Skip navigation
Sell your car on Carsguide for free

Bankrupt Chrysler dead, but not gone

  • By Paul Gover
  • Herald Sun
  • Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Text size
  • Fiat chrysler

    The move will have minimal impact in Australia, as Chrysler Group is profitable and actually growing its market share despite the local showroom downturn.

Chrysler has retreated into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as it restructures ahead of a new global alliance with Fiat.

The smallest of the 'Big Three' automakers in the USA will go to court early next week to begin the next stage in its life after a small group of shareholders rejected a GM-style restructuring plan to ensure American government support to get it through the global economic crisis.

The move will have minimal impact in Australia, as Chrysler Group is profitable and actually growing its market share despite the local showroom downturn. Further into the future there is likely to be a liaison of some sort with the Fiat distributor, Ateco Automotive.

"For today, it's definitely Chrysler going forward," says the head of Chrysler Group Australia, Gerry Jenkins.

"Our customers have to know we're here and solid."

Jenkins was briefed this morning on the new situation during a global conference with Chrysler headquarters in Auburn Hills, a suburb of Detroit, and says he is pumped.

"Today it is clear what strategy we're going to embark on and who our partners will be and what the company is going to look like. We're focussed on what the future of Chrysler will look like," he says.

The Chapter 11 move comes after months of speculation about the total collapse of Chrysler.

It also comes as the latest development for a company which has bounced from drama to drama over more than 25 years, including a variety of alliances and links with everyone from AMC to Mitsubishi and Daimler. The German deal promised the most, and was promoted as a 'merger of equals' including the DaimlerChrysler name, but could not survive deep cultural differences between the companies and the financial difficulties of Chrysler's operations in the USA.

Jenkins says Chapter 11 is the best way for Chrysler to move forward and that the company is taking an accelerated form of the American financial protection, which could allow it to re-emerge within 30-60 days under a new structure.

"Effectively we hit the ground running," he says.

Fiat has welcomed the new development and, like Chrysler, can see the synergies going forward.

"This transaction represents a constructive and important solution to the problems that have plagued not just Chrysler in recent years, but the global automotive industry as a whole," says the CEO of Fiat Group, Sergio Marchionne.

"Our goal since we first entered discussions with Chrysler nearly a year ago was to leverage the strengths of both companies to yield the scale, efficiencies and cost savings necessary to create two stronger automakers able to compete more effectively on a global scale. This transaction is an important step toward achieving this objective."

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 4 comments

  • Interesting debate on who bought who down Daimler or Crysler I dont profess to have an answer but I suggest that just because Daimler come out of the deal without going broke it doesnt neccisarily mean Chryler was at fault. Remember Ansett were taken over by Air NZ and the later went broke but survived at Ansetts expense.

    John of Colac Posted on 07 May 2009 12:09am
  • Guy Oakes, Not correct. The alliance of Daimler Cgrysler broke due to the inefficiency of Chrysler ". . . and the financial difficulties of Chrysler's operations in the USA." The fact that Chrysler went broke and Daimer does not says it all.

    Sean T of Victoria Posted on 03 May 2009 10:10am
  • James, get yourself informed, mate. Daimler-Benz took over Chrysler in 1998 becuase Benz had no money. Don't forget that Chrysler was the most profitabel and most celebrated car maker in the world in 1998. Have a look at Daimler's management history - AEG, Fokker, Dornier, AdTranz - all gone under Daimler's stewardship. Great truck companies like Freightliner, Western Star and Sterling are either dead, on life support or only a shadow of their pre-Daimler days. Chrysler should never have jumped into bed with Daimler, they would have been much stronger if they had stayed independent.

    Guy Oakes of Sydney Posted on 02 May 2009 11:47am
  • I don't think that Daimler/Mercedes-Benz should have ever signed up to be partners with Chrysler because in the car market the way it is Chrysler will bring Daimler/Mercedes-Benz down.

    James Roberts of Kangaroo Point Posted on 01 May 2009 5:21pm
Read all 4 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics