Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Touareg R50: city boy

  • By Paul Pottinger
  • The Daily Telegraph
image The big Toureg R50 is more a town car than a traditonal bush-basher.

A self-described ?4WD writer? recently attempted to take yours truly to task for ?failing? to take big 4WDs offroad.

And that particular missive came to mind on Wednesday while piling along in Volkswagen's Touareg R50.

This 2.6-tonne chunk of 5.0-litre V10 turbo diesel would very likely carve upexpanses of nature in a fashion of which our rustic chum would approve.

The reality, of course, is that no R50 will be so deployed. A hint is its hardly Leyland Brothers-esque 21-inch alloys shod with low-profile rubber, and the absence of a spare.

Actually, an ad campaign depicted the regular V10 Touareg towing a passenger jet. There's not a lot of call for that sort of thing either — although if you happen to live at Mascot ...

Anyway, our friend from the leather-Akubra-and-abundant-facial-hair brigade hasn't twigged that this is the 21st century and them there sprawling clusters of huts we call “cities” contain 95 per cent of the population.

And most SUVs (as we call 'em now) never see terrain much further west than, or any more challenging than, the parking lot of Woollahra Oval.

Indeed, as we inched painfully around Surry Hills, almost every second auto on show was an SUV.

Shod in those bling rims, clad in the metallic blue hue with odd interior metal accents of VW's R-series vehicles (the Golf R32 and forthcoming Passat R36), this here Touareg is for boulevards, boy, not back tracks.

And, of course, for queuing outside the better-to-do schools, inevitably driven by over-groomed mothers (who'll just love the vast wing mirrors).

So the only pertinent question is just how ludicrously overdone the R50 is for this urban jungle, with its clogged, decaying roads and multiplying clusters of speed cameras.

We've asserted that Audi's closely related Q7 (with 4.2-litre, direct-injected V8 turbo diesel) is a blast on the autobahn but a bit of a bugger around Sydney Town, where the roads are of asimilar standard now as in 1788.

In this country, you'll seldom legally access more than a fraction of the R50's 258kW and Wagnerian 850Nm from 2000rpm. But it's unexpectedly easy to deal with in the 'burbs.

The VW's response with the go pedal shoved down is face-flatteningly emphatic. But, as opposed to the rather toey manner of the Q7, it has at least some room to move between go and the arrival of terminal torque.

Nor is the R50's stop pedal as irritatingly over-servoed as the Audi's. In fact, you'd like more bite.

I was warned that the VW might have difficulty getting its mad capability smoothly to the road, but the R50's six-speed Tiptronic auto and all-wheel drive were equal to the task.

Although almost comically overpowered, it achieved exceptional peak-hour average economy of 14 litres per 100km, dropping to 11.4 over a 250km combined freeway and arterial-road run. Progress at cruising speed iseffortless.

The running-gear package includes a sport mode in which the R50's air suspension can be manually or automatically lowered by 20mm to complement the stiffer spring rate.

With suspension and ride height set at the most dynamic (sport may be terse, but comfort mode is so soft as to be sick-making), the R50 comports itself more than capably on a downhill run of 25km/h corners.

Body roll is impressively contained, to the extent that this enormous steel castle imbues you with confidence as it wends its way through the teeming rain and mist, very possibly terrifying drivers of smaller cars (most cars, actually) as it looms over them.

The R50's visual statement is strong, but not Hummer-ly horrible. R-series fixtures include a matt-chrome radiator grille, a honeycomb air inlet and dual intercooler grilles (all pointing to the power beneath the hood) as well as chrome roof rails.

The Touareg's safety package has earned five stars, as opposed to the Q7's four, in European NCAP testing.

There's a switchable Electronic Stabilisation Program, self-levelling, bi-xenon headlights with cornering lights and cleaning system, parking sensors, a rear-vision camera and — onthe passive front — six airbags.

Apparently the ABS-plus brakes adapt brake pressure in off-road conditions to reduce stopping distances as much as 20 per cent.

Not that any owner will find that out.

Within, this is the best current Volkswagen, perceptibly behind Audi in terms of material and plastics quality but by no means embarrassed.

