Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Toyota RAV4 CV: review

  • By Neil Dowling
  • The Sunday Times
  • image

    The CV auto is the essential RAV4 — neat, cleanly styled, very functional and fairly priced at $35,490 (plus on-road costs). Photo Gallery

Neil Dowling road tests and reviews the Toyota RAV4 CV and finds it?s just like chicken.

We live in an age of allergies that feeds an industry of preventative medicines and an army of taxpayer-funded advisors.

Each of us has some food-related allergy or, at least, an intense dislike to what's on the dinner plate.

All foods, that is, except chicken.

You never hear a kid complain about KFC.

You never get the aircraft scenario where the flight attendant pushing the food trolley down the aisle is asking: "Chicken? Chicken anyone? No, I'm very sorry sir, the fish and the stew are all gone."

Everybody likes chicken. It's every menu's safe bet.

And if a car was listed on the menu as chicken, it would undoubtedly be served up with a Toyota badge.

Like chicken, everybody likes Toyota. It's the safe bet.

I thought the world had passed by the Toyota RAV4. It's now three years old and the new kids on the block — notably the VW Tiguan, Nissan Dualis and Subaru Forester — are flavorsome options.

Yet the RAV4 still impresses and sales shows that despite the newcomers, the RAV4 is Australia's second most popular Compact SUV after the Forester.

It's about the same price as its rivals and technically and feature-wise, is on par. That makes it a hard sector for buyers to pick their next car.

Toyota knows that so there are nine RAV4 models that start with this one here, the base-model CV with automatic transmission.

Yes, you can buy a 3.5-litre V6 version and scare the pants off Commodore owners.

But to me the CV auto is the essential RAV4 — neat, cleanly styled, very functional and fairly priced at $35,490 (plus on-road costs).

The five door wagon seats four adults. The back seat slides on rollers so the luggage area can be expanded — at the expense of legroom, of course — and that feature should be a no-brainer for all SUVs.

The side-hinged tailgate looks cumbersome with the spare wheel — a full-size spare, by the way — hanging off but is actually light and well supported by gas struts.

I like the underfloor bins for small-item storage, the netting for shopping and the flip down rear seats for added cargo space.

It drives like a small car with light steering feel and simple dashboard controls. Nothing fancy, just efficient.

The four-speed auto is a bit archaic in a market with five and six-speed boxes, but the Camry-derived 2.4-litre engine is lazy enough so there's a broad power band.

Performance is adequate rather than elating, though I caught myself smiling once so I left the grey cardigan in the wardrobe.

More important is an upgrade by Toyota that made electronic stability control (in Toyota-speak it's VDC) standard along with traction control and active head restraints. The latter reduces whiplash injury.

The CV gets two airbags but there is an optional package that adds five airbags — you have to use your other hand because that's seven in total — and climate-control, dual-zone airconditioning. No, I don't know why aircon and airbags have become allied.

Along with its easy driving manners, the RAV4 is quiet and comfortable. Yes, some conventional sedans — the Corolla for example — are quieter and indeed safer, but the small SUV market promises more flexible cabin space.

Though economical to purchase, the RAV4 is a bit thirstier than expected. Toyota claims 9.6 litres/100km and I was into the 10s and sometimes 11s. Compared with a similar size sedan — the Corolla, again — which is rated at 7.4 l/100km, the RAV4 will put its hand deeper into the weekly household spend.

On the plus side, there's a set service cost for the life of the three year warranty which is cheaper than most rivals.

But I like the RAV4 for its simplicity. It's just like chicken.


Snapshot
TOYOTA RAV4 CV
Price: $35,490 (plus dealer and statutory charges)
Engine: 2.4-litre, 4-cylinder
Power: 125kW @ 6000rpm
Torque: 224Nm @ 4000rpm
Economy (official): 9.6 litres/100km, (tested): 10.5 litres/100km
Emissions: 227g/km
Transmission: 4-speed automatic, constant 4WD
Rating: 85/100

Rivals: Ford Escape ($33,990) — 80/100; Honda CR-V ($33,990) — 86/100; Jeep Patriot/Compass Sport ($29,990) — 79/100; Mitsubishi Outlander LS ($32,990) — 85/100; Nissan X-Trail ST ($32,490) — 84/100; Subaru Forester X ($30,990) — 86/100; VW Tiguan 125TSI ($33,990) — 86/100

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 10 comments

  • I have just purchased a 2011 Rav4 CV almost 2 months ago and only seem to be getting 300kms 320kms per tank. Is normal or should I take it back to Toyota and have them look at it. The car was brand new off the lot at a dealer with only 36kms on the clock when I bought it.

    Mitch Viton of Alice Springs Posted on 03 November 2011 1:22am
  • I am trying to find out how much the cargo barriers are for the Rav4 2009 model?

    Toni courtenay-Ralph of adelaide Posted on 11 August 2011 9:36pm
  • I have had a RAV V6 for 3 months, I am 185cm tall, 110kg and find the seating comfortable in both the drivers and passengers seats with plenty of legroom in the rear.
    It’s performance almost scary when pushed hard.
    I had previously driven a Territory TS AWD. The RAV does everything the Territiory does better, quicker, cheaper and does not fall to pieces as you drive along, i found the Ford a poor product compared to the Toyota .

    R Simpson of Sydney, NSW Posted on 09 June 2010 2:24pm
  • I’ve had manual 2007 CV from new, with added alloys, running boards, nudge bar with spots, tow bar, roof/cycle rack carrier, headlight and bonnet protector, tinted windows, cargo barrier (for the dogs).  Paid $31000 on the road in Jan 07.  Although it has its odd rattle (intermittent) and a recent warranty job on a knocking steering column, it is fantastic - love the RAV.

    Neil of SA Posted on 07 August 2009 1:38am
  • AWD V6 would be the choice. Nice !!!

    J.J.T of QLD Posted on 24 June 2009 1:45pm
  • The RAV4 especially the V6 model is far from boring or ugly.

    Infact, an optioned example with an alloy nudge bar, side steps, dark window tint etc look rather good, even funky - particularly in black.

    The RAV is defantly one of the better SUV’s available.

    Hilko of Warnbro, WA Posted on 24 June 2009 3:42am
  • I own a current RAV4 CV - 2 yrs 40,000K’s. No serious problems, just a dead CD player and few dash & door trim rattles developing. Bit of road noise too at speed. Uses more petrol that you would think, just as much as my wife’s VZ Commodore, but I do drive it a bit harder. Body roll & understeer when cornering at speed is concerning so beware. Contented owner none the less.

    Brad of South West Slopes Posted on 18 June 2009 3:36pm
  • The Toyota RAV4 is boring and ugly.  There are better vehicles available.

    John Ralph Posted on 18 June 2009 3:32pm
  • Where is Suzuki Grand Vitara in the list of rivals ?? Thats gotta be a great alternative, much more for same money…

    Brian of Melbourne East Posted on 17 June 2009 6:03pm
  • The Toyota RAV4 and Kluger are undoubtedly amoung the best SUV’s on the market not to mention the AWD V6 version of the RAV is infact not a bad drive ... very quick with respectable road manners.

    That stated, i believe the next generation RAV4 will be introduced with a diesel engine in Australia (as they already are in many parts of the world particuarly in Europe) and the all new 2.5 4cyl that will be progressively replacing the current 2.4 4cyl in the Toyota range.

    Shane of Central Queensland Posted on 16 June 2009 5:50pm
Read all 10 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links