Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Toyota Camry Hybrid: review

  • By Neil Dowling
  • The Sunday Times
  • image

    Toyota claims 6 litres/100km which is 32 per cent more economical that the four-cylinder Camry petrol version and any housewife will find 32 per cent a seductive discount, no matter what the product. Photo Gallery

Neil Dowling road tests and reviews the Toyota Hybrid Camry

"Oh, this is the hybrid?," he asks. "Yes."  Silence. Because, in truth, that's all he really needs to know.

It's a hybrid and it's made in Australia and it's a Toyota and at less than $37,000, it costs the equivalent of a base-model six-cylinder sedan from Ford or Holden and runs on only two-thirds of their fuel consumption.  Basically, what's stopping you?

Hybrids have been around ever since Mendel split his time between prayer and propagating peas.  It's not a bit scary. It drives like any other Camry though its trick of turning off its petrol engine when coasting or at a stop sign is initially freaky.  Unlike the high-tech Prius on which the Camry is mechanically and electrically based, nothing is unusual.

Appearance

It looks like a normal sedan car - true, too much like a normal sedan car - and has a conventional dashboard and switches and dials.  The gearshifter looks like a normal automatic shifter, even though it's attached to an unconventional transmission.

It seats five adults, the boot is large-ish - but space is crimped a bit by the battery pack - and aside from a tidy up on the outside that greatly improves the Camry donor, it's invisible in the parking lot.  You will look at the Camry Hybrid and consider buying it because it is relatively easy on petrol and is practical.

There's no doubt it will accept the family in comfort and almost whisper-quiet operation, even with the engine on, and really the only downers are a slightly shorter boot with only a small through-hole for skinny cargo, and the more serious inability to take a tow bar.

Fuel economy

Toyota claims 6 litres/100km which is 32 per cent more economical that the four-cylinder Camry petrol version and any housewife will find 32 per cent a seductive discount, no matter what the product.  And it is seductive until you figure that though it will save you about $500 a year in petrol bills (at 15,000km and $1.20 a litre), the Hybrid costs $3000 more than the mid-spec Sportivo with which it shares many features.

Be warned: It will take you six years to make up the difference - if you still own the car by then.  But it's not about the money, is it? This is a clever piece of engineering and there's a piece of me that quietly puffs out my chest at my ability to allow the Federal Government to give Toyota $35 million to build the car in Australia.

As a taxpayer, part of that money, you see, is mine - so I have an attachment.  You can also feel tinged with green while pulling away from the lights or reversing out of the underground carpark - the car in motion but no noise from under the bonnet.

It's a bit creepy and its silent motion will shock pedestrians habitually operating on their ears to manoeuvre around the city. In fact, the US association for the sight and aural-impaired are quite worried about the potential injury to members as the trend to noiseless vehicles takes hold. Damn environmental concerns!

Drivetrain

You will marvel at its ability, seemingly at random, to switch off its polluting engine and run on the electric motor.  The motor is charged by the petrol engine and, cleverly, by connecting the onboard generator every time the Camry brakes. It's called regenerative braking.

The Camry Hybrid doesn't have a plug-in capability - and thank the heavens for that! Plug-in electric cars have a place but they require more expensive and usually bulkier batteries and have only enough juice for 100km or 150km. The Camry idea, where every thing is onboard, is neater.

Toyota's greenest locally-built car comes in two versions - base at $36,990 and Luxury at $39,990. The latter gets leather, sat-nav, sunroof and an upmarket audio and is the affluent way to help the environment eke out a few more centuries.

Driving

On the road it drives like a conventional Camry and once you get used to the engine occasionally napping, only the dull lightness of the electric power steering clarify the difference.  Handling feels a bit better because the battery is on the boot and helps balance out the front-wheel drive car.

The Hybrid is heavier but it's also more powerful. This translates into a faster time to 100km/h but because of the continuously-variable transmission's wishy-washy lag, it doesn't feel like it's going anywhere for the first few milliseconds.  Something weird happened while I was out there behind the wheel - I didn't enjoy punching it. I felt, I don't know, dirty.

