Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

BMW confirms front-wheel drive

  • By Karla Pincott
  • Carsguide
  • image

    Reports overnight from Europe have quoted BMW boss Norbert Reithofer confirming that a small BMW will be built on the front-wheel drive Mini Cooper platform.

Never say never ? at BMW.

The German prestige brand has always vowed they’d never venture into the front-wheel drive field. But reports overnight from Europe quote BMW boss Norbert Reithofer confirming that a small BMW will be built on the front-wheel drive Mini Cooper platform.

"There will be front-wheel drive BMWs in the smaller vehicle classes in the future,” Reithofer stated at the carmaker’s annual shareholder and financial meeting in Munich yesterday.

“This segment is expected to grow further. And we will take advantage of this opportunity,” Reithofer said. “We are exploring the possibility of developing a joint architecture for the front and four-wheel drive systems of these cars.  We all know that the cost structure in the small car segment is different from that of the larger model classes. We intend to grow profitably in this segment as well.

“Because there is one element that applies to the entire process chain: We will increasingly apply modular manufacturing kits to various models and brands. This approach enables us to cut costs further – without compromising on top quality.”

The mini BMWs – as opposed to BMW Minis - that result from this strategy are likely to be strong contenders for supremacy in the sprouting luxury subcompact segment.  And they would improve the badge’s average fuel economy and emissions – which would boost their ability to comply with coming legislation not only in Europe but in the huge US market.

But the jury will be out for a while on what it might mean to the brand value after years of trumpeting the perceived dynamic superiority of rear-wheel drive.  However in a world that is seeing Aston Martin re-badge a tiny Toyota, it seems the old-school rules and boundaries may be losing relevance.

A new generation of young buyers – possibly looking for a cheaper doorway into a prestige brand – will probably care more about the badge on the front of the car than about which set of wheels is driving it.

And some of those could well be here, with BMW Australia saying they would definitely look at importing it.  “We’ll consider it in our planning once it’s available,” BMW spokesman Tim James says.  “But at this stage we haven’t got any advice on the timing.”

James agrees the subcompacts would slip in well underneath the current 1 Series, but says there is little concern about cannibalisation of sales.   “BMW would have conducted thorough research and have obviously identified a market,” James says.  “So for them to proceed and go in this direction means they think there would be only minimal risk of cannibalisation.”

And despite BMW often – and strongly – stating that rear-wheel drive is the mark of true driving dynamics (most publicly when a former Australian boss declared Audi was not a competitor because they had no rear-drive cars) James says the front-wheel news is unlikely to dilute the brand image.

“At BMW, everything they do, they always engineer to the highest standards,” James says.  “They won’t bring anything to market that isn’t a true BMW – that isn’t the ultimate driving machine in its segment.

“It won’t come with a negative connotation. And we do consider Audi a competitor in our market – whether it’s their front-wheel or all-wheel drive cars, Audi’s in the mix.”

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 18 comments

  • There is always a debate on fwd vs. rwd, but I just think of it as the horse and cart vs. the horse: the cart is just a dead weight on how the horse can really perform as a purpose built machine. They look for cost efficiencies and new features, but what I want is a faster, lighter, roomier, more efficient, better quality, more attractive vehicle. Compare the E21 BMW from the 80's with IRS and RWD versus all the aforementioned fwd vehicles: it can outperform in all areas. 30 years on...

    Sam T of Perth Posted on 19 January 2011 3:59pm
  • loving the pink car in the picture, so appropriate.

    James of Sydney Posted on 27 April 2010 11:10am
  • FWD are good for the right sized cars. Just as much as AWD systems are useless on other cars. The same goes with RWD. They can be utilized... or they can be driven by bogans who really shouldn't be on the road in the first place.

    rose of Newcastle Posted on 27 March 2010 11:38am
  • BMW already makes FWD cars. The retro Mini (that somehow, unlike the smaller original Mini, can't find room for a real spare tyre and uses horrid run-flats and a can of inflation goo instead - useless in Australia) that handles fine (especially with normal radials). FWD can be brilliant if you don't overpower it, my Mazda 323 Astina is testament to that, as were my two Austin 1800s and two Morris 1100s with Hydrolastic suspension. More interior room, far less weight, lower drivetrain friction losses, better cornering grip and better traction on loose surfaces. In a compact car, FWD has been the ideal choice since 1959.

    Michael Granat of Carnegie, Victoria Posted on 27 March 2010 11:07am
  • Don't worry, they will always make RWD cars also. You will not see a FWD M3 or M5 soon. Don't like FWD, don't buy it.

    Mschumacher of Earth Posted on 24 March 2010 3:31pm
  • Yes, lots of advantages to RWD. But FWD does have it's own advantages. FWDs are considered better in 'light' off-road conditions thanks to the engine's weight pushing the drive wheels down. It's also better because the steering wheels are the ones applying the power, which in these conditions is supposed to a good thing. But this affects a niche group of people. A more useful advantage to FWD is the components channeling the power from the engine to the drive wheels are shorter. This has two advantages - less weight and more efficient power transfer. The longer the distance the power has to travel, the more power is lost by the time it's delivered to the drive wheels.

    alex of brisbane Posted on 24 March 2010 1:38pm
  • So why was this decision made? Money. Pure and simple. The GFC flattens the underlying profitability, which is being lessened by other car makers who are using a cheaper manufacturing process of FWD. Eventually BMW had to do this. A real shame though. The funniest thing is the BMW comments over the years refuting that FWD would "never be used." Yeah right. Give it 10-20 years, with the manufacturing of electric and hybrids in full steam. Half of BMW models will be FWD.

    Liam of Sydney Posted on 23 March 2010 2:50pm
  • I have had both front and real wheel drive cars. There are several reasons why i prefer rwd. I have a subwoofer box in the boot and in the rwd car the extra weight gets pushed around rather than pulled in a front wheel drive car. The impact on fuel economy is substantial given that most front wheel drive cars have small motors and low torque. RWD cars also wear tyres much better (as long as you dont do burnouts). My front wheel drive car used 3 front tyre sets to 1 rear set. The original tyres were cheapys and they wore out in 3 months from new. RWD are better for towing, i remember once i saw a Camry towing a caravan in the wet and it was struggling to get up a slight hill. All the weight was on the back wheels from the caravan and the front tyres were just spinning. In my experience too, fwd cars understeer quite badly. RWD is superior in many ways.

    DW of Brisbane Posted on 23 March 2010 12:36pm
  • what a shame... trying to get into every segment of the market - just because Audi is doing it don't have to follow... c'mon stay a market leader , not a market follower.. I want to drive a BMW not a conformist commodity..

    Jeff Posted on 23 March 2010 11:04am
  • The single best thing about my girlfriends old BMW is that its RWD if it didn't have that, the car would be just like any other small soul-less car out there..........BORING

    brent petrie of melbourne Posted on 22 March 2010 9:43pm
  • IMHO ... sellout. But then again, what's wrong with that?

    pudogg Posted on 22 March 2010 2:57am
  • I won't be buying one; the main reason that I prefer BMWs IS because they are rear wheel drive...

    Jon Somers of Sydney Posted on 20 March 2010 9:24pm
  • Why do this. Their RWD 1 series already has very competitive fuel economy, and this is the only reason to go FWD, maybe packaging, but its a small car so you cant expect much room inside.

    Shakeel of Liverpool NSW Posted on 20 March 2010 6:05pm
  • love how the FWD BMW is pink :-D says something doesn't it?

    John Xenos Posted on 20 March 2010 4:28pm
  • Extremely dissapointing to hear..Always have been a loyal BMW fan and what seperated Bmw from the other luxury cars is that they were able competitivly match their cabin space,prices, fuel economy and more all with having rwd layout....i don't know too many bmw enthusiasts who will accept a bmw with a fwd layout. And although surely bmw will perhaps provide a class leading ride and handling for a fwd car, it unfortunately will undermine the brand's image...bmw will not stand out and will become just like the many other passion lacking luxury cars...maybe bmw is feeling the pinch from rival Audi and Jaguar, but that is not to say that if you cant beat them-join them..

    cue Posted on 19 March 2010 6:48pm
  • Dave, it might probably give other FWD (eg VW) a shudder up their spine. A BMW FWD could potientially be a class benchmark.

    R Posted on 18 March 2010 10:25pm
  • There's enough FWD's flooding the market without BMW putting it's name to this garbage. FWD BMW... no thanks.

    Kaygas of Melbourne Posted on 18 March 2010 6:58pm
  • Why? it does not make sense. A FWD BMW would only dilute the brand and have them competing against other FWD models.

    Dave Posted on 18 March 2010 1:09pm
Read all 18 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links