Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Industry protests Luxury Car Tax hike

  • By Jonah Wigley
  • Carsguide
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
image ...Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan's Luxury Car Tax hike angers the industry.

Carmakers have spoken out strongly about the jump in Luxury Car Tax.

In his first Federal Budget, Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan has implemented a luxury tax hike that will affect cars priced at $57,000 and above.

In a budget that claims to protect lower income earners, the new car tax jumps from 25 to 33 per cent and will precipitate a price rise in around 105,000 cars yearly.

Luxury manufacturers unhappy with the government’s tax hike, argue that it is their investment in new technologies that makes cars safer and greener - and that mass market brands enjoy the benefits of such investment without having to fund research and development.

Mercedes-Benz Australia spokesman David McCarthy can’t understand why the Rudd Government has focussed on cars only. “You can go out and buy a one million dollar speedboat and a two million dollar helicopter and they are not subject to anything but GST.

“The government’s mantra is working families. Do they assume that you’re not a working family if you can afford a $57,000 car?”

McCarthy was unhappy at the speed at which the government imposed the tax and doesn’t think they have given enough thought to the thousands of jobs in importation, distribution and services, that luxury brands provide. “This is a tax on equity, a tax on safety and a tax on technology.”

BMW Group Australia managing director Guenther Seemann backed McCarthy’s stance. “Over the years, luxury brands pioneered new safety technologies such as airbags, ABS brakes, and Electronic Stability Control. Today, mass market brands and their customers reap the rewards”.

“Likewise, luxury brands are today at the forefront of engineering cleaner cars which emit less CO2 emissions.”

However, the government is unlikely to budge, considering its stated plan to reduce inflation and support the battler - struggling to cope with already crippling interest rates.

Audi managing director Joerg Hofmann also spoke out against the tax change. “The Government has a direct interest in making cars safer and cleaner, yet has effectively put this kind of technology at risk for Australian buyers, a move that seems directly at odds with its green agenda “

“For years now, our global headquarters have also invested heavily in important research and development. One key development has been the systematic reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions for its vehicles. This year, Audi will introduce the world’s cleanest diesel technology in its new A4 3.0 TDI quattro sedan – a new car with a 90 percent reduction in NOx emissions.”

Imported cars will make up 90 per cent of those affected but the locally produced Holden Statesman and Caprice - as well as other prestige Australian-made cars - will also be in the firing line.

How much more will you pay for luxury cars?

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 28 comments

  • Nice one Wayne let's kill the economy even further with your beginners guide to economic management! BTW tell me if you genuinely know what you are doing why can I buy a rebadged Commodore SS in the US for $33K (AUD) when here in Adelaide (where they are made) i pay $57k????

    Raff Posted on 22 May 2008 9:15am
  • "With all the features that are popping up in cars above $57K will eventually trickle down." What happens if you crash before the features trickle down?

    elephino Posted on 20 May 2008 2:57pm
  • It's just a load of whinging from luxury car dealers that's all. It's not going to have any effect on those purchasing cars priced above $57K. We have lots of great cars with all the safety features available under the $57K mark, ie front side and curtain airbags. Really, how many times are you going to crash your car. With all the features that are popping up in cars above $57K will eventually trickle down. Let's face it, the market isn't going to stop its hunger for cars above $57K just because it increased in price by how much?....... Those fools at dealerships should really come up with valid arguments.

    Greatest Tax in the World Posted on 16 May 2008 7:23pm
  • It's just another tax! Like all taxes, unconnected to the victim, just another money raiser.

    Doug Watson of Sydney NSW Posted on 16 May 2008 5:23pm
  • Shut up the so called "luxury carmakers". Today, the forefront technology is hybrid, pioneered by Toyota and Honda. The Prius cost around $37K. If you can buy a car > $57K, then you can pay a bit more for tax.

    sean Posted on 16 May 2008 4:08pm
  • The so called luxury car dealers are so concerned for the poor rich people buying there cars that they may have to pay a little more for a luxury imported car that it could turn the customer to purchase an Australian built luxury car and worst of all from an other dealer and what a shame the proffit would not go to them!

    Kenneth MacPherson of Perth Western Australia Posted on 15 May 2008 11:58pm
  • Increased car taxes should apply to gas guzzlers and those that lack safety features. This would encourage local manufacturers to build more efficient engines and add equipment like curtain airbags (missing from the new Falcon). So called expensive imports have pioneered seatbelts, airbags, ABS, Traction Control, Stability Control, hybrid power plants, diesel engines.These benefits then flow down to your everyday vehicles. This is a tax on safety and commonsense. A socially divisive political move that puts revenue above passenger well-being and the preservation of fast disappearing oil reserves. Doug- Glebe.