Here was a car designed to skimp on fuel to save its owner money while helping the planet limp forward on its intergalactic Zimmer frame and I'm trying to drag OPEC into ruin.  But, of course, it's quite difficult to make the Camry Hybrid guzzle fuel. Then again, I couldn't match Toyota's 6 litres/100km average, either.

I returned 7 l/100km. That's fine. Not anywhere near as good as some Europeans - Volkswagen's petrol 118TSI Golf and diesel TDI models, for example - but better than equivalent petrol-fuelled sedans.  A mate got closer, finding an average at about 6.5 l/100km. The difference wasn't anything with our right feet. Rather, I used the freeway and he used a coastal road. I was locked in to 100km/h with the engine never pausing and he was against a string of traffic lights and lots of undulations where the engine could be switched off and electric power used.

It's sufficient t make you consider where you live and how you get to work.  And if someone asks, tell them with a smug smile that yes, it's a hybrid.

Toyota Camry Hybrid

Price: from $36,900
Engine: 110kW/187Nm 2.4-litre, 4-cyl
Motor: 105kW/270Nm AC 650-Volt water-cooled; AC 650-Volt generator
Performance: 0-100km/h - 8.9 seconds
Economy (official) 6.0 litres/100km; (tested) 7 litres/100km
Emissions: 142g/km (Corolla: 175g/km)
Transmission: CVT; front-drive
Rating: 85/100

Rival

Ford Falcon XT ($39,690) — 82/100
Holden Commodore Omega ($39,990) — 81/100
Honda Accord VTi-L 2.4 ($38,990) — 82/100
Nissan Maxima 2.5 ST-L ($33,990) — 85/100

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 11 comments

  • I have driven my new hybrid for 5000km with a mixture of country, freeway and city driving (I drive to the city for work every day) and have returned an average of 5.6l/100km. I have had petrol only Camry’s before which have managed 9.5l/100km. I agree that the lack of initial take off can be disconcerting; and the first few times that the engine cuts off but you are still doing 100km/h is weird but I love the quiet smoothness of the hybrid and it is definitely more powerful than previous models. I recommend a test drive, it is a great feeling getting 1000km from a single tank and being able to wait for the petrol price cycle to be at its lowest before filling up.

    Ivan Yates of Perth Posted on 29 December 2010 11:05pm
  • Well guys put it this way. 2.9% interest rate on Toyota finance for Hybrid Camry - UNBEATABLE. Value for money - for sure. Would I buy it? Yes. I took a test drive on a series 2 Camry Hybrid - I was very impressed. Car was great to drive, no issues found in outright performance and between pushing the accelerator pedal and forward movement. Eliminated obviously in series 2. Overtaking - nice combination of fuel and Electric power. No hesitation there either. Downfall - BOOT space and bright lights on the climate unit during the night. Gadgets - nice variety- wipers, auto headlights, RV camera, electric seats and so on. From me thumbs up and I just decided to get one for my family.

    Brizzy boy of Brisbane Posted on 11 June 2010 4:51am
  • To the revheads who have their heads in the sand. Come back in 10 years you won’t be able to by a gas guzzler. Electric/Hybrid is the future and they will get better !!! The only reason they are not in more use now is we need to keep multi nationals rolling in money and to help BP pay to clean up the mess !!!

    Ron Sproul of Sydney. Posted on 02 June 2010 12:44pm
  • Having driven the Camry Hybrid on the freeway and faced with numerous Road Trains, planting the foot delivered a sharp response and PLENTY of acceleration.  Having the Electric motor assisting when required was great!  I’m buying one and I’m excited about it.  Easily got 6 Lt/100 km on a flat highway at 110 k.

    Alan Parker of Whyalla Posted on 23 April 2010 9:02pm
  • I’ve had the Hybrid Camry for about a month now and am completely satisfied. The car is very smooth and has more than enough power and acceleration for both highway and city driving. All this is fine, and so are all of the options and gadgets, but what makes this car really special in my mind is the excellent fuel economy. I’ve done ~2300km so far and have been averaging 6.2L/100km, without really trying. This translates to ~ 1000km per 65L tank. For a genuine 5 seater that delivers 140kw of effortless power that’s pretty good! In my view Toyota is on a winner with it’s hybrid technology that, I believe, will only be fully appreciated as fuel prices continue to head northwards. The biggest challenge for Toyota is to demonstrate that its hybrid cars are reliable and there for the long haul.

