become rich but I sure do not them to be taxed extra or hated by sections of the public because they got off their bum and made something of themselves. This is just the same old Labor but with a different face.

    DAVID of Buderim Posted on 13 May 2008 8:39am
  • I do believe certain people movers are effected as well, poor families with lots of kiddies. Its ridiculous, this stupid law. Not the fact that its there, but the fact that the cut off is approx. $57,000.... They should seriously have exceptions for certain cars. And I must say, I commend luxury car makers excuses smile they're great! They make sense....but its still luxury car makers.... I suggest we leave the 20% tax in where it is now, then increase it to 33% somewhere between 70,000 and 100,000?

    Tomas Rivera of Brisbane Posted on 12 May 2008 6:19pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links