Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Toyota LandCruiser: fuel the difference

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Advertiser
image With a $10,000 price difference between petrol and turbodiesel model, it’s a tough to choice.

LandCruiser's enviable reputation is fuelled by either petrol or diesel power.

A price premium of $10,000 stands between the petrol and turbodiesel models of the new 200-Series LandCruiser range. While other companies charge the same for equivalent petrol and diesel models, in some cases even less for the diesel, it makes a decision between the two big Toyotas more complex.

I've driven the Sahara turbodiesel V8 and loved the torque, liked the tricky kinetic suspension but felt a little miffed at some equipment omissions compared with its predecessor.

I'm back in a LandCruiser, this time the GXL petrol V8 version. It sounds nice, which is why a lot of people buy V8s, but how does it stack up against the diesel?

Claimed fuel consumption figures of 14.5 litres/100km for the petrol versus 10.3 litres/100km for the diesel are lab numbers.

The petrol engine delivers 410Nm of torque - down from the diesel's 650Nm - and in real-world driving conditions the power difference is apparent.

It's not a bad engine but to keep up with the diesel's level of performance it has to work harder and, as a result, fuel use increases.

Also working against the GXL is the fact that V8 petrol models retain a five-speed automatic, while its diesel brethren get an extra ratio.

Combine that with the petrol's higher engine revolutions for peak torque and the petrol V8 is handicapped by comparison. The GXL features list looks comprehensive, although for $70,000 you might expect a few more toys.

But with front and side airbags, as well as curtain airbags for the first two rows, anti-lock and stability control systems, there is ample safety gear.

The cloth-covered seats have only manual adjustment and there's no automatic headlights or rain-sensing wipers. You do get 17 inch alloys, reach'n'rake adjustable steering, cruise control, front and rear climate control, and power windows and mirrors. For the same money, there are other Japanese and U.S.-built SUVs that have leather trim, trip computers, electric seats, auto-dimming mirrors and seat-heaters on their extras list.

Buyers will need to ask themselves what price to put on clever suspension and the badge reputation that the brand has built.

 


Snapshot

Toyota Landcruiser

GXL petrol V8

Price: $69,990.

Engine: 4.6-litre 32-valve DOHC petrol V8.

Transmission: Five-speed automatic, constant four-wheel drive, lockable Torsen limited-slip centre differential.

Power: 202kW at 5400rpm.

Torque: 410Nm at 3400rpm.

Fuel consumption: 14.5 litres/100km (claimed), tank capacity 138 litres.

Emissions: 341g/km.

Suspension: Independent double wishbones, dampers, coil springs, hydro-mechanical semi-active anti-roll bar (front). Live axle, trailing arms, coil springs, Panhard rod, dampers, hydro-mechanical semi-active anti-roll bar (rear).

Brakes: Four-wheel ventilated discs with four-piston calipers (front). Single-piston rear calipers.

Dimensions: Length 4950mm, width 1970mm, height 1905mm, wheelbase 2850mm, track fr/rr 1640/1635mm, ground clearance 220-225mm, cargo volume 700 litres, weight 2555kg.

Wheels: 17in alloys.

 

Class competition:

Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 5.7 Hemi, from $70,990.

Nissan Patrol ST-L, from $61,440.

Mitsubishi Pajero Exceed V6, $70,990.

Volkswagen Touareg V6 FSI, $74,990.

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 15 comments

  • I agree with Gordon Roscoe. When i got my performance exhaust system (fitted at 110,000kms on the odo) for my 4.7 V8 it was like i had a new car and i’ve owned it since new. (early 2005 model) I get the same economy as Gordon mentions. I havent chipped mine yet though and mine is a manual. The chip is coming when the $$$ arrive soon. Highly recommended.

    Peter M of Melbourne Posted on 15 March 2012 5:16pm
  • I have a friend who wants to sell his VX twin turbo diesel land cruiser with 18,000km with more extra accessory like full top sun and moon roof 20 inch mags . How much you think I should offer him please let me know asap cheers John .

    Chandra of Melbourne Posted on 10 December 2011 7:41am
  • I have the V8 Sahara diesel (2008) and the wife has a petrol Prado 2005 model. The standard V8 is hopeless in power and fuel-I had the car fitted with an upgraded exhaust and chip (cost 3300). It changed the car significantly-much more power and less fuel. It now returns 16l per 100ks non highway and 12l-ish on the highway. You can get as low as 10l/100 on the highway on cruise control @ 90Ks. Towing a 3,2T van it returns 18 to 20l/100ks. The wife?s petrol Prado Grande returns 16l/100ks non highway.

    Gordon Roscoe of Brisbane Posted on 13 October 2010 12:10am
  • I would like some advice if anyone can! I currently own a petrol Prado and its time to upgrade. Also tow a horse float and will upgrade too; meaning bigger and heavier. Would like to buy second hand e.g. 140k or so diesel turbo Land Cruiser over the Prado because of its extra weight allowance, but at what price fuel efficiency in the non towing state, which is the bulk of my driving. NRMA has no figures.

    christine Bain of lismore nsw Posted on 15 September 2010 6:29pm
  • Consumption is similar to my 06 on the highway. The first thing I got Toyota to do was change the ECU so it went into 6th gear at 98kph (factory set is 108kph). You have to coax it into 6th by pushing your foot down then lifting it. At 110kph it will be doing about 1700 rpm.