The Touareg doesn't qualify as refined on the road, though; there's just a bit too much road and engine noise.

At $129,900, the R50 represents good value by the standards of this segment. It's $8K up on the “non-R” V10 TDI Touareg (which runs a 230kW/750Nm version of the V10) and $6K up on the slightly quicker and lighter Q7 4.2 TDI.

The latter achieves 100km/h from rest in a claimed 6.4 seconds to the VW's 6.7. The nearest equivalent diesel Range Rovers are sluggish off the mark by comparison, but kill both VW Group variants for cachet.

Very much like the Audi, however, the value — indeed, the intelligent choice — comes far further down the range with those variants packing the excellent 3.0 TDI V6. That the Touareg version happens to begin some $11K cheaper at $74,990 should be persuasive.

But not to that sub-branch of the human species who are aroused by the R50's particular distinction of boasting 10 cylinders under the bonnet and more torque than anything this side of exotic money can muster.

And that, in so far as it can be said to be one, is surely the object of the whole R50 exercise.

 


SNAPSHOT

VOLKSWAGEN TOUAREG R50

Price: $129,990

Engine: 5L/V10 twin turbo diesel, 258kW/850Nm

Performance: 0-100km/h: 6.7 secs

Economy: 11.2L/100km (tested)

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 5 comments

  • Geoff, Hayden and Peter

    Well said, chaps, but don’t mind the Dancing fool overly. He’s a sad cyber-scavenger with a galloping case of Relevance Deficit Disorder.

    Note the classic symptoms: the pedantic carping, the pompous bluster, the plethora of personal details - as though anyone, anywhere has ever remotely cared what he has to say. Otherwise he’d have had something better to do at 2am on May 8.

    Paul Pottinger of Sydney Posted on 17 July 2008 12:07pm
  • ‘Morris Dancer’
    You are on this website criticising every review made by someone on a 4wd that you dont like.

    It has to be stated that you appear to be running quite a personal campaign; this becomes painful when you also include ‘facts’ that are clearly not factual at all.

    1- “Anyone with a modicum of off-road 4WD knowledge knows that the R50, like every other Touareg variant, is really a soft-roader with 4WD pretensions.”
    —What a load of uninformed BS. The standard Touareg will hold its own against most other 4WD’s in a pure bush bash. It is far from a soft roader.

    2- “Assuming you’re referring to off-road driving, on what evidence do you make this assertion? What other practical intent could the R50’s low-range reduction gearing and ride height-increasing airbag suspension serve?”..
    —Surely you jest (I know you dont jest… its vitriol)... The R50 like the W12 Touareg is not geared for offroad driving. Read the marketing literature and look at the Tyres…

    Like you I could go on but it will fail to do either of us justice.

    I do have a Touareg and have taken it off road in rural Victoria, SA and NT. There are few cars that are as capable or that I would like to cover the distances in.
    Growing up in remote rural locations I am in a position to judge this car quite critically. Ie your own statement licences me to discuss this.
    “and leave any vehicle claimed by its maker to have off-road credentials to people who know what they’re talking about.”

    It must be said that if this vehicle wont get you where you are going;
    - You have ran out of skills
    - You have the wrong tyres
    - You have chosen to stop so as not to damage the vehicle; something that may not have crossed your mind in a second or third hand Nissan Patrol.
    - You probably should not be going there.
    - In a very few instances it may not be the vehicle you need to be using; again in this instance the skills required are also likely to be an issue.

    It is appreciated that esteemed journalists as yourself only get to spend a short amount of time in cars before passing judgement; as such I guess I can understand your lack of knowledge in this regard.

    'Geoff Treg' of Melbourne Posted on 12 July 2008 1:07am
  • Observed from a small distance, it seems Mr Dancer is constantly on the prowl to criticize a fellow journalist in their presentation of an opinion.

    Mr Dancer, if I want to buy a serious 4WD (which I still am not sure what even you would term this, maybe aside from the likes of a Defender) I will research the ‘serious’ 4WD magazines and Blogs.  However, the market to which Mr. Pottinger is writing is agnostic at best to ‘real four wheel driving’.  All I want is to know that I can take a 4wd to the beach or down a dirt track, as do almost all of the people who read this article and others like it you have been so critical over the years.

