Skip navigation

Toyota 86 GTS vs Ford Focus ST

  • By Stuart Martin
  • The Daily Telegraph
  • image

Toyota 86 GTS and Ford Focus ST go head to head in this comparative review.

3 stars

VALUE from $35,490

3.5 stars

VALUE from $38,290

The four-seater gets plenty of kit -- satnav, touchscreen audio with voice commands, Bluetooth and USB connection, limited-slip diff function, 17-inch alloys, LED running lights, HID automatic headlights, leather/Alcantara heated sports seats, dual-zone climate control and fully adjustable sports steering wheel.

The ST gets Recaros, 18-inch alloys, leather-wrapped sports wheel, auto headlights and rain-sensing wipers, rear parking sensors, nine-speaker USB/Bluetooth Sony sound with voice activation, reversing camera and satnav. Plus variable-ratio sports steering.

3 starsTECHNOLOGY 3.5 starsTECHNOLOGY

Subaru's flat-four with Toyota's dual fuel injection produces 147kW at a lofty 7000rpm and 205Nm not much earlier at 6400rpm yet it's flexible. The busy soundtrack is augmented by an intake sound generator and conducted by a sharp six-speed manual gearbox turning the rear axle. Dance anyone?

With an uprated version of the 2.0-litre direct-injection turbo four from the Ford Falcon, the ST produces 184kW/360Nm with a claimed thirst of 7.4 litres/100km. The only transmission is a six-speed manual. Electronic assistants include three-stage stability control and torque vectoring.

3 stars

DESIGN

3.5 starsDESIGN
The long, low look gets attention. Well-proportioned rump with twin exhaust pipes and a diffuser. When you sit behind the upright steering wheel the GTS has comfy leather/Alcantara sport buckets. The two rear seats are somewhat useful but the Focus has a real back seat.
 
You won't confuse this five-door with a mainstream Focus. The interior is more versatile than the 86's and gets the full sports seat treatment. The dashboard and chunky steering wheel are too busy but it's a comfortable passenger space front and rear.
3 starsSAFETY 3.5 starsSAFETY

Five stars were awarded to the near-identical twin Subaru BRZ. The safety features list of the "Toyobaru'' includes seven airbags -- dual front, front-side, curtain and a driver's knee bag, anti-lock brakes, stability and traction control (with a sport mode).

The newest hot Focus has a five-star ANCAP rating, with dual front, front-side and curtain airbags, anti-lock brakes with electronic brakeforce distribution and emergency brake assistance systems, rear parking sensors and a reversing camera.

2.5 starsDRIVING 4 starsDRIVING

It's not a scorcher in a straight line but the 86 GTS is light on its wheels, with sharp steering, rifle-bolt gearshift and great balance. On the right road or track, the driver can lead the rear end a merry dance without real fear of being bitten.

More civilised than the 86 in traffic; the Focus makes better noise when exploiting the bags of grip, enthusiastic well-weighted steering and considerable grunt. Still some torque steer with which to contend. The ST will cover long distances in better shape.
  FINAL POINTS
  image  
  FINAL POINTS
  image

VERDICT

Two new-age hot shots: one boasts more grunt but delivers it all through the front wheels, the other goes for light 'n' nimble without huge outputs. Both will delight the driver but the Ford is easier to live with day to day.
 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 4 comments

  • Focus ST is a remarkable car for the price,
    1. Value for money.
    2. Performance and pure enjoyment.
    3. Practicality, everyday living and
    5. Great looks in real life, rather than some of the terrible photos I have seen.

    I guarantee ill be holding onto my 2013 Focus ST much longer than owners of the 86 or BRZ. Besides, you have to be smashing that rev limiter to complete any sort of sizeable drift in dry conditions. And don’t bother bringing the 86 or BRZ to a track day. After your 10 laps your already at-least half a lap behind.

    One last point, The focus ST Sony stereo is not as complex as these reviewers quote. On purchase all the functions are clearly shown by the salesman at CityFord and the rest I self explanatory.
    I’d love to see someone test drive this car and quote me otherwise. Oh and if you would rather a Golf GTI, keep saving your pennies because it will cost you at least $7,000 more for a comparable package. 

    Pete Evans of Sydney Posted on 08 April 2013 2:02pm
  • There is a distinct styling difference that make these two cars completely incomparable. I wouldn’t buy a hatchback regardless of how fast it goes. On the flip side I think there are many more who wouldn’t buy a coupe despite how cool it looks.

    Car fan Posted on 21 October 2012 5:24pm
  • Have another look at the ST specification. I think you will find the ST has got the GTS covered and probably deserves a higher Value rating than the GTS

    Muz of Brisbane Posted on 21 October 2012 10:24am
  • While you’re doing rwd vs fwd comparisons, how about comparing the GT86 vs Polo GTi?

    Julian Posted on 18 October 2012 8:29pm
Read all 4 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Feedback Form
Feedback Analytics