    GARY LADBROOK of ROMA Posted on 30 August 2010 8:02pm
  • Whilst I appreciate everyone’s concern about fuel economy this is a big hulking vehicle and if you are too worried about fuel use you have bought the wrong one get a Mini!

    paul Posted on 02 August 2010 7:00pm
  • We have a 100 series Landcruiser we only get 8 klms/100klms on the highway and with a loaded camper trailer we are only getting 4.5klms/100klms.  What’s the go!!!

    Ray Minor of Rockhampton Posted on 11 July 2010 8:48pm
  • Love my 1 yr old Sahara but the clunking in the tail shaft is annoying and wasn’t present in my previous Sahara or in my previous landcruisers. Toyota say there was not enough grease - well why not and how is this not a manufacturing fault? How often will this have to be regreased? Sounds like bollocks to me!!!

    Ian Tucker of Adelaide Australia Posted on 04 May 2010 9:20pm
  • Picked up my new 200 D4D in Melbourne 12klm on speedo, drove it to Sydney & sat on the speed limit all the way mostly in 6th gear which kicks in about 100k’s, 920klm from door to door, economy was 10.3 k/l exactly what Toyota claim on their site. Since then have driven around town & to Newcastle & back averaging between 12.5 & 14 lit/100, for a big vehicle i think that is ok, try getting that kind of economy out of a Rodeo or Mazda.
    When i hear people complain about economy & they say they have been driving at 120k/h plus
    i just wonder.

    Vince Burling Posted on 18 December 2009 11:41am
  • I have owned an FJ55 and an 80 Series Landcruiser over the last 35 years.  I clocked a million kilometers in the FJ55.  I rebuilt the motor once in this vehicle.  How disappointing Mr. Toyota that a vehicle that is supposedly designed to take people to remote places is now designed in such a way that people are hesitant to go into remote areas.  Why??

    Ray Mackaway of Sydney Posted on 21 September 2009 10:35am
  • Yep all of the above ive had it 12 months now twin turbo die sahara . And i,m not that happy.
    i dont know where these tester get there fuel consumption figures from ? best ive got is 14L/100km . ive had the 4x4 low electric,s shut down and dummy spit as well , it,s ok to spend 10 min stop starting the motor and tryng all sorts of button pushing secquences . unless of course your on the beach with waves coming in over you .

    GLENO of NOOSA Posted on 05 July 2009 7:35pm
  • I have a LC 200 sahara diesel,also most disappointed with the fuel economy,14/15L/100KM around town,I also have a 2007 sv6 with claimed city/country cycle of 11.3 L/100KM,I use less than 12L/100 in this aroud town,so I don’t think it’s my driving habits.
    Along with a few other problems,I have a shudder or hesitation on takeoff,after trying to fix it, the dealer has agreed to replace the tailshaft,I have to say,I trust my holden ute in the bush a lot more than this high priced Toyota.

    jim ring of west aust Posted on 22 November 2008 1:55pm
  • I have a new L200 SAHARA Diesel (yr 04/08)
    I have only had it for 4mths and travelled 8000k ,i am very disappointed with ;
    1/ brakes—in comparrison to my previous Navarra i find the L/C Brakes very poor and noticeably lacking ( unlaiden )
    2/ Hand brake—noticeably very inadiquate to a point i do not have any confidence in their ability to hold the L/C—the transmission park ensures the final resting point
    3/ Fuel consumption—lucky to get average 19lts/100klm around town (unlaiden and without passengers)
    out on the Hwy towing a small Ali tinnie -16-17lts/100klm
    with only 90lts tank to draw on -the travel range is very limited
    4/ Downhill assist and Hillstart assist-when activated -the noise coming from under the dash is a bit strange and off putting (rather a load sound like something crunching)
    5/ the keyless entry -is too close to the radio control on /off button and i have accidently hit the start button instead of the radio and stopped the engine
    6/ with only 3000klm on the clock and no off road travelled the transmission electronics -locked up where by i could not get 4 low and had to return the vehicle back to the dealer to have the electronics reprogramed -not a confidence booster for future outback travels?

    any way the ride and comfort is very impressive

    Greg cooper Posted on 05 September 2008 4:02pm
  • 200 series V8 diesel is my third landcruiser and worst for fuel consumption,
    normal driving and use never less than 13L/100 km, 6th gear is another issue,  great if you want to drive over 110/km useless otherwise.  when towing 18 ft van have had up tp 22L/100km never less than 18.5/100km traveling up through central NSW,  flat going a little wind and always try to stay around the 95 to 100km/hr . Plenty of power and rides as good as any cruiser but could not be recommended . Keep your 100 series.

    Ian McPherson of Echuca Posted on 13 July 2008 3:39pm
  • 14.5 litres /100km, your dreamin’, 20L/100km- if you’re lucky

    Bob Winterbottom of no way man Posted on 11 May 2008 11:27am
Read all 15 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links