    I will never, as do most 4wd owners take it to places to which you infer.  I doubt Mr. Pottinger has ever claimed to know everything about four wheel driving, as I doubt even a self professed expert like you would.  But at least he doesn’t even pretend to.  What he has done is write an honest article giving his opinion to a wide market which he has done well.

    I doubt anyone really cares if he was not factually correct on the material of Akubra hats.  It really wasn’t important and highlights your animosity to your colleagues who compete in the same space as you.

    Hayden of Melbourne Posted on 04 July 2008 4:08pm
  • Oh great ! - another expert who thinks he has a monopoly on 4WD knowledge.

    Mr Dancer seems to have the opinion that if a car has 4WD capability then he (or some other “4WD expert”) is the only one qualified to judge it.

    The fact that some cars are targeted at people that do not want to “climb every mountain” seems to have escaped him.

    The R50 is clearly made primarily for road use - so your assumption that it is not a proper 4WD is just another form of snobbery.

    The last time I checked this was a free country and people buy cars for their own reasons. If they choose to drive a 4WD in the city then that is their choice.

    If you want to talk about unnecessary features consider the average commuter car (or bike) that is built to go more than 100 KMH - surely that is only for race cars because if plod gets you he will punish you!

    If you look in the average suburban carpark you will find an abundance of 4WD’s - are those people all dumb? Maybe they find that these cars suit their purposes for a number of reasons other than tearing up the bush.

    For the record - I drive a diesel landcruiser and I find your judgemental diatribe offensive - I would say Mr Pottinger’s description of you is too kind.

    Maybe you are one of those people who like to criticise expensive vehicles because they know they could never afford one and are jealous.

    I would love to know what you drive.

    Peter Rogers of Warrandyte VIC. Posted on 29 June 2008 8:30pm
  • As the “self-described “4WD writer”” who took you to task (a successful “attempt” I’d reckon, considering your superiors saw fit to publish my criticism of your dereliction of duty, I’ll correct the more obvious blunders in your R50 piece:

    1. “This 2.6-tonne chunk of 5.0-litre V10 turbo diesel would very likely carve upexpanses [sic] of nature in a fashion of which our rustic chum [there’s no need to be patronising, my ‘city-slicker mate’] would approve”: If that verbiage is meant to imply that the R50 has some degree of off-road ability, you’re well wide of the mark. Anyone with a modicum of off-road 4WD knowledge knows that the R50, like every other Touareg variant, is really a soft-roader with 4WD pretensions.

    2. “no R50 will be so deployed”: Assuming you’re referring to off-road driving, on what evidence do you make this assertion? What other practical intent could the R50’s low-range reduction gearing and ride height-increasing airbag suspension serve?

    3. “our friend (your description, but certainly not mine) from the leather-Akubra-and-abundant-facial-hair brigade hasn’t twigged that this is the 21st century and them there sprawling clusters of huts we call “cities” contain 95 per cent of the population.”: Your second pathetic attempt at sarcasm is not only three-fold inaccurate (Akubra hats are made from rabbit felt and not leather; I don’t wear one; and I’m clean-shaven) but it also betrays your stereotypical dismissal of off-roaders.

    4. “most SUVs (as we call ‘em now)”: You, along with other ignorant people (including much of the Australian motoring media and the motor industry, which seem to be uncomfortably closely aligned), might call “them” (presumably you mean off-road 4WDs) ‘SUVs’, but knowledgeable off-roaders don’t use that meaningless and purposefully confusing term. A vehicle is either an off-road (or all-terrain) 4WD or it isn’t.

    5. “almost every second auto”: In Australia, ‘auto’ means ‘automatic’ and not ‘automobile’.

    I could go on, but if you haven’t got the point by now you never will. Stick to writing about cars, and leave any vehicle claimed by its maker to have off-road credentials to people who know what they’re talking about.

    Unless you really want to learn something about bush driving, in which case venturing beyond your inner suburban lair once in a while would be a good start.

    'Morris Dancer' (freelance 4WD journalist) of Sydney, Australia Posted on 08 May 2008 3:00am
Read all 5 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links