    Doug Watson of Glebe Posted on 15 May 2008 4:13pm
  • Why should those fortunate enough to afford a car costing more than $57k be expected to pay more Tax? It's just another grab for $$$ by the government to fund all the perks only government employees have access to. Go and ask them what % they actually pay in Income Tax, and you'll find out that they can Salary Sacrfice most of their pay. and pay virtually No Tax at all. Ask a politcian what discount they can purchase alchol for at a Duty free shop; it's a lot less then you and I. Greedy greedy Government who mis-manage our money.

    DJ of W.A. Posted on 15 May 2008 3:23pm
  • Good idea, but cars are already way too expensive here...

    Josh Posted on 15 May 2008 2:37pm
  • Nice was to improve holden and ford falcon sales.

    Charlie M. of Vic Posted on 15 May 2008 12:06pm
  • All that talk about safety. Why are commercials and SUV's taxed at a lower rate, when they dont have to pass the same safty tests as passenger cars. If I was to be in an accident I would much prefer to be in a passenger car that an SUV, 4x4 or a work ute. Maybe SUV's which have a high roll-over risk or other types with crumple zones (for example) should be taxed higher. Too many people are swapping passenger cars for others types which dont pass crash tests so well.

    dave Posted on 15 May 2008 11:41am
  • The so called luxury cars have been the key factor in most safety and emission controlling innovations. Whats the chance the next crollolla is going to come up with a industry first innovation and be sold for a ~ 22K ?!?

    who knows Posted on 15 May 2008 8:50am
  • The so called luxury cars have been the key factor in most safety and emission controlling innovations. Whats the chance the next crollolla is going to come up with a industry first innovation and be sold for a ~ 22K ?!?

    who knows Posted on 15 May 2008 8:46am
  • If you can afford to buy a luxury car, you can afford to pay extra taxes on it. Clear and simple.

    Andrew Posted on 14 May 2008 11:38pm
  • Congratulations to Wayne Swan for having the gumption to implement this tax. If you can afford a car over $57K then you can afford to contribute a little more to the commonwealth.

    Angus Chisholm of Sydney Posted on 14 May 2008 7:19pm
  • Michael from Melbourne, where did you get your information regarding safety features. Your Toyota Corolla does not have the equivalent safety features of the Luxury cars mentioned in the articles, furthermore it doesnt have the same crash test safety ratings as any of the vehicles mentioned in the article. Luxury vehicles or high end vehicles do provide a gate for mainstream models to follow suit with safety and green technology. Also the Luxury Car Tax makes no difference to the commissions on sales of vehicles. You must have inherited your millions-your too stupid to have made all that money on your own.

    TJ of ADELAIDE Posted on 14 May 2008 3:38pm
  • I recken the increase tax should only go to the Luxury cars starting From 100,000. Leave 20% tax on the Local made cars like FordS & Holdens. But what ever it is, like someone will say 2 WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT.

    Coolio Hunt Posted on 14 May 2008 2:29pm
  • Why doesn't the government just tax by the type of car and emissions, per Europe etc? I drive a Pug 308 XTE HDi and have diesel economy of 7L per 100km. Emissions are ridiculously low and I am not burning drastic amounts of the world's fading oil resources. I should be rewarded for this. Government should cut tariffs on diesel/hybrid imports and remove taxes from diesel to really persuade general public to environmentally friendly options. Wave the luxury car tax if it is a hybrid or falls under a certain fuel efficiency/emission criteria. Forward thinking is required, not blatant tax increases to people to ignorant to care anyway! I thought the focus was on the environment? Not from what I am seeing!

    Gen Y of Sydney Posted on 14 May 2008 1:57pm
  • Another rise in taxes.... If we go out and buy a car, we have both Sales tax and GST.. When GST came in, it was to replace Sales Tax, but this was too difficult for the car market place, so now we have the double tax, and has now been increased. Tax on a tax, not many people enjoy paying that.....This is just another grab for $

    Paul of Sydney Posted on 14 May 2008 12:45pm
  • This tax has not gone far enough. There should be more tax on fuel guzzling cars, then use all this money to make fuel efficent cars such as hybrids and turbo diesel's cheaper. The money raised by the taxes could also be used for r&d;to make locally built large cars more efficent or put into our roads to make travelling time quicker which would save on fuel costs in another way. People say petrol is already dear, but there is still clear demand for big petrol guzzling cars! I work for a company that manufacturers large cars and my job is in the firing line with these taxes, but so what its a small price to pay for the right thing to do.

