Skip navigation

carsguide.com.au

Test drive: Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart

  • By Neil Dowling
  • Herald Sun
image Ralliart comes with practically all the looks of the Evo X and even has similar mechanicals.

Apply some basic maths and find Mitsubishi's winning formula.

The quickest way around a race track is simply mathematics.

Going faster and beating all your mates is directly proportional to a diminishing fear factor and a rising-rate expense program divided by the money in your bank account.

To go faster, a rough rule is $10,000 a second per lap. That is, spend an extra $10,000 on your race car and you will be one-second quicker per lap faster.

Theoretically, you'd spend $30,000 for a three-second rocket around the circuit but sadly, the formula is disproportionate. You may only gain 1.25-seconds, for example.

So the question is: Do you pay an extra $29,200 over the Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart SST for the Evolution X MR and gain a one-second 0-100km/h sprint time?

Or do you enjoy the Ralliart and use the "spare" money to buy (a) BHP Billiton shares, (b) a whopping plasma screen and surround sound system, or (c) the Kawasaki Ultra 250X jet ski.

Money may not be the only reason to consider forgoing the one-second advantage.

The Ralliart comes with practically all the looks of the Evo X and even has similar mechanicals. Even the aluminium bonnet is identical.

Drivetrain

It has the same basic engine though is dumbed down to 177kW from the Evo's 217kW. It has 343Nm of torque — compared with the Evo's 366Nm — and is delivered at lower revs.

The gearbox — Mitsubishi's new and quite delightful dual-clutch six-speeder — is also shared though the Evo allows three driving modes to sharpen the ride.

Driving

Ride comfort is better in the Ralliart — though the MR isn't bad and certainly up on its predecessor — which extends its audience to include children and the wife.

Combined with all-wheel drive, it makes a sedan that can live comfortably in the city and country with a dynamic performance and safety personality when required.

Drive it as an automatic and the 2-litre engine shows some weakness at low revs.

This lag is more pronounced than the Evo — though even this car has some hesitation — mainly because of it misses out on the Evo's twin-scroll turbocharger that works better across the rev range.

The Ralliart's engine will, however, quickly smarten up by 2500rpm and be on song at 4000rpm right up to near 7000rpm.

At which point your smile will only be eroded by realisation that the car is consuming premium unleaded petrol at a rate that would shame beer-drinking end-of-semester uni students.

Treat the Ralliart nicely, though, and 11.4 litres/100km is entirely acceptable in city and suburbs, plus a short time in the country.

The gearbox is pin sharp on changes and will step up with higher revs before it upchanges when in Sport mode. The paddle shifters, by the way, are perfectly placed and have a default to full-auto when held.

Handling is first rate. As mentioned, it's not Evo X class but it's also not far short of the mark. The bottom line is you won't have a chance to test this car to its fullest on public roads anyway.

Mitsubishi aims this car at the driver who enjoys a fang and likes a car that shouts "performance".

The practicalities are shared with the base Lancer. That's a great start because the Lancer is a delightful small car with a great shape, very good cabin and boot space, and a pretty interior.

More goodies, such as the six-disc CD player, are added to the feature list but the healthy basics of most Lancers — a five-star crash rating, electronic stability control and seven airbags — remain.

Options include the Rockford Fosgate sound system ($750), that audio with sunroof ($2350) and those two with a multi-communication pack with sat-nav for $4750.

Comfort rates highly for those in the sports-tailored front seats, less so for the rear where firm foam and short thigh length makes adults wish for shorter journeys.

No complaints, however, about leg and headroom though I'll put my two-cents worth in about that space-saver spare.

But this is a very appealing package. It serves to uphold the Evo image while saving its buyers near-on $30,000. The only cost is one second.

 


Snapshot

Price: $42,990

Engine: 2-litre, 4-cyl, turbocharger, intercooler

Power: 177kW @ 6000rpm

Torque: 343Nm @ 4725rpm

Transmission: 6-speed automated dual-clutch manual, sequential, paddle shifters; constant 4WD, front and rear LSD, electronic centre diff

0-100km/h: 6.3 seconds

Top speed: 240km/h

Economy (official): 10 litres/100km

Economy (tested): 11.4 litres/100km

Greenhouse: 240g/km (Corolla: 175g/km)

 

Comments on this story

Displaying 3 of 4 comments

  • WRX’s are useless… get an STi so you dont blow your tranny.

    Lancer ralliart maybe has some power, but its just competition to the WRX, and dont expect the same level of build quality as an EVo.

    Now, instead of crappy WRX’s, we got Lancer’s as well.


    Stuff the turbo ricing, get a Civic Type R or Integra Type S… or a series 7-9 EVO.

    K of Sydney Posted on 16 January 2009 5:21pm
  • So Chris, let me guess, the new WRX MY09 has gotta be the best car in 2009 in your opinion huh?? what is it 5.5 seconds 0-100, rear lights identical to the 2002 Elantra or Kia Rio depends on which korean sht box is your favourite, and widely criticised the ugliest sport car in the market though only sells for $43,000.  You know a pig with a lipstick is still a pig, not to mention the same old 5 speed manual gear box carried over from the 1st generation, 5th gear deadfening your ears when cruising on highway only 100K cos engine already reving at 3000rpm, sht stereo and no modern day technology whatsoever.  Give me 42 grand i’ll take Ralliart anyday and then spend another 4 and half grand take it to MRT for tuning and its good for 240+ KW, and then the car will go even harder than an EVO 10 and as for WRX it can kiss my bum.

    TRD of Lane Cove Posted on 15 January 2009 2:50pm
  • Hey chris sounds like you work for subaru LOL

    ron colins Posted on 10 January 2009 5:51pm
  • Don’t be fooled! This is not a cut down Evo, this is a spec’ed up Lancer!

    The suspension is nowhere near comparable, the transmission is the worst paddle system I’ve seen in any car and the ride just feels rubbish.

    Drive before you buy! There are plenty of better options out there.

    Chris of Perth Posted on 16 December 2008 8:30pm
Read all 4 comments

Add your comment on this story

Indicates required

We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide your full name. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. The location field is optional.

Cars for sale

Sponsored Links