Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Diesel or not

  • By Paul Pottinger
  • The Sunday Telegraph
  • image

    In every way a GTI with a diesel donk, the GTD runs probably the best of the new crop of common rail four cylinder turbo diesels. Photo Gallery

Four-wheel-drive owners have known about the virtues of diesel for decades ? that's why almost half of those privately purchased run those engines.

But with cars, petrol still outsells diesel by more than 12 to one, despite the number of diesel versions on the market increasing. The premium charged for diesel cars — typically $2500-$3000 — isn't much of an incentive.

However while the price of diesel at the pump has previously been north of PULP, it’s now more likely to be comparable with the cheaper 91 RON unleaded petrol.  This means absurdly long periods of ownership are no longer necessary to make diesel's superior fuel economy a paying proposition. And its resale is also likely to be higher.

And that makes many a car glaringly better value in the oil-burning version than the one with spark plugs.

HATCH MATCH

Volkswagen Golf GTI 5-door ($40,490)
Volkswagen Golf GTD ($39,290)

One goes a bit harder, the other goes a lot further.  If the Mark VI GTI is the best all-round car under $100,000   and, let’s face it, it is   the diesel sibling runs it close and surpasses it in some areas. In every way a GTI with a diesel donk, the GTD runs probably the best of the new crop of common rail four cylinder turbo diesels.

Power-wise, the GTD’s 125kW is 30 units behind the GTI, but its 350Nm wins the torque contest by a fat 70, so in gear punch more than compensates for being a bit over a second off the petrol car’s claimed 0-100km/h time of 6.9. But the performance benchmarks seem more than somewhat irrelevant with the GTD, which, manual form, can rev to 5200rpm and even more atypically sounds alright too.

Both five door models weigh in the same, so it takes a discerning judge going hard to fully appreciate the GTI’s dynamic edge. While the latter is imbibing 95 RON (98 preferred) at 7.7l/100km, the GTD manual’s 5.5l/100km sees it extract the utmost from the Golf's 55-litre tank.
Not only is the diesel take on this celebrated hot hatch cheaper to buy, it will distinguish you from the white cap wearers.

EXECUTIVE DECISION

BMW 320i Lifestyle ($55,300)
BMW 320d Lifestyle ($59,100)

One’s the most popular 3 Series, the other is pound for pound the best. The 320d is the no-brainer, default choice in Europe, where they wrinkle their high brows that anyone would bother with BMW’s gutless petrol four.

The extra ask for the diesel is more than a bit bloody rude, but consider the 320d is not only the 320i’s effortless superior, but an argument can be made for it being the best 3 Series this side of $90K.

The 320d’s four is good for 135kW/350Nm through the perfectly simpatico six-speed ZF auto and is the equal of its better in almost any legal circumstance, with BMW's hallmark rear-wheel-drive and near even weight distribution being present and correct. In fact, the 320d’s standard 16-inch runflat tyres are among the better-riding versions of this widely-disliked rubber.
As for consumption, the “d” does 5.4L/100km to the “i’s” 8L   98 RON at that.

FLEET AFOOT

Ford Mondeo LX wagon ($32,390)
Ford Mondeo LX TDCi wagon ($36,390)

There was a conspicuous lack of mourning when Ford canned the Falcon wagon, largely because this hugely capacious Euro lugger was on hand, more so because the diesel was en route.  That price disparity is no little thing, but (based on driving the Mondeo hatches), the diesel is so superior that it should have another name.

Even on the open road, with all care, we exceeded the combined fuel consumption claim 9.5-litres per 100km/h in that weedy 118kW/298Nm 2.3-litre petrol four. It isn’t engine enough for a near 1600kg car, let alone one with a total luggage capacity of a hearse-like 2163 litres.

With a new six-speed dual clutch transmission, the improved TDCi wagon range is good for 120kW/340Nm married and a 6.2L/100km.

SOCCER MUM MOBILE

Kia Sportage SLi ($31,990)
Kia Sportage SLi diesel ($34,990)

One of the newcomers of 2010 designed by an Italian in California, made in Korea and adapted especially for Australia the Sportage is light years ahead of its predecessor.  On paper, though, the petrol versus diesel thing isn’t quite so clear cut. In the mid-spec SLi, claimed combined fuel consumption being as close as 9.2l/100km (petrol) versus 7.5.

The former’s 2.4L/4-cylinder (130kW/227Nm) gets done like a dinner by the 2L/4-cylinder turbo-diesel with 135kW and class bashing 392Nm, but the it’s lighter and more “car-like” in its demeanor, so with identical specification, a six-speed auto and new variable all-wheel-drive system it depends what appeals. Of course, if you happen to be in the habit of pulling anything along behind you, or doing vast open road distances, it’s the diesel every time.

AFFORDABLE DILEMMA

Hyundai i30CW SLX wagon ($27,390)
Hyundai i30CW SLX CRDi wagon ($29,890)

The i30 CRDi (diesel) hatch won the Carsguide’s 2007 Car of the Year despite the supposed handicap, in fact enhancement, of the then non-choice five speed manual transmission. The 1.6-litre diesel makes better by far then the 2.0-litre petrol of the four-speed automatic only SLX wagon.

But then it would be with 85kW/255Nm against 105kW/187Nm. Again it’s a case of torque being far from cheap, but that extra is the difference between a highly capable lifestyle or owner operator device and one that’s ordinary by comparison.

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 8 comments

  • True Pottinger, but for the price? I don't think so, not for the same price as a GTI. I'm sure the GTD performs well but I'm also sure that the GTI has better brakes, grip and cornering ability, not to mention quicker in a straight line. Put it this way - whenever you pull up at the lights in a GTD and a GTI pulls up next to you, you'll think - 'I could have had that...but I was a cheapskate and wanted to save 2.5 l/100kms.'. Seriously? If the GTD was say mid 30k I think it would be better, but not for it's current price.

    alex Posted on 10 September 2010 8:36am
  • One of the problems with diesel engines is that fuel stations still have only one diesel pump. Access to that pump could be a problem at times. Also, diesel engines are noisier than the petrol equivalent.

    Tony Posted on 07 September 2010 5:27pm
  • Motormouth of Sydney... The claim is the "GTI is the best all-round car under $100k"... not fastest, all round. That includes ride, handling, interior, ease of driving, quality, price, etc. Yes, the turbo falcon and SS commodore are better in straight line performance, but they fall very short in many other areas. We will wait to see on LPi, but that still only covers the current horrendous fuel consumption.

    DM Posted on 07 September 2010 1:32pm
  • I have to take issue with the statement that the GTI is the best all-round car under $100k. I would suggest there are plenty of better cars. The obvious ones to come to mind are the XR6 Turbo and SS sedans. Both are in the same ball park as the GTU pricewise but absolutely annihilate the GTI's performance whilst being far more practical day-to-day. Once Holden and Ford release their new LPi technology, it's likely the big sedans will be as cheap to run as a GTI and probably kinder to the environment, too. And that's before you look closer towards the $100k mark, where you have to start comparing the GTI to very capable 3 Series and C Class models, as well as much better performing HSV and FPV offerings. Pretty stupid remark, really.

    MotorMouth of Sydney Posted on 06 September 2010 4:58pm
  • It's not just the running costs Peter, a smart purchaser would look at the resale potential of both the petrol and diesel models and use that as one of the things to guide their decision. Go and have a look at what the second hand small 4x4s are selling for and you'll see that the diesels are selling for more than $4k more. You don't know what you're missing!!

    Andrew of Kingswood Posted on 05 September 2010 12:25pm
  • I have driven the 2.0 and 2.4 petrol models in the Kia Sportage range, along with a Hyundai 2.0 petrol. I have not driven the diesel model and, to be honest, I didn't feel the need to, after driving the 2.4 litre petrol. I reckon most people, be they soccer moms or whoever, would be more than happy with the performance of the SLi petrol Sportage. Plenty of grunt, responsive and lively. A nice engine indeed. And, in mixed hills and busy city driving, I found I was able to keep the fuel economy gauge around the low-9 l/100kms region. I reckon you could easily better the official fuel eco. figures in city driving. So my advice to potential buyers is, unless you are towing, don't bother to drive the diesel, drive the 2.4 petrol - you'll be more than happy, and you will keep the extra $4000 in your pocket. Even if petrol prices suddenly *doubled* compared to diesel, it'd take something like 4 years to make up that difference.

    Peter Ms Posted on 03 September 2010 3:20pm
  • Ssangyong has had high powered common rail diesels since 2004 and why has it taken other companies so long to catch up to the smallest car maker on the planet. Go Rexton, Actyon, Kyron and Stavic.

    Larry of Sydney Posted on 03 September 2010 1:00pm
  • In what areas does the GTD surpass the GTI? Name one, apart from fuel economy. The GTD was only made to appeal to the diesel lovers. Both cost the same, the GTI runs rings around the GTD in terms of performance (regardless of what you think Paul and let's face it, the GTI is far from a petrol guzzler. A diesel will look better on paper, but Kw/hp is better for speed than torque is. If you want acceleration - stick with petrol. And what's the GTD auto's claimed fuel consumption? Or does it not come in auto? ... But that IS the point of the GTD - it comes about as close to the GTI as possible and brings all those diesel virtues to the table. Not the least of those is an open road cruising range about 25 per cent greater. That's not insignificant if you live beyond the city where 98 RON (which the GTI really needs) is scarce and horribly expensive. FYI: The GTD DSG does 5.8L/100km. By no means does the Mark VI GTI run rings around the GTD. The latter's a blunter instrument, sure, but how often do most of us get to drive in circumstances where that final few tenths is a factor? For what it's worth I'd have a GTI manual, but the GTD is a niche car well worth considering, if only to be a bit different. You won?t lose by that difference. Cheers - PP

    alex Posted on 03 September 2010 12:30pm
Read all 8 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links