    John of Melbourne Posted on 18 April 2010 7:33pm
  • ................... That pause was my 2006 Camry, major lag problem since Toyota launched its 2006 2.2Lit engines. I do know it is some Toyota’s SMART CHIPie TECHNOLOGY, but man that is a major buzz kill for such a beautifully crafted car.

    ...after reading this article and especially the same lagging problem in this new Camry hybrid, well i don’t know about saving planet, but while suddenly speeding up to overtaking a 16 wheeler big rig and suddenly confronted by another vehicle coming on to you. to be honest i will choose me and my family. I know.. what you guys are thinking but am taking about me and me and my wife goes to work, and have to go through such ordeal daily just to find out each and every time that my cars computer is still thinking which gear to pick 3rd or 4th.

    About fuel consumption, I had a FORD fairmont (3.8Lit) on gas and was happy and than switched to 2006 Camry 2.2Lit. I am still confuse why is my car still giving such low ks/Lit. My Camry is giving me 11Lit/100k. i was expecting minimum to be 13Lit/100k.

    So, high fuel consumption for 2.2Lit car and Huge Lagging problem post 2006 Camry is problem for me. Good shape and sexy is just keeping this car in my garage.

    nadia2006camry of southaustralia Posted on 16 April 2010 6:57pm
  • Shame that Toyota will not allow you to tow anything with it. For a family car that seems like an oversight

    Kent Witney of brisbane Posted on 31 March 2010 10:06am
  • The car is actually an AWD vehicle, the petrol motor drives the front weels and the electric motor drives the rear wheels.

    M C Hesus of Adelaide Posted on 20 March 2010 7:52pm
  • Even,
    If your Mrs’ Corolla consumes 12.23 l/100km, something is wrong with it. Mine is 7.3. Corolla uses more fuel than a 1996 Ford 6, LOL.

    sean t Posted on 16 March 2010 11:43am
  • FWD vs RWD - You’re not going to know until you give it the beans around a corner in the wet - which the vast majority of people won’t do. Don’t get me wrong, I think the locally made sixes are fantastic but I give this Camry the kinda thumbs up. FINALLY, a hybrid you wouldn’t mind owning. It’s good Mr Dowling that it looks conventional. I’m sick of seeing car manufactures make ‘green’ cars look, well - stupid. They’re always these stupid looking cars that would appeal more to young girls for being ‘cute’ rather than someone who wants a good car and actually does research before buying one. AND - this actually has POWER! (Compared to a normal car anyway). 0-100 in under 9 secs is not to be snuffed at. It’s roomy, NORMAL LOOKING and seemingly well equipped all with a pretty low fuel consumption. BUT IN SAYING THIS - you could save yourself $3000 and buy the sportivo as you said, most people aren’t going to keep a car for six years. So you’re better off with just normal 4cyl fuel consumption for a slightly lighter and sportier Camry I feel. Compared to petrol cars I don’t think it’s all that amazing but for a ‘green’ car, I think it’s the best so far.

    Alex Posted on 15 March 2010 10:47am
  • Why wouldn’t you buy one? Here are a few good reasons: Front wheel drive - we like rear wheel drive cars, we can throw the boat on the back or a caravan or a trailer. No mention of service cost, and just how much does it cost both price and the enviroment when the batteries fail (and they do) and have to be replaced. The measily amount of fuel you’re saving is so not worth this tax payer funded farse. In my old 1996 Ford 6, I repeatedly get 9.2 litres/100km, about 825km per tank on the freeway, with 28 km approx before a refill. I do find it strange you keep crapping on about these so called ‘fuel efficient’ cars. My Mrs has the latest Corolla and it uses a third more fuel than my old Ford. So go on, next you’ll be telling people to buy a horse & cart because it uses less fuel.

    Evan of The Real World Posted on 13 March 2010 3:14am
Read all 11 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links