Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Test drive: Subaru Impreza WRX

  • By Neil Dowling
  • The Sunday Times
image New profile... Subaru's new WRX sedan is finally balanced, in proportion and now armed with sufficient styling to draw attention. Photo Gallery

The world is full of remarkable coincidences?

Like how a former president of the United States had a father who also did the job and how another ex-president's wife had a big stab for the same job.

And like the thought that one of the world's best car makers is Subaru yet, purely coincidentally, the same car maker is one of the world's most dreary car designers. Remarkable.

I don't know what you think — and really, I do care — but the latest Subaru Impreza hatch just does not do it for me. It doesn't stand out on the road and say: Look at me, I'm the latest and greatest.

It says: Yep, me again.

That's an awful shame. The Impreza is very well screwed together and has the best safety in its class, equalled only by the Mitsubishi Lancer.

The hatch is nice to drive, feels solid on the road, has understated cabin features and though a bit more expensive than others, has the lure of things like the maximum safety star rating and all-wheel drive. It just looks, well, ordinary.

Appearance

Now there's another Impreza. One that doesn't look ordinary and, in WRX trim tested here, actually looks like something you would pleasantly park in your driveway without your boring neighbour starting hee-haw noises over the fence.

This is the Impreza sedan.

Sit inside and it's all the same as the hatch. But walk around the outside and it has a cute tail that balances out the profile.

The WRX gets a rear spoiler atop this boot lid, further impressing the audience.

There is also a STI-look grille that successfully hardens up the almost floral decoration of the one on the standard hatch.

The Impreza is finally balanced, in proportion and now armed with sufficient styling to draw attention. That can only be good.

There is a certain austerity to the cabin but no complaints about the finish.

Inexplicably, the audio system in the WRX is one of the best around in terms of sound quality and the enveloping nature of the speakers.

The touch-screen system (optional) is excellent and sat-nav is appreciated though the buttons are weeney making it awkward for the driver to change the modes.

And the seats are a pleasant compromise between sports and comfort, with sufficient lateral support so tired bodies like mine can plop in and creak out.

Naturally the sedan has a bigger boot than the hatch though it still has a high floor. Combined with the small lid, it will limit the car's cargo-carrying flexibility though some relief is in the split/fold rear seats.

The boot floor hides a space-saver spare and there's precious little room for anything else.

Features

The WRX comes standard with pretty much everything you'll want in a small car.

It seats four adults, has climate airconditioning and electric windows and mirrors. There is a six-disc CD player and iPod jack, trip computer and cruise control.

There is also height and telescopic steering wheel adjustment, height adjustment for the driver's seat, privacy glass for the rear doors and DataDot security technology.

As the penultimate Impreza, the exterior gets colour-coded door handles and mirrors, alloy wheels, the mandatory spoiler and body kit.

Pricing

The hatch and the sedan versions of the WRX start at the same $39,990 — the same as in previous years despite the jump in performance and features.

But the test car added leather upholstery, the sat-nav system — which replaces the six-disc CD player with a single-disc unit to allow room for the DVD map — and sunroof. Subaru bundles these three together and offers the WRX for $45,480.

Drivetrain

The flat-four gets more power but the accent is on its delivery to the four wheels.

That engine is still 2.5 litres and there's a turbocharger to give it a kick, resulting in power rising 26kW to 195kW and torque to 343Nm from 320Nm.

This all arrives at higher revs which is a surprise given how much easier the car gets off the mark. The torque hits its peak at 4000rpm (previously 320Nm at 2800rpm) and power at 6000rpm (previously 169kW at 5200rpm).

A graph (unavailable for viewing) may show a fatter torque band at lower revs.

The flat-four engine drills through a five-speed manual — “no need for a heavy six-speed,” Subaru says — and ends at the front wheels and, via a limited slip differential, the rear wheels.

Disc brakes are all around with ventilated units up front. Spot the WRX models by their red-painted calipers on show behind the spokes of the 17-inch alloys.

Suspension is MacPherson struts at the front and, in a recent move, double wishbones with coils at the back that replace the struts used in previous models.

Subaru has also tweaked the suspension with firmer joints to sharpen steering input and flatten out the bends.

Driving

A decade-old Subaru can be identified just by cranking over its starter motor. You don't have to see the car to know it’s Subaru.

Well, the latest one is less easy to pick by sound. Better body insulation has muffled the dentist-drill starter and a bigger exhaust system has muted the exhaust note. Not killed the note, merely turned the volume down a tad.

The latest WRX gets quieter and has added a bit of softness in the power delivery despite the extra kilowatts and Newton-metres.

From the driver's seat it's nice and simple and a lot like before.

But press in the clutch and engage first and the shifter feels positive with less resistance than the older model.

Drive the machine and the box shows shift improvements especially the downchange into second cog and then into first.

The engine is a winner. Less fussy than before and with almost no willingness to stall off the mark, it displays more low-end guts to make driving so much easier.

That rush still comes on hot from 2000rpm and pushes through 3000rpm with a bit of a thrust at about 4000rpm. There's no harshness about the delivery — it's smooth, linear and easy to control.

The box, also, suits the extra torque. The WRX would run harder with a six-speed unit but, in truth, the five felt fine and given the engine's flexibility, was a no-brainer. It’s lighter and cheaper than a six, too.

Impreza steering is a tad firm but that suits the car and the way it's supposed to be driven.

Subaru has played with the suspension but you'd never call it harsh. It's a good balance between smooth and coarse bitumen with the only bit of nagging aimed at the noisy tyres.

Basically, an easier WRX to drive and own. And, thankfully, prettier.


Snapshot

Subaru Impreza WRX

Price: $39,990 ($45,480 as tested)

Engines: 2.5-litre, flat-4-cyl, turbocharger, intercooler

Power: 195kW @ 6000rpm

Torque: 343Nm @ 4000rpm

Fuel economy (official): 10.4 litres/100km, (tested): 10.8 litres/100km

Transmission: five-speed manual; constant 4WD

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 15 comments

  • A rough ride toy for immature boys! Even the doof doof set, as immature as they are, could spell rough.

    mark rowney of 2 Posted on 20 September 2011 1:05pm
  • best bang for ur buck…

    phil Posted on 22 February 2010 8:11pm
  • a ruogh ride toy for inmature boys

    xilef of WA Posted on 14 May 2009 9:16pm
  • Subaru has proven technology and quality. I own an a STi.
    Subaru have proven safety, braking and handling, especialy 4WD in the wet.
    Note 10 years at or near the top in the world championship rally.
    How can someone even compare a cheap brand against this.
    You pay for quality. I know what car I would be driving in the wet.
    I new a friend who bought a Kia carnival. He had a motor replaced after 100k km. Heard there was more….
    Best of luck with your kia’s.
    I will stick to Subaru. Cheer’s.

    Stephen of Newcastle Posted on 08 March 2009 1:18pm
  • all u idiots get in here talking about an all u ever do it drive past the subaru show room an stick ur head out the window at it…....... im sorry but go an test drive it seriously then test drive a ralliart , mps , xr6 turbo and ss commodore an make sure u do the wrx first because it will be a very short day trust me i went the other way around and atleast i saved the best til last so in other words the wrx goes and stopps so ferociously and u wnt believe how much it grips U JUST WONT!!!!!!!!

    chris (09 wrx owner) Posted on 05 March 2009 1:28pm
  • I’ve WRXs for the past 10 years and this has to be th worst design since the “bug eye” model. My last one was an 07 STi and am now in the market for a replacement. I agree, the hatch would be the better option but it needs the “flare” of the STi i.e. same body, this could be a quick fix to boost WRX sales, but am still not convinced on buying another one for now.

    JB of Sydney Posted on 27 February 2009 6:14pm
  • I Bought the EVO X, will never look back at subaru.
    Mind you i still own a version 6, MY99 STi, but the new subbies leave some room for improvment…

    mani of Geelong Posted on 26 February 2009 4:46pm
  • I feel sorry for the Subaru marketing people. Mr Ikuo Mori, I don’t think your message “Aiming to Satisfy All Our Customers by Striving to Be an Appealing Company with a Strong Market Presence” is working. And I don’t think those avid fans constantly need the nonsensical advertising thrown down their throat to buy the new WRX. What a pity!

    Des of Perth Posted on 25 February 2009 11:28pm
  • Subaru ah still so squishy and now so ugly only reason it sells is because it so cheap but just how many repeat buyers would be interesting to know.

    troppo Posted on 25 February 2009 12:54pm
  • Yes I was thinking Kia too - and that was before I read everybody elses comments. Is this telling us something?

    Corey of Brisbane Posted on 25 February 2009 12:21pm
  • It is amazing that even with all the critisism, the WRX still sells so well. It commands 21% of the sports market in Australia, as of January 2009. (Source VFACTS Jan 2009) So they must be doing something right. Like producing a driveable performance car that can reach 0-100 in under 6 seconds and can be driven hard in the wet. AWD 195 klw under $40K Go figure!!!!!!!!!

    Paul Gosford of Gosord Posted on 24 February 2009 3:40pm
  • I’ve seen the sedan in the flesh and to me the tail lights made the rear look like a Kia, i.e. Very Cheap looking.

    Jim Posted on 24 February 2009 3:33pm
  • V/boring…..subaru design team RIP!

    Jim of Perth Posted on 24 February 2009 2:57pm
  • This story was brought (bought) to you by Subaru, yet another dud looking WRX made by the designers they poached from Kia.

    Objectivity who needs it?

    Patrick of Sydney Posted on 24 February 2009 1:20pm
  • Prettier? The back of the WRX looks like a Corolla sedan to me, the car looks awful in both hatch and sedan form but if I had to choose one, I think the hatch is better looking than that afterthought boot. The concept itself reminds me of the Echo or Yaris sedans, bolting a boot onto a car never really designed for one never looks good…

    Ramsey of Adelaide Posted on 24 February 2009 1:19pm
Read all 15 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links