    Aaron Posted on 14 May 2008 12:20pm
  • This tax has not gone far enough. There should be more tax on fuel guzzling cars, then use all this money to make fuel efficent cars such as hybrids and turbo diesel's cheaper. The money raised by the taxes could also be used for r&d;to make locally built large cars more efficent or put into our roads to make travelling time quicker which would save on fuel costs in another way. People say petrol is already dear, but there is still clear demand for big petrol guzzling cars! I work for a company that manufacturers large cars and my job is in the firing line with these taxes, but so what its a small price to pay for the right thing to do.

    Aaron Posted on 14 May 2008 12:15pm
  • Once again we are being treated to a load of hypocritical nonsense from the "luxury car industry". The vehicles they are talking about tend to be grossly overpriced so what difference will a relatively small amount extra pay make. People who buy them tend to worship status and think they will somehow be better if they can flaunt so called superior goods. Why dont these car sales people come clean and admit that their real concern is that they may not make as much money from sales commissions. In any case those who chase the illusion of status in this way are not likely to be put off by relatively small price changes. On the contrary they'll feel even better because they've paid more! All the pitiful nonsense about developing higher safety standards blah blah blah is just that. i.e it is marketing hype that has little if any substance in fact. The luxury car makers didn't invent or even substantially develop much of the safety equipment now quite readily available. They only introduced it on some of their models to assist in being able to gull the rich, the wannabees and like fools into paying even more inflated prices for a badge on the front of their car. I drive a small toyota that has the same level of safety equipment as most of the luxury cars costing 2, 3, 4, 5 and more times what I paid. And guess what, I'm a millionare as is my wife . Now thats real status as distinct from an overpriced heap of metal that'll not be worth much in 5 years time.

    Michael of Melbourne Posted on 14 May 2008 10:19am
  • I agree on the increase Im afraid if the luxury importers are woried about market share then look at developing a more affordable version for the local market bring it in under the luxury tax threshhold and keep the quality and wathc your sales go through the roof there is the chalenge to BMW Mercedes and the likeas for people movers there are plenty under the luxury car tax limit hyundai kia just to name a few nothing wrong with these cars either as there are plenty of familys using them these days, once again the challenge is now for the makers like toyota chrysler and the rest to make a product that meets their so called higher satandards and sell it for a price under the luxury tax limit and as I said before watch their market share and profit climb as more people switch to their brand because they could now afford it.

    Troppo Posted on 13 May 2008 3:44pm
  • I dont see what the fuss is. Years ago there was a luxury car tax. If I was buying a luxury car a few thousand more would not make that much difference, since I would already be borrowing a lot of money. You still get pleanty of nice cars under $57 000

    dave Posted on 13 May 2008 2:16pm
  • hm... why even waste time discussing this dumb new law... its just another stupid ridiculous unbelievably dumb law the government has put out... just like those dumb laws on p platers that don't make any sense and contradict themselves... you do know the government does not know anything about cars.....

    TOMMY Posted on 13 May 2008 11:23am
  • So whats the problem. Only 10% of veichles sold in Australia are over the 57k luxury car tax threshold. Now if you ask me the people buying these cars need to pay more tax sicnes they have dodgy accountants anyway. And the crap about the safety features being veveloped in luxury cars is a joke. People who want these overpriced veichles will still buy the. BMW boss is an idiot since airbags where devloped for cars by an American and first used in fords. ABS was developped for aircrafts. And the statemnt about green cars and fuel economy is a laughable statement. Most of your 57k+ cars are the worst green cars. That Audi and BMW boss should get there heads checked out since last time I checked cheaper Japanese cars are much greener then there overiirced Audis and BMW's!

    Luke of Sydney Posted on 13 May 2008 8:50am
  • Whilst I agree partly to the tax lets get right. $57000 is not a luxury car and the threshold needs to rise to at least $80000. We heard from Labor that medicare thresholds need to rise as they had not in 10 years so why luxury car tax. Further Labor is getting a chop of tax with the GST. Why is the community and government for fixated on the so called rich, good on them. As a parent I would love my child to become rich but I sure do not them to be taxed extra or hated by sections of the public because they got off their bum and made something of themselves. This is just the same old Labor but with a different face.

    DAVID of Buderim Posted on 13 May 2008 8:39am
  • I do believe certain people movers are effected as well, poor families with lots of kiddies. Its ridiculous, this stupid law. Not the fact that its there, but the fact that the cut off is approx. $57,000.... They should seriously have exceptions for certain cars. And I must say, I commend luxury car makers excuses smile they're great! They make sense....but its still luxury car makers.... I suggest we leave the 20% tax in where it is now, then increase it to 33% somewhere between 70,000 and 100,000?

    Tomas Rivera of Brisbane Posted on 12 May 2008 6:19pm
Read all 28 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics