Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Used car review: Fuel economy cars

  • By Stuart Innes
  • The Advertiser
  • image

    The Ford Fiesta Econetic is the most economical when it comes to fuel with an official rating of 3.7l/100km. Photo Gallery

When it comes to sipping less fuel, the car industry is getting better and better.

Doing 100km of general running about for less than five bucks in fuel makes motoring pretty affordable. As manufacturers bring out more models with increasingly-amazing frugality, motorists are laughing all the way from the pumps.

A generation ago, the 30 miles per gallon mark (9.4 litres/100km in metric speak) was a fairly good figure to achieve, with only the little, low-powered super-sippers doing better than 40 miles per gallon (7 litres/100km).

Now, however, the best of the fuel misers are achieving official results of better than 4 litres/100km (70 miles per gallon).

Just as importantly, they are cars that perform OK in the cut and thrust of everyday commuting and most will readily hold their own on a run to Victor or the highway to the Barossa. There's no need to creep along getting in others' way, when you've got 80kW of power and 250Nm of torque under the right foot as is the case with two of the top five fuel economy cars on sale in Australia.

Why the focus on cutting fuel?

Three main considerations drive auto engineers to develop these fuel-sipper engines:

1) The cost of oil long-term will rise, making refilling more expensive.
2) The world will run low on oil (we are using it at a greater rate than we are discovering it), and so it has to be stretched further.
3) The environment and people’s concern for it means it's important when the less fuel burnt per kilometre creates less exhaust emission; and cars might be taxed on their emission rating here one day.

Petrol vs diesel

Fuel cost of running a petrol versus a diesel car depends on the relative prices of the fuel. But in recent times there has not been much difference between them.

The best advances have been made with diesel-fuelled engines. The fuel is squirted into the engine in carefully measured tiny amounts under enormous pressure thanks to modern 'common rail' injection systems. The injection process is helped by cleverly-designed turbochargers (using the engine's exhaust gasses to spin a turbine that pushes more air, and therefore oxygen, into the cylinders).

Combined with optimised shape of the combustion chamber, there is great efficiency of power achieved from every drop of fuel, a help to fuel economy and emissions.

What’s the advantage of diesel?

Similar work is being done on petrol-fuelled engines but the standout characteristic of diesel engines' torque, or pulling power, at low engine revs gives them an advantage of fuel economy. Diesel cars can get into their higher gears sooner and at relatively low speeds. And once settled, the engine ticks over at a low speed and so uses less fuel.

Take the Fiat 500, for example. Its 1.4-litre engine running on petrol is quite economical. Maximum torque of 131Nm comes at 4250rpm and its official fuel economy is 6.3 litres/100km. But its 1.3-litre JTD diesel brother has more torque, 145Nm, at about a third of the engine speed, 1500rpm, and its fuel economy is 4.2 litres/100km. The little petrol engine uses 50 per cent more fuel while giving similar on-road performance.

The top petrol-only car on the fuel economy list from www.greenvehicleguide.gov.au is the tiny Smart Fortwo. It has an engine of just one litre size and three cylinders and is only a two-seater. But its light weight means the modest 55kW power is enough.

What about hybrids?

Hybrid cars - those that have a conventional engine plus and electric motor, exemplified by the Toyota Prius - come into their own in stop-start commuting. Normally, when a driver presses the brake pedal it is the enemy of fuel economy: you've burnt fuel to build speed only to waste it by braking and converting to heat energy that is lost. The hybrid car harnesses that energy, like an electricity generator, and feeds it to the battery pack for an electric motor that assists propelling the car.

But hybrids are not so beneficial in open road driving where they run on their conventional engine only and still carry the weight of the electric motor and batteries with little chance to use brake regeneration. However, the Prius is the third-best in fuel economy of all cars.

Stop-start systems

Some fuel-wise cars have stop-start: when the car is stopped and in neutral, the engine shuts off. It restarts as the driver presses the clutch pedal to move into gear.

Other fuel-saving technology

Engines done, the auto engineers then enhance the efficiency of their fuel misers by making them light in weight (they ditched the spare wheel of the Ford Fiesta ECOnetic to cut weight) and they run on low-rolling resistance, thin, tyres.

Aerodynamics also get attention. Look at the plate-style wheel covers on the Volvo C30 DRIVe. The Fiesta ECOnetic sits lower than other Fiestas and has a deflector skirt under the front wheel while the MINI D has underbody smooth airflow design. Prius boasts a drag co-efficient of .25 (anything below .3 is commendable; this is very good for a four-door).

Only one of our top five can be had with an automatic transmission, the MINI charging $2350 extra for its sophisticated six-speed automatic.

Visit www.greenvehicleguide.gov.au for models' official fuel economy and emissions rating.

TOP 15 FUEL MISERS

CAR MODEL FUEL TYPE ECONOMY ANNUAL COST*
Ford Fiesta Econetic Diesel 3.7l/100km $749
Volvo C30 DRIVe Diesel 3.8l/100km $769
Toyota Prius Hybrid Electric/petrol 3.9l/100km $789
Mini Cooper D Diesel 3.9l/100km  $789
Fiat 500 1.3 JTD Diesel 4.2l/100km $850
Smart Fortwo Petrol 4.4l/100km $891
Citroen C3 1.6  Diesel 4.4l/100km $891
BMW 118d  Diesel 4.5l/100km $911
Audi A3 1.9 Diesel 4.5l/100km $911
Citroen C4 1.6 Diesel 4.5l/100km $911
Honda Civic Hybrid  Electric/petrol 4.6l/100km $931
VW Polo 66TDI  Diesel 4.6l/100km $931
Suzuki Alto  Petrol 4.7l/100km $951
VW Golf 77  Diesel 4.7l/100km  $951
BMW 320d Diesel 4.7l/100km $951

* Annual cost for fuel at 15,000km a year and $1.35 a litre.                          Source: Green Vehicle Guide

THE TOP 5 AT A GLANCE

Ford Fiesta ECOnetic from $24,990

Engine: Diesel, 1.6L, 4-cyl turbocharged, DOHC
Power: 66kW @ 4000rpm
Torque: 200Nm @ 1750rpm
Transmission: Five-speed manual; front-wheel-drive
Fuel consumption: 3.7 litres/100km
CO2 emissions: 98g/km
Dimensions: 3950mm long, 1722mm wide

Volvo C30 DRIVe from $36,150

Engine: Diesel, 1.6L, 4-cyl t/charged, DOHC, stop-start
Power: 80kW @ 4000rpm
Torque: 250Nm @ 1750rpm
Transmission: Five-speed manual; front-wheel-drive
Fuel consumption: 3.9 litres/100km
CO2 emissions: 99g/km
Dimensions: 4266mm long, 1782mm wide

Toyota Prius from $39,900

Engine: Petrol, 1.8L, 4-cyl DOHC; AC 650V series-parallel hybrid, stop/start
Power: 73kW @ 5200rpm + electric motor
Torque: 142nm @ 4000rpm + electric motor
Transmission: CVT; front-wheel-drive
Fuel consumption: 3.9 litres/100km
CO2 emissions: 89g/km
Dimensions: 4460mm long, 1745mm wide

Mini Cooper D from $33,750

Engine: Diesel, 1.6L, 4-cyl t/charged, DOHC; stop-start
Power: 80kW @ 4000rpm
Torque: 240Nm @ 1750rpm (260Nm on overboost)
Transmission: Six-speed manual (six-speed automatic $2350); front-wheel-drive
Fuel consumption: 3.9 litres/100km
CO2 emissions: 104g/km
Dimensions: 3709mm long, 1683mm wide

Fiat 500 JTD from $25,990

Engine: Diesel, 1.3L, 4-cyl t/charged, DOHC
Power: 55kW @ 4000rpm
Torque: 145Nm @ 1500rpm
Transmission: Five-speed manual; front-wheel-drive
Fuel consumption: 4.2 litres/100km
C02 emissions: 111g/km
Dimensions: 3546mm long, 1627mm wide

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 11 comments

  • I bought a 2nd hand Prius Itech today with 25,000 klms on the clock for 22,500 dollars. i took it for my first drive and the fuel consumption was 4.2l per 100 klms. Not bad for a first run, I think I can do better once I get used to the car. I am a 67 year young woman who loves new technology, and of course helping the environment. Early days but i think everyone should have one Gill Brown

    Gill Brown of Perth Australia Posted on 30 March 2011 8:37pm
  • What about the suzuki alto? Nearly as good fuel economy and NO price premium. This is the hero eco car if you ask me.

    simon@syd of sydney Posted on 22 July 2010 3:50pm
  • How much space is in these cars? Not much luggae space. Love my Skoda Roomster. Can get under 5L per 100km easily on the highway, and I have even done that in some driving where the speed limit is 60.

    Paul of Warwick Posted on 21 July 2010 9:19pm
  • "Only one of our top five can be had with an automatic transmission" - a bit misleading as the Prius has a CVT (or their equivalent) which most drivers would classify as an automatic. For those saying the costs are not worth it have a look at secondhand prices for Prius - you can pick up a 3 year old one for about the same price as a similar age high-spec Corolla. Definitely the way to go. Also the Prius will match its claimed fuel consumption around town if you drive it sensibly which is much better than any of the diesels will do around town (also carries 4 adults in comfort which most of the other top 5 wont).

    Terry Bradford of Buderim, QLD Posted on 20 July 2010 3:48pm
  • I lived in Darwin from 1982 to 1985 and the Darwin to Adelaide solar car challenge was run every year back then with amazing technology. It's amazing after all these years that NONE of that technology has made it into production in modern cars. Funny that because the main sponsors for the solar car challenges were the petrol companies!

    MichaelD of Melbourne Posted on 20 July 2010 2:27pm
  • Is gas/lpg still considered an economic alternative to petrol/diesel (especially in larger cars)? Why is it not mentioned in articles about fuel economy these days?

    Mr Gormsby of Melbourne Posted on 20 July 2010 1:44pm
  • Is gas/lpg still considered an economic alternative to petrol/diesel (especially in larger cars)? Why is it not mentioned in articles about fuel economy these days?

    Mr Gormsby of Melbourne Posted on 20 July 2010 1:39pm
  • Same story for solar panels on your roof makes no economic sense over paying for electricity and would never buy a hybrid car or diesel as pay back not worth price differential. Government should simply say all cars should be made with lpg and carbo fuel tax is rubbish idea being discussed by political parties as revenue raiser for govt nothing to do with environment.

    mark of Perth Posted on 19 July 2010 7:56pm
  • I have bought a Ford Fiesta Econetic. Its fuel use with me driving is in the high 4s in a combination of highway and easy urban running. Still running it in so it might improve when it loosens up. I have read 3 accounts that back this experience of the econetic using in the high 4s. Other road test reports support the official tester's high 3 claims. Previous car was a Daihatsu Charade that nearly always showed up 6.7 l/100. You expect a diesel to use 2/3 of a petrol. The Fiesta is using 3/4 of what the Charade used but carries an extra 200kg. In general you could say this is typical diesel. The explanations for its claimed frugality don't add up. The VW Polo is similar weight and dimensions and claims 4.6 l/100. Maybe the only extrordinary thing about this Ford is the manufacturer's ability to put one over the testing authorities. However, the pommy authoritys seem to believe the low figures as they have given the Fiesta a road tax break on the basis of its low emissions. It has got me confused. Has anybody got any more info. Anybody tested the new VW Polo to see how it compares to the official figures in normal use?

    Jonathan Knox of Tasmania Posted on 16 July 2010 3:13pm
  • Why buy a Ford Fiesta ECOnetic from $24,990, when you can buy the cheapest of the Fiestas in the normal petrol engine and still be way ahead after 4 years. It's vital to compare the payback time of the car - not just the petrol. Why buy a $40k Prius, when a Corolla at high fuel useage will be cheaper over a set period of time?

    Bean Counter of Sydney Posted on 16 July 2010 1:50pm
  • My view is burn up as many fossil fuels as possible whilst we still have them because some time in the future we will all be driving golf carts.

    Ruppert Theobald 111 of Silver Spoon Posted on 16 July 2010 12:03pm
Read all 11 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links