Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Can GM be saved?

  • By Joshua Dowling in Detroit
  • Carsguide
image Will GM weather the storm?

Close to the brink, car giant calls for higher petrol prices.

Rick Wagoner, the boss of the world’s biggest car maker, General Motors - the parent brand to Holden - says the chances of his company surviving the automotive industry crisis is good but “it’s not 100 per cent”.

In an interview with a group of journalists overnight, he also said the current dip in the cost of fuel is making it difficult to force motorists into more economical vehicles.

Last year, sales of new vehicles in North America fell to their lowest level since World War II as the car business felt the full brunt of the global economic meltdown.

Now Detroit’s Big Three car makers are faced with two dilemmas: they need to weather the current storm at the same time as they need to spend what little money they have on expensive fuel-saving technology that car buyers aren’t yet prepared to pay a premium for.

“Obviously [the chance of survival] is not 100 per cent but I think the chances are very good,” Wagoner said. “This is an extraordinary set of circumstances that we are in and the economy is in. I hope we don’t have to see this sort of thing happen again.”

GM has until March 31 to show the US Congress a viable business plan and a detailed explanation of why the company should be saved – if it is to receive further financial assistance. It has already received $US13 billion from the US government just to keep the company afloat for the next two months.

The head of GM’s product development, Bob Lutz, said legislating strict fuel economy targets, as the US government has done, in order to turn buyers away from thirsty vehicles, was like “trying to solve the obesity epidemic by only making small clothes”.

In an earlier interview with journalists Lutz stopped short of calling for higher taxes on petrol, but it is clear the low cost of petrol is making it more difficult for the car industry to move forward. In his separate interview, Wagoner was more direct.

“I’m going to let politicians make the call on [higher petrol taxes] but I would simply observe that almost every other country in the world has a fleet that has better fuel economy than the US, and almost none of them have regulations on manufacturers,” Wagoner says. “What happens is there are petrol taxes and people respond rationally to that.”

Wagoner said the government needed to create customer incentives for economy cars – and disincentives for gas guzzlers.

North America has among the cheapest petrol in the developed world. The price of petrol is a little more than half cost in Australia, and about a third of what it is in Europe.

The average price of petrol in North America this week is equivalent to US64 cents per litre. A year ago it cost a little more than $US1. The state and federal taxes there amount to just 12 cents per litre of petrol, and 14 cents per litre of diesel, less than 20 per cent of today’s average retail price.

In Europe, government taxes account for almost two-thirds of the cost of fuel, while in Australia about half the current retail price is soaked up by petrol tax (38 cents) and the GST (10 per cent of the total sum).

“If the US Government wants us to move away from the reliance we have on petroleum then … they will have to take the lead role,” Wagoner said. He also suggested that it could be done by subsidising expensive research and development of new fuel-saving technologies, which would make the cars more affordable and bring them to showrooms faster.

For the time being Wagoner has voluntarily declined his multi-million dollar salary in lieu of a $1 annual wage, and sold or cancelled the lease agreements on GM’s five corporate jets.

When asked what he was going to spend his one dollar on, he replied: “Yeah, my kids.”

The 2009 Detroit Motor Show

 

  • Poll

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 16 comments

  • In 1995 GM produced a great electric car which was on the roads in LA. They had had the know how for years to clean up their stinking gas guzzlers but they chose not to. All the manufacturers hate the idea of electric cars because such cars don't need much servicing so they miss out on the follow up servicing rip off. Also the Governments would secretly hate the idea of the missed revenue of the petrol tax rip off. The car companys only have themselves to blame

    steve of mt.eliza Posted on 15 January 2009 9:05am
  • Is it realy the fault of the consumer, if they are offered a large motored fuel guzzler and fuel is not as expensive any more then we will buy the guzzler to keep up the appearence of being financialy secure in ourselves, I however do beleive that the answer lies with the auto companies themselves, 1:- stop building bloody great v8 monsters 2:- concentrate on the mid capacity v6 with hybrid technology and active cylinder management to replace the need for v8 engines. 3:- install such an engine in the commodore sized and falcon sized vehicles and also introduce a smaller capacity hybrid tech engine in the base spec car. manufacture these at current rates and people will buy as they will have no choice hey theres your captive market also. becoming industry leaders instead of adopting the technology of other manufacturers could just be the way to saving our automotive industry.

    Troppo Posted on 14 January 2009 4:16pm
  • Rather than raising the price of petrol, why not rate taxes on all cars by their economy. For example, if a car has less than 3 litres per 100kms then 5% tax while all cars/4WD and recreational vehicles which go over 13 litres per 100kms pay 50% tax and then have a gradient between the two amounts. All cars which run purely on fuel cells or fossil/gas free fuels, pay no tax and hybrids pay 10%. Annual registration for cars could also be calculated by their carbon footprint. The value of cars are rated by their energy friendliness rather than the old fashioned and often chaotic methods employed by governments across the world. I would rather see a rich man drive a Ferrari running on Hydrogen than a rich man using 22 litres per 100 kms on his Turbo Bentley.

    David M Priol of Faulconbridge, NSW Posted on 14 January 2009 3:55pm
  • The reason they need petrol o go up is because the US government is legislating strict fuel economy targets in order to turn buyers away from thirsty vehicles. But if petrol is cheap, people wont buy the fuel efficient cars that GM is being forced to make, they will keep their old gas guzzlers. If pertrol goes up, then they will buy new fuel efficient cars and GM sell more cars.

    DM of Melbourne Posted on 14 January 2009 3:28pm
  • Beats me too. Couldnt the lower fuel prices actually help Gm shift some of the excess stock they are drowning in? Raising the cash they need? Fords F150 was still the Nr 1 seller in the US last year. Comment like these just make you question their priorities. Is there any way that we can buy Holden and let it stand alone before these idiots take it down with them?

    andrew Posted on 14 January 2009 9:13am
  • Now i'm confused.... High petrol prices are what hurt GM, Ford etc for a long time as they never could be bothered building fuel-efficient cars... Now they want to price of petrol to go up again? Who's going to buy a V8 Holden, or a Mustang if petrol costs as much as it does in Europe

    John Xenos Posted on 13 January 2009 4:58